|
04 Jan 05 - 11:11 PM (#1371661) Subject: Barbara Allen anomoly From: GUEST,Percy If young William was buried in the choir (assumingly under flagstone), then how on earth did his rose grow OUT of the coffin, UP through the stone, ACROSS the church floor, OUT the door (or window) OVER (how far?) to the church wall to join up with B.A.'s briar? I've heard of some horticultural feats, but this has to be one of the best yet... Percy |
|
04 Jan 05 - 11:26 PM (#1371668) Subject: RE: Barbara Allen anomoly From: Amos Well, let's not make any assumptions here. For one thing, at least one version that discusses the entwining rose and briar says nothing about the different locations of burial. It's one of the related Barbry Ellen links -- not sure which. For another the parts of a church are often loosely named. For a third, the rose and the briar growing out of true lovers' bosoms int heir graves is a common theme...for example, it is reconstructed completely in "Lord Lovell". So who knows which verses were borrowed from whence? A |
|
04 Jan 05 - 11:30 PM (#1371672) Subject: RE: Barbara Allen anomoly From: GUEST,Percy A, In my version the verse goes as follows: "BA was buried in the old church yard, young William IN THE CHOIR...etc (my caps). As we all know that's the part of the church that lies e-west. |
|
05 Jan 05 - 12:26 AM (#1371706) Subject: RE: Barbara Allen anomoly From: Leadfingers They Buried her in the old church yard Sweet Williams grave was by her They grew and they grew by the old church wall The Red Rose and the Briar Is the verse that I have , which at least makes sense ! |
|
05 Jan 05 - 12:31 AM (#1371710) Subject: RE: Barbara Allen anomoly From: Bob Bolton G'day Percy, What do you mean - anomoly? It rhymes! Regard(les)s, Bob |
|
05 Jan 05 - 12:57 AM (#1371722) Subject: RE: Barbara Allen anomoly From: GUEST Sheesh, talk about conjuring upa straw man. Does every church that ever was have a stone floor? No. Ever been in a dirt floor church? I have. So what are you worried about? |
|
05 Jan 05 - 06:45 AM (#1371855) Subject: RE: Barbara Allen anomoly From: Lanfranc Anomoly is itself an anomaly! Alan (ducking and running!) |
|
05 Jan 05 - 10:46 AM (#1372055) Subject: RE: Barbara Allen anomoly From: GUEST It's a floating verse. There's a lot of them about. We even found a song that consists entirely of floating verses. It doesn't make a lot of sense, but that's how it was sung by the lady it was collected from. Anahata |
|
05 Jan 05 - 10:48 AM (#1372059) Subject: RE: Barbara Allen anomoly From: treewind Oops - cookie went AWOL - that was me! Anahata |
|
05 Jan 05 - 11:01 AM (#1372080) Subject: RE: Barbara Allen anomoly From: Big Jim from Jackson "Sweet William was buried anigh her" is the way I have often heard it. |
|
05 Jan 05 - 11:03 AM (#1372084) Subject: RE: Barbara Allen anomoly From: Big Jim from Jackson I forgot to mention "Barbara was buried by the old church tower" |
|
05 Jan 05 - 05:30 PM (#1372408) Subject: RE: Barbara Allen anomoly From: Joybell True-Love painted this theme on a little car I had. (Mini Moke = cute little baby jeep type car). There were two skeletons lying together under the windows, along the side, with a rose and briar twining at the roof-top. A little owl with stars for eyes perched on top. The stars had moved up from below the skeletons, having been mined by a group of little dwarfs working with pick-axes underground. Barb'ry and Sweet William were wearing colourful leather boots but nothing else - well no - there were a few wisps of lace and silk floating around. Anyway not much. People kept telling me their interpretations of what we were trying to say. We weren't saying anything actually. It was just an artist's inspiration. The best one was that it was a comment on the road toll! How boring! We singers of old songs live in a different space, don't we. Hope this all helps. Cheers, Joy |
|
