|
07 Apr 05 - 04:54 PM (#1454755) Subject: BS: Pubic information service From: GUEST,Guest from the Chat Room Spring is in the air - the sap is rising - and the Cat Chat Room is pondering on matters of deep significance. Apparently "Most Aussie men are" ... "Nearly all US men are", But some would "swear that men never compare" ... Some have "only ever seen one in [their] life"; Equally, some knew they'd "only seen one sort, but weren't sure which it was..." Some have conducted unsuccessful field trials to gather empirical data; and some have seen baby ones but never grown up ones ... While others have established that all the men they've slept with were...(but: before, during, or after was not established) Obviously, this is question is of deep and abiding cultural significance and interest - at least to a Chat room full of female catters .. So, which are you - Roundhead or Cavalier? (Then we went on to enigmatically discuss the efficacy of lion poo as a rodent repellent and budding daffodils - I think?) |
|
07 Apr 05 - 04:58 PM (#1454758) Subject: RE: BS: Pubic information service From: wysiwyg I think most people would rather their Chat chat was kept in the Chat room-- not characterized, quoted, or reacted to in the threads. Like PMs, what happens there ought really to stay there. That's why it's THERE. ~S~ |
|
07 Apr 05 - 06:05 PM (#1454814) Subject: RE: BS: Pubic information service From: Uncle_DaveO Plus, if this thread goes on at all, it should be shoved downstairs forthwith! Dave Oesterreich |
|
07 Apr 05 - 07:05 PM (#1454877) Subject: RE: BS: Pubic information service From: Peace You were not a guest. You were a memebr and part of the discussion. Too bad that many there may have considered you a friend. |
|
07 Apr 05 - 08:23 PM (#1454942) Subject: RE: BS: Pubic information service From: The Fooles Troupe 1) I don't consider that EVERYTHING is sacrosanct - the basic topics discussed in the chat room MAY be grist for the mill in starting a BS thread. Some degree of discretion IS needed, though - and at least no-one was named. 2) If you are going to play as per 1) above however, pretending that you are anonymous when those who WERE in the chat can pretty well tell who you are is gutless - at least have the courage to identify yourself. 3) There are no GUESTS in the chat room - everyone is a member. I wasn't there, but I can narrow down my guesses as to who this alleged GUEST is to a handful - which may or may not be correct, and also smears all those suspects who are not guilty. |
|
07 Apr 05 - 08:26 PM (#1454945) Subject: RE: BS: Pubic information service From: GUEST,Guest from the Chat room Oi! Get off your high horses - I was nominated by a (very large) majority vote in the Chat room to put this topic thread up!! |
|
07 Apr 05 - 08:30 PM (#1454949) Subject: RE: BS: Pubic information service From: GUEST,One who was there Shite you were. Name names then. |
|
07 Apr 05 - 08:40 PM (#1454957) Subject: RE: BS: Pubic information service From: GUEST,GFTCR OWWT - I don't believe you were there - because as daft (I was going to say salacious or vulgar .. but, actually, it was just a daft bit of fun!) as the discussion was ... (and especially as we all dared each other to post this thread) ... I don't believe anyone present there would be so vulgar as to start swearing at someone else ... And on a pedantic note: I am a Guest "here" on the thread now .. and I was (then) "from" the Chatroom. |
|
07 Apr 05 - 08:41 PM (#1454960) Subject: RE: BS: Pubic information service From: wysiwyg If you were asked to do it, you should have said so at the outset. I hate to break it to the newer members, but there are actually a few community expectations here, and I'm sure I'm not the only one who recalls a time when most members not only knew them but respected them. ~Susan |
|
07 Apr 05 - 08:46 PM (#1454964) Subject: RE: BS: Pubic information service From: Bee-dubya-ell Never can tell when yer gonna step in shit around here, huh? Mudcat Dynamics 101: The general tone of responses to a thread topic is established by the first respondent. If the initial response is lighthearted and favorable, then subsequent responses will be likewise. If the initial response is unfavorable, then the thread-starter is automatically an outcast and a moron and the bite of that first respondent will start a feeding frenzy that makes a school of blue sharks look like a buncha pikers. |
|
