|
13 Feb 01 - 11:33 PM (#397619) Subject: GUTLESS' IDIOT GUEST' CHAIN UPDATE From: catspaw49 Recently an Idiot Guest/Member chain by e-mail began among several Mudcatters and friends who had been asking each for more stupid, cowardly, idiot Guest/Members, as needs arose. The Idiot Guest/Member chain grew in number of recipients and requests for sniveling, wimpering, cocksuckers throughout that month and was issued weekly or oftener as urgent needs required. The Idiot Guest/Member Chain is still very new (but getting real old) and is still creating itself via flames received from gutless wonder, Idiot Guest/Members. Its existence evinces respect for Mudcatters who find Mudcat-posted flames from Idiot Guest/Members problematic, and it allows for Idiot Guest/Members in an environment free of condemnation or censure, except for the occasional castration. The Idiot Guest/Member list also includes flames for the Mudcat Cafe and its leaders. Of course these flames, like all flames on the web, are entirely optional! Participants are expected to exercise mature responsibility in how they use and respond to the list-- there are no Idiot Guest/Member Chain Police forcing anyone to read the bullshit provided or the situations described. Participants also are expected and asked to provide feedback about the conduct of the Idiot Guest/Member Chain. This includes thoughtful discussion toward consensus should anything about these miserable little, pissant motherfockers be offensive in any way. Spaw
|
|
13 Feb 01 - 11:35 PM (#397623) Subject: RE: BS: GUTLESS' IDIOT GUEST' CHAIN UPDATE From: Amergin ROFL... |
|
13 Feb 01 - 11:38 PM (#397629) Subject: RE: BS: GUTLESS' IDIOT GUEST' CHAIN UPDATE From: wysiwyg Oh Pat I wish you'd warned me! I need a corset to hold my sides together! I think I'm having puppies! SO well WRITTEN!!! ~S~ |
|
13 Feb 01 - 11:41 PM (#397634) Subject: RE: BS: GUTLESS' IDIOT GUEST' CHAIN UPDATE From: catspaw49 Yeah, all that deleting and inserting............. Spaw |
|
13 Feb 01 - 11:43 PM (#397636) Subject: RE: BS: GUTLESS' IDIOT GUEST' CHAIN UPDATE From: Little Hawk It's a little complicated, though. Why couldn't we just have another detailed technical description regarding the dimensions of your John Thomas, Spaw? That wouldn't go on as long! :-D - LH |
|
13 Feb 01 - 11:45 PM (#397639) Subject: RE: BS: GUTLESS' IDIOT GUEST' CHAIN UPDATE From: wysiwyg Perfectly designed insertions making the sense of the original post completely inside out. Perfect. I salute you. You are to be commended. Ummmmmm........ uhhhhhh..........bub-bub-buh-bleSS YOU PAT.... sorry it just popped out with the puppies! (Feb Ex claimed self exemption) ~S~ |
|
13 Feb 01 - 11:49 PM (#397641) Subject: RE: BS: GUTLESS' IDIOT GUEST' CHAIN UPDATE From: Little Hawk Wa-a-a-a-i-i-i-t a minute! Now I get it. You're lampooning the stupid pornography thread. I hadn't seen that one yet. O-o-o-o-o-kay, then. Very funny indeed! - LH |
|
14 Feb 01 - 12:06 AM (#397646) Subject: RE: BS: GUTLESS' IDIOT GUEST' CHAIN UPDATE From: Sarah2 Spaw, I've fallen and I can't stop laughing! Sarah |
|
14 Feb 01 - 12:09 AM (#397648) Subject: RE: BS: GUTLESS' IDIOT GUEST' CHAIN UPDATE From: GUEST,khandu What the hell did he say? Whatever it was, I am proud of you, Little Hawk. Your first response said it all! {:D khandu |
|
14 Feb 01 - 12:11 AM (#397651) Subject: RE: BS: GUTLESS' IDIOT GUEST' CHAIN UPDATE From: mkebenn Leave it to the master..now where did I leave my ass when I laughed it off? Mike |
|
14 Feb 01 - 12:18 AM (#397658) Subject: RE: BS: GUTLESS' IDIOT GUEST' CHAIN UPDATE From: flattop Why does the leg of the cat's initial post sound a bit like the missionary gazing at the natives' tits? |