05 Jan 05 - 06:25 PM (#1372492) Subject: RE: Barbara Allen anomoly From: Q (Frank Staplin) And he was buried in diamond stone And she was buried in cold harber. (a version collected by Sharp) I suppose the listener would know what cold harber is. Young Jimmy was buried in the new church-yard, Bar'bra Allen was buried in the choir. (Coll. in Virginia, in Bronson) The singer, poetically challenged, was stuck for a word to rhyme with brier. Oh she was buried in the old church-yard, Sweet William was buried a-nigh her... (Ritchie Family, KY, recorded by Jean Ritchie. From Bronson) Now she sang sensible, intelligible songs! A crowded church-yard- William, Jimmy, Sir John, etc., etc. |
|
05 Jan 05 - 06:48 PM (#1372525) Subject: RE: Barbara Allen anomoly From: Lighter Holy crow, you guys! Don't you know that "Love Conquers ALL"??? |
|
05 Jan 05 - 07:40 PM (#1372588) Subject: RE: Barbara Allen anomoly From: Uncle_DaveO Q: You said Jean Ritchie. From Bronson) Now she sang sensible, intelligible songs! Not "sang"; sings! She's here on Mudcat. Dave Oesterreich |
|
05 Jan 05 - 07:54 PM (#1372605) Subject: RE: Barbara Allen anomoly From: Q (Frank Staplin) Yeah, I know Dave O. My brain is drained today. |
|
05 Jan 05 - 08:03 PM (#1372612) Subject: RE: Barbara Allen anomoly From: Don Firth As I learned it. I'm not sure where, but I think it was out of A Treasury of Folk Songs compiled by John and Sylvia Kolb, a Bantam paperback I bought off a drugstore rack for 35ยข back in 1952. A great starter kit! No problem with anomalies in that version. They buried her by the old church tower; They buried him beside her And out of his grave grew a red red rose And out of hers a green briar. They climbed and they climbed up the old church tower 'Til they couldn't climb any higher; There they twined and they tied a true lovers' knot, The red rose 'round the green briar. [The red rose grew out of Sweet William's grave because his love was true. The briar grew out of Barbara's grave because she had "issues."] Don Firth |
|
05 Jan 05 - 08:32 PM (#1372631) Subject: RE: Barbara Allen anomoly From: Malcolm Douglas Beware of trying to derive "meaning" from versions of songs found in tradition. They may be confused or altered and will get you nowhere except an almighty tangle. Similarly, texts heard on records or seen in books are potentially misleading if they don't tell you where they came from. Singers ("traditional" or professional) and, often enough, book editors, don't worry too much over whether or not the words make logical sense; and it really doesn't matter. See, for instance, the recent discussion here that went into interminable and pointless length about whether or not it was possible to kill somebody with a "wee pen knife" and whether or not the term ought to be "weapon knife"; when all the time the words were clearly just a "ballad convention" with no pretense at all to (or undue concern for) strict realism. That's the case here. It's just a poetic convention, not an anomaly or logical problem. Nobody worries about whether or not it's physically possible (ballads are full of physical impossibilities. So what?) If you really want to examine "meaning", then you need to look at the earliest available texts. They don't even contain those verses. |
|
05 Jan 05 - 09:04 PM (#1372645) Subject: RE: Barbara Allen anomoly From: Don Firth True indeed, Malcolm. A horse is never just a horse, it's always a "milk-white steed" or a "dapple grey." A woman's hand is never just a hand, it's usually a "lily-white hand." There are stock words and phrases that crop up in ballads all the time. People can drive themselves nuts trying to make perfect sense out of ballad conventions. Sometimes it just isn't there. But sometimes ballad conventions do make perfect sense if you know what's going on. One that throws a lot of people is "my false true-love." Not the contradiction it seems to be. My "true-love" is the woman I truly love. If she's false to me, then she is "my false true-love." Don Firth |
|
05 Jan 05 - 09:08 PM (#1372648) Subject: RE: Barbara Allen anomoly From: Malcolm Douglas Oh, absolutely. They often do make perfect sense (even if they seem a little odd, to begin with, to the modern sensibility); it just doesn't matter very much when they don't. |
|
