|
04 Feb 02 - 05:58 AM (#641850) Subject: Grammar: Use of the semi colon From: GUEST,Geoff Is there any reason to ever use a semi colon? To my mind it's outdated and useless. Take this page. As far as I'm concerned, all their examples could be better written with the use of a comma or full stop (period). Or am I being a philistine? Geoff |
|
04 Feb 02 - 07:37 AM (#641881) Subject: RE: BS: Grammar: Use of the semi colon From: GUEST This has got to be the dullest thread ever! What the #$*&! is happening here? Are we to be taken over by geriatric pedants? This site was supposed to be about MUSIC |
|
04 Feb 02 - 07:39 AM (#641883) Subject: RE: BS: Grammar: Use of the semi colon From: Mike Byers It's fairly useful in writing when you'd like to indicate a pause longer than the pause indicated by a comma but shorter than the pause indicated by a period. But like any other tool in the writer's kit, it can be used either for good or ill. |
|
04 Feb 02 - 08:25 AM (#641903) Subject: RE: BS: Grammar: Use of the semi colon From: Skipjack K8 Beginning a paragraph with 'Or' is probably your worst crime, Geoff! Seriously, though, I like to bung in a semi-colon where I can, supposedly to try and keep them alive. We discuss music by using the accepted rules of English grammar for written English, Guest, so piss off, you anonymous teenage gobshite. Skipjack |
|
04 Feb 02 - 08:41 AM (#641917) Subject: RE: BS: Grammar: Use of the semi colon From: Murray MacLeod Is there any reason to ever split an infinitive? Murray |
|
04 Feb 02 - 09:09 AM (#641926) Subject: RE: BS: Grammar: Use of the semi colon From: kendall Up in the left corner the heading says "Lyrics, forum and chat." Nuff said. |
|
04 Feb 02 - 09:36 AM (#641943) Subject: RE: BS: Grammar: Use of the semi colon From: Amos Abandon the semicolon? Forbid it, Muses!! It is, when well used, a powerful tool; it answers a need; it adds to typographical beauty; it carries more information in less space than any mark devised by man, outside the "full stop" or period; and it trains the mind in subtlety. I prithee, sir, seek a fruitful task on which to turn your hand!! Your current endeavour is wanton, and threatens woe to all the children of the mother tongue! A |
|
04 Feb 02 - 09:57 AM (#641957) Subject: RE: BS: Grammar: Use of the semi colon From: Jim Dixon In the examples given, I think a period (full stop) would work pretty well. I do occasionally use semicolons, however. |
|
04 Feb 02 - 10:29 AM (#641983) Subject: RE: BS: Grammar: Use of the semi colon From: Crazy Eddie Yes Murray, there are good reasons to occasionally split an infinitive! The firstone that comes to mind, is to gently irritate certain people! :0) And that reminds me, one important use of the semi-colon is to distinguish a wink-and-grin ;o) from a common-or-garden grin :o) |
|
04 Feb 02 - 12:14 PM (#642068) Subject: RE: BS: Grammar: Use of the semi colon From: DougR I think semi-colons are good;however,they can be over used, I suppose. DougR |
|
04 Feb 02 - 12:45 PM (#642100) Subject: RE: BS: Grammar: Use of the semi colon From: PaulM The fact that the semi colon is a 'lower case' (non shift) key on computers / typewriters suggests that it did once have some use. If keyboards didn't have to be designed with past legacies in mind, I expect it'd be a CTRL ALT SHIFT thing now. I'd agree with Geoff. I never use them |
|
04 Feb 02 - 12:45 PM (#642101) Subject: RE: BS: Grammar: Use of the semi colon From: Don Firth 1. One should use a semicolon between closely related independent clauses not joined by a coordinating conjunction. 2. Use a semicolon between independent clauses linked with a conjunctive adverb or transitional expression. 3. A semicolon may be used between independent clauses containing internal punctuation even when a coordinating conjunction links the clauses. 4. Use a semicolon between items in a series containing internal punctuation. 5. Do not use a semicolon to separate a subordinate clause from the rest of the sentence. On the other hand, I have a friend who has no choice but to use a semicolon because he had to have part of his colon surgically removed. Don Firth |
|
04 Feb 02 - 12:48 PM (#642104) Subject: RE: BS: Grammar: Use of the semi colon From: Don Firth But of course don't forget to put a "/" in when it's needed, such as following "not." sigh. -- Don Firth |
|
04 Feb 02 - 12:56 PM (#642115) Subject: RE: BS: Grammar: Use of the semi colon From: kendall I dont mind semi-colons, they are somewhat half assed but,use them if you have them. It's adverbs that I hate! |
|
