|
05 Dec 03 - 04:44 PM (#1066271) Subject: BS: You Thought Cell Phones Were Bad... From: Clinton Hammond ... Behind The Wheel???? This is just wrong on SO many levels! -Everything In Its Time And Place???- But ya gotta have a licence to own a dog.... |
|
05 Dec 03 - 04:54 PM (#1066279) Subject: RE: BS: You Thought Cell Phones Were Bad... From: Peace Clint: Gotta love it, huh? Jaysus. |
|
05 Dec 03 - 05:03 PM (#1066283) Subject: RE: BS: You Thought Cell Phones Were Bad... From: Clinton Hammond I donno what's worse.. they mysoginistic CULT she's part of.... ... Her bad driving.... Or her bad driving WITHOUT even having a licence... Or that she doesn't -think- she did ANYTHING wrong... I'm consoled knowing that in about 300 to 400 years the magnetic poles are likely gonna flip, and for a few years this planet won't have ANY protection from cosmic rays and solar radiation... (While the field passes through its "nodal point") And with any luck, that'll mean the end of all stupid life on this rock... It'll shake this planet like it was an Etch-a-sketch... And the universe will go on, happy to be rid of this failled experiment... |
|
05 Dec 03 - 05:10 PM (#1066292) Subject: RE: BS: You Thought Cell Phones Were Bad... From: Stilly River Sage Standard operating procedure when a nursing mom has the child with her on a road trip is to pull over in a rest area to nurse. Thankfully, this nut is a rare exception to the rule. Now if they can stop idiots from letting little dogs ride on their laps to hang their heads out of the driver's window at 65 mph they'll give the rest of us some peace of mind. I'm always afraid one of those dogs is going to come flying out on the highway. SRS |
|
05 Dec 03 - 05:17 PM (#1066298) Subject: RE: BS: You Thought Cell Phones Were Bad... From: Clinton Hammond "this nut is a rare exception" Like roaches... where there's one, there's probably millions! "stop idiots from letting little dogs ride on their laps" I couldn't care less about the dogs... It's the thousands and thousands killed every year because of driver error that bothers me... (95% of all traffic accidents are driver error... or close to it) |
|
05 Dec 03 - 05:21 PM (#1066303) Subject: RE: BS: You Thought Cell Phones Were Bad... From: Burke "Donkers reportedly said she fed the baby on her husband's orders to save time." Save time, risk life of driver, child & everyone else on the road. This sounds to me like the general culture's priorites in extreme, instead of really holding alternative values. I don't see where "house arrest" will make a difference. |
|
05 Dec 03 - 05:34 PM (#1066313) Subject: RE: BS: You Thought Cell Phones Were Bad... From: Stilly River Sage The dog presents the same kind of driver distraction, Clinton. My concern is two-fold, the distracted driver causing accidents and the mashed pup. It's too bad that it's the act of nursing that is somehow going to get the bad rap, and not the fact that this woman can't think for herself and is a member of a cult that encourages such mindless dependence. Sounds like she shouldn't be behind the wheel anyway, since she doesn't have a license. She was talking on the cell phone and writing down notes AT THE SAME TIME as she was nursing. Geez. Talk about multi-tasking. SRS |
|
05 Dec 03 - 05:51 PM (#1066324) Subject: RE: BS: You Thought Cell Phones Were Bad... From: Rapparee My exact sentiments, SRS. I can see (have seen!) nursing and talking notes, nursing and talking on the phone, but nursing, driving, talking o the phone and taking notes, all because Dear Hubby said to save time! No problem! Punish him, too, because since she is subordinate to him ("Master and Man" concept in law) then HE has the ultimate responsibility for HER actions. Let's see: reckless endangerment of a child, driving without a license, reckless driving, failure to stop, running from the cops...ought to give him a few years in the Graybar Hotel. She can be ordered into a care facility, preferably one that will let her have her child with her. Too bad there's no punishment for that male's REAL crime! |
|
05 Dec 03 - 05:52 PM (#1066327) Subject: RE: BS: You Thought Cell Phones Were Bad... From: McGrath of Harlow "Donkers" - I thought Americans didn't go in for rhyming slang... Why hasn't the husband being charged? After all, according to this perverse little sect, it would appear that he was primarily responsible for what happened, and was in charge of the vehicle and its occupants. |