05 Jan 05 - 09:18 PM (#1372651) Subject: RE: Barbara Allen anomoly From: Amos A similar interminable, but fun, discussion was had about whether it would be possible to sink the Spanish enemy with a bit and augur while floating alongside her. A |
|
06 Jan 05 - 12:07 PM (#1372831) Subject: RE: Barbara Allen anomoly From: Don Firth Wow, could that kid tread water! Don Firth |
|
06 Jan 05 - 12:41 PM (#1372860) Subject: RE: Barbara Allen anomoly From: Q (Frank Staplin) How about that cowboy, already wrapped up in white linen, but able to give a long discourse on his mis-spent life? |
|
06 Jan 05 - 01:01 PM (#1372878) Subject: RE: Barbara Allen anomoly From: Billy Weeks I learned it as 'they buried her beside the church and him BESIDE the choir' which makes perfect sense. People do getburied that way. Provided they are dead. |
|
06 Jan 05 - 04:51 PM (#1373153) Subject: RE: Barbara Allen anomoly From: Q (Frank Staplin) Didn't the choir object? |
|
06 Jan 05 - 05:11 PM (#1373171) Subject: RE: Barbara Allen anomoly From: Joybell Ah! but it's such fun playing this game isn't it? I also particularly liked the "Golden Vanity" discussion. I often gaze at cuckoos to see if the do indeed "wobble" as they fly (ours are different from American ones of course). They don't, as it turns out, although they don't "warble" either. Thornbills on the other hand do wobble as they fly. Oh the thornbill she's a pretty bird She wobbles as she flies. Not the same ring to it somehow. Cheers, Joy |
|
06 Jan 05 - 06:35 PM (#1373276) Subject: RE: Barbara Allen anomoly From: kytrad (Jean Ritchie) Uncle DaveO, and Q. It's OK to say, "she sang..." as that has been in my repertoire since I was born. The track used as the opening one on the "Rose and Briar" CD was done for Folkways (the 2-record set of Child Ballads in America-now issued on one CD by Smithsonian/Folkways) in 1961. But,"she sings" is still OK too- I think! |
|
06 Jan 05 - 09:29 PM (#1373500) Subject: RE: Barbara Allen anomoly From: jaze Barbry Allen was buried in the old churchyard Sweet William was buried beside her Out of Sweet William's heart there grew a rose Out of Barbary Allen's a briar They grew and grew in the old churchyard til they could grow no higher At the end they formed a true lover's knot and the rose grew round the briar. OK, they still had to grow out of the coffins and up thru the ground, but then true love is an amazing thing! |
|
07 Jan 05 - 03:14 PM (#1373911) Subject: RE: Barbara Allen anomoly From: Uncle_DaveO Not necessarily through coffins. For a long, long time corpses were buried in no more than a winding sheet, or shroud. Dave Oesterreich |
|
07 Jan 05 - 04:57 PM (#1373994) Subject: RE: Barbara Allen anomoly From: Tannywheeler It's one of the great blessings of life to be able to say of Jean Ritchie "She sings..." (IMHO)(tenses are sometimes important), and "...anigh her.." is the rhyme I remember, too. Not so weird. Tw |
|
08 Jan 05 - 01:06 AM (#1374382) Subject: RE: Barbara Allen anomoly From: GUEST,Percy Thankyou one and all. It has been most enjoyable watching you all go at it! Percy |
|
08 Jan 05 - 01:54 PM (#1374561) Subject: RE: Barbara Allen anomoly From: GUEST,Skivee, cookieless They threw them down in some dark hole, which was photosynthesis denyin' So nothin' grew from their gory tombs and nothin' did en-twi-an Does that take care of the matter? |
|
11 May 20 - 09:26 AM (#4051806) Subject: RE: Barbara Allen anomaly From: Mo the caller Does a seed or sucker need photosynthesis? You've not looked at my garden path. Now love and hate are very strong But nature's power is stronger It breaks the stones that men have laid With bramble and with briar. |
|
11 May 20 - 05:54 PM (#4051870) Subject: RE: Barbara Allen anomaly From: EBarnacle If BA had not been a false truelove and William hadn't been a jerk the song would have had a different ending and would probably not have survived as long. Barbara came 'longside his bed, Said "William don't you leave me: We'll wed tomorrow in the church And you'll never grieve me." The first time I became aware of this song was in a book called, I believe, Wilderness Journey. I do not recall the deathbed verse fom that--I was about 10 at the time. |
