|
02 Feb 19 - 11:54 AM (#3974562) Subject: review: Three Identical Strangers (film) SPOILER From: keberoxu I'm cheating, as usual. I watch the film tonight on a cable TV broadcast, it will be my first time seeing this film. This opening post is done this way, in the faint hope that someone else might take an interest in watching the broadcast. "Three Identical Strangers" is scheduled on the CNN network for 9 PM, Eastern standard time, tonight, Sat. 2 February. This documentary has generated a lot of mass-media coverage and press. I wonder if more people have read ABOUT the film than have seen it. Yes, it's the one about identical triplets separated at birth and raised in three different families. SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER I guess I ought to put SPOILER in the thread title but I don't think there's room. The SPOILER is: the film is about the trials and tribulations of three men. Only two survive, at the end, to tell the tale. One more thing: Has anyone posting here, already seen this film? Care to tell us your impression/ opinion? Okay, after I've watched the broadcast on CNN, I will submit a follow-up post with my review. |
|
02 Feb 19 - 01:56 PM (#3974579) Subject: RE: BS: review: Three Identical Strangers (film) From: ChanteyLass I saw it during its theatrical release. It's worth seeing. I also remembered the men being on talk shows like Phil Donahue's after they'd met. Clips from that and other shows were incorporated into this film. |
|
02 Feb 19 - 06:08 PM (#3974611) Subject: RE: BS: review: Three Identical Strangers (film) From: keberoxu Here is a link to the Wikipedia article on the psychiatrist, Peter B. Neubauer. I guess there would be an M. D. after Neubauer's name. It's missing from Wikipedia. After I read a summary of Neubauer's study and designs on the triplets profiled in Three Identical Strangers, I was scandalized, and it seems I'm not the only one who feels that way. |
|
02 Feb 19 - 06:32 PM (#3974612) Subject: RE: BS: review: Three Identical Strangers (film) From: keberoxu After viewing the finished film, the adoptee subjects and the film director sit for an interview. |
|
02 Feb 19 - 11:21 PM (#3974624) Subject: review: Three Identical Strangers (film) SPOILERS From: keberoxu Wow, just now turned off the [guest room] television and I am so emotional that I will probably have trouble sleeping tonight. The intent of this film was to engage the audience emotionally, and it surely works. I'm kind of wobbly-trembly in fact. At the same time, a part of me hangs back, detached, and observes: Whoever made this film was very careful and conscientious about things. The men in question all got married, held down jobs, had families. The spouses are interviewed, and the family members who helped raised them as children, the friends who grew up with them. The children of these men, however, are not interviewed in the film; so those relationships are curtained in privacy. naw. I can't do a review right now. I'm too bowled over. This film packs a heck of a punch. Thanks for listening, anyhow, sorry. |
|
03 Feb 19 - 02:27 PM (#3974695) Subject: RE: BS: review: Three Identical Strangers (film) From: keberoxu You know what? I'm going to let others do the reviewing. Call me lazy. I'm still knocked for a loop by watching the television broadcast. I don't know what quantity of people have viewed the film, but there is a lot of commentary on the Internet about it. |
|
03 Feb 19 - 10:01 PM (#3974743) Subject: RE: BS: review: Three Identical Strangers (film) From: Bill D I saw it... to me, it was 20% interesting data about genetics.. and 80% maudlin hype... They could have told that sad story with much less repetition and stretching of the interviews ... but then it would not have had the lurid appeal that got it on those daytime talk shows originally. |