04 Feb 02 - 12:56 PM (#642117) Subject: RE: BS: Grammar: Use of the semi colon From: Bill D the semi-colon indicates phrasing and continuity in speech,(with a touch of inflection).....If you were to use a period (full stop) in all cases, the passage read aloud would seem choppy and dull. It originated to fill a need in a complex language, and I hate to see the yuonger generation (especially on the internet/WWW) eliminating so many of the clues to the meaning and flow of their thoughts. |
|
04 Feb 02 - 01:23 PM (#642144) Subject: RE: BS: Grammar: Use of the semi colon From: Uncle_DaveO PaulM: Your typewriter example is ingenious but wrong. Your argument assumes that the typewriter keyboard is designed to be convenient, whereas it was designed specifically to be inconvenient! No kidding! The first typewriters had a good deal of lag in them, and the early typists (when the machine was first being developed) jammed up the machines frequently by typing too fast. The QWERTY keyboard we use today was designed specifically to slow down the typist so that (s)he wouldn't jam things up! Dave Oesterreich |
|
04 Feb 02 - 01:35 PM (#642155) Subject: RE: BS: Grammar: Use of the semi colon From: Don Firth The Dvorak keyboard is far more efficient and much faster for a skilled typist who is used to it. I'd make the switch were it not for the learning curve and the fact that I'm not the only one who uses this keyboard. Don Firth |
|
04 Feb 02 - 01:50 PM (#642171) Subject: RE: BS: Grammar: Use of the semi colon From: Ringer Personally, I don't care if nobody else uses semicolons, I shall continue to use them, would the non-users thereof please ensure that they close their sentence-structures with something because strings of phrases strung together with commas, as some posters post, are very confusing |
|
04 Feb 02 - 02:31 PM (#642203) Subject: RE: BS: Grammar: Use of the semi colon From: Ebbie Well put, Bald Eagle! |
|
04 Feb 02 - 03:17 PM (#642242) Subject: RE: BS: Grammar: Use of the semi colon From: Ferrara I love semicolons, judicially used, and use them even in my conversation. Ask anyone -- my normal way of talking is loaded with any or all of the following: independent clauses linked with conjunctive adverbs or transitional expressions; independent clauses containing internal punctuation even when a coordinating conjunction links the clauses; and/or items in a series containing internal punctuation. Rita |
|
04 Feb 02 - 03:55 PM (#642268) Subject: RE: BS: Grammar: Use of the semi colon From: Jim Dixon A semicolon is best used to link two phrases that grammatically could be separate sentences, but that need to be linked together somehow to show their proper meaning. For example: I don't care what the dictionary says; I like the word "irregardless." If you were to replace the semicolon with a period, it would give the impression that there are two thoughts here, each of which could stand on its own. That would give the impression that in general I don't care what the dictionary says. Actually, that's not true: In general, I do care what the dictionary says, but this case is an exception. To get the proper meaning for the first part, you have to interpret it in light of the second part. In my experience, grammar books often give poor examples of the principles they are trying to teach. |
|
04 Feb 02 - 07:40 PM (#642492) Subject: RE: BS: Grammar: Use of the semi colon From: kendall IRREGARDLESS!!! Slowly I turn...step by step. Please dont ever use that awful non word where I can here it! |
|
04 Feb 02 - 07:48 PM (#642502) Subject: RE: BS: Grammar: Use of the semi colon From: Bill D "Here, here", Kendall...*wink* |
|
04 Feb 02 - 07:56 PM (#642516) Subject: RE: BS: Grammar: Use of the semi colon From: Peg I like semi-colons. I am also a fan of using two spaces between sentences. I do not, however, like to use an extra comma in a grouping, unless the pause is needed for emphasis, e.g. "She handed him her gloves, her hat, and a bottle of champagne." peg |
|
04 Feb 02 - 08:13 PM (#642537) Subject: RE: BS: Grammar: Use of the semi colon From: Jim Dixon When sentences are used as examples of usage, one should not take them literally. |
|
05 Feb 02 - 12:20 AM (#642712) Subject: RE: BS: Grammar: Use of the semi colon From: Crazy Eddie Jim, Your reasoning and example are pretty clear. 'A semicolon is best used to link two phrases that grammatically could be separate sentences, but that need to be linked together somehow to show their proper meaning. For example:
I don't care what the dictionary says; I like the word "irregardless."'