|
05 Dec 03 - 05:58 PM (#1066334) Subject: RE: BS: You Thought Cell Phones Were Bad... From: Wesley S Just the other day I saw a man driving slowly in the far left lane out on 121. He was reading a paperback while he drove. How I wish there had been a police car to catch him in the act. |
|
05 Dec 03 - 06:54 PM (#1066376) Subject: RE: BS: You Thought Cell Phones Were Bad... From: Cluin Don't they have child seat laws in the States? |
|
05 Dec 03 - 07:00 PM (#1066382) Subject: RE: BS: You Thought Cell Phones Were Bad... From: wysiwyg So, men, would you or would you not accept a blow job while driving? ~S~ |
|
05 Dec 03 - 07:05 PM (#1066385) Subject: RE: BS: You Thought Cell Phones Were Bad... From: GUEST Consider it a deal! |
|
05 Dec 03 - 07:08 PM (#1066386) Subject: RE: BS: You Thought Cell Phones Were Bad... From: Little Hawk Not, Susan. Too distracting. Like Clinton said, there's a proper time and a place for everything. :-) It's hard to fully enjoy one thing while also tring to do another. That woman's name might better be "Bonkers", I'm thinking. What she is doing is sort of symptomatic of the whole North American culture (the multi-tasking nonsense), but she's an extreme example of it. - LH |
|
05 Dec 03 - 07:20 PM (#1066398) Subject: RE: BS: You Thought Cell Phones Were Bad... From: Bill D Susan...it was only OFFERED once! In Utah, in a VW bug, in 1965, on a desolate strech of road...*grin* No, I would NOT accept any such thing on an interstate in Ohio! Nor would I try to take notes and talk on a cell phone at the same time, even in Utah... |
|
05 Dec 03 - 07:38 PM (#1066412) Subject: RE: BS: You Thought Cell Phones Were Bad... From: Bee-dubya-ell Three months under house arrest???? So she gets locked up in her own house under the thumb of the same misogynistic asshole whose "orders" got her in the fix in the first place? Christ! What judge had his head far enough up his ass to issue that sentence? What she needed was three months in jail so she would at least stand a chance of realizing what an idiot she is. |
|
05 Dec 03 - 07:45 PM (#1066421) Subject: RE: BS: You Thought Cell Phones Were Bad... From: Peace The BJ while driving thing got my interest. Are the interstates bumpy? That could hurt like a SOB. (Gotta love GUEST. Didn't care if it was a guy or a gal doing the deed.) The woman is a f##kin' idiot. I've handled some accidents in which babies have been smashed up. There aren't too many things worse than that. In case I didn't make myself clear above, the woman is a fuc#in' idiot. And her husband ain't too bright either. |
|
05 Dec 03 - 07:50 PM (#1066426) Subject: RE: BS: You Thought Cell Phones Were Bad... From: McGrath of Harlow But if, by his own rules, that husband was in charge of the vehicle, and in control of his wife, why wasn't he charged, found guilty, and given a spell of of non-house arrest? |
|
05 Dec 03 - 08:03 PM (#1066440) Subject: RE: BS: You Thought Cell Phones Were Bad... From: Little Hawk Because HE didn't commit the act. People are responsible for their own actions, therefore the woman is responsible for hers. The husband is not guilty of driving while breastfeeding while etc...he is guilty of committing abuse in his marital relationship. - LH |
|
05 Dec 03 - 08:19 PM (#1066454) Subject: RE: BS: You Thought Cell Phones Were Bad... From: Liz the Squeak I can't decide which is the greater sin - allowing her husband to rule her like that, or not using her own judgement to preserve the life of her baby, if not herself and other road users... and I bet it was him on the phone! LTS |
|
05 Dec 03 - 09:06 PM (#1066472) Subject: RE: BS: You Thought Cell Phones Were Bad... From: Bobert Of all the threads I have opened at Mudcat, I must say that this one is absolutely disgusting... Yuck... Sorry, call me a prude... Heck, I won't know 'cause I ain't comin' back to this joint... Knock yerselves out, though.... Prudish Bobert p.s. Breast-feedin' and drivin' don't mix.... Pull over onthe side of the road.... Same fir, ahhh, BJ's.... It's the rules, I'm sure... |
|