|
14 Feb 01 - 12:25 AM (#397662) Subject: RE: BS: GUTLESS' IDIOT GUEST' CHAIN UPDATE From: catspaw49 ........oy..................Hey Hawk! do you think you could explain this to flats and khandu? Spaw |
|
14 Feb 01 - 12:32 AM (#397667) Subject: RE: BS: GUTLESS' IDIOT GUEST' CHAIN UPDATE From: wysiwyg Pat, I just want to know-- did you laugh yourself silly doing this one? How many times of holding back came bursting out of you with this one exercise? ~S~ |
|
14 Feb 01 - 12:40 AM (#397672) Subject: RE: BS: GUTLESS' IDIOT GUEST' CHAIN UPDATE From: flattop Looks like Little Hawk has been converted. Praise the Lord! (Or should that be Susan the Lord? Eight other men in one dream, Susie?) That's probably enough for one night for one unnatural man of the cloth. |
|
14 Feb 01 - 12:48 AM (#397673) Subject: RE: BS: GUTLESS' IDIOT GUEST' CHAIN UPDATE From: kimmers Very, very funny, Spaw. I salute you with two fingers up my nose... |
|
14 Feb 01 - 12:57 AM (#397675) Subject: RE: BS: GUTLESS' IDIOT GUEST' CHAIN UPDATE From: Clinton Hammond why doesn't this place just have moderators to delete this kind of garbage? |
|
14 Feb 01 - 01:01 AM (#397679) Subject: RE: BS: GUTLESS' IDIOT GUEST' CHAIN UPDATE From: wysiwyg CH, we'd all be gone in a heartbeat. There are so many people here who would object to so many other people, it'd be like a morgue in short order! ~S~ |
|
14 Feb 01 - 01:13 AM (#397683) Subject: RE: BS: GUTLESS' IDIOT GUEST' CHAIN UPDATE From: Clinton Hammond I don't mean the parody, I mean the offending threads... the obvious trolls and flames... I don't mean spending yer life moderatind each and every post, but the blatantly obvious threads that have nothing at all to do with Mudcat... please... |
|
14 Feb 01 - 01:59 AM (#397688) Subject: RE: BS: GUTLESS' IDIOT GUEST' CHAIN UPDATE From: Sorcha CH, because Max is more grown up and probably more sober than most of us.... |
|
14 Feb 01 - 02:01 AM (#397689) Subject: RE: BS: GUTLESS' IDIOT GUEST' CHAIN UPDATE From: Mark Cohen CH, the best thing to do with them is to ignore them and let them drop off the end of the list. Max has taken what I think is a very wise approach: no censorship at all, unless someone is clearly posing a threat to other people. Remember what Harry Truman said: If you can't stand the heat...move to Alaska. Or something like that; my brain is fogged with all this rain. Maybe I need to move to someplace warm. Aloha, Mark PS: Spaw, a tip of the coconut-palm-leaf hat to you. |
|
14 Feb 01 - 02:04 AM (#397691) Subject: RE: BS: GUTLESS' IDIOT GUEST' CHAIN UPDATE From: wdyat12 Now I enter into this virgin unsullied thread. Yikes!!! What have I stepped in? "Can't we all just get along?" wdyat12 |
|
14 Feb 01 - 08:00 AM (#397775) Subject: RE: BS: GUTLESS' IDIOT GUEST' CHAIN UPDATE From: catspaw49 Ah, thank you Mark........But could you tip that thing the other way? The rain's running off onto me here. Spaw |
|
14 Feb 01 - 08:38 AM (#397798) Subject: RE: BS: GUTLESS' IDIOT GUEST' CHAIN UPDATE From: kendall Spaw, why do you always have to sugar coat your statements? |
|
14 Feb 01 - 09:09 AM (#397818) Subject: RE: BS: GUTLESS' IDIOT GUEST' CHAIN UPDATE From: RichM How do I get on this anonymous chain mail list? Would I have to become an anonymous "guest" ;) ?
I've been online since 1990...first on parody,or prodigy (what was that ancient online service kemosabay?)
I've been anonymous most of that time using various nicks, but now I say f-ckit, IamwatIam,whenIammitdammit!
On the other hand, I can respect other participants' reluctance to be identified...On line stalking happens, and is easy to do from the anonymity of one's private space.
