|
05 Jun 03 - 07:19 PM (#962932) Subject: Review: Tudor Barn From: Dipsodeb Have just spent an excellent evening at the Tudor barn in Eltham. It was really nice to meet up with old friends and to see returning visitors from as faraway as America. The Folkmob seeme to have it really together when it comes to putting on a great night. Gawd Bless Americans and South East Londeners......... HIC!!! |
|
06 Jun 03 - 09:02 AM (#963176) Subject: RE: Review: Tudor Barn From: mexican I'll second that - It is the best folk club I've ever attended - great people! |
|
06 Jun 03 - 10:08 AM (#963219) Subject: RE: Review: Tudor Barn From: Dave Bryant I expect that Woodsie and Charles Atlas would agree. |
|
06 Jun 03 - 07:10 PM (#963473) Subject: RE: Review: Tudor Barn From: mexican No that woodsie & charles atlas don't come anymore they play down the woodman with Danny McKay! |
|
03 Jul 03 - 06:41 PM (#976256) Subject: RE: Review: Tudor Barn From: cockney Nice one Richard B - you are a star!!! Play with fire - great folk song, hey! |
|
03 Jul 03 - 07:16 PM (#976272) Subject: RE: Review: Tudor Barn From: GUEST,Dave K It was really a pleasure to sit around on a Thursday night and have such a great time. The 'round' took time - but everyone listened and enjoyed what others had to offer. The club usually runs on a Wednesday but is doing the Thursday spot until mid July due to another booking. It is great that numbers have not gone down and there is a lot of support. Next week is a PA night. Please come along. |
|
04 Jul 03 - 02:16 AM (#976436) Subject: RE: Review: Tudor Barn From: Richard Bridge Flattery will get you everywhere! All you need now are some droopy girls (given the age of most folkies, me included). Tell you what, though, I really missed having Jacqui's recorder and guitarwork, and harmonies... |
|
04 Jul 03 - 05:09 AM (#976504) Subject: RE: Review: Tudor Barn From: Dipsodeb Richard, any chance of getting Jaqui to come along sometime? Thanks for last night, you brought a bit of cheeriness into the evening, hope to see you next week.. FLATTERY FLATTERY FLATTERY ........ xx |
|
04 Jul 03 - 07:57 AM (#976567) Subject: RE: Review: Tudor Barn From: Richard Bridge Read thread Obit, Jacqui Walker |
|
04 Jul 03 - 09:06 AM (#976596) Subject: RE: Review: Tudor Barn From: The Barden of England Believe all you read people - this is a fabulous venue with really friendly members. They made me very welcome for which I thank them wholeheartedly. I'm just brassed off that I couldn't make Knockholt, it sounds like it was a hoot. Keep up the good work folks, you deserve your great reputation. |
|
04 Jul 03 - 11:58 AM (#976696) Subject: RE: Review: Tudor Barn From: Dipsodeb Oh Richard I am so so sorry, I thought that Jaqui was a mudcatter friend,I truly did not know of your sad loss.. A friend has just emailed me and let me know. Please accept my sincere apologies for putting my size fours in it. I feel terrible now. Debs :( |
|
05 Jul 03 - 02:37 AM (#977139) Subject: RE: Review: Tudor Barn From: Richard Bridge Don't blame yourself. Obviously you did not realise. I just could not resist pulling your leg a bit when I saw your post. |
|
05 Jul 03 - 12:56 PM (#977343) Subject: RE: Review: Tudor Barn From: GUEST,Woodsie Anyway folks, what about the great DK wasn't he great. Am I losing the plot? |
|
06 Jul 03 - 04:46 AM (#977668) Subject: RE: Review: Tudor Barn From: Richard Bridge No, you are right |
|
07 Jul 03 - 06:48 PM (#978615) Subject: RE: Review: Tudor Barn From: GUEST,Dave K Thanks - We have a PA night this Thursday - and are looking forward to going back to Wednesday in a few week. Everyone - and I mean everyone is welcome to come down and join in. |
|
08 Jul 03 - 09:48 AM (#978995) Subject: RE: Review: Tudor Barn From: GUEST,mexican Back to wednesday on 23rd July - hooray!!! |
|
09 Jul 03 - 07:04 AM (#979641) Subject: RE: Review: Tudor Barn From: GUEST,Flying Fish Sound like a good place - I'll try and get down when I'm in London - hope they're not too cruel to banjo players! |
|
09 Jul 03 - 07:43 AM (#979651) Subject: RE: Review: Tudor Barn From: GUEST,Referee Yellow card for the reference above to someone who's already come in for a lot of abuse on this mudcat. I can't believe that anyone still wishes to continue this old-hat slagging match in public, given the way Round One ended up (i.e. to nobody's credit). In future I suggest that you don't name names in public unless you're pretty certain that the individual has no objection to being so named. If in doubt, leave it out! |
|
09 Jul 03 - 10:05 AM (#979751) Subject: RE: Review: Tudor Barn From: Richard Bridge Would someone like to let those not in on the in-joke about old hats know what it is? I like old hats.... |