05 Dec 03 - 09:34 PM (#1066475) Subject: RE: BS: You Thought Cell Phones Were Bad... From: GUEST,Stilly River Sage Everyone knows that a blow job isn't safe when you're driving. The best you should try for is a hand job, because it doesn't interfere with the steering wheel. ;> |
|
05 Dec 03 - 10:22 PM (#1066499) Subject: RE: BS: You Thought Cell Phones Were Bad... From: Little Hawk Oh, fer heaven's sake! LOL! I can hardly believe that people would mix sex with driving, but...experience has shown that absolutely anything people can imagine, they will do, if at all possible! People have a capacity for idiocy that is almost godlike. - LH |
|
05 Dec 03 - 11:48 PM (#1066522) Subject: RE: BS: You Thought Cell Phones Were Bad... From: wysiwyg :~) I discovered a long time ago that the simple utterance of the word BLOWJOB can derail most any guy's self-certain rant! LOL! You can be on the far side of a country as wide as the US and on the phone, (in other words NO hope of instant gratification), and it still works instantly! Hmmm..... I may have to start visiting the political threads! ~S~ |
|
06 Dec 03 - 12:22 AM (#1066538) Subject: RE: BS: You Thought Cell Phones Were Bad... From: Peace Blow is just an expression. |
|
06 Dec 03 - 01:02 AM (#1066553) Subject: RE: BS: You Thought Cell Phones Were Bad... From: Peace Did I mention that I think that woman if a fu##in' idiot? In case I didn't allow me to do so now. That woman is a fu#kin' idiot. Thank you all. I feel a bit better now. |
|
06 Dec 03 - 05:31 AM (#1066591) Subject: RE: BS: You Thought Cell Phones Were Bad... From: Clinton Hammond WYSIWYG The idea is better than the actuality... Brucie... Don't hold back eh... Heh |
|
06 Dec 03 - 08:03 AM (#1066624) Subject: RE: BS: You Thought Cell Phones Were Bad... From: Sandra in Sydney We have laws against using cell phones while driving. We also have laws that everyone uses a seatbelt & babies under a certain age must be in an approved Baby capsule & restrained by seat belts. And not forgetting the other laws against child abuse, including in certain cases compulsary reporting of abuse. A child in danger (moral or physical) can be removed from the parent/caregiver. Poor little kid - what kind of a life will it have (if it survives further car trips) & house arrest - will it be a Master or a slave? |
|
06 Dec 03 - 08:29 AM (#1066629) Subject: RE: BS: You Thought Cell Phones Were Bad... From: JennyO Living in that sect, it's bound to be a slave. It was a girl. |
|
06 Dec 03 - 08:53 AM (#1066636) Subject: RE: BS: You Thought Cell Phones Were Bad... From: Little Hawk I've never accorded huge importance to blowjobs, Susan. They rank fairly low down on the scale of great sexual experiences as far as I'm concerned, though I'm not opposed to the practice by any means... I don't get why so many men seem to be obsessed with them (judging by what I've observed here and there). What's the big deal? Actual intercourse is far superior, in my opinion, as one is giving as well as receiving. It's more interactive. I realize this is a divergence from the main point of this thread, but I cannot let your implication that all men lose their judgement at mention of the mundane, common blowjob go unchallenged... :-) - LH |
|
06 Dec 03 - 08:57 AM (#1066640) Subject: RE: BS: You Thought Cell Phones Were Bad... From: Cluin I dunno, Clinton. With that particular delightful manoeuvre, it's been my experience that the actuality always blows away the idea (pun kind of intended, but not enough to bother crafting it better). That being said, I'd pull over. Too dangerous. Men are pretty much incapable of handling anything else during their climax, even to save their lives. (But yes, the offer would be a turn-on itself) |
|
06 Dec 03 - 08:58 AM (#1066641) Subject: RE: BS: You Thought Cell Phones Were Bad... From: Cluin Little Hawk, .... aw forget it. |
|
06 Dec 03 - 09:22 AM (#1066654) Subject: RE: BS: You Thought Cell Phones Were Bad... From: Little Hawk Hey, we've all got our own slant on things, right, Cluin? I can't stand coffee, and always drink tea. I watch virtually no TV and hardly ever willingly listen to a radio. I grew up in a generation which all smoked dope and I didn't, but I had hair down to my belt and loved Bob Dylan. I regard William Shatner as a virtual demigod. I'm weird. :-) - LH |
|