|
|
05 Feb 02 - 12:43 AM (#642727) Subject: RE: BS: Grammar: Use of the semi colon From: Jim Dixon Sure, the meaning would be clear, but in standard Engish, you don't use commas that way. I guess some rules are arbitrary, just like the rules of spelling. |
|
05 Feb 02 - 01:03 AM (#642733) Subject: RE: BS: Grammar: Use of the semi colon From: Dicho (Frank Staplin) The semicolon gets a lot of use in poetry and, of course, lyrics. It coordinates independent clauses of a compound sentence, to quote Webster's, or links independent thought lines of a lyric, to put it into a form familiar to lyricists. It is true that semicolons make no never mind to the new generation, but, of course, their language is incomprehensible anyway- take rap. On second thought, don't. Crazy Eddie, your sentence with the semicolon makes me pause fractionally; if you placed a comma there, the tendency is to race on and perhaps lose some of the meaning. |
|
05 Feb 02 - 01:13 AM (#642737) Subject: RE: BS: Grammar: Use of the semi colon From: Haruo Yes, and there should be a few more hyphens, too. And judiciously used. As well as judicially, when appropriate. Semi-colons (note hyphen) are also de rigueur in finishing off numerical Unicode character aliases; or whatever they're called. Liland |
|
05 Feb 02 - 03:18 AM (#642773) Subject: RE: BS: Grammar: Use of the semi colon From: Crazy Eddie Thanks Jim, for the reply. The trouble is, if you haven't been formally taught these rules, the more subtle ones are not so easy to pick up.
Dicho, you say:
Is it a question of degree in a case like this? (I've used a semicolon above. I could have used a full-stop, (or a query) but I think the semicolon makes the connection between the clauses clearer. Is this usage correct? |
|
05 Feb 02 - 07:26 AM (#642846) Subject: RE: BS: Grammar: Use of the semi colon From: Hrothgar Are they handy for bowel resections? |
|
05 Feb 02 - 07:29 AM (#642853) Subject: RE: BS: Grammar: Use of the semi colon From: kendall This may not be music related, but, I'm learning something here. (I dont remember learning about semi-colons in school) The school I went to was so sub- standard, you could get a letter if you knew what the letter was. |
|
05 Feb 02 - 08:28 AM (#642890) Subject: RE: BS: Grammar: Use of the semi colon From: Amos Eddie: Your usage is correct; you have joined two independent clauses so that they relate clearly by using a semi-colon, and have also informed a reader as to a sense of timing in taking your sentence in. I've done the same here. If you look at the commas, periods and semi-colons in this paragraph, the differences should be clear. Hope this helps, Amos |
|
05 Feb 02 - 08:40 AM (#642897) Subject: I'll have your semi colons if you don't want 'em! From: Steve Parkes If you don't like 'em, and you can manage without, then do so; but don't suggest that my way is wrong because yours is right! And if you're not sure about a rule, recast your sentence to avoid the problem; but if you want to break the rules, you have to know how to use them in the first place. Steve P.S. Kendall, do you hate adverbs, or do you really hate adverbs?! |
|
05 Feb 02 - 09:26 AM (#642929) Subject: RE: BS: Grammar: Use of the semi colon From: Snuffy Adjectives are worst; they're mostly lies. |
|
05 Feb 02 - 10:24 AM (#642967) Subject: RE: BS: Grammar: Use of the semi colon From: Ringer I thought that was statistics. But we applaud your careful use of the semi-colon, Snuffy. |
|
05 Feb 02 - 11:33 AM (#643020) Subject: RE: BS: Grammar: Use of the semi colon From: McGrath of Harlow I tend to usae dashes, but normally with the same role and timing as semi-colons, to inbducate a slightly lkonger pause and placing the ckause at a slight distance.
