|
09 Nov 04 - 10:30 AM (#1321436) Subject: BS: Arafat dead--unconfirmed at this moment. From: Peace Just like the title says. Heard it from someone at work. |
|
09 Nov 04 - 11:02 AM (#1321464) Subject: RE: BS: Arafat dead--unconfirmed at this moment. From: The Beast of Farlington Not dead yet, but only hours to live, according to bbc.co.uk/news |
|
09 Nov 04 - 11:13 AM (#1321476) Subject: RE: BS: Arafat dead--unconfirmed at this moment. From: Once Famous I sure hope so. And France harbors terrorists like him. Bring on someone from Palestine who has some common sense, please. |
|
09 Nov 04 - 11:17 AM (#1321487) Subject: RE: BS: Arafat dead--unconfirmed at this moment. From: mg I hope it is true. I read, and I think it was in an Israeli newspaper, that the French government had given them until Tuesday afternoon to declare him dead, and then a couple of days to get him totally gone. This charade, if that is what it is, is making them look medically foolish. But it has been done, I think, with good intentions...to let things not get out of hand. Even if there are eruptions etc...I think it is so much for the best. A natural death in a foreign country....May he rest in peace and may less corrupt and less fanatical men and women follow in his place. mg |
|
09 Nov 04 - 11:25 AM (#1321500) Subject: RE: BS: Arafat dead--unconfirmed at this moment. From: Mrrzy Yeah, they've probably got him on life support so it's actually a philosophical question whether he's dead or not. And how are they going to honor the 24-hour deadline to get him buried when they will also want an autopsy to show that he wasn't murdered by the French? Does Sharon's permission to return include after death? |
|
09 Nov 04 - 11:32 AM (#1321506) Subject: RE: BS: Arafat dead--unconfirmed at this moment. From: Bill D It sure doesn't include permission to bury hin in Jeruselem where he wanted,,,can you imagine the scene as they try to have a service and/or put up a monument? |
|
09 Nov 04 - 11:34 AM (#1321510) Subject: RE: BS: Arafat dead--unconfirmed at this moment. From: GUEST,Chief Chaos Actually they'll want the autopsy to prove that he wasn't killed by Massad or any Isreali group (induced sickness or poison). A nice quiet death from natural causes would be preferred rather than him becoming a martyr to the cause. |
|
09 Nov 04 - 12:29 PM (#1321570) Subject: RE: BS: Arafat dead--unconfirmed at this moment. From: GUEST I don't think the Israelis will allow a burial anywhere in the territories. Maybe a nice, quiet cemetary just outside Paris, like Jim Morrison. Say what you will about Arafat, but he did more to bring the plight of the Palestinians to the world stage and showed the Israelis to be the military wing of the US government in the Middle East more than anyone, and that will be his legacy. And that ain't a bad legacy. But he has been ineffective for a long time. Which is why the Israelis have been so trigger happy killing off the Hamas leadership. The PLO is well past the use-by date, it's been Hamas running the show for a long time, which will also continue for a long time to come. No matter how big the Israelic concentration camp gets. |
|
09 Nov 04 - 12:57 PM (#1321613) Subject: RE: BS: Arafat dead--unconfirmed at this moment. From: Nerd I thought The Israelis had approved a burial in the Gaza Strip, with access for Palestinian and other Arab leaders through Israel. I read it somewhere, but it may not be true! |
|
09 Nov 04 - 01:03 PM (#1321621) Subject: RE: BS: Arafat dead--unconfirmed at this moment. From: GUEST I don't know Nerd, I haven't been following this very closely. But I would be surprised at this point if the Israelis allowed Arafat's body to be returned. I believe Arafat's remains should be immediately returned, but who knows what his batty wife if gonna do? She is the one, under French law, who calls those shots, not the Palestinian OR Israeli leadership. I suppose there is a chance that arrangements have already been made between Palestinians, French, and some other nations we aren't aware of right now, for him to be buried someplace like Tunisia or Jordan, perhaps. We'll all know soon enough. |
|
09 Nov 04 - 01:08 PM (#1321627) Subject: RE: BS: Arafat dead--unconfirmed at this moment. From: Stilly River Sage This has been a story worthy of Agatha Christie. Poison has always seemed like an option when listening to descriptions of his symptoms. |
|
09 Nov 04 - 01:14 PM (#1321636) Subject: RE: BS: Arafat dead--unconfirmed at this moment. From: GUEST God, you do love conspiracy theories doncha SRS? It couldn't possibly be that a 70 year old man with a lot of medical problems and lack of access to adequate health care for years and a lot of money stashed in Swiss bank accounts couldn't just be dying, and his not-exactly aggrieved widow pulling strings to make sure it all goes here way, the people be damned? C'mon. Machiavellan political drama is much more interesting that paranoid conspiracy theory crap! |
|
09 Nov 04 - 03:43 PM (#1321813) Subject: RE: BS: Arafat dead--unconfirmed at this moment. From: Once Famous Well, I hope he doesn't rest in peace. He should rot in hell. No one I know is going to sit shiva for him or do a yiskir service for him. |
|
09 Nov 04 - 04:11 PM (#1321848) Subject: RE: BS: Arafat dead--unconfirmed at this moment. From: GUEST "We'll all know soon enough." Oh god, I hope I haven't cursed us. I just remembered Franco's lengthy departure. |
|
09 Nov 04 - 04:14 PM (#1321853) Subject: RE: BS: Arafat dead--unconfirmed at this moment. From: GUEST,Karl Shove http://www.angelfire.com/md2/customviolins/arrujudged.jpg |
|
09 Nov 04 - 05:40 PM (#1321934) Subject: RE: BS: Arafat dead--unconfirmed at this moment. From: Kim C From the Monty Python thread: "But I'm not dead yet." |
|