06 Dec 03 - 09:24 AM (#1066655) Subject: RE: BS: You Thought Cell Phones Were Bad... From: Midchuck Consider that most (straight) guys are terribly excited about the idea of a blowjob from a woman, but disgusted by the idea of one from another guy, even though, if they kept their eyes closed the whole time, they wouldn't know the difference (unless the male blower had done it more and was therefore markedly more skillful). The idea of a relationship with a woman who would do whatever I told her, without question or complaint, is exciting to me for about as long as I can avoid the question of how I'd deal with the responsibility involved. Peter. |
|
06 Dec 03 - 09:52 AM (#1066661) Subject: RE: BS: You Thought Cell Phones Were Bad... From: Cluin I just never thought I'd hear a guy ask "What's the big deal with blowjobs?"... But now that you bring up the Shatner thing.... yeah, you're weird! ;) And Midchuck, I've had a not-so-skillful beejay or two in my day and had thus moved on to more pleasurable options, but like Kristoffersson sang: "Ever since the first I had, the worst I had was good" (I think the feel of a moustache would turn me off though...) Anyway, women shouldn't breastfeed while driving, no matter what their so-called religion. |
|
06 Dec 03 - 10:30 AM (#1066680) Subject: RE: BS: You Thought Cell Phones Were Bad... From: Peg hey the thread drift here is almost as good as the hairy armpits discussion that came from the democracy rant! How about a big collective groan of pity ("Awwwwwwww!") for Little Hawk, who apparently has never had a really good blow job. But he seems to still be a happy and fulfilled guy, so no big deal. For the record, I think doing ANYTHING other than driving, while driving, is stupid. My dear friend Adam was killed talking on his cell phone while driving. Yet a number of his friends still do this when I am in the car. Infuriating and inexplicable. |
|
06 Dec 03 - 01:27 PM (#1066796) Subject: RE: BS: You Thought Cell Phones Were Bad... From: Peace Let me get this clear: Is the BJ being given by the passenger or the driver? If the driver's doin' the giving (as it were), that would be very unsafe. Anyway, I think so. |
|
06 Dec 03 - 01:28 PM (#1066798) Subject: RE: BS: You Thought Cell Phones Were Bad... From: Peace If her husband tells her to blow up the tires, will she burn her lips on the tailpipe? |
|
06 Dec 03 - 02:57 PM (#1066837) Subject: RE: BS: You Thought Cell Phones Were Bad... From: McGrath of Harlow Presumably if he was charged with being the person in control of the vehicle he would have had to plead guilty to that. Or of course he could have pleaded not guilty and told the court, and his wife, that that way of thinking was rubbish. Which would have been quite useful in itself. |
|
06 Dec 03 - 07:50 PM (#1067035) Subject: RE: BS: You Thought Cell Phones Were Bad... From: Bill D "Men are pretty much incapable of handling anything else during their climax..." piffle! People vary.....ALL rules have their exceptions. |
|
06 Dec 03 - 07:59 PM (#1067040) Subject: RE: BS: You Thought Cell Phones Were Bad... From: Cluin Maybe if you're some kind of exceptional Tantric guru. They're not often out driving the interstate, getting a quick beej, though... |
|
07 Dec 03 - 04:37 AM (#1067109) Subject: RE: BS: You Thought Cell Phones Were Bad... From: Gurney Most of the comments here are from blokes, with a few not very informative inputs from the ladies. It is my observation (as a bloke) that most women, especially experienced Mums, can multitask very impressively. I can't and don't answer the phone on the move, and even stop talking in traffic. I have, however, seen my own Mum knitting to a pattern on one arm of her chair, a book on the other, litening to/watching TV, and joining in with any of several family conversations, all at the same time. There wouldn't be too many guys who could do that, so how about some thoughtful input from the ladies. It is just the dangerous bit, the 65mph, that is horrifyingly stupid, isn't it. Isn't it? |
|
07 Dec 03 - 05:15 AM (#1067123) Subject: RE: BS: You Thought Cell Phones Were Bad... From: sledge Factor in the possibility of mechanical faliure and other road users poor driving and it just gets worse. |
|