Would irregardless be supposed to have the same meaning as regardless? Surely it should imply the opposite (cf resolute and irresolute, responsible and irresponsible). |
|
05 Feb 02 - 12:24 PM (#643069) Subject: RE: BS: Grammar: Use of the semi colon From: Steve Parkes It's a solecism, McG, formed by applying the style of words like "irresolute" and "irresponsible" to "regardless"; no doubt we could make up a few of our own: how about "irreknown", "irrecognisable"? Steve |
|
05 Feb 02 - 12:47 PM (#643093) Subject: RE: BS: Grammar: Use of the semi colon From: McGrath of Harlow But does adding the ir do the same to regardless as it does to resolute? Someone who is irresolute is not resolute. So if some one does something irregardless of danger, does that mean that they are doing it while taking significant note of the danger involved? If that's what it means it might be quite a useful addition to the language, indicating a higher degree of bravery for example - but my impression is that people mean the same by irregardless as by regardless, and it seems a bit redundant.
Another word pair where the words are synomyms in spite of appearances is valuable and invaluable. It is a weird language we share. |
|
05 Feb 02 - 12:52 PM (#643099) Subject: RE: BS: Grammar: Use of the semi colon From: kendall Such words as Artic partic u ly, nucula, oragutang, irregardless indicate a poor command of the language, or, a speech impediment or just plain laziness.When I hear someone butchering the language with such non-words, I tune them out. Language was created to allow us to communicate; there are rules; they were created to prevent everyone from speaking his/her own lingo, and, being incomprehensible to others. If this makes me a grammar Nazi, so be it. We haff vays to make you tok. |
|
05 Feb 02 - 01:14 PM (#643125) Subject: RE: BS: Grammar: Use of the semi colon From: Dicho (Frank Staplin) Parkes, the fun with irregardless is due to the -less at the end, which comes around and bites the irr- at the beginning. Irrecognizable is approved by no less an authority than the OED and has a history in print of over 150 years. I notice that you spell recognize with an "s" in spite of the OED's authority over the English language (just poking fun, I am aware of the problems in English social history and the intentional use and teaching of non-oxbridge language by most people). |
|
05 Feb 02 - 01:25 PM (#643145) Subject: RE: BS: Grammar: Use of the semi colon From: McGrath of Harlow Yes, but irrecognizable means the opposite of recognizable. It's a useful word, without any obvious synonyms. |
|
05 Feb 02 - 01:55 PM (#643183) Subject: RE: BS: Grammar: Use of the semi colon From: Stilly River Sage Interesting topic. For people who speak in short sentences, colons and semi-colons are probably not much of an issue. I know I've written a couple of sentences in Mudcat discussions that I've suggested people not try to diagram; those are the sentences that need semi-colons. For more information (and some pretty good examples) you might want to find the Harbrace College Handbook . Hardest class I ever took at the university was History and Development of the English Language. You'd think it would be easy, a class about your first language, right? Au contraire! I like your post, Don. It's an excellent example of how complicated our grammar is today, when we now choose to add html to it. SRS |
|
05 Feb 02 - 02:31 PM (#643215) Subject: RE: BS: Grammar: Use of the semi colon From: Dicho (Frank Staplin) I was looking for a book at a used store when I noticed the owner throwing books into a garbage bin. He said that they were things that never would sell. Among them were several books on language, and one was the Harbrace College Handbook. Another was the Prentice-Hall handbook for Writers. Both are useful, and well-written as well. |
|
05 Feb 02 - 03:37 PM (#643276) Subject: RE: BS: Grammar: Use of the semi colon From: Uncle_DaveO I don't believe anyone has mentioned the semi-colon's use as "the comma's big brother" in a complex series. Thus, in a series (of course normally set off with commas) where one of the series-members contains a comma, the "big brother" is called in to control the series, while the "internal" comma remains in place and doesn't cause confusion. "I gave her expensive cut flowers; imported liquor; and, only on occasion, candy." If the semi-colons were shifted back to commas, the result would be VERY muddy: |
|
05 Feb 02 - 03:58 PM (#643293) Subject: RE: BS: Grammar: Use of the semi colon From: Uncle_DaveO Oh, oh! I left out "expensive cut" and "imported" in my last example. But it's a second-rate sentence, so it's about second-rate gifts, I guess. Dave Oesterreich |
|
05 Feb 02 - 04:22 PM (#643311) Subject: RE: BS: Grammar: Use of the semi colon From: Desdemona I write a great deal and use them pretty often; they serve a function somewhere between a comma(not emphatic enough), "and" (often an unnecessary extra word that makes a sentence "sound" clumsy), and a full stop when you haven't necessarily completed your point. And I think it's wonderful that we can become impassioned, nay, even VIOLENT about proper punctuation---Strunk & White would be so pleased! |
|
05 Feb 02 - 04:52 PM (#643326) Subject: RE: BS: Grammar: Use of the semi colon From: Uncle_DaveO Desdemona said: And I think it's wonderful that we can become impassioned, nay, even VIOLENT about proper punctuation---Strunk & White would be so pleased! I just knew we were going to get into traditional theological argument, with citations to Holy Writ! Dave Oesterreich