09 Nov 04 - 05:57 PM (#1321948) Subject: RE: BS: Arafat dead--unconfirmed at this moment. From: Jeri Unless I'm badly mistaken, Muslims don't do autopsies. When I was still in the Air Force, there was an ambassador from an African country who died a few hours after eating at an officers' club. They didn't rule out poisoning (simply because he was a VIP and there was a dinner in the next room of a group comprised of very NOT Muslim people). We had to take samples of every [expletive deleted] type of leftover food and send them off for testing. I made a comment that if he were poisoned, it would likely show up in the autopsy, and that's when I was told about Muslims not believing in autopsies. (None of the foods contained poisons,and it was believed he'd had a heart attack.) Also, I thought I'd inform everybody of the latest news: As of this very second, Arafat is still possibly not dead. |
|
09 Nov 04 - 06:05 PM (#1321957) Subject: RE: BS: Arafat dead--unconfirmed at this moment. From: robomatic An autopsy could confirm tertiary syphilis, n'est-ce pas? |
|
09 Nov 04 - 06:14 PM (#1321960) Subject: RE: BS: Arafat dead--unconfirmed at this moment. From: Bill D the current concern |
|
09 Nov 04 - 06:18 PM (#1321967) Subject: RE: BS: Arafat dead--unconfirmed at this moment. From: Liz the Squeak As of the news at 11.00pm GMT, he's in a coma, he had a brain haemorrage and there are no plans to turn off any life support at the moment. Don't try and bury folks before time. LTS |
|
09 Nov 04 - 08:45 PM (#1322108) Subject: RE: BS: Arafat dead--unconfirmed at this moment. From: McGrath of Harlow The suggestion that the Israeli secret service might have poisoned Arafat isn't actually in the least improbable - there have been several previous attempts on him, and at least one other Palestinian leader. That doesn't in itself mean that it is the true explanation this time, just that the suggestion shouldn't be seen as a wild-eyed conspiracy theory. |
|
09 Nov 04 - 08:55 PM (#1322116) Subject: RE: BS: Arafat dead--unconfirmed at this moment. From: GUEST Well at least he brought the dish rag onto the fashion scene. |
|
09 Nov 04 - 08:57 PM (#1322117) Subject: RE: BS: Arafat dead--unconfirmed at this moment. From: Once Famous If you remove that schmatta, you will probably find what is killing him. |
|
10 Nov 04 - 04:34 AM (#1322315) Subject: RE: BS: Arafat dead--unconfirmed at this moment. From: Wolfgang A man like him doesn't just die like other people. The question who gets (access to) the embezzled billions and the question who gets to the power after him will determine when his death will be announced. If you have seen the clinic speokesman the last days you couldn't avoid the impression that between the lines he always telegraphed that he is not allowed to speak the truth. His death at this moment doesn't suit the Israelis (before the wall is finished), Sharon felt better with Arafat in power because that gave him the reason to be uncompromising. That's why I do not believe the Israeli connection to be probable (and not because they never would if they wanted). His death willofficially be announced when it suits one of the warring factions (I include here his wife) and that will be very soon I guess. Wolfgang |
|
10 Nov 04 - 05:00 AM (#1322330) Subject: RE: BS: Arafat dead--unconfirmed at this moment. From: Peter K (Fionn) If you have seen the clinic speokesman the last days you couldn't avoid the impression that between the lines he always telegraphed that he is not allowed to speak the truth. It's quite a surprise to see such fanciful rubbish coming from Wolfgang. Martin Gibson and his ilk make me hope even more that the Palestinians will come out of this with a leader as strong as Arafat once was and who will be as effective in keeping their cause on the world stage until it is fairly resolved. |
|
10 Nov 04 - 10:22 AM (#1322354) Subject: RE: BS: Arafat dead--unconfirmed at this moment. From: Peace It seems I have started an argument here, and such was not my intent. I however do hope that the money that crook took from the Palestinian people gets BACK to the Palestinian people. |
|
10 Nov 04 - 10:45 AM (#1322374) Subject: RE: BS: Arafat dead--unconfirmed at this moment. From: GUEST,Skeptic Arafat and his associates have been responsible for putting their cause on the world stage by quite often killing innocent people (mostly Jews). This is some way to prove a just cause! I believe they should have a state but The Palestinian cause lost me and my sympathy way back when they murdered the Isreali athletes at the Olympics. He has constantly blown his legimate chances of negotiating real peace and has put his own Palestinian people in despair for more than a generation because of the consequences. Now a new generation who knows nothing about living a peaceful and prosperous life will probably want to continue the hatred toward their Jewish neighbors without end. He runs a corrupt government and cannot seem to shake the freedom fighter terrorist struggle that he supports. This is their Palestinian Hero. He has been an utter failure for his people- and the results are obvious, and why so many in the world can't see that is beyond me. Hopefully some brighter and genuine leaders who can seriously negotiate peace will emerge and positive changes can happen on both the Israeli and Palestinian sides. |
|
10 Nov 04 - 10:48 AM (#1322381) Subject: RE: BS: Arafat dead--unconfirmed at this moment. From: Once Famous Spoken like a true anti-semite, Peter K Got anyone from Hamas you want to nominate? |
|
10 Nov 04 - 11:08 AM (#1322393) Subject: RE: BS: Arafat dead--unconfirmed at this moment. From: GUEST,Ron Burgundy I have several leather bound books and an apartment that smells of sweet mahogany |
|