07 Dec 03 - 05:30 AM (#1067129) Subject: RE: BS: You Thought Cell Phones Were Bad... From: Liz the Squeak As a female and a mother, it is possible to multitask, just as it is possible to be truly stupid in a moving vehicle. To care for a child whilst living a (relatively) normal life, multitasking is essential. However, I would never suggest a BJ in the front of a vehicle (that steering wheel is bloody hard on the head, and you nearly always get the hand brake or the gear lever in a tit), I would never dream of feeding anything to anyone if I was driving and I use a cradle for the phone on answerphone and wait till I get to a suitable place to stop and return the message. I have done the following a pattern on one leg, listening/watching TV and had conversations with people but never whilst driving. Multitasking is a great skill to learn, but the biggest skill is learning when NOT to multitask. LTS |
|
07 Dec 03 - 10:57 AM (#1067233) Subject: RE: BS: You Thought Cell Phones Were Bad... From: Little Hawk LOL! Good one, Peg! Best laugh I've had this morning... It's not that I scorn the merits of the legendary blowjob, it's just that I am perplexed by the utter obsession for them that is so clearly evident in pornographic materials intended for men. That's what I don't get. It's overkill. I do not intend to reveal any more personal revelations regarding my own experiences in this area... (big "AWWWWWWW!" from the collected loggers-on and GUESTS at Mudcat...) :-) Now here's what your typical commuter might be seen doing (simultaneously, I mean) on Toronto's busiest highway (the 401) on a frantic Friday afternoon in rush hour: He's drinking a hot coffee, reading the latest Stephen King novel, consulting his Ontario road map for directions to Haliburton, giving the finger to the guy he just cut off, talking to his wife on the cellphone, scratching himself, eating a Whopper, adjusting the miniTV set that is mounted on the dashboard, AND driving....sort of. - LH |
|
07 Dec 03 - 01:10 PM (#1067305) Subject: RE: BS: You Thought Cell Phones Were Bad... From: Cluin Well, that commuting thing in the big sprawling metroplis that is Southern Ont. does take up a lot of time.... (how many hours a week wasted behind the wheel as your life-clock ticks away?) It would (and did) drive me crazy (Just one of the reasons there's no love lost between Toronto and me). So I can see why people would want to try and do something else besides just driving, especially in gridlock or slowdowns because all the rubberneckers are gawping at the latest accident in the inside lane of the 401... But there has to be limits. |
|
07 Dec 03 - 01:11 PM (#1067308) Subject: RE: BS: You Thought Cell Phones Were Bad... From: Cluin Notice I didn't mention blowjobs at all in the above post? Guess I'm not so obsessed after all, eh?..... DOH! |
|
07 Dec 03 - 04:32 PM (#1067403) Subject: RE: BS: You Thought Cell Phones Were Bad... From: Little Hawk Nice going, Cluin. :-) The thing about being stuck in traffic is, it's a perfect time to learn some of those subtler spiritual techniques like: remaining calm in a supposedly "stressful" situation concentrating on slow, relaxed breathing appreciating the present and enjoying it to the fullest, instead of focusing intently on some hypothetical future (like your arrival at wherever you are trying to get to) ceasing the "end-gaming" approach to life living in the "now" realizing it doesn't actually matter if you get to the next light a few seconds or even a few minutes sooner...because if you di, so what? And you'd probably still be in a hurry anyway...to no useful effect. being kind to other people and letting them change lanes, move in, etc...like you would want them to do for you! All of the above is completely lost on the competitive personality, who approaches every situation in life on a win/lose basis and regards every other person as an obnoxious nuisance or (if she's pretty) as an object to be used or acquired. He rushes busily through existence, seeking an elusive reward that is always around the next corner, and suffering pain and disappointment on almost every step of the way. He is "the busy backson". He dies sooner than he might have, causes pain to others, and misses almost every quiet and beautiful thing around him along the way. So...being stuck in traffic is an opportunity, and it's a valuable one. The last thing on Earth that the marketing system wants is a mature public...they want a public that is bored, scared, driven, and frustrated...and looking for a "magic pill" to take it all away. - LH |
