|
16 Oct 04 - 01:12 PM (#1298481) Subject: BS: Swift Boat for Truth Sunk! From: Charley Noble Here's a summary: "ABC News Nightline went to Vietnam and interviewed villagers who witnessed the firefight in February 1969 that led to John Kerry being awarded a Silver Star. The incident is a center piece of the allegations made by the so-called 'Swift Boat Veterans for Truth', whose leader John O'Neill has claimed that there was no firefight and that Kerry shot dead a fleeing teenager. Nightline's detailed interviews with the villagers, including former Viet Cong fighters who took part in the incident, verified Kerry's account of events. When confronted by Nightline's Ted Koppel, a clearly rattled O'Neill refused to address the content of the report." Cheerily, Charley Noble |
|
16 Oct 04 - 01:22 PM (#1298486) Subject: RE: BS: Swift Boat for Truth Sunk! From: John MacKenzie Truth is the first casualty of politics! Giok |
|
16 Oct 04 - 01:52 PM (#1298513) Subject: RE: BS: Swift Boat for Truth Sunk! From: McGrath of Harlow I suppose they'd say that this just showed how these Commies wanted Kerry to win... |
|
16 Oct 04 - 02:20 PM (#1298536) Subject: RE: BS: Swift Boat for Truth Sunk! From: Jack the Sailor Kerry had it all planned out with the Viet Cong so that he could eventually win the Presidency and send them free ketsup. |
|
16 Oct 04 - 03:15 PM (#1298571) Subject: RE: BS: Swift Boat for Truth Sunk! From: Don Firth John O'Neill has hated Kerry's guts since Kerry mopped the floor with him in their debate about the Vietnam war on The Dick Cavett Show back in 1971. Don Firth |
|
16 Oct 04 - 03:18 PM (#1298572) Subject: RE: BS: Swift Boat for Truth Sunk! From: Amos A blow for sooth!! A |
|
16 Oct 04 - 03:29 PM (#1298578) Subject: RE: BS: Swift Boat for Truth Sunk! From: GUEST The point you all seem to be missing is, no one gives a shit about this story. It's more productive to talk about the O'Reilly Factor and Fox News' phone sex harrassment case. Even better than Monica on tape, we'll soon be hearing Mr. Morality himself talking dirty to his girls on the show. Maybe Ann Coulter will come to O'Ratley's defense with taped phone sex conversations with her! |
|
16 Oct 04 - 03:30 PM (#1298582) Subject: RE: BS: Swift Boat for Truth Sunk! From: Jack the Sailor O'Neil, Chuck Colson's protege, has made a great living for the past 35 years from the contacts he made trashing Kerry. Kerry must be a great man, to have such an enemy. Its like Holmes and Moriarity or Batman and The Joker. |
|
16 Oct 04 - 03:34 PM (#1298590) Subject: RE: BS: Swift Boat for Truth Sunk! From: Jack the Sailor Here ya go GUEST, something you can do!! Subject: Unfair and Unbalanced Dear friend, Common Cause, MoveOn.org, and a bunch of other organizations have launched a campaign to take on Fox for pretending partisan news is "fair and balanced." They've posted a really horrifying but funny video clip highlighting Bill O'Reilly's hypocrisy as well as a complaint to the FTC at: http://www.moveon.org/fox/ Check it out. The challenges to Fox's partisanship are mounting. It's crucial that we voice our disgust with Fox's deceptive advertising now. Thanks. jts |
|
16 Oct 04 - 03:37 PM (#1298595) Subject: RE: BS: Swift Boat for Truth Sunk! From: John MacKenzie If a broadcasting organisation, or a newspaper is privately owned, then it has an agenda secret or otherwise. Giok |
|
16 Oct 04 - 03:54 PM (#1298600) Subject: RE: BS: Swift Boat for Truth Sunk! From: artbrooks Giok, are you then implying that publicly-owned media organizations, such as, for example, the Voice of America, have no agendas? |
|
16 Oct 04 - 03:58 PM (#1298602) Subject: RE: BS: Swift Boat for Truth Sunk! From: John MacKenzie VOA is of course a government funded propaganda machine. Giok |
|
16 Oct 04 - 04:07 PM (#1298613) Subject: RE: BS: Swift Boat for Truth Sunk! From: artbrooks ABC Article |
|
16 Oct 04 - 05:43 PM (#1298653) Subject: RE: BS: Swift Boat for Truth Sunk! From: McGrath of Harlow Is that the same unnamed GUEST who keeps posting about how every American should vote for Nader? It gets confusing at time. |
|
16 Oct 04 - 09:03 PM (#1298730) Subject: RE: BS: Swift Boat for Truth Sunk! From: Peace Thank you, Charley, for posting this. It is great. |
|
16 Oct 04 - 09:17 PM (#1298739) Subject: RE: BS: Swift Boat for Truth Sunk! From: Charley Noble And thanks to Artbrooks for tracking down the details in the ABC Nightline report and creating the link. Charley Noble |
|
16 Oct 04 - 10:20 PM (#1298764) Subject: RE: BS: Swift Boat for Truth Sunk! From: Peace I LOVE THIS THREAD. |
|
16 Oct 04 - 10:47 PM (#1298776) Subject: RE: BS: Swift Boat for Truth Sunk! From: Stilly River Sage Kerry and O'Neill, "Holmes and Moriarity or Batman and The Joker," Clinton and Sciaffe. |
|