|
09 Jul 03 - 10:27 AM (#979770) Subject: RE: Review: Tudor Barn From: cockney Who is this self titled GUEST Referee? I think he or she has posted onto the wrong thread - "old hat slagging match" - "naming names in public" what are they on about? |
|
09 Jul 03 - 10:31 AM (#979773) Subject: RE: Review: Tudor Barn From: GUEST,Referee Prefer not to "enlighten" you, Richard. If you weren't around when the last period of misuse of the mudcat to start a neighbourhood spat arose, then you're best off out of it! However I thought I'd seen the end of this singling-out of musicians for snide commentary. Obviously some people's spitefulness knows no bounds. |
|
09 Jul 03 - 11:10 AM (#979800) Subject: RE: Review: Tudor Barn From: GUEST And please don't pretend that you don't know what I'm talking about. Do I really need to remind people of the spat a few months back which ended up in a thread being deleted because of the heat occasioned by slagging off some of your neighbours? Do I need to remind people how it culminated in the mother of all tirades by a certain bruce lee? All I'm doing is drawing to people's attentions the fact that they are lapsing into bad habits by using people's names in public places where they shouldn't. If you really couldn't work that one out, then there's not much help I can offer. It's down to everyone involved in the former spats to think about whether they really want to re-open the can of worms. Naming individuals in public on this board as in the supposedly humorous but actually a "sly dig" manner in an opening post to this thread can only serve to reopen old wounds. Does anyone really want to go there? |
|
09 Jul 03 - 11:15 AM (#979804) Subject: RE: Review: Tudor Barn From: The Barden of England GUEST,Referee - I'm horribly confused? What 'spat' are you talking about, as this thread has only said good things about the 'Tudor Barn' - and quite rightly. It doesn't suit when you make comments that obviously have nothing to do with the thread, so please read the thread again, as I can find nothing that needs a Yellow Card as you put it. Maybe you're better off out of it, as you succinctly put it. I'll just take it that you're trying to stir things up because that's all you can do. |
|
09 Jul 03 - 11:27 AM (#979812) Subject: RE: Review: Tudor Barn From: GUEST,Referee On the contrary. Various posters to this thread will know exactly what I mean by the reference to a local musician who has become some sort of a satanic figure to members of a community of musicians who spent some time in the recent past singling him out for vilification. I believe that such people should keep such feelings to themselves and should not be discussing them in open forums such as this. If you don't know what I'm taking about then I would suggest that you ask some of your mates. They'll be able to tell the tale, no doubt. |
|
09 Jul 03 - 12:14 PM (#979860) Subject: RE: Review: Tudor Barn From: GUEST Once again GUEST REFEREE, I can't find a thing that's offensive here. If one of the posters to this thread is, or has been offensive in another thread, then why not start a new thread about it and put your gripes, opinions or whatever there so that people can either agree, disagree or whatever, but why then need to stir things up here in what has, up until today, been a nice friendly thread and a pleasure to be part of is simply beyond me. I like the Tudor Barn I like the people who go there, and I find no harm in them. What's wrong with that. Axe grinding somewhere else please! |
|
09 Jul 03 - 01:07 PM (#979920) Subject: RE: Review: Tudor Barn From: Dipsodeb I am horribly confused, I started this thread and I have just read it all the way through twice and I can't see any harmful reference to anyone. Referee I may have a vague feeling of what you may be referring to but it goes back a long way, is certainly not mentioned here and as far as everyone involved is concerned is a closed book. Why drag up old wounds........ stop. |
|
09 Jul 03 - 03:08 PM (#980041) Subject: RE: Review: Tudor Barn From: Richard Bridge I'm tempted to start in on the usual footballing comments on "ref", but I've just done searches on Kenningham and Bryant and still find nothing to give a foundation to the ref's oddly spiky comment, so I'm still waiting to see what it's all about - does it link to another comment on another thread I saw a month or so back about the folk police going to a folk venue near here - I think the comment objected to was "too country for my taste"? |
|
09 Jul 03 - 07:24 PM (#980193) Subject: RE: Review: Tudor Barn From: GUEST Could anyone please tell me the meaning of the word disingenuos? No? Tendentious? Anyone? Mother, it's a wolf! No, it's not. Yes, it is! SNORT! |