10 Nov 04 - 11:47 AM (#1322435) Subject: RE: BS: Arafat dead--unconfirmed at this moment. From: Ellenpoly I read earlier that Israel has decided to let Arafat be buried back in Ramallah. I think this was a wise idea. I haven't looked for any new news, so I don't know if he's actually passed yet. I do hope that whoever takes over the mantle, it happens sooner than later, and that he (I doubt it'll be a she) will be open to some kind of peace process. It's been such a sad and tragic mess for so long. |
|
10 Nov 04 - 11:54 AM (#1322444) Subject: RE: BS: Arafat dead--unconfirmed at this moment. From: McGrath of Harlow In the end, of course, he'll be buried once again in Jerusalem. That's how these things work in the long run. |
|
10 Nov 04 - 11:59 AM (#1322447) Subject: RE: BS: Arafat dead--unconfirmed at this moment. From: GUEST I too heard that the Israelis will allow him to be buried in Ramallah, and that the funeral may be held in Cairo. We'll see what the wife has to say about all of it, eh? Like it or not, she seems to be in control of the legacy making for now. |
|
10 Nov 04 - 12:16 PM (#1322466) Subject: RE: BS: Arafat dead--unconfirmed at this moment. From: Bill D while he is in France, his wife is in FULL control...French law. Later...who knows? |
|
10 Nov 04 - 02:02 PM (#1322605) Subject: RE: BS: Arafat dead--unconfirmed at this moment. From: DougR Arafat has been dying for days, brucie. I think I heard it on television. DougR |
|
10 Nov 04 - 02:44 PM (#1322657) Subject: RE: BS: Arafat dead--unconfirmed at this moment. From: Wolfgang Peter K, if I hear a spokesman (in the full report) using qualifiers in his speech of the type "as far as I can disclose" or "I have been asked to..." I take that an indication that they are at least not telling the whole truth. If that's rubbish to you, weel, what can I say. Wolfgang |
|
10 Nov 04 - 03:55 PM (#1322706) Subject: RE: BS: Arafat dead--unconfirmed at this moment. From: freda underhill according to the Arab Monitor, he's gone. The Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat passed away |
|
10 Nov 04 - 04:22 PM (#1322732) Subject: RE: BS: Arafat dead From: freda underhill see above |
|
10 Nov 04 - 04:50 PM (#1322758) Subject: RE: BS: Arafat dead--unconfirmed at this moment. From: McGrath of Harlow "Arafat is dying" - everybody is dying, Doug, apart from the ones who are already dead. "Dying" is really another way of saying "alive". Just thought I'd add that cheerful reminder... |
|
10 Nov 04 - 05:13 PM (#1322775) Subject: RE: BS: Arafat dead--unconfirmed at this moment. From: Once Famous Now that's a fine piece of pretzel logic. |
|
10 Nov 04 - 07:37 PM (#1322890) Subject: RE: BS: Arafat dead--unconfirmed at this moment. From: Peace So, where'd he stash the Palestinian loot? |
|
10 Nov 04 - 07:55 PM (#1322906) Subject: RE: BS: Arafat dead--unconfirmed at this moment. From: Peace Well, it's confirmed. He is or he isn't dead. Truthfully, I haven't been able to tell the difference for a few years, anyway. |
|
10 Nov 04 - 08:22 PM (#1322925) Subject: RE: BS: Arafat dead--unconfirmed at this moment. From: vectis They should bury the bugger in Egypt where he came from. |
|
10 Nov 04 - 08:53 PM (#1322952) Subject: RE: BS: Arafat dead--unconfirmed at this moment. From: mg I had always heard he was Egyptian but recently I heard his family was from Gaza and I think they said he was born there..not sure..seems he was mostly reared in Egypt at least. mg |
|
10 Nov 04 - 08:53 PM (#1322954) Subject: RE: BS: Arafat dead--unconfirmed at this moment. From: Rt Revd Sir jOhn from Hull According to latest BBC News, he's had a brain heammorage, he's in a coma, his liver and kidneys have stopped working and he's on a life support machine to keep him breathing, apart from that he's ok. |
|
10 Nov 04 - 09:07 PM (#1322962) Subject: RE: BS: Arafat dead--unconfirmed at this moment. From: GUEST,Obie When the bastard is dead countries of the world will send delegations to his funeral. Huge crowds will march through streets wailing and crying. He and Osama are cut from the same cloth, but we give him the Nobel prize. Go figure........... Obie |
|
10 Nov 04 - 09:22 PM (#1322969) Subject: RE: BS: Arafat dead--unconfirmed at this moment. From: Peter K (Fionn) Martin, no need to look for excuses for why I don't like your take on Arafat. Such a small-minded, embittered attitude is more than worthy of my contempt in its own right. Most of the Jews I know here in the UK and elsewhere in Europe are well to the left on the political spectrum (the proper left rather than the Kerry left). They are supportive of a properly independent Palestine and are horrified at what Israel (thanks to the US) does in their name. Many of them would regard people like Noam Chomsky and the late Edward Said as eloquent spokesmen for their views. I'm wary about generalising, but in my own limited experience Jews seem a fairly decent sort. (I don't care for their religion, of course, but it's not the worst.) On the other hand there are non-Jewish politicians in the US who are only too eager to sign up to your line, if that's what it takes to get elected. I despise them for that. I guess that makes me anti-Gentile as well as anti-Semite in your simple little world. |
|
10 Nov 04 - 11:02 PM (#1323046) Subject: RE: BS: Arafat dead--unconfirmed at this moment. From: robomatic Just heard it officially announced he's assuming room temperature. |
|
10 Nov 04 - 11:03 PM (#1323047) Subject: RE: BS: Arafat dead--unconfirmed at this moment. From: robomatic Now someone here can post a flowery obit about how he was working for peace along with Saint Pancake. |
|
10 Nov 04 - 11:14 PM (#1323049) Subject: RE: BS: Arafat dead--unconfirmed at this moment. From: CarolC He wasn't working for peace. He was working for independence for his people. If you hate Palestinians, obviously you'll see that as a bad thing. If you don't hate Palestinians, you'll see it as the tragedy it was/is. |
|