Rich McCarthy |
|
14 Feb 01 - 10:09 AM (#397844) Subject: RE: BS: GUTLESS' IDIOT GUEST' CHAIN UPDATE From: Peter K (Fionn) Well I followed the links and discovered that this is not a parody of the porno thread, but a parody of a parody (namely that porno thread) of a prayer thread - started by....WYSIWYG! A mere three catters posted to WYSIWYG's thread, so no wonder it's all a bit obscure. I'm glad I got it sorted out, though. Pornorgraphy falls well within the embrace of my warm tolerance, whereas prayer lies well beyond. The sooner Max strikes his blue pencil through Praise's superstitious babbling, the better for all of our salvations. I don't hold with anyonymous posts either, but if Max had struck on that basis, we wouldn't have had the porno parody, nor Spaw's parody of the parody. I'm just bitterly disappointed that Praise is still spreading her crap on Mudcat (albeit under the new WYSIWYG persona) having promised to abandon us to preach in other pastures. (That promise was a bit like the magician Paul Daniels saying he'd leave the UK if Labour win the election. Labour won, and a newsaper sent a removal truck to his door, but still the fucker wouldn't go.) I seem to remember that in announcing her (conditional) return, Praise undertook to hold fire on the mumbo jumbo. I expect it was a Christian's promise (cf Simon Peter). Anyway if we can keep responders to her prayer threads down to three or less, there's a chance she'll get the message. |
|
14 Feb 01 - 10:10 AM (#397845) Subject: RE: BS: GUTLESS' IDIOT GUEST' CHAIN UPDATE From: Kim C heeheeheeheeheeheeheeheeheehee :D |
|
14 Feb 01 - 10:11 AM (#397846) Subject: RE: BS: GUTLESS' IDIOT GUEST' CHAIN UPDATE From: catspaw49 Rich...(and all).....This isn't about any real guests. This is a member flaming another without the courage to use their name........Guest/Member. In this case, we have gone round a lot about "healing threads," religion, "prayer chains" and all of that and reached a sort of truce. I'm an agnostic and in all truth, I believe that if it works for you, fine......Don't "inflict" yours on me and I'll do the same. WYSIWYG/Praise/Susan has maintained a lower profile and simply put up a thread for those (and there are quite a few) who might wish to participate in her prayer chain. Not a big deal and definitely not an "in your face" thing. At this point, a member of ours who lacks the guts to use their own name, posted several threads ... "Curse Update" and "Pornography Update"... modeled on her text. If you have a problem, at least use your name......they didn't and they never do. These are members, not really guests at all. I'm wearing out on this crap and we've sorted out the worst of the problems to most people's satisfaction. Our Member/Guest is just stirring the pot and so I started this one. I have a far bigger problem with anonymous assholes than I do with anyone's religion and how they practice it. I'm ready in this case to have an "outting" of this member, but the call belongs to Max and I would never push it. Its not about censorship or about guests or about religion. What it is about is the lack of courage and courage of conviction to use your own name........and about causing and continuing dissention on a basically dead issue. Spaw (and let's not even try to play the "Spaw is an alias thing;" most of my life is on these threads) |
|
14 Feb 01 - 11:28 AM (#397886) Subject: RE: BS: GUTLESS' IDIOT GUEST' CHAIN UPDATE From: Katcina Spaw, What a wonderfully stated thread beginning. I loved is and laughed myself silly. ( That doesn't really take much of a laugh though.) Your last statement was also well done, as were several others. I am personally thankful for the tolerance that Max has because I have learned so much about the mental process of so many by just reading the silliest of threads. Besides, it's so much fun to post on one of these crazies and prove to the world just how crazy I really am. Katcina |
|
14 Feb 01 - 12:42 PM (#397946) Subject: RE: BS: GUTLESS' IDIOT GUEST' CHAIN UPDATE From: Rick Fielding Hey Rich! The only time I regretted using my real name on line was when I started getting confused with a "Dr" Rick Fielding, who apparently teaches at Bob Jones University in the States. (yes, they really DO name Universities in that way) He's to the right of Atilla the Hun. Ahhh, he's probably just as sick about gettin' confused with a sucky lefty like me! Rick |
|
14 Feb 01 - 04:09 PM (#398084) Subject: RE: BS: GUTLESS' IDIOT GUEST' CHAIN UPDATE From: GUEST,khandu Was that what Truman said? I thought he said, "Fock the Japs!" khandu |
|
14 Feb 01 - 06:22 PM (#398156) Subject: RE: BS: GUTLESS' IDIOT GUEST' CHAIN UPDATE From: Little Hawk flattop - The explanation is simple. You just take the length of Leg of the Cat's most important asset, double it, take the square root of the diameter of the planet Neputune in kleeds (a Neptunian unit of measure more or less equavilent to the length of Richard Nixon's nose in late 1972), and divide the one by the other, and you have your answer! Or is it the other way around? At any rate, try it both ways. It's as plain as the nose on your face. Well...no, not quite that plain, but you get the general idea. I've been "converted", you say? To what??? - LH |
|
14 Feb 01 - 06:59 PM (#398182) Subject: RE: BS: GUTLESS' IDIOT GUEST' CHAIN UPDATE From: wysiwyg This is addressed to the people who have already posted in this thread a number of times, and who are still posting, in an attempt to keep a laugh going or discuss a topic other than the actual idea behind this thread. For some of the newer members, let me explain something. A convention that is seldom used here at the Mudcat is when someone says " 'Nuff said." When it is used, however, it's a good idea to respect it. It means, "I'm being as polite as I'm going to be, but DROP IT." I guess the penalty for not honoring that hint would be losing the respect of the person who declared " 'Nuff said." As explained above, this thread was started in response to one aimed at me and activities associated with me. So the one who can claim the right to say " 'Nuff Said" on this matter would be ME. I did say it on another one of these threads to forestall people feeling a need to defend what needed no defending; it was respected and I appreciate that. This thread provided a light relief to the heaviness of the idea of flaming, for a time, and while that was its focus I had no problem. But now it's gotten several other agendas mixed in that could run on and on ad nauseum. If you really want to address a serious subject-- please, would you start your own thread with a title that lends an opportunity to make a start at a reasonable discussion? Just because this topic restimulated a concern you have, does not mean you have to use this thread as the platform to address it. So-- 'NUFF SAID. ~Susan |