10 Sep 01 - 04:43 PM (#546548) Subject: Reasons why English is so hard - Part 2 From: katlaughing The other one was over 100 posts and with one of the last postings by Tracey Dragonsfriend, I think it is worthy to continue. Here is Tracey's posting...try reading it aloud!
How about this one : Multi-national personnel at North Atlantic Treaty Organization headquarters near Paris found English to be an easy language... until they tried to pronounce it. To help them discard an array of different accents, the verses below were devised. After trying them, a Frenchman said he'd prefer six months at hard labor to reading six lines aloud. Try them yourself…
|
10 Sep 01 - 04:51 PM (#546559) Subject: RE: BS: Reasons why English is so hard - Part 2 From: O'Trasno oops,sorry kat---i'll just nudge you back up there....ah that's better! |
10 Sep 01 - 05:44 PM (#546593) Subject: RE: BS: Reasons why English is so hard - Part 2 From: Ralphie Is Constitute the opposite of Prostitute? Just a Thought Ralphie |
10 Sep 01 - 06:12 PM (#546608) Subject: RE: BS: Reasons why English is so hard - Part 2 From: Dicho (Frank Staplin) I got to re-reading older posts and added to the long string. O'Trasno, I put a comment for you there. Kat, in your area I'm sure that you have encountered a hoarse horse. |
10 Sep 01 - 06:18 PM (#546613) Subject: RE: BS: Reasons why English is so hard - Part 2 From: Willa How about examples such as 'Do you know that that that that you used should be a which?'? |
10 Sep 01 - 07:53 PM (#546671) Subject: RE: BS: Reasons why English is so hard - Part 2 From: katlaughing Or it is a witch? Haha! Keep 'em coming, phoaks, these are great! Dicho, a horse is a hoarse horse, of course, especially if he's the talking Mr. Ed, unless of he's a coarse horse named Horace! O'Trasno, no problem. Thanks! kat |
10 Sep 01 - 08:00 PM (#546676) Subject: RE: BS: Reasons why English is so hard - Part 2 From: Jim Dixon Don Firth mentioned Shelley Berman in the previous thread. Here are some more of his bits that I remember: One Kleenex, two Kleenices. One sheriff, two sheriphim. |
10 Sep 01 - 08:07 PM (#546680) Subject: RE: BS: Reasons why English is so hard - Part 2 From: Dicho (Frank Staplin) Willa, that 50 words for snow in Inuit is an exaggeration, but I think you will find that fishermen will know many kinds of fish while I will call most of them fish. We use adjectives to describe different kinds of snow- neve (damn, I can put accents in Word, but not in Mudcat), powdery, granular, etc. etc. A snow specialist will easily have as many descriptive phrases and words as the Inuit. We don't need to know them in our pursuits. Spaniards don't seem to have the class distinction on accents; they just recognize the region that the speaker comes from. As far as I know, it is only the English teacher of Spanish who insists that Castillian is the true Spanish (but that is changing). Living in Spain, O'Trasno, you are better able to answer that than me (than I (can)). |
11 Sep 01 - 04:27 AM (#546836) Subject: RE: BS: Reasons why English is so hard - Part 2 From: paddymac No wonder the author od the opening post above is anonymous. If his or her identity was know the students would probably have lynched him/her. |
11 Sep 01 - 09:50 AM (#546973) Subject: RE: BS: Reasons why English is so hard - Part 2 From: Ringer Splendid poem, Tracey (and thanks to kat for the split). Not wishing to cavil, but what the folk is Foeffer? |
11 Sep 01 - 03:20 PM (#547308) Subject: RE: BS: Reasons why English is so hard - Part 2 From: Dicho (Frank Staplin) Foeffer- must be short for hasenpfeffer (sp.?). Don't feel much like doing anything today, but I just wanted to say that my wife once made a tape of me in conversation. It was painful to listen to. I think most of us are much better on paper than we are off the cuff. |
11 Sep 01 - 03:22 PM (#547310) Subject: RE: BS: Reasons why English is so hard - Part 2 From: lady penelope Bleedin' obscure,that's what! Every one goes on about english being really hard 'cos of all the above type nonsense, but no one says anything about south east asian languages which depend on your tone of voice for different meanings for the same word!!! Any way the above poem only works if you say it using a standard or "recieved" english accent ( I never understood that phrase, why is it recieved, who do you get it from? ). Say it in one of many regional accents and it becomes nonsense!! TTFN M'Lady P. |
19 Sep 01 - 03:43 PM (#554221) Subject: RE: BS: Reasons why English is so hard - Part 2 From: GUEST Here's a little piece that cracked me up: How to Write Good English |
19 Sep 01 - 03:55 PM (#554235) Subject: RE: BS: Reasons why English is so hard - Part 2 From: GUEST,Whut? I cain't unnerstand why you'ins say that English is so gosh darn hard. Everbuddy in my trayler park learned to speek it dang good by the tyme we droped outta fif grayde. |
19 Sep 01 - 05:42 PM (#554324) Subject: RE: BS: Reasons why English is so hard - Part 2 From: Dicho (Frank Staplin) Lady Penelope, PLEEZE! Receive, not recieve- or am I dense and that was duh-liberate? I have a Navajo Dictionary and Grammar- 1069 pp. of very fine print and Quarto plus size. They have tones also. Did you know the Navajo word for xiphoid is 'ayiditsee'? No? Your education must be limited. Seriously, no wonder the Japanese never were able to understand the Navajo Code-talkers during WWII. |