10 Nov 04 - 11:18 PM (#1323056) Subject: RE: BS: Arafat dead--unconfirmed at this moment. From: CarolC ...or rather, you'll see the fact that the Palestinians needed/need someone to work for their independence as the tragedy it was and is. |
|
10 Nov 04 - 11:25 PM (#1323063) Subject: RE: BS: Arafat dead--unconfirmed at this moment. From: Bill D why do you have to 'hate' Palestininans to disagree with Arafat's policies? I don't 'hate' anyone over there, but I disagree with BOTH Arafat and Sharon! Of course the Palestinians need representation and leadership, but not necessarily of the type they were getting. |
|
10 Nov 04 - 11:29 PM (#1323066) Subject: RE: BS: Arafat dead--unconfirmed at this moment. From: CarolC I didn't say you have to hate Palestinians to disagree with Arafat's policies. I said that if you hate Palestinians, you'll think that working for their independence is a bad thing. |
|
10 Nov 04 - 11:52 PM (#1323087) Subject: RE: BS: Arafat dead--unconfirmed at this moment. From: mg I think we have to press for more than an independent state, and we have to press, lobby etc. the government for massive immigration. We should have a substantial colony here in the U.S. -- in part to take the population pressure off the situation there, and in part as acknowledgement that our country has not been totally fair. I would start with hundreds of thousands and maybe go as high as one million, and ask for volunteers who want to go to rural areas with declining populations. We have land, they have at least an older population with skills. They are used to dry land farming, or were. They admittedly did not make the desert bloom, but they worked with it. Great Britain is probably too small to take many, but Canada could and should. Argentina perhaps? Start with the ones in Lebanon and go from there. Insist on all of the younger ones having trades, regardless of whether or not they go for advanced education, the same requirement I would make of all American students. mg |
|
11 Nov 04 - 12:05 AM (#1323098) Subject: RE: BS: Arafat dead--unconfirmed at this moment. From: Little Robyn So now it's true - it's on the news. He's gone. |
|
11 Nov 04 - 12:06 AM (#1323101) Subject: RE: BS: Arafat dead--unconfirmed at this moment. From: Peace Gone where? |
|
11 Nov 04 - 12:30 AM (#1323119) Subject: RE: BS: Arafat dead--unconfirmed at this moment. From: GUEST 3:30 a.m. Paris time. Funeral in Cairo, burial in the PA compound in Ramallah, his temporary successors ar already in place. It should be a smooth transition of power, hopefully. |
|
11 Nov 04 - 12:34 AM (#1323124) Subject: RE: BS: Arafat dead--unconfirmed at this moment. From: dianavan Looks like Arafat isn't even buried yet and Hezbollah (with the help of Iran) is giving Israel plenty to worry about. Its far from over. http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/500063.html d |
|
11 Nov 04 - 12:47 AM (#1323131) Subject: RE: BS: Arafat dead--unconfirmed at this moment. From: GUEST Well dianavan, it's pretty damn over for Arafat and Fatah, I reckon. Of course the war will continue to be waged without him, but that has been true for quite some time now. Hamas has been calling the shots in the West Bank and Gaza, though, not Hezbollah. Hezbollah remains pretty isolated in Lebanon at this point, and the Bekaa Valley. |
|
11 Nov 04 - 01:15 AM (#1323144) Subject: BS: Arafat is dead From: Shanghaiceltic I heard on the BBC that he finally died at 3.30 this morning in Paris. Apart from the haggling over the money he salted away and who will get it (watch out for a rash of Nigerian like spam mails) the leadership seems to be quite split. Maybe however Bush & Co will actually try and deal with the problem in the Mid East. |
|
11 Nov 04 - 02:46 AM (#1323191) Subject: RE: Arafat is dead--11 November 2004 From: Ellenpoly This should make for some interesting news in the next days, or months...he certainly couldn't take it with him..xx..e http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/3995769.stm |
|
11 Nov 04 - 11:02 AM (#1323334) Subject: RE: Arafat is dead--11 November 2004 From: GUEST The money will be accounted for eventually. I mean, they're running the Palestinian Authority now, which indicates someone besides Arafat has access to the funds. I know the money thing all sounds 'irregular' to say the least, to conventional middle class folks. But let's face it, Arafat wasn't living like a king. Sure he made sure his family was taken care of, sure graft, corruption, and bribery was part and parcel of the way he did business. But Arafat never struck me as a guy who was ever into the money for anything except the power it gave him to control people and buy the PLO's way in and out of rough spots. In other words, he wasn't a Saddam Hussein, who put a lot of his ill gotten gains into palaces, etc. Arafat wasn't greedy, just knew he needed a lot of liquidity to run the revolution his way. |
|
11 Nov 04 - 11:41 AM (#1323355) Subject: RE: Arafat is dead--11 November 2004 From: NH Dave Sorry, Mary, lets let the other Arabian states line up to give any Palestinian who wants a place to live, sanctuary before we invite them into our countries. For all of that, the Palestinians have a place to live, the area they fled to, after many attempts to dislodge the Israelis from what is now Israel. All they have to do is agree to live in peace with their neighbors, something they certainly were unwilling to do with Arafat fanning the flames of hatred, terrorism, and resistance. Arafat was a terrorist, the founder of Fatah, which evolved into the PLO, back when both he and it were forced to relocate into lands like Syria, to continue their resistance to the UN sanctioned, Israeli rule of Israel. Among their many excesses, includingf the hyjacking of aircraft, the PLO claimed credit for the assasination of Israeli atheletes at the 1972 Sumjer Olympics. As time went on the PLO was surpassed by Hamas and other terrorist resistance groups who are still operating in these disputed areas, and the PLO has become more of a Palestinian solidarity group than the effective organization of its birth. Back in 1994 he and Israeli leaders hammered out a peace accord between Israel and the Palestinians at Camp David, for which effort he and both Yitzhak Rabin and Shimon Peres were honored with the Nobel Peace Prize. Dave |