|
12 May 20 - 09:08 AM (#4052006) Subject: RE: Barbara Allen anomaly From: The Sandman william a jerk? |
|
12 May 20 - 12:05 PM (#4052048) Subject: RE: Barbara Allen anomaly From: leeneia We get all these variants as people try to think of a rhyme for briar. Here's a novel choice from the song 'Sweet William and Lady Margot.' And it's bury them both in the quiet church yard, where praying folk RETIRE, and see how it grows out of her heart a rose and out of his a briar. I agree with the OP, choir is a silly choice, unless the church is in ruins. |
|
12 May 20 - 12:40 PM (#4052052) Subject: RE: Barbara Allen anomaly From: Jim Carroll For the record, in the medieval church, being buried inside the church was common and the walls of the choir' (choire - where the clergy sat) was often a favoured spot for burying the clergy and patrons, which suggests not only that the ballad (or the motif) was older than sometimes believed bt also a class difference between the protagonists - one buried in state, the other stuck out in the cold Tom Lenihan, who sang this ballad, always said that the burial bit, particularly the 'rose and briar' didn't belong to this ballad Jim Carroll |
|
12 May 20 - 01:26 PM (#4052062) Subject: RE: Barbara Allen anomaly From: Steve Gardham Of course it doesn't belong to this ballad. None of the early versions have it, but many other ballads do. It is a Europe-wide motif existing in ballads seemingly much older than any British ones. |
|
12 May 20 - 02:24 PM (#4052077) Subject: RE: Barbara Allen anomaly From: The Sandman it belongs to it now, folk process |
|
12 May 20 - 05:39 PM (#4052108) Subject: RE: Barbara Allen anomaly From: Steve Gardham Absolutely, along with quite a few other unrelated ballads. |
|
13 May 20 - 07:53 AM (#4052206) Subject: RE: Barbara Allen anomaly From: EBarnacle Yes, William was a jerk. He was drinking in a tavern with his pals. Everyone else was toasting their beloveds and he did not. Surely he knew word would get back to BA about his lack of enthusiasm. She being a jealous type, felt slighted and the tragedy followed. |
|
13 May 20 - 08:27 AM (#4052216) Subject: RE: Barbara Allen anomaly From: Jim Carroll With respect Steve - it is a "floater" verse which automatically 'belongs' to every song or ballad it lands on These are transferable motifs like 'seas running dry" or "rocks melting with the sun" At present I'm being gobsmacked by working may way though a survey of songs which make up the 1801 second edition introduction to 'Complaynt of Scotland' and finding out how far back these motifs and even songs go Putting dates or specific origins on them is like trying to put fog in a bottle Jim |
|
13 May 20 - 11:11 AM (#4052244) Subject: RE: Barbara Allen anomaly From: Steve Gardham Jim, You are 100% correct. Nobody would even attempt to put a date on a motif. As you say most of them go back to the earliest records and as far as we know beyond this. However, there is some mileage for researchers in identifying the earliest extant appearance in ballad form, even if that earliest appearance is in another culture or state. Dating the earliest extant versions is not easy by any means but I find it a useful exercise and other researchers appear to be interested in the results. Takes all sorts I suppose. |
|
13 May 20 - 03:01 PM (#4052295) Subject: RE: Barbara Allen anomaly From: Jim Carroll "Dating the earliest extant versions is not easy by any means" Impossible in fact unless you can trace the oral versions further back than the beginning of the twentieth century and further still, earlier than Mrs Knipp Pepys suggested the song was "old" then Accordi to the anonymous writer of the introduction to the second edition of 'Complaynt' many of the songs current then and mentioned in the first edition, many of these songs predated the printing press, suggesting an extremely lively oral tradition way back then Putting a date on these pieces is rather like trying to represent a horse race by taking a photograph at the winning post - a 'non-stater' to mix metaphors Don't know whether anybody is interested but I've started to put up some of our old articles and talks on the Academia website - I intend to make it a regular thing I started last week with an article/talk I gave entitled, 'Mikeen McCarthy, Ballad Seller' and have just put up one on Walter Pardon I will put up another next week on a London/Clare singer and dancer Yez gorra fill in these empty days with something more interesting than cutting grass ! Jim |
