|
04 Nov 04 - 04:41 AM (#1316159) Subject: BS: One for sir john of hul From: muppett I cdnuol't blveiee taht I cluod aulaclty uesdnatnrd waht I was rdanieg. The pheonmneal pweor of the human mnid aoccdrnig to rscheearch at Cmabrigde uinervtisy. It deosn't mttaer in waht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are, the olny iprmoatnt tihng is taht the first and lsat ltteer be in the rghit pclae. The rset can be a taotl mses and you can sitll raed it wouthit a porbelm. Tihs is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe. Amasanig huh? And I awlyas thought slpeling was ipmorantt! |
|
04 Nov 04 - 06:43 AM (#1316215) Subject: RE: BS: One for sir john of hul From: Dave Hanson Rsbibuh. eirc |
|
04 Nov 04 - 08:35 AM (#1316296) Subject: RE: BS: One for sir john of hul From: The Fooles Troupe This has been posted here before many times. Many, many times. Many, many, many times. Many, many, many, many times. Many, many, many, many, many times. Many, many, many, many, many, many times. Many, many, many, many, many, many, many times. A bloody lot of times, actually.... |
|
04 Nov 04 - 08:59 AM (#1316323) Subject: RE: BS: One for sir john of hul From: Dead Horse I'm sure you've been told a thousand times not to exagerate, Fooles. |
|
04 Nov 04 - 09:05 AM (#1316328) Subject: RE: BS: One for sir john of hul From: muppett And your point is ................ Foolestroupe? |
|
04 Nov 04 - 09:07 AM (#1316331) Subject: RE: BS: One for sir john of hul From: Paco Rabanne You should have typed - And Yuor Pnoit is .......... Fsifhbsadcnjsde |
|
04 Nov 04 - 09:25 AM (#1316361) Subject: RE: BS: One for sir john of hul From: Rt Revd Sir jOhn from Hull splleng not imoprant, tihs is music shight, not spllening sghit. |
|
04 Nov 04 - 09:26 AM (#1316362) Subject: RE: BS: One for sir john of hul From: muppett WLEL SIAD JHON |
|
04 Nov 04 - 09:28 AM (#1316364) Subject: RE: BS: One for sir john of hul From: Mr Red We can all serge on from Hull................. I did it in 1998. |
|
04 Nov 04 - 10:39 AM (#1316453) Subject: RE: BS: One for sir john of hul From: Hand-Pulled Boy Just give us time. |
|
09 Nov 04 - 12:39 PM (#1321582) Subject: RE: BS: One for sir john of hul From: s6k this is music shite, not spelling shite |
|
09 Nov 04 - 12:47 PM (#1321600) Subject: RE: BS: One for sir john of hul From: Nerd Wolfgang and I have both debunked this elsewhere. The original post was made deliberately easy to read by only switching a few letters around. In one thread on this, I took a random passage from a book on my desk and it took another 'catter twenty minutes from getting halfway there to finishing the decipherment! |
|
09 Nov 04 - 07:48 PM (#1322044) Subject: RE: BS: One for sir john of hul From: Hand-Pulled Boy Correct spelling is important otherwise we'll all end up like americans. What would the Queen say? |
|
09 Nov 04 - 08:03 PM (#1322057) Subject: RE: BS: One for sir john of hul From: GUEST,heric Nerd is right about denchmeieprt. |
|
09 Nov 04 - 10:09 PM (#1322174) Subject: RE: BS: One for sir john of hul From: Peace . . . and furthermore, it is with regret that I inform you I am on the wrong thread. But while I'm here, hlelo, Ojhn. |