|
11 Nov 04 - 12:19 PM (#1323388) Subject: RE: Arafat is dead--11 November 2004 From: MAG Are they Egyptians? Are they Jordanians or anything other than Palestinians? Why should they get shoved out of their own country? those of you who think the death of Arafat is going to calm things down in the Mid-East are in for a rude awakening. As knowledgeable people have been saying for decades, Arafat was a MODERATE. Sorry, Mary, lets let the other Arabian states line up to give any Palestinian who wants a place to live, sanctuary before we invite them into our countries. For all of that, the Palestinians have a place to live, the area they fled to, after many attempts to dislodge the Israelis from what is now Israel. |
|
11 Nov 04 - 12:53 PM (#1323418) Subject: RE: Arafat is dead--11 November 2004 From: Bill D 'moderation' is a relative thing...Hitler was a 'moderate' next to Genghis Khan and Idi Amin... |
|
11 Nov 04 - 01:01 PM (#1323428) Subject: RE: Arafat is dead--11 November 2004 From: Once Famous Peter K. Noam Chomsky and Edward Said hardly represent any case for Israel. If you read Alan Deshowitz you would know that. he makes complete mincemeat of what they say and rightfully so. The small amount of Brit Jews hardly represent what I believe is support for Israel here. I would think that they would keep a low profile there and everywhere else in europe. |
|
11 Nov 04 - 01:13 PM (#1323443) Subject: RE: Arafat is dead--11 November 2004 From: McGrath of Harlow "For all of that, the Palestinians have a place to live, the area they fled to" - so that's alright, then. All very reminiscent of what happened to another people who were living on land coveted by arrivals with more wealth and more firepower, and who were "relocated" to "reservations". And then the reservations got whittled down any time the settlers wanted a bit more land, or what was under the land. "Settlers" is a great word isn't it for displacing people from their homes? An even better euphemism than "ethnic cleansing". |
|
11 Nov 04 - 02:02 PM (#1323504) Subject: RE: Arafat is dead--11 November 2004 From: Peter K (Fionn) Martin, British Jewry is not a single-minded entity. (Neither is American Jewry for that matter. I mean, I'm sure they didn't ALL fund Hitler's rise to power and Germany's re-armament in the 1930s.) Am I the only person round here who's getting confused by the way thread names now get changed in mid thread? |
|
11 Nov 04 - 02:32 PM (#1323544) Subject: RE: Arafat is dead--11 November 2004 From: robomatic How about if those on American reservations got better weapons (or, more realistically, lawyers) and turned the tide on the folks who had lived on their formerly ancestral grounds? Is there a moral difference? |
|
11 Nov 04 - 02:44 PM (#1323561) Subject: RE: Arafat is dead--11 November 2004 From: greg stephens I'm with PeterK(Fionn). Not on the politcs, on thread name changes. it's very confusing if an old thread (when Arafat was still alive) is now converted retrospectively to one where he is dead on November 11. It makes some people's postings read very oddly until you examine what's going on carefully. I can see the logic, Joe Offer and co like to combine all threqads about "Dirty old Town" into One Big Thread if they can, but tjis aim can lead to a lot of confusion in some cases. |
|
11 Nov 04 - 02:46 PM (#1323564) Subject: RE: Arafat is dead--11 November 2004 From: Once Famous Well, before he was almost dead. Now he is. |
|
11 Nov 04 - 02:53 PM (#1323572) Subject: RE: Arafat is dead--11 November 2004 From: GUEST,Tunesmith A poster criticised Arafat for being resonsible for killing innocent people in a "just cause". Now, how many innocent people has the US killed in Iraq in their "just cause". If Arafat is terrorist, what does it make Bush and his cronies - mass murderers at the very least, is the answer. |
|
11 Nov 04 - 03:07 PM (#1323602) Subject: RE: Arafat is dead--11 November 2004 From: Peace But, it would have been ridiculous to leave the thread title as it was. Thanks for the change, clones. |
|
11 Nov 04 - 03:20 PM (#1323631) Subject: RE: Arafat is dead--11 November 2004 From: GUEST,HR Here is an Arafat bio with lots of links. |
|
11 Nov 04 - 03:23 PM (#1323636) Subject: RE: Arafat is dead--11 November 2004 From: GUEST,HR One minute film on Arafat's legacy. |
|
11 Nov 04 - 03:53 PM (#1323695) Subject: RE: Arafat is dead--11 November 2004 From: robomatic Re: Thread Title: I think the change was good, but should've been followed by (formerly..Arft is dy.) I think that would've made it clear to all. But I think that most of us 'figgered' it out. There've been a lot of poorly thought-out comments on this thread. I think saying that Hitler was a moderate next to Genghis or Idi shows a poor knowledge of all of the above. I think making Bush and Arafat equivalent shows a misunderstanding of the principles involved. You can make all of 'em equivalent by saying: Bush / Sharon / Hitler / Stalin / Arafat / Amin all did "what they thought was best". In other words, going down the road of moral equivalency in this manner makes anything else you say meaningless, because it's equally applicable to anyone else. Making the Palestinians equivalent to Indians on Reservations overlooks the fact that one can equally state that the Jewish people are the 'Indians' who took BACK what had been stolen from THEM. Arafat spent a lot of time making demonstrably false statements of fact, of history, of his policies, and of his actions. His was a cult of personality, which puts him more into the techniques of Nasser, which he was familiar with, and Saddam Hussein, who apparently modeled himself with some success after Josef Stalin. It is yet simplistic to say, "Good, he's dead" without knowing what's going to happen, but we can all hope that with the end of his stultifying and non-productive rule, something better can happen. As I've quoted before, from an Israeli military history book, "The tragedy of the Middle East is not that it's a battle of right against wrong, but of right against right." God would weep if He wasn't still celebrating the Red Sox winnning the World Series. |