|
07 Dec 03 - 06:59 PM (#1067486) Subject: RE: BS: You Thought Cell Phones Were Bad... From: Willie-O Both Donkers are Bonkers. That's about all I dare say on the matter. Christ on a plastic pony... W-O |
|
07 Dec 03 - 07:18 PM (#1067502) Subject: RE: BS: You Thought Cell Phones Were Bad... From: Peace Hey, Cluin and LH: being stuck in traffic is the perfect place for a BJ. Nobody's goin' anywhere, no bumps to worry about, and it gives the truckers something to think about as they pass. I figger the greatest resistance will come from the Brits. They have nothing like the TransCanada with about 20000000 miles of Canadian Shield to drive through, 170000000 miles of Saskatchewan and a 22 hour crawl from Vegreville to the west side of Edmonton. (The last bit isn't TransCanada, but it would fit right in if it was.) |
|
07 Dec 03 - 07:32 PM (#1067510) Subject: RE: BS: You Thought Cell Phones Were Bad... From: Grab Bruce, we've got the M25. World's longest car park. Might as well have something to do other than listen to Capital FM or some other crud. My worry is the practicality. I know from any car I've driven that the steering wheel would be in the way of anyone trying to get their head in my crotch. To accomodate, I'd need the seat far enough back that I wouldn't be able to reach the wheel or pedals. Hey, maybe I've just discovered a sneaky bit of car design, so that anyone wanting a blowjob whilst driving has to take their foot off the throttle, so the car naturally drifts to a halt (stalling at about 10mph because you can't change gear). Graham. |
|
07 Dec 03 - 07:51 PM (#1067529) Subject: RE: BS: You Thought Cell Phones Were Bad... From: Little Hawk I think we've got a new word for an indescribably stupid person: a donkers. |
|
07 Dec 03 - 08:05 PM (#1067535) Subject: RE: BS: You Thought Cell Phones Were Bad... From: Bee-dubya-ell I totally agree with Little Hawk about blowjobs in porn. Receiving the actual thing is one thing, but exactly what is there about watching someone else receive it that's supposed to be so thrilling? Let's see, we have a penis being inserted into a woman's mouth. I am heterosexual. I don't particularly get off on looking at guys' penises. And if I do get a burning desire to look at a penis, I'll just look at my own. And I can look at real live women's mouths all I want to in the grocery store or the library or any other public place. If I wanna look at porn I wanna see women doing things with the parts of their anatomies that I don't usually get to see, not their mouths. Maybe it's just the guys who never get blowjobs that like to look at pictures of other guys getting them. |
|
07 Dec 03 - 08:14 PM (#1067540) Subject: RE: BS: You Thought Cell Phones Were Bad... From: Cluin Same reason for looking at porn, period, innit? |
|
07 Dec 03 - 09:05 PM (#1067562) Subject: RE: BS: You Thought Cell Phones Were Bad... From: Two_bears Now if they can stop idiots from letting little dogs ride on their laps to hang their heads out of the driver's window at 65 mph they'll give the rest of us some peace of mind. I'm always afraid one of those dogs is going to come flying out on the highway. ----- Aloha nui loa Stilly: This is ONE thing I am happy to agree with you about. ;-) Cell phones used to have decent sound quality; but now they sound like garbage. |
|
07 Dec 03 - 09:08 PM (#1067565) Subject: RE: BS: You Thought Cell Phones Were Bad... From: Two_bears So, men, would you or would you not accept a blow job while driving? ---- Absolutely not. It is not worth the risk of dying. Two Bears |
|
08 Dec 03 - 12:11 AM (#1067642) Subject: RE: BS: You Thought Cell Phones Were Bad... From: Little Hawk It's a boneheadedly stupid idea all right, but that doesn't mean people won't do it. Some guy lost control of his car on Yonge Street in downtown Toronto for that very reason, and ended up veering onto the sidewalk, scattering pedestrians in all directions, and crashing through the front of a store. Fortunately, no one was killed. The police were not amused, and he lost his license and got charged with a number of violations of the law. I'm not sure what they did about his girlfriend. Cell phones? I don't like 'em, but they are useful in some respects. I have resisted getting one so far. Nice to see you on board, Two Bears. - LH |