17 Oct 04 - 01:23 AM (#1298832) Subject: RE: BS: Swift Boat for Truth Sunk! From: Jack the Sailor Scaife is a good super villian but O'Neil has been Kerry's nemisis since 1971. And if you've seen his picture lately, he is plenty scary looking. Like a Dick Tracy Villian, you know like Mumbles and Flat Head and those guys. How about "Colostomy Bag Face"? |
|
17 Oct 04 - 03:40 AM (#1298866) Subject: RE: BS: Swift Boat for Truth Sunk! From: Ellenpoly O'Neil, O'Reilly... Is this an O'Pattern we should be looking into?? ;-D |
|
17 Oct 04 - 09:38 AM (#1298946) Subject: RE: BS: Swift Boat for Truth Sunk! From: van lingle Maybe they'll look into it on "The O'Franken Factor". |
|
17 Oct 04 - 10:08 AM (#1298964) Subject: RE: BS: Swift Boat for Truth Sunk! From: Charley Noble Now remember, gang, the characterization "he is plenty scary looking" doesn't necessarily sort out who's a real villain. I prefer, "what he's doing is pretty scary." I suspect the chief motivation of our agent provocateur "guests" is to discourage progressive minded folks from voting at all. It's a pretty simple strategy. You know I'll feel a whole lot better protesting Kerry's actions in the White House for the next 4 years than having to deal with the consequences of Bush getting re-elected. Charley Noble, preparing to head out for another round of door-to-door leafleting |
|
17 Oct 04 - 10:23 AM (#1298979) Subject: RE: BS: Swift Boat for Truth Sunk! From: Rapparee GUEST is a narc, an undercover agent for the Bush/Cheney/Ashcroft gang, who is attempting in a clumsy way to throw the election to Bush by undermining rationality. |
|
17 Oct 04 - 12:06 PM (#1299048) Subject: RE: BS: Swift Boat for Truth Sunk! From: Stilly River Sage I didn't listen to the Sunday morning news shows (my favorite organic gardening program is on the radio at this time). Anything good turn up on this topic? SRS |
|
17 Oct 04 - 02:32 PM (#1299144) Subject: RE: BS: Swift Boat for Truth Sunk! From: Amos Give 'em hayull, Chahlee!! Oi'm wit you. A |
|
17 Oct 04 - 05:25 PM (#1299225) Subject: RE: BS: Swift Boat for Truth Sunk! From: GUEST,Frank It ain't over yet. Sinclair, the station group is forcing their lying propaganda down the public's throat while the manager, David Smith is soliciting prostitutes in his Mercedes. Karl Rove, John O'Neil, T. Boone Pickens and the other Reactionary character assassins have bankrolled this piece of crap to trash Kerry before the election. "Stolen Honor" is a piece of Wrong-Wing garbage. Frank |
|
17 Oct 04 - 08:32 PM (#1299331) Subject: RE: BS: Swift Boat for Truth Sunk! From: Peace Refresh |
|
18 Oct 04 - 12:54 AM (#1299444) Subject: RE: BS: Swift Boat for Truth Sunk! From: Genie Yes, Frank, Sinclair -- the company that would not allow any of their stations to air the ABC Nighline episode where Koppel showed the names of the US soldiers killed in Iraq because it was "too political" and inappropriate so close to the election -- is frocing all its stations to cancel prime time programming to air the 90-minute "news" broadcast "Stolen Honor." Michael (?) Powell, head of the FCC, has said he sees no violation of FCC regulations in this. Sinclair claims that they will allow someone to represent the Kerry campaign the same night after they air "Stolen Honor." (Somehow I doubt that they'll also show "Going Up River.") They "invited" Kerry to come on the show, but you can imagine what that would be like (aside from the fact that it would take him away from campaigning at a critical time and force him to focus on stuff that happened 33 years ago). It remains to be seen who and what they will allow to be presented as "the other side," but for some inexplicable reason I don't have much confidence in their "fairness." |
|
18 Oct 04 - 06:07 AM (#1299561) Subject: RE: BS: Swift Boat for Truth Sunk! From: freda underhill this is GREAT! |
|
18 Oct 04 - 09:03 AM (#1299664) Subject: RE: BS: Swift Boat for Truth Sunk! From: Charley Noble "the other side"? Why Ralph Nadar of course. I really hate to see our local CBS affiliate trashed by its owner Sinclair Broadcasting but that's what's going down in Maine. The latest flip-flop was a major supermarket chain, Hannaford, which pulled its ads and then a day later reinstated them so they wouldn't be accused of playing politics; it's also rumored that they've pulled the red peppers from their display shelves and if the greens were not in majority they'd be pulling them as well. "Going up River" would make an appropriate response but I'm afraid the damage would already be done to the 10 or so undecided voters in this state. There's no way they would watch TWO such programs back to back. Hell, I doubt if I would unless I were more amply supplied with bourbon. Back to leafleting the rural end of town, and planting more lawn signs. I've observed that one of the more popular lawn signs has been "BUSH MUST GO!" Charley Noble |