|
11 Nov 04 - 04:07 PM (#1323721) Subject: RE: Arafat is dead--11 November 2004 From: CarolC Making the Palestinians equivalent to Indians on Reservations overlooks the fact that one can equally state that the Jewish people are the 'Indians' who took BACK what had been stolen from THEM. You could say that, but it would be equally accurate to say that before it was stolen from the Jewish people all those millenia ago, the Jewish people stole if from the people who were there before them, committing genocide in the process. Looks like nobody's got the high ground, really. So since everybody's just as guilty as everyone else, maybe it's time for everyone to get off their high horses and try to find a way to ensure a future for the children of today. By the way... as far as I'm concerned, the crimes Sharon is guilty of are just as great as those of Arafat, but I will not celebrate Sharon's passing either. |
|
11 Nov 04 - 04:11 PM (#1323731) Subject: RE: Arafat is dead--11 November 2004 From: tarheel why dont the cremate him,then we'll know for sure he's dead! good ridance!!!!!!!!!! |
|
11 Nov 04 - 07:09 PM (#1323955) Subject: RE: Arafat is dead--11 November 2004 From: mg I would also like to see a million settled in Arab countries also. Starting with those in refuge camps in outside areas. mg |
|
11 Nov 04 - 07:48 PM (#1323990) Subject: RE: Arafat is dead--11 November 2004 From: McGrath of Harlow But of course, unlike other refugees, the right to return to their homes can't possibly apply in their case. The point of the parallel with what happened to Native Americans isn't that you can rewind history, and rectify past injustice. It's that perhaps this parallel is one factor that shapes the way a lot of Americans see this situation, and seem to identify so strongly with one side rather than the other. |
|
12 Nov 04 - 04:18 AM (#1324336) Subject: RE: Arafat is dead--11 November 2004 From: Pete_Standing McGrath said ""Arafat is dying" - everybody is dying, Doug, apart from the ones who are already dead. "Dying" is really another way of saying "alive". Just thought I'd add that cheerful reminder... " This is what Philip Larkin had to say For nations vague as weed, For nomads among stones, Small-statured cross-faced tribes In mill-towns on dark mornings Life is slow dying. So are their separate ways Of building, benediction, Measuring love and money Ways of slow dying. The day spent hunting pig Or holding a garden party, Hours giving evidence Or birth, advance On death equally slowly. And saying so to some Means nothing; others it leaves Nothing to be said. ====================== It was said on BBC R4 6pm news that Israel hopes that it can now have a reasonable Palestinian authority to talk with. The Palestinians have probably thought the same way for a long time. Sharon, man of peace? He made calculated moves to antagonise the Palestinians even before his election. Arafat may not have been an angel, but democracy in Israel and eleswhere have hardly sorted out the wheat from the chaff either. |
|
12 Nov 04 - 04:32 AM (#1324342) Subject: RE: Arafat is dead--11 November 2004 From: Ellenpoly I thought your last post, CarolC, was very intelligent in it's summation. By the way..nice to know the widow won't go wanting.. http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?pagename=JPost/JPArticle/ShowFull&cid=1100147302168 ..xx..e |
|
12 Nov 04 - 06:40 AM (#1324412) Subject: RE: Arafat is dead--11 November 2004 From: Wolfgang He has done a tremendous and successful job to keep the Palestine question on the world's agenda. Without him and his propaganda effort (though I often had the impression that he did it at least as much for himself as for his people) their plight might have been less prominent. I'm sure they'll keep him in mind as a great leader and revolutionary. On the other hand, he was a failure as a statesman. If the Palestinians would have gotten a state instead of a permanent state of revolution they might have chased him away quickly. He was a monarch in the original sense of the word like Kim, Fidel and Gaddafi still are. There was no question of accountability for him. He did what he felt like. The monies went on his private accounts. That does not mean he kept all (or even most) of it for himself. He very often was moved by a story from an individual person to give this person money to help, but who was helped and who wasn't was a question of his personal whim and emotion. Monies paid for specified tasks by the EU were diverted to wherever he thought they were needed. People questioning and criticising this style of governing lived a dangerous life. He had ten different secret services to help him keep the grip on his people. All these were accountable only to him personally and more or less uncontrolled. Rumours of torture and illegal killings have never been answered convincingly. He signed more death penalties on a per capita basis than a former governor in Texas did and other than in Texas, executions were open to the public. Despite his smiling front appearance, he was a very hard man. He talked smoothly and compromising to journalists from the West and, sometimes even on the same day, was belligerent and uncompromising in a talk to his people in Arabic. Perhaps a people in a state of revolution needs such a leader, but one should wish them now that they soon get someone who doesn't behave like a monarch. He was and talked enigmatic and perhaps for that reason could keep himself in power for that long for different people could read different sense in his speeches: There has never come a proper well-formed Arabic sentence out of his mouth. (The way) he articulated was a chaos of words, slogans, adjectives and prepositions juxtaposed in defiance of the rules of the Arabic language. His coworkers(personell) had to guess which intentions and ideas did hide behind the hodge-podge of his words. That's how also the politics looked over the years that Arafat was making in the name of the Palestinian people. (my translation from German) (Salman Masalha, Palestinian lyricist, in his obituary) Wolfgang |