|
08 Dec 03 - 07:28 AM (#1067717) Subject: RE: BS: You Thought Cell Phones Were Bad... From: Dave Bryant I must admit that I have driven with a girlfriend giving me a BJ. It was before the seat belt laws were introduced in the UK. What's more, there were six other passengers in the vehicle (a long wheelbase Landrover) but only the pair of us in the front. She laid down across the front seat pretending to be tired and "fell asleep" with her head in my lap. By the time I realised what she was up to, it was too late to say anything and when I made one remark, a gentle bite was enough to warn me of the possible result of objecting. I'm glad though, that it was a straight empty road and that I didn't need to make an emergency stop. Incidently, the lady concerned is a member of Mudcat and does look in and post now and again . . . . . |
|
08 Dec 03 - 08:57 AM (#1067744) Subject: RE: BS: You Thought Cell Phones Were Bad... From: Rapparee In my younger days, I...no, I don't think I'll discuss those things. Considering that you can get Internet access for you car now, as well as TV, video players, and cell phones, the distractions to the driver can get pretty multitasking ("busy"). So here's this guy driving along, oh, the Beltway around Washington DC. It's early rush hour, but traffic is still moving well in excess of the speed limit. As he approaches the point where the traffic from I-95 from Baltimore joins the Beltway, his Internet connection displays an email that his wife has left him. He takes a quick call from his broker, who tells him that his stock portfolio has lost half its value and he needs to come up with a couple hundred thou before the market opens tomorrow, the "Blues Clues" video tape has run out and the kids in the back are screaming, his radio choices are Rush Limbaugh and rap, and his girlfriend is saying that now that his wife has left they can get married. Ah.... |
|
08 Dec 03 - 11:35 AM (#1067821) Subject: RE: BS: You Thought Cell Phones Were Bad... From: Wesley S If we're talking about giving head in a car why are we all assuming that the men are doing all of the receiving ? Whats good for the goose is good for the gander as well. Not as easy perhaps - but still worthwhile. |
|
08 Dec 03 - 11:49 AM (#1067829) Subject: RE: BS: You Thought Cell Phones Were Bad... From: Little Hawk Well, for sure, Wesley. Look, here's an idea: Get a chauffeur to drive the vehicle, and have one of those cars with tinted windows and a private area at the rear with a divider sealing off the front. Chauffeur drives, while you and your ladyfriend engage in whatever pleasurable acts come to mind. This seems to me like an elegant and practical way to approach the whole situation, with a minimum of risk or possible embarrassment to other drivers. That's the way I'd do it, given the choice. :-) Then too, you could go the Willie Nelson route and ride in a big tour bus, complete with jacuzzi and minigolf driving range for those who like to have sex in the great outdoors, or a reasonable facsimile thereof! My bet is that if Penelope Rutledge decided to have sex in a moving vehicle, that she wouldn't consider it unless it was either piloted or chauffered by a highly trained and discreet professional in a spiffy uniform. - LH |
|
08 Dec 03 - 12:02 PM (#1067840) Subject: RE: BS: You Thought Cell Phones Were Bad... From: Dave Bryant Wesley - it would be a bit difficult/dangerous to "give head" while you're actually driving though. Imagine the scene if Ms Rutleges' chauffeur-driven car were to break down. The chauffeur gets out the tool kit and lifts the bonnet - or hood to you transatlantic types. He then crawls undeneath the car. Ms Rutledge gets out of the car to see if she can be of some assistance. She can only recognise one of the items in the tool box, so she calls undetneath "Do you want a screwdriver ?" and gets the reply "If you're in the mood m'lady, but let me get this car sorted out first". |
|
08 Dec 03 - 12:08 PM (#1067846) Subject: RE: BS: You Thought Cell Phones Were Bad... From: Little Hawk Ha! Ha! Ha! Ha! Ha! Awright! That makes my day! - LH |