07 Apr 05 - 08:46 PM (#1454967) Subject: RE: BS: Pubic information service From: GUEST,GFTCR Thanks WYSIWYG - I should have specified at the outset that the situation is that I was asked to do it .. I would never otherwise dream of breaking the confidences of chatroom! |
|
07 Apr 05 - 08:50 PM (#1454968) Subject: RE: BS: Pubic information service From: Peace Yep. Just one big happy family. |
|
07 Apr 05 - 08:52 PM (#1454969) Subject: RE: BS: Pubic information service From: GUEST,GFTCR Bee-dubya-ell: never a truer word spoken (not) in jest!! :( And to think, everyone in chat gleefully anticipated a "cheeky" response from Mudcat "members"! |
|
07 Apr 05 - 10:30 PM (#1455018) Subject: RE: BS: Pubic information service From: CarolC I would like a definition of the terms being considered (in the big question), please. |
|
07 Apr 05 - 10:40 PM (#1455023) Subject: RE: BS: Pubic information service From: GUEST,Give us an N |
|
08 Apr 05 - 02:52 AM (#1455094) Subject: RE: BS: Pubic information service From: MBSLynne Good grief!! I was one of the ones in the chat and it was all fun and a good laugh as always! When we talked about starting a thread about it, we thought that, Catters being the jolly, humorous people they are (we thought) we'd get some good witty comments. I've seen far nearer the knuckle threads than this started by some of the people who are decrying this one. It was done in a spirit of fun and I can see no reason why all you miseries are being so up your own...... Gosh GFTCR, I'm glad you did post as guest! We jokingly discussed 'outing' the person who was going to start the thread.....couldn't do it now...she might get her throat ripped out by men with no senses of humour! I'm truely disappointed in you all. Love Lynne PS Guest one who was there....I don't remember anyone who was there disagreeing with the idea of starting this thread. |
|
08 Apr 05 - 03:04 AM (#1455101) Subject: RE: BS: Pubic information service From: Liz the Squeak I must confess. Although I did NOT start this thread, it is all my fault. Whilst in the chat room last night, I was also watching a programme on TV called 'Life before birth' (sort of Womb with a View), and happened to partake a couple of choice details from the programme, in the interests of general education, on the grounds that a) a day you've learnt something new is a day not wasted and b) it might engender some amusing remarks. It did indeed engender some amusing remarks in the chat. It also regressed back to the origins of the item discussed, which lead to the detailed and light-hearted discussion of 'roundheads or cavalliers' which was indulged in by members of both sexes who were in the chat room at the time. I'm sorry. It's my fault. It's also my understanding that either style makes no difference to hygiene, that entirely depends on the owner. LTS |
|
08 Apr 05 - 03:11 AM (#1455110) Subject: RE: BS: Pubic information service From: catspaw49 Friggin' amazing.................I'll grant that I'm around less than I used to be and things do change over time, but when the hell did the chat become some kindof privileged communication? Is there about to be another altercation.....this one between the chatters and non-chatters? How in the name of gawd do we take such simple and fun stuff and jam-pack it with rules? Everybody step back a few paces and breathe deeply............Now take a good look at this thread................If you aren't now convulsed in laughter, repeat the process until you are. Spaw |
|
08 Apr 05 - 05:23 AM (#1455157) Subject: RE: BS: Pubic information service From: MBSLynne Thanks Spaw...some sanity.... |
|
08 Apr 05 - 06:04 AM (#1455177) Subject: RE: BS: Pubic information service From: robomatic I remember the stuff we talked about at night in the dormitory corridors was not necessarily the stuff we wanted to talk over at breakfast the next day. In fact, none of us had the bad taste to try it. It's amazing what some people think is fun. Looks like you just had to be there. As G,GFTCR has found out, one can't tell the difference between being nominated and being anointed, and being anonymous adds nothing to one's credibility. "just 'armless bit o' fun....nivir mind that I've got a mask on and I'm tykin' notes!" |
|
08 Apr 05 - 06:14 AM (#1455181) Subject: RE: BS: Pubic information service From: Micca well, as a party to the original Chatroom discussion, and therefore a vote FOR the person above to post it. I thought (and still think) that this thread is 1 less offensive and controversial than some threads I have seen recently 2 an amusing addition to the BS around here 3 an opportunity for the very witty and punny Mudcatters to let their imaginations run riot. 4 and after all Rule One for BS threads, if you dont like/are offended by a thread, DON'T POST to it or read it!!! |