|
12 Nov 04 - 08:17 AM (#1324455) Subject: RE: Arafat is dead--11 November 2004 From: Peter K (Fionn) Well said, CarolC. |
|
12 Nov 04 - 11:14 AM (#1324621) Subject: RE: Arafat is dead--11 November 2004 From: NH Dave While noting that Arafat fomented terrorisn, we must also realize that it was terrorism on the part of the Jewish population of Palestine that finaly made the British occupiers of the region decide that this small bit of territory wasn't worth the bother of trying to govern it. The resulting civil struggles between the Arab and Jewish occupants of Palestine resulted in a set of boundaries that defined the Israel of the late 40's and early 50's, an area that included both Israeli and Palestinian people. Subsequent wars over this upstart country in an Arab or Moslem region resulted in more land acquisition on the part of Israelis since they were more willing to die for their cause than the Arabs, or just better at warfare. Each war, started by their neighbors, resulted in Israel coming out on top, abeit with lots of help from the USA. We initially tended to support them due to a large American Jewish population, but we support them now because they are the only friend we have in the region, and they are able to provide us with intelligence data that, for many reasons, we are unable to get for ourselves. Israel did not keep all of the land she captured during the many incursions by local Arabic countries, perhaps not of her own volition, but by judging things in the light of world opinion; and she seemed to have come to a state of peaceful coesistance with Egypt, her largest neighbor. Unfortunately there never seemed to be any common ground in the matters between the Israelis and the Palestinians that did not involve driving the Israelis into the sea, so this situation was never resolved. Arafat and his ilk existed by playing on Palestinian hopes of their return to lands they abandoned 50 years ago, and driving his people to increasingly more violent acts of terrorism, to the point where peace may not be possible between these two peoples, as long as the current generation still exists. It will be interesting to see how this problem plays out in the wake of his death, and if peace can possibly come to this troubled region. Dave |
|
12 Nov 04 - 11:16 AM (#1324624) Subject: RE: Arafat is dead--11 November 2004 From: mg Surely now we can insist on some proper accounting for any money we send, and surely the EU can too. mg |
|
12 Nov 04 - 11:59 AM (#1324672) Subject: RE: Arafat is dead--11 November 2004 From: Gervase Of course Arafat fomented terrorism. It's what the underdogs do. Menachim Begin was a terrorist with blood on his hands, and so was just about every other bugger who tried to get independence/recognition for his own people's point of view - with the exception of Ghandi. Most people - Arafat included - sooner or later recognise that the gun is not the best way to win hearts and minds, and adopt a more political approach. Sadly for Arafat and the Palestinians, Arafat wasn't a natural politician and was inclined to throw his toys out of the pram when he couldn't get what he wanted from the Israelis. Latterly Sharon has been a much more evil bastard than Arafat, in my opinion; deliberatey and cynically trying to avoid giving worthwhile concessions to the Palestinians and endorsing murder and terror. Before wringing your hands over Munich in '72 (for which Arafat may or may not have had some responsibility), consider the foul Chabra and Shatilla massacres, for which Sharon was directly responsible. Arafat's death may have cleared the log-jam in the Palestinian political process, but the poor sods will get nowhere while Sharon remains in power. Shame we're not listening to Kaddish over him. |
|
12 Nov 04 - 12:21 PM (#1324691) Subject: RE: Arafat is dead--11 November 2004 From: GUEST,Skeptic "Before wringing your hands over Munich in '72 (for which Arafat may or may not have had some responsibility), consider the foul Chabra and Shatilla massacres, for which Sharon was directly responsible" In the cause of freedom the Palestinian militants are still murdering people in order to somehow prove their point. They just don't realise that this strategy is immoral and destructive to their purpose (unless their purpose is just to kill). Munich was just one major gross act of murder that captured the media. Sharon is by no means an angel, but the Israelis are fed up with these acts of random murder. Even yesterday there were Palistinians demonstrating and chanting "Death of Israel" and Hamas says attacks will continue. That's no way to earn Statehood. |
|
12 Nov 04 - 12:34 PM (#1324704) Subject: RE: Arafat is dead--11 November 2004 From: GUEST Arafat is Arapfft!!! He is kaput!!! |
|
12 Nov 04 - 12:54 PM (#1324733) Subject: RE: Arafat is dead--11 November 2004 From: Once Famous He dead. |
|
