|
07 Jun 04 - 11:24 AM (#1202013) Subject: BS: Man on the Moon From: Pied Piper Sorry to re-hash this but I'd like to do a survey of peoples opinions. Did People set foot on the moon? Yes or no will be fine Thanks PP |
|
07 Jun 04 - 11:26 AM (#1202015) Subject: RE: BS: Man on the Moon From: GUEST,MMario no - they were inside spacesuits. However they set boots on the moon. |
|
07 Jun 04 - 11:30 AM (#1202017) Subject: RE: BS: Man on the Moon From: Pied Piper Ya know, I though about re-wording that bit to avoid rattling the cages of the pedantic bastards here, but the speed of your pedantry has surprised even me. |
|
07 Jun 04 - 11:32 AM (#1202019) Subject: RE: BS: Man on the Moon From: el ted yes. |
|
07 Jun 04 - 11:34 AM (#1202020) Subject: RE: BS: Man on the Moon From: GUEST,MMario cya - on my behalf - not trying to be pedantic about your question. |
|
07 Jun 04 - 11:39 AM (#1202024) Subject: RE: BS: Man on the Moon From: Tam the Bam (Nutter) No they did not land on the moon, because in the photies there are no stars, the flag was waving in the wind, the shadows didn't look right the dust under the caspstile wasn't really disturbed unilike dust should of been and how could they get to the moon and back again with computer with the knowledge that powers your mobile Phone and last bnut not lest if they did get to the moon then how did they survive the Van Allen Belts that surround the earth. However if you think that they went to the moon then that's up to you. Myself and my father who doesn't beleive in anything doesn't think that they went to the moon. However one day we will find out. One way or another. |
|
07 Jun 04 - 11:49 AM (#1202031) Subject: RE: BS: Man on the Moon From: el ted So you reckon it was all staged in North Dakota by Canadians then? |
|
07 Jun 04 - 11:56 AM (#1202037) Subject: RE: BS: Man on the Moon From: Amos Wotta load of unmitigated horsepucky. A |
|
07 Jun 04 - 11:57 AM (#1202041) Subject: RE: BS: Man on the Moon From: GUEST,MMario you believe it was all a hoax then, Amos? |
|
07 Jun 04 - 12:37 PM (#1202077) Subject: RE: BS: Man on the Moon From: Amos Absolutely not. I think the question is horsepucky -- jejeune, suggistible, superstitious and paranoid silliness. A |
|
07 Jun 04 - 12:47 PM (#1202087) Subject: RE: BS: Man on the Moon From: Blackcatter Penguins in Spaaaaaaaaaaace! |
|
07 Jun 04 - 01:02 PM (#1202101) Subject: RE: BS: Man on the Moon From: Wolfgang yes Wolfgang |
|
07 Jun 04 - 01:10 PM (#1202110) Subject: RE: BS: Man on the Moon From: GUEST,Buzz Aldrin No one has been to the moon. And there's no such place as Hull -- it's made up and the postings you see here are all from Little Hawk supported by confirmation back-up replies from Amos. They don't even live in the same hemisphere you know. |
|
07 Jun 04 - 03:57 PM (#1202215) Subject: RE: BS: Man on the Moon From: GUEST,Jack Swigart Ya mean Amos and LH aren't the same poster? |
|
07 Jun 04 - 04:27 PM (#1202228) Subject: RE: BS: Man on the Moon From: s6k no. |
|
07 Jun 04 - 04:30 PM (#1202233) Subject: RE: BS: Man on the Moon From: TS I once heard that the Man on the Moon is a Newfie!!..according to Stompin' Tom atleast...and he'd never lie!! |
|
07 Jun 04 - 04:39 PM (#1202238) Subject: RE: BS: Man on the Moon From: GUEST,Neil Armstrong There is no way that I am going all the way to the moon in a tin can. Come on guys, get serious. Would you? |
|
07 Jun 04 - 04:59 PM (#1202245) Subject: RE: BS: Man on the Moon From: Grab PP, why the hell are you asking? Do we need a billygoat to deal with a TROLL...? Graham. |
|
07 Jun 04 - 05:05 PM (#1202248) Subject: RE: BS: Man on the Moon From: Peace There IS no man on the moon. |
|
07 Jun 04 - 05:12 PM (#1202253) Subject: RE: BS: Man on the Moon From: GUEST Come on, Amos, don't hold back -- tell us how you really feel about this thread! |
|
07 Jun 04 - 05:46 PM (#1202292) Subject: RE: BS: Man on the Moon From: Georgiansilver If man actually landed on the moon....why have they never landed another there and why is the moon not being used some 40+ years later. Be Blessed. |
|
07 Jun 04 - 05:56 PM (#1202303) Subject: RE: BS: Man on the Moon From: Blackcatter Well their not using the Sahara desert either. |
|
07 Jun 04 - 06:01 PM (#1202306) Subject: RE: BS: Man on the Moon From: GUEST,Rachael D. How can this thread have survived this far without a posting from Little Hawk? He must have been abducted (again). |
|
07 Jun 04 - 06:05 PM (#1202308) Subject: RE: BS: Man on the Moon From: Amos Little Hawk has suspended his Mudcat activities temporarily. A |
|
07 Jun 04 - 10:13 PM (#1202405) Subject: RE: BS: Man on the Moon From: Ebbie Yes |
|