|
13 May 20 - 03:56 PM (#4052306) Subject: RE: Barbara Allen anomaly From: Steve Gardham Jim, you need to look up the word 'extant'. Yes, I've been following your additions to Academia with interest. Thanks for this. |
|
14 May 20 - 02:23 AM (#4052373) Subject: RE: Barbara Allen anomaly From: Jim Carroll "Extant" "still in existence; surviving." - what I thought it was Which makes no difference to its origins - a bit like the Eiffel Tower really. only much, much older What's your point ? The fact that some versions have the 'rose and briar' motif and some don't makes neither more correct than the other The oral tradition expands the songs, never replaces them - they are all out there lurking in the ether somewhere Jim |
|
14 May 20 - 06:23 AM (#4052405) Subject: RE: Barbara Allen anomaly From: Steve Gardham Precisely, 'still in existence, surviving' so the 'earliest version still in existence'. That's all we're claiming as fact, nothing more. The rest is opinion based on 50 years of studying as much of the extant material as possible. |
|
14 May 20 - 07:38 AM (#4052418) Subject: RE: Barbara Allen anomaly From: Jim Carroll "That's all we're claiming as fact, nothing more." I'm concerned with your view on origins, but as I said, the rose and briar motif belongs wherever it lands Your opinion - once presented as irrefutable fact is spancilled from the word go by that fact that our detailed knowledge (which is sparse enough), of an oral tradition which is older than printing, only goes back as far as 1900, so everything earlier than that has to be guesswork (and sometimes wishful thinking) One of the factors that appears to have been missed is the mixed reception songs in print received among the singers - some regarded them as unreliable, others as sacrosanct and shouldn't be altered These were singers regarded as such rather than old people reporting what their granny's, granny had passed down Jim |
|
14 May 20 - 10:19 AM (#4052444) Subject: RE: Barbara Allen anomaly From: Steve Gardham We at least have plenty of facts to back up our opinions, based in the individual songs themselves, when they were first printed, and detailed comparison with thousands of others that didn't make it as far as the oral tradition of the last 150 years. >>>>'One of the factors that appears to have been missed is the mixed reception songs in print received among the singers - some regarded them as unreliable, others as sacrosanct and shouldn't be altered These were singers regarded as such rather than old people reporting what their granny's, granny had passed down'<<<< What relevance has this to what was happening in England 200 years ago? |
|
14 May 20 - 10:26 AM (#4052445) Subject: RE: Barbara Allen anomaly From: Steve Gardham Anyhow getting back to the title: Jim, interested in your statement, 'Pepys suggested the song was "old" then'. Can you flag this up for us all please? Don't recall Pepys referring to the age of the song at all. |
|
14 May 20 - 10:43 AM (#4052449) Subject: RE: Barbara Allen anomaly From: Jim Carroll "Old Scotch Ballad" I seem to remember Stave Jim |
|
14 May 20 - 02:49 PM (#4052485) Subject: RE: Barbara Allen anomaly From: Steve Gardham I think Pepys must have written that one in his secret diary! Here's what Child quoted 'In perfect pleasure I was to hear her sing, and especially her LITTLE Scotch song of Barbary Allen.' Or maybe Child got it wrong. He was always editing the ballads apparently. |
|
14 May 20 - 02:50 PM (#4052486) Subject: RE: Barbara Allen anomaly From: Steve Gardham What was that comment a few posts back about 'wishful thinking'? |