12 Nov 04 - 01:30 PM (#1324773) Subject: RE: Arafat is dead--11 November 2004 From: CarolC The difference between killing of civilians by Palestinians and killing of civilians by Israelis is this: Israelis kill many, many more Palestinian civilians than the other way around, and... When Isrealis do it, they don't get punished for it. |
|
12 Nov 04 - 05:11 PM (#1324973) Subject: RE: Arafat is dead--11 November 2004 From: Alonzo M. Zilch (inactive) I just heard a report on the radio that Al Jazeera (hardly a pro-Israel or pro-American news agency)is reporting that the money that Arafat skimmed off the Palestinians is not the $300 million that Forbes Magazine reported a while back, but somewhere between $3-5 BILLION. Al jazeera is also reporting that Mrs. Arafat has agreed to turn over the various accounts containing that money to the Palestinian Authority. In return, she'll be paid $22 million PER YEAR for the rest of her life. Imagine, she'll be forced to survive on less than $61,000 per day. |
|
12 Nov 04 - 05:51 PM (#1325024) Subject: RE: Arafat is dead--11 November 2004 From: Once Famous CarolC, you are such a hater of Israel. You are a profound anti-semite. |
|
12 Nov 04 - 06:40 PM (#1325061) Subject: RE: Arafat is dead--11 November 2004 From: McGrath of Harlow It's strange how some things get remembered and some things get forgotten? For example back in 1982 when Israel invaded Lebanon they had a go at getting Arafat, and targetted an apartment block where they thought he was staying, and killed 200 people. But somehow that kind of thing has slipped out of most people's consciousness when they are trying to draw up the record on atrocities. Here's a very interesting, and critical obituary of Yasser Arafat It emphasises how far from his original ambitions for his people he had been willing to go, in the view of the writer, David Hirst, to try to get some kind of Palestinian state, far furher than he had any kind of mandate to go. "A genuinely democratic leader" could well be far less able to surrender so much. |
|
12 Nov 04 - 06:40 PM (#1325063) Subject: RE: Arafat is dead--11 November 2004 From: CarolC I don't hate you, Martin, but I suspect you probably hate me. I don't suppose there's anything I can do about that, and that's unfortunate. But no matter how many times you call me an anti-Semite, I still refuse to hate you. |
|
13 Nov 04 - 02:48 PM (#1325837) Subject: Obit: Yasser Arrafat From: GUEST GOOD FUCKING RIDDANCE !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! |
|
14 Nov 04 - 11:42 AM (#1326430) Subject: RE: Arafat is dead--11 November 2004 From: Once Famous I don't hate anyone CarolC, not even you. I just wish that someone would give you a good knock on the head so you would see how much in left field you were, that's all. |
|
14 Nov 04 - 11:55 AM (#1326444) Subject: RE: Arafat is dead--11 November 2004 From: McGrath of Harlow Isn't left field as necessary position in baseball as any other? |
|
14 Nov 04 - 03:04 PM (#1326618) Subject: RE: Arafat is dead--11 November 2004 From: Peace "Imagine, she'll be forced to survive on less than $61,000 per day." Times is tough. |
|
14 Nov 04 - 03:38 PM (#1326644) Subject: RE: Arafat is dead--11 November 2004 From: CarolC Interesting point, McGrath. I asked JtS about it and he said that the person in left field doesn't see a lot of action, but if he or she wasn't there, everybody would always be hitting the ball into left field. Works for me. |
|
14 Nov 04 - 04:55 PM (#1326697) Subject: RE: Arafat is dead--11 November 2004 From: John on the Sunset Coast What a wonderful birthday present! And I wouldn't say that about almost anyone else's death. May his soul rot in the Islamic equivalent of Hell. |
|
14 Nov 04 - 06:06 PM (#1326741) Subject: RE: Arafat is dead--11 November 2004 From: akenaton The West and the Israelis would very much like to see the Palistinian people quietly disperse throughout the Middle East, so that the great wrong done to them in 1945 is at last forgotten. I have no doubt ,after Arafats' death there will be plenty of "democratic" leaders ready to be bought by America,and help them achieve their objective. Maybe it would be in the Palistilians' best interests, but I always ask myself, how would I feel if my dear native land of Scotland was given to others ,and I forced into exile. Sometimes there are feelings which cannot be ignored,for example the Scottish emmigrants to America and Canada who still feel the ties after centuries. I agree with Fionn I hope they hang on a little longer with a strong leader. With the Middle East becomming a battleground , it cant be long before the West is at last forced to change its position, move to contain Israeli expansion and ensure a proper State of Palistine. On the death of Arafat, I find it strange that no details of his origional illness have been given. The "democratic " leaders in waiting in the PLA also have much to gain from Arafats death...Ake |
|
15 Nov 04 - 04:53 PM (#1327727) Subject: RE: Arafat is dead--11 November 2004 From: Once Famous I believe Arafat had AIDS and an autopsy showed his body was harboring gerbel terrorists when he died. |
|
16 Nov 04 - 03:31 AM (#1328270) Subject: RE: Arafat is dead--11 November 2004 From: GUEST,Boab Martin I detest GWB and all around him. I definitely do not detest Americans in general. I likewise detest the expansionism of Israel, and the mindset of some of the leadership there. I abhor the "chosen people" concept as much in respect to the Jewish people as I did when the Nazis had exactly the same cry for the "master race". But I "hate " neither the Jewish people or the German people. I have a very dear American Partner, and a fair few Jewish friends, not least the family who were given shelter in our home in 1940. So please do not confuse dislike of a policy with dislike for people. "Anti-Israel" is NOT "anti-semite." I suspect that the two are deliberately lumped together by those who wish to have a tool for the denigration of someone elses opinions. |
