|
20 Jul 98 - 11:46 AM (#32993) Subject: Max--Year 2000 From: Richard Max; What will happen to the database and forum in the Year 2000. Is Mudcat compliant or will we lose our favorite resource and chat? Some folks are trying to tell us it is just a software problem but it goes beyond that. I'm usre you folks have considered it but just wanted some reassurance. Thanks , Richard |
|
20 Jul 98 - 05:13 PM (#33015) Subject: RE: Max--Year 2000 From: dick greenhaus I THINK that the only thing that happens is that Max turns into a pumpkin (and maybe I'll turn into a bar) |
|
20 Jul 98 - 06:35 PM (#33020) Subject: RE: Max--Year 2000 From: Bo .. and susan turns into a peach. So what you're saying is that the Entire DT is becoming a video slot machine in the year 2000! :) hmmm Bo |
|
20 Jul 98 - 07:04 PM (#33021) Subject: RE: Max--Year 2000 From: Barbara Shaw Looks to me like 2-digit years in the threads, so depending on what you're using, the sorts could be wrong without century in the date. |
|
21 Jul 98 - 11:24 AM (#33067) Subject: RE: Max--Year 2000 From: Jon W. Of course Max has mentioned that he's trying to port the database and forum to SQL. That should take care of most Y2K problems. |
|
21 Jul 98 - 12:29 PM (#33069) Subject: RE: Max--Year 2000 From: Max There is no y2k problem with the mudcat. We arre much too smart for that. The years are stored as four digit, though I only display two for space reasons on the mudcat. No worries. |
|
21 Jul 98 - 10:35 PM (#33110) Subject: RE: Max--Year 2000 From: Richard Wright I knew that--just wanted to be reassured. Thanks Max Richard |