|
|
05 Feb 02 - 05:01 PM (#643332) Subject: RE: BS: Grammar: Use of the semi colon From: Dicho (Frank Staplin) Uncle DaveO, another good teaching example- These are my favorite flowers: violets, for their sentimentality; roses, for their color; and buttercups, for their cheerfulness. On the other hand, this advice to writers from author Cornelia Evans: "If a writer wishes to use an informal narrative style he should avoid semicolons as much as possible. Semicolons denote a longer break in the sentence than commas and they may slow down the reader unnecessarily." |
|
05 Feb 02 - 05:45 PM (#643353) Subject: RE: BS: Grammar: Use of the semi colon From: kendall What a thread! "To BOLDLY go where no man has gone before" "You've got mail" AAAAARRRRGGGG!! |
|
05 Feb 02 - 06:09 PM (#643366) Subject: RE: BS: Grammar: Use of the semi colon From: Desdemona These posts will be graded for correct punctuation. |
|
05 Feb 02 - 09:12 PM (#643469) Subject: RE: BS: Grammar: Use of the semi colon From: Stilly River Sage Strunk and White have been largely devalued in English classes in the last decade. That little book that has such influence was, I believe, originally written as an essay for students in (duh. . .) either Strunk or White's class, has been treated as received wisdom for far too long. (One wrote it, the other came along and edited it). I think the New Yorker or perhaps the New York Times had a role in the acceptance of the book. I don't remember the whole story. Those with a burning curiosity about grammar and other composition questions might want to visit Bartleby for a large number of reference books online, or poke around in a place like the Guide to Grammar and Writing that is maintained by an English professor in Hartford, Connecticut. SRS |
|
06 Feb 02 - 12:03 AM (#643566) Subject: RE: BS: Grammar: Use of the semi colon From: Crazy Eddie McGrath of Harlow: "Yes, but irrecognizable means the opposite of recognizable. It's a useful word, without any obvious synonyms." I haven't got a dictionary to hand, but isn't unrecognisable in common usage, as an antonym of recognisable? Where does irrecognisable come in? |
|
06 Feb 02 - 12:11 AM (#643570) Subject: RE: BS: Grammar: Use of the semi colon From: Dicho (Frank Staplin) wotthehell wotthehell say comma boss comma capital i apostrophe m getting tired of being joshed about my punctuation period capital t followed by he idea seems to be that capital i apostrophe m ignorant where punctuation is concerned period capital n followed by o such thing semi colon the fact is that the mechanical exigencies of the case prevent my use of all the characters on the typewriter keyboard period capital i apostrophe m doing the best capital i can under difficulties semicolon and capital i apostrophe m grieved at the unkindness of the criticism period please consider that my name is signed in small caps period archy period capital a rchie was a giant cockroach who jumped about on the keys of a typewriter period capital h e would climb on the framework and cast himself with all his force upon a key comma head downward comma and his weight was just sufficient to operate the machine comma one slow letter after another period capital h e had a great deal of difficulty operating the shift mechanism period capital i apostrophe m his reincarnation in the computer age and capital i find things somewhat easier because capital i can jump on a key called enter to change to the next line period The poem is from archy and mehitabel by don marquis and the text that follows is written with apologies to don marquis comma archy and mehitabel the cat period |
|
06 Feb 02 - 03:15 AM (#643612) Subject: RE: BS: Grammar: Use of the semi colon From: Steve Parkes I think all these misuses of language come from people not reading. We learn to speak by listening to thosae around us; only later do we learn to read. People who don't read enough will never learn the proper use and usefulness of puctuation, and will miss out on most of the fun you can have with language. Steve P.S. Of course, if you'de read The Catcher in the Rye at an impressionable age, you would of picked up some bad habits! |
|
06 Feb 02 - 08:25 AM (#643710) Subject: RE: BS: Grammar: Use of the semi colon From: kendall If he would of...if I wouldn't have...he was like, and then she was like... I simply cant listen to these oral cripples! |
|
06 Feb 02 - 08:57 AM (#643735) Subject: RE: BS: Grammar: Use of the semi colon From: Steve Parkes Irony, Kendall, irony! |
|
06 Feb 02 - 09:49 AM (#643787) Subject: RE: BS: Grammar: Use of the semi colon From: kendall I chowda the language on purpose. I do know better, so, it is not coming from ignorance. |
|
06 Feb 02 - 10:05 AM (#643799) Subject: RE: BS: Grammar: Use of the semi colon From: Desdemona Of course, sometimes a complete disregard for the conventions can work brilliantly; think of William Faulkner or James Joyce, had they observed the conventions! On the other hand, the currently vexing common practice (at least in the US) is the willy-nilly conversion of nouns into verbs: "parenting", "mentoring", etc. Most annoying. |
|
06 Feb 02 - 11:26 AM (#643845) Subject: RE: BS: Grammar: Use of the semi colon From: McGrath of Harlow Quite right about unrecognizable as a synonym for the irr form. That occurred to me after I had posted it. Dumb.