|
10 Jul 03 - 02:29 AM (#980324) Subject: RE: Review: Tudor Barn From: The Barden of England Just to make things plain, I was GUEST who wrote on 09 Jul 03 - 12:14 PM. I had logged on at my home computer and Mudcat doesn't yet come up with my name. I don't like being annonymous, unlike the odd Referee, but there you go. |
|
10 Jul 03 - 04:47 AM (#980375) Subject: RE: Review: Tudor Barn From: Richard Bridge You mean disingenuous. "insincere, uncandid, or having secret motives". |
|
10 Jul 03 - 05:58 AM (#980395) Subject: RE: Review: Tudor Barn From: Dave Bryant I think that the name "Referee" is referring to is mentioned in the 4th posing on this thread. As he is so touchy about it, I won't actually quote it except to say that it's not "Woodsie" or "Charles Atlas". I believe that it is all connected with a "Folk Song and Blues Session" which was started at the Dule of Edinburgh at Lee - the thread now appears to have been deleted. There is already a current thread insisting that the word "session" means an instrumental session where everyone plays at the same time, and the gentleman named also believed in this interpretation of the word. The above was just to put mystified readers in the picture, if "referee" wishes to coment on it would he please put his comments in another thread and he can post just a link in this thread if he so wishes. If I'm wrong, will he please PM me and I will post an apology. This Thread is about the Tudor Barn club, which is not directly connected with the aforementioned session - could we please keep it that way. |
|
10 Jul 03 - 06:28 AM (#980407) Subject: RE: Review: Tudor Barn From: Dave Bryant Incidently, Richard, John, and myself put our real names into every posting which we make. Anyway, the question which I was originally going to ask is - when does the club go back to Wednesday nights ? |
|
10 Jul 03 - 07:07 AM (#980429) Subject: RE: Review: Tudor Barn From: Dipsodeb Hiya dave i'm pleased to be able to say that the club goes back to Wednesday night on the 23rd of this month. Hope to see you there. ~Debs~ |
|
10 Jul 03 - 07:15 AM (#980433) Subject: RE: Review: Tudor Barn From: Dave Bryant Thanks Deb. John Barden has very kindly started a thread here if "GUEST Referee" wishes to continue his subject. OK then Folks, no more rude remarks about people (except me and DK - but then that's usual). |
|
10 Jul 03 - 07:32 AM (#980444) Subject: RE: Review: Tudor Barn From: Dipsodeb Ah, referee the penny has just dropped, I now realise what you are going on about re: reference of name in this thread. Actually I agree with you. I think it was uneccesary, and thoughtless, but I don't think it was meant to cause offence. I realise that this is a sensitive issue for you and definitely agree that names mentioned in a completely unrelated thread was pointless and bitchy. |
|
10 Jul 03 - 08:31 AM (#980478) Subject: RE: Review: Tudor Barn From: greg stephens This thread seems to have lurched off track a touch, perhaps I could give it a nudge back on course. I visit Eltham frequently(my brother lives there) so I am interested to hear of a club. can someone tell me more? Is it a singaround only, or a club with guests? Who organises things? Etc etc |
|
10 Jul 03 - 09:00 AM (#980500) Subject: RE: Review: Tudor Barn From: Dave Bryant Hi Greg, you can find a website here. Dipsodeb is one of the organisers, so you could always PM her for details. Myself and Linda (Essex Girl) live at Mottingham - just down the road from Eltham - let us know (PM me) the next time that you're coming down this way and we could try and meet up. Our next folk barbecue (the thread for the last one ran over 100 postings) will be on Sunday 14th Sept - from about 2pm onwards. Why not schedule a trip down for then. We usually have a reasonable number of Mudcatters attending - be nice if you could make it as well. BTW if you navigate from the FolkMob site to Dave Kenningham's and then to the one he's set up for me, you'll be able to see some of the BBQ pics. There are some more on the Mudcat Photos here. |
|
10 Jul 03 - 10:09 AM (#980533) Subject: RE: Review: Tudor Barn From: greg stephens Thanks very much for the info, Dave |
|
10 Jul 03 - 07:00 PM (#980900) Subject: RE: Review: Tudor Barn From: cockney Coool baby - As Zappa said: why are some people so hung up? |
|
11 Jul 03 - 03:54 AM (#981089) Subject: RE: Review: Tudor Barn From: GUEST,Referee Thank you dipsodeb. Well said. Let's hope this is the last time that people make such remarks and make it necessary for people to hijack your thread to make a point. Roll on, buddy ... |