|
12 Sep 04 - 10:15 AM (#1269946) Subject: BS: Come you nigh? Kay shuns! From: beardedbruce after reading the following from BillD, I had to start this. No idea where it will go.... ""I know you believe you understand what you think I said, but I'm not sure you realize that what I said is not what I meant." "All esoteric conceptualites reflect considerations of consciousness not included in perceptual gradients, so we must eventually reduce the permutation of the variables to their most uniform state, else we narrow unnecessarily the options of the more profligate contributors to the enterprise.....at least, that's how I see it. " |
|
12 Sep 04 - 04:19 PM (#1270275) Subject: RE: BS: Come you nigh? Kay shuns! From: McGrath of Harlow That middle paragraph was elegantly and clearly expressed, and summed up a situation which often occurs, and can cause serious problems, including wars. The third paragraph was a successful, and I assume intentional, example of word abuse. |
|
12 Sep 04 - 05:35 PM (#1270382) Subject: RE: BS: Come you nigh? Kay shuns! From: GUEST "so we must eventually reduce the permutation of the variables to their most uniform state". I think BillD wants to take the clothes away from the military so they have to march around nekked. I for one do not agree. |
|
12 Sep 04 - 05:36 PM (#1270384) Subject: RE: BS: Come you nigh? Kay shuns! From: GUEST,brucie The above GUEST was me. |
|
13 Sep 04 - 02:27 AM (#1270789) Subject: RE: BS: Come you nigh? Kay shuns! From: GUEST,Boab Some miscreant carried away with the exuberance of his own verbosity? |