I gather that the irr form is an eroded way of saying in, with words beginning with r. So it's really "unrecognizable".
Which doesn't do anything to explain irregardless... I think it might be that people sometimes like the sound of a rolled r as a way to emphasise a word, and if you do that to regardless, it can come out as irregardless. |
|
06 Feb 02 - 11:29 AM (#643846) Subject: RE: BS: Grammar: Use of the semi colon From: Desdemona Even worse----occasionally I've actually heard "irregardlessly"!!! |
|
06 Feb 02 - 01:12 PM (#643923) Subject: RE: BS: Grammar: Use of the semi colon From: Dicho (Frank Staplin) Irrecognizable and unrecognizable both appeared in written form in the 19th C. When they were coined is unknown. The "ir-" in the sense of not goes back at least to the 14th century. "Un-" is probably as old, but I leave the detection to the lexicographers. Thread creep, anyway. |
|
06 Feb 02 - 01:53 PM (#643959) Subject: RE: BS: Grammar: Use of the semi colon From: McGrath of Harlow My finger slipped in my last post - what I meant to say was that with irr being an eroded in, "irrecognizable" is really a way of writing "inrecognizable."
(And I suppose the dash in that last sentence could be seen as taking the place of a semicolon. Couldn't have been a comma - I suppose it could have been a full stop, at a stretch. I prefer a dash. Looks better on the page.) |
|
06 Feb 02 - 03:43 PM (#644055) Subject: RE: BS: Grammar: Use of the semi colon From: Dicho (Frank Staplin) Inrecognizable does not yet exist as a word, but if you use it enough, someone will pick it up and run with it- much like our modern word proactive. What is an "eroded" in? Both are honorable prefixes. "Ir- is the assimilated form in Latin of the prefix in- before initial letter r, used in the same way in English (and much more frequent than in-) in words such as irrational," as well as irrecoverable, irreligion and irrecognizable. OED |
|
07 Feb 02 - 03:29 AM (#644364) Subject: RE: BS: Grammar: Use of the semi colon From: Steve Parkes In my country we say "elided", McG! Steve |
|
07 Feb 02 - 04:19 AM (#644375) Subject: RE: BS: Grammar: Use of the semi colon From: GUEST,Boab Semi-colons in written language are like grace-notes in music, or triples on a drum---[dash!!] ---the meaning of the script, the melody or the rhythm are perfectly whole and functional without them, but not always as pleasing to the eye/ear as when they are judiciously used. Sentences?--One of the most prolific writers alive today truly murders the cherished regulations of the "academics"; have you ever read Stephen King? |
|
07 Feb 02 - 08:01 AM (#644434) Subject: RE: BS: Grammar: Use of the semi colon From: McGrath of Harlow "Ir- is the assimilated form in Latin of the prefix in- before initial letter r, used in the same way in English (and much more frequent than in-) in words such as irrational," as well as irrecoverable, irreligion and irrecognizable. OED
Precisely.