08 Jun 04 - 01:45 AM (#1202472) Subject: RE: BS: Man on the Moon From: Ebbie www.snopes.com: "The fanciful notion that the six Apollo lunar missions launched by the USA between 1969 and 1972, during which a total of twelve men landed and walked on the moon, were elaborate hoaxes staged in top secret desert locations and movie studios here on Earth has been a familiar aspect of popular culture and conspiracy theory since the first moon landing in 1969. "Perhaps because Americans' confidence in their government was at a low ebb due to America's controversial military involvement in Vietnam, perhaps because people felt threatened by the rapid onrush of technological progress the space program represented, or perhaps just because some people enjoy the furtive thrill of disseminating the "secret knowledge" encapsulated in conspiracy theories, the moon landings have become a locus for a cynical distrust of government and disbelief in America's tremendous achievements in space exploration." What I don't understand is how anyone can seriously question it. For pete's sake, does anyone think that all of the hundreds of people involved in the space program are in on it and are all keeping the great secret? Not to mention the reporters, both domestic and foreign, who would LOVE to break a story like that. Let it die, already. |
|
08 Jun 04 - 03:47 AM (#1202505) Subject: RE: BS: Man on the Moon From: beardedbruce wasn't the snopes site used as a source for a lot of anti-Iraq war info in another thread? seems like their info might be at least questioned... And yes, we went there. See the pictures taken by Apollo 16 at landing, and compare to the ones taken by the Clementine spacecraft 25 years later or so. I was on Clementine, as Data Manager- I saw the pictures as they came down, and there were no alterations made. Only way they could match was for the astronauts to have been there. Sorry if the facts upset anyone. |
|
08 Jun 04 - 03:51 AM (#1202508) Subject: RE: BS: Man on the Moon From: Sttaw Legend It must be true because I saw it on the television |
|
08 Jun 04 - 05:25 AM (#1202561) Subject: RE: BS: Man on the Moon From: Lanfranc Yes, but... Wasn't he clouting on St Peter's shoon? Thou hast well drunken man, who's the fool now? Alan |
|
08 Jun 04 - 03:40 PM (#1202893) Subject: RE: BS: Man on the Moon From: Pied Piper LH and Amos are not the same person, but I suspect they appear in each others dreams as spirit guides. |
|
08 Jun 04 - 04:07 PM (#1202921) Subject: RE: BS: Man on the Moon From: Bill D yes, they went there. (That "flag waving in the wind" was on WIRES, so it could been seen!) (BTW,,,the earth really IS semi-spherical, not flat) |
|
08 Jun 04 - 06:46 PM (#1203037) Subject: RE: BS: Man on the Moon From: Peace Ah ha! At last I have caught you Bill D. The world is ROUND, like a saucer. (Watch, he's gonna come back with centrifugal force and stuff like that.) I have WAITED for this day. |
|
08 Jun 04 - 07:42 PM (#1203079) Subject: RE: BS: Man on the Moon From: HuwG Link to REM's take on the subject: Man on the Moon |
|
08 Jun 04 - 08:49 PM (#1203115) Subject: RE: BS: Man on the Moon From: beardedbruce The world is an oblate sphereoid. There is a very useful 50 x50 term gravity model, called GEM-10. |
|
08 Jun 04 - 09:34 PM (#1203163) Subject: RE: BS: Man on the Moon From: Mark Clark Of course men walked on the moon. There can be no doubt. Here is an unretouched photograph of the landing taken from a giant telescope on earth. The “Eagle” has clearly landed. If that photo doesn't convince you, consider that one of the missions left a reflector there, aimed back at earth, so terrestrial scientists could bounce laser beams off of it and use it for precicely measuring distances. I'm guessing that anyone with a suitable laser and an amateur telescope can prove that the reflector is actually there. - Mark |
|
08 Jun 04 - 10:08 PM (#1203191) Subject: RE: BS: Man on the Moon From: Peace My God. I'm living on an oblate sphereoid? I though that was a well-rounded member of a religious order. |
|
09 Jun 04 - 12:56 PM (#1203693) Subject: RE: BS: Man on the Moon From: Tam the Bam (Nutter) As I said I don't think that they did and yet some people think that they did go there. Well lets believe what we want to believe OK. |
|
09 Jun 04 - 12:59 PM (#1203698) Subject: RE: BS: Man on the Moon From: Amos No, Tam. Let us examine facts and base our conclusions on them. This is not one of those "my superstitions are just as good as yours" areas. It is an assertion about facts. A human being did walk, suited andbooted, on the surface of the Moon of Earth. Get over it. A |
|
09 Jun 04 - 02:37 PM (#1203754) Subject: RE: BS: Man on the Moon From: Wolfgang Not for Tam, Amos. Remember his recent contribution to the UFOs thread? I think that they do because unlike some other people I have an open mind, and until someone prooves that they don't exist then I'll believe that they do. (Tam the Bam (Nutter)) A classic example for argumentum ad ignorantiam. I believe what I want, prove me wrong but don't expect I'll listen to your arguments. Wolfgang |
|
09 Jun 04 - 08:06 PM (#1204000) Subject: RE: BS: Man on the Moon From: McGrath of Harlow Is there really such a place as America? |
|
09 Jun 04 - 08:12 PM (#1204004) Subject: RE: BS: Man on the Moon From: Blackcatter Yep. But true Americans only live in the middle part (and Alaska also). |
|
09 Jun 04 - 08:48 PM (#1204028) Subject: RE: BS: Man on the Moon From: Bill D hmmm......."...ROUND, like a saucer", huh, brucie. *grin*...would that be a FLAT round saucer, or a gently upwardly curving saucer with a place for a cup? (and yep...centrifigual force is mostly what made this speheroid 'oblate', like bb said)...I 'spose enuf centrifigual force would have MADE it very like a saucer, huh?) |