|
14 Mar 04 - 08:24 PM (#1136484) Subject: BS: Why is noone ever in 'Weighty Issues' From: Skipjack K8 Is it an obesity forum? Noone's ever there to ask. Well? |
|
14 Mar 04 - 08:42 PM (#1136489) Subject: RE: BS: Why is noone ever in 'Weighty Issues' From: Allan C. If memory serves, it was set up to be a weekly gathering place. SINSULL was the main originator. I believe Thursdays evening, Mudcat time, was set for the gathering. Maybe someone else will come along to confirm this. |
|
14 Mar 04 - 08:49 PM (#1136495) Subject: RE: BS: Why is noone ever in 'Weighty Issues' From: McGrath of Harlow ????? |
|
14 Mar 04 - 09:18 PM (#1136516) Subject: RE: BS: Why is noone ever in 'Weighty Issues' From: Allan C. McGrath, Weighty Issues is the name of an alternate room in the Mudchat. It is intended to be a resource for support and advice for those of us who could stand to lose a stone or two. |
|
14 Mar 04 - 09:23 PM (#1136518) Subject: RE: BS: Why is noone ever in 'Weighty Issues' From: Peace Ouch! |
|
15 Mar 04 - 04:16 AM (#1136725) Subject: RE: BS: Why is noone ever in 'Weighty Issues' From: Bee-dubya-ell I just don't think the quick, brief, on-the-fly discourse style of the chat room is a very good mode for talking about weighty issues. If I want to say something about an important issue, I'll usually want to use a few more words than that little box in the chat room provides. I'll also want to edit it, proofread it, and send it through a spellchecker so I don't look like an idjit. Bruce |
|
15 Mar 04 - 06:33 AM (#1136796) Subject: RE: BS: Why is noone ever in 'Weighty Issues' From: John MacKenzie Too heavy man! John |
|
15 Mar 04 - 08:18 AM (#1136877) Subject: RE: BS: Why is noone ever in 'Weighty Issues' From: Dead Horse ...............crate of gin! |
|
15 Mar 04 - 10:31 AM (#1136997) Subject: RE: BS: Why is noone ever in 'Weighty Issues' From: SINSULL The room is usually used when two weight watchers meet up in the general chat and want to share successes. I have lost and gained the same 8 lbs. three times since the room opened. But one Atkins dieter has lost almost 30lbs. Not bad! |
|
15 Mar 04 - 10:33 AM (#1136998) Subject: RE: BS: Why is noone ever in 'Weighty Issues' From: McGrath of Harlow The basic trick, surely, is not to have anything edible or drinkable anywhere near your computer, and get so interested in what you're doing on the Internet that you lose all trace of time and miss the odd meal. |
|
15 Mar 04 - 11:20 AM (#1137038) Subject: RE: BS: Why is noone ever in 'Weighty Issues' From: Skipjack K8 Oh. |
|
15 Mar 04 - 11:50 AM (#1137071) Subject: RE: BS: Why is noone ever in 'Weighty Issues' From: Fibula Mattock DO NOT be seduced by Skipjack's alledged interest - he has one aim, and one aim only, and that is to increase his lard sales, the greasemongering so-and-so! Resist his evil temptations. Declare oil sanctions!* (*although extra virgin cold-pressed olive oil is good, right?) |
|
15 Mar 04 - 01:40 PM (#1137204) Subject: RE: BS: Why is noone ever in 'Weighty Issues' From: MAG We're all at the Y working out. 8>) |
|
15 Mar 04 - 02:20 PM (#1137249) Subject: RE: BS: Why is noone ever in 'Weighty Issues' From: open mike Funny, i have asked many times while in the chat why no one was ever in the weighty issues room I figured it was some place to go if you were talking about something so heavy that the regular chat room did not want to deal with it. I am on Paltalk on thursday nights so i guess that explains why i never saw it in use. |
|
15 Mar 04 - 05:19 PM (#1137395) Subject: RE: BS: Why is noone ever in 'Weighty Issues' From: Liz the Squeak I'm never around at that particular Mudcat time.... But I did lose 2 stones last year - 28lbs! LTS |
|
15 Mar 04 - 05:33 PM (#1137415) Subject: RE: BS: Why is noone ever in 'Weighty Issues' From: Joybell I haven't figured out the time properly. I keep meaning to drop in. Friday morning I guess it is for me. I really like the idea. Joy |
|
15 Mar 04 - 05:43 PM (#1137426) Subject: RE: BS: Why is noone ever in 'Weighty Issues' From: Clinton Hammond They're there... it's just that they're so big, you can only see 'em from far away! (I'm just kidding obviously!) |
|
15 Mar 04 - 06:27 PM (#1137459) Subject: RE: BS: Why is noone ever in 'Weighty Issues' From: SINSULL Come over here Clinton so I can smack you. |
|
15 Mar 04 - 06:28 PM (#1137462) Subject: RE: BS: Why is noone ever in 'Weighty Issues' From: Clinton Hammond Smack this, Sin... :-) |
|
15 Mar 04 - 06:29 PM (#1137464) Subject: RE: BS: Why is noone ever in 'Weighty Issues' From: Liz the Squeak Join the queue Sins!!! LTS |
|
15 Mar 04 - 08:03 PM (#1137543) Subject: RE: BS: Why is noone ever in 'Weighty Issues' From: Tinker Queue?? Now if we simply join forces and let the boy understand our postion.... I'm sure he'll grasp the gravity of the situation, when he's done gasping... tinker |
|
15 Mar 04 - 08:18 PM (#1137549) Subject: RE: BS: Why is noone ever in 'Weighty Issues' From: Clinton Hammond Ya... you folks know all about gravity eh? Hehehehehehe |
|
15 Mar 04 - 08:28 PM (#1137551) Subject: RE: BS: Why is noone ever in 'Weighty Issues' From: freda underhill several of us were in there a couple ofd hours ago, and after the inital smart remaks it was pretty helpful, so i will check it out again |
|
16 Mar 04 - 05:43 AM (#1137830) Subject: RE: BS: Why is noone ever in 'Weighty Issues' From: Noreen So will you Clinton when we're sitting on you.... |
|
16 Mar 04 - 12:54 PM (#1138292) Subject: RE: BS: Why is noone ever in 'Weighty Issues' From: Clinton Hammond I'll bet ya I can out run ya Nor... Heh Cause I can run faster scared than you can angry! :-) |