"Elided"? No, that means leaving out a vowel; in this case it's a consonent that's left out. I suppose that dictionary definition above indicates that "assimilated" is the correct technical term. I think "eroded" is a fair enough word to refer to the process by which we knock the rough edges off words that are tricky to pronounce. |
|
07 Feb 02 - 10:25 AM (#644520) Subject: RE: BS: Grammar: Use of the semi colon From: Steve Parkes Well, ones hates to be pedantic, but elision can apply to consonants or syllables as well as vowels. I have to admit, though, that "erode" is a much more suitable word in this context, or even "corrode"! Steve |
|
14 Feb 02 - 09:29 AM (#649889) Subject: RE: BS: Grammar: Use of the semi colon From: Uncle_DaveO McGrath of Harlow said: My finger slipped in my last post - what I meant to say was that with irr being an eroded in, "irrecognizable" is really a way of writing "inrecognizable." (And I suppose the dash in that last sentence could be seen as taking the place of a semicolon. Couldn't have been a comma - I suppose it could have been a full stop, at a stretch. I prefer a dash. Looks better on the page.) If you look, there is NO dash in either of those quoted paragraph. What is there in each case is a hyphen with spaces before and after. A dash in printing (referred to as an em dash) is a longer horizontal bar than a hyphen, and is neither led nor followed by a space. In typing, the long dash bar is rendered as two hyphens, with no spaces before or after. The function of the hyphen is to join two words or word parts into one expression, as in "a dark-green color". The function of the dash, on the other hand, is to separate sections of a sentence--sometimes as a parenthetical indicator, sometimes to indicate a breaking off of a thought. Dave Oesterreich
|
|
14 Feb 02 - 11:00 PM (#650557) Subject: RE: BS: Grammar: Use of the semi colon From: Stilly River Sage Dealing with this from the academic position can get ridiculous. In writing a thesis or dissertation (here in the US, at any rate) one must follow the style manual to the letter and there are actually people whose job it is to measure margins and look to see if your dash is an "m" in length or if your lines are exactly double-spaced. They aren't looking at the content, mind you, unless perhaps to comment that there are too many personal pronouns. I had to get a note from the chair of my committee to take to the graduate school saying that the number of times "I" appeared in the document was entirely appropriate to the subject. In addition to the style manuals (I usually use the MLA--Modern Language Association) that is used in liberal arts, but have more recently had to switch to the Chicago Manual of Style. And then there's the book by Kate Turabian that is just about writing theses and dissertations. It can take longer to get the darned thing into the proper format than it took to do the original thinking and writing to get the degree! SRS
|
|
14 Feb 02 - 11:28 PM (#650579) Subject: RE: BS: Grammar: Use of the semi colon From: 53 Is that the same thing as the small intestine? |
|
15 Feb 02 - 02:46 PM (#650983) Subject: RE: BS: Grammar: Use of the semi colon From: DMcG Split infinitives: I read some years ago that in Latin it is impossible to split an infinitive because it is simply part of the way the verb is conjugated. Consequently, splitting infinitives implied you did not appreciate Latin, which in turn implied you were ill-educated. Consequently worrying about split infinitives is no more than snobbishness! Anyone who is a Latin scholar is entitled to shoot this down :-) Semicolons are a different matter - they are concerned with the lengths of pauses and changes of voice pitch as sentences start and end - in fact, they change mere words into music! |
|
15 Feb 02 - 03:52 PM (#651028) Subject: RE: BS: Grammar: Use of the semi colon From: Dicho (Frank Staplin) Stilly River Sage, you didn't add that the style editing continues long after the degree. Different technical journals have different formats. My colleagues and I often would format our papers for a particular journal to save on rewrite. The bibliography was a real pain in the ass, making certain that every colon, semicolon, comma and period was in the right place. And did the journal require italics or quotation marks? Some journals used the style manual from hell; getting the paper into print sometimes was more time-consuming than the research itself. |
|
15 Feb 02 - 04:31 PM (#651055) Subject: RE: BS: Grammar: Use of the semi colon From: McGrath of Harlow There doesn't seem to be a way of putting in a dash on a keyboard, so a single hyphen is generally used instead. Gimme a dash key, and I'd use it by choice. But not a double hyphen, which is ugly to my eyes. |
|
15 Feb 02 - 05:01 PM (#651075) Subject: RE: BS: Grammar: Use of the semi colon From: Bill D isn't this–different from this—? (side by side — –) n dash & m dash, or dash & hyphen...I get either by using a little program called AllChars, which allows access to any character using hotkeys and keyboard shortcuts... æ œ Æ ‡ ¶ it is fun, free and useful |