|
08 Apr 05 - 06:19 AM (#1455183) Subject: RE: BS: Pubic information service From: Davetnova LTS - I might have known it was your fault! :-) And in case this is a genuine survey - I'm a roundhead and am not cavalier with my affections. (I've got to be a roundhead, I haven't got enough hair to be a cavalier[and lets not bring mirkins into this]) |
|
08 Apr 05 - 07:16 AM (#1455210) Subject: RE: BS: Pubic information service From: MBSLynne Lol Davet! That's more like it! |
|
08 Apr 05 - 07:38 AM (#1455220) Subject: RE: BS: Pubic information service From: wysiwyg Oh, OK, no worries then. I guess it will be OK with all past and present chatroom users if I pop in now and then to see who's getting raunchy with whom, and report that out to various spouses.... employers.... well OK then! :~) ~Susan |
|
08 Apr 05 - 07:41 AM (#1455227) Subject: RE: BS: Pubic information service From: GUEST,GFTCR Think I'll just be lurkin' in the merkin for a while .... |
|
08 Apr 05 - 07:43 AM (#1455228) Subject: RE: BS: Pubic information service From: GUEST Oh, Susan ... only if all present take a vote on outing their spouting! |
|
08 Apr 05 - 07:47 AM (#1455233) Subject: RE: BS: Pubic information service From: wysiwyg If even ONE person who would object leaves Chat just before the vote, I guess that would be their problem, then? :~) Screw them, right? :~) ~S~ |
|
08 Apr 05 - 07:48 AM (#1455234) Subject: RE: BS: Pubic information service From: The Fooles Troupe Bee-dubya-ell ...and you may have wondered why the Fooles jump into some threads early and babble nonsense... |
|
08 Apr 05 - 08:01 AM (#1455248) Subject: RE: BS: Pubic information service From: GUEST,GFTCR Perhaps you need to go and lie down in a darkened chat room? It is/was a joke Susan: what DO you think we were voting on? To reveal the name and status of individuals' foreskins? Hardly, as it was a majority female vote from a majority female room ... in pursuit of (salacious and daft) knowledge to add to the fund of knowledge about "members" e.g. how many catters have cats/ dogs/ play cover versions/ vote Republican/ run around nekkid and howl at the full moon? Screwing third parties was only mentioned obliquely - vis "Centres of Continuing Education" as part of the Pubic Information Service. I assume you don't mean literally? |
|
08 Apr 05 - 08:02 AM (#1455249) Subject: RE: BS: Pubic information service From: Bee-dubya-ell Okay, since somebody opened the playroom window and that awful stench seems to have drifted outdoors, I'll play now. I'm pretty sure lion poo is an excellent rodent repellent. When's the last time you saw a mouse try to crawl up a lion's ass? Now, if someone will explain the principle question asked in the opening thread, I'll try to come up with a witty response. I'm assuming "WTF?" no longer qualifies as witty. |
|
08 Apr 05 - 08:17 AM (#1455264) Subject: RE: BS: Pubic information service From: MBSLynne WYZYWYG, no one who was in the chat room made any objection whatsoever. No names have been posted, though three of us have come on here under our own names and said we were there and it was all a laugh. What on earth are you going on about? It's certainly a far cry from >>popping in now and then to see who's getting raunchy with whom and report that out to various spouses...employers....>> No one has been hurt by this because no one has been mentioned. Not only that, but there is nothing in it to hurt anyone, unlike the idea of sneaking to spouses etc to report things said in the chat room. Though no one with any sense at all would say things in the chat room that their spouses would object to anyway! |
|
08 Apr 05 - 08:28 AM (#1455275) Subject: RE: BS: Pubic information service From: John MacKenzie Whether or not I wear a pullover is my business, but I think I look good in a pink polo neck! G ¦¬] |
|
08 Apr 05 - 08:31 AM (#1455279) Subject: RE: BS: Pubic information service From: Alba Giok:>)..lol It's a Chatroom...not a Confessional. If your going to chat about subjects that you rather other Folks won't hear about... PM (that is the confidential bit of this Forum?)or pick up the Telephone, compose an email, or write a Letter... A chatroom is a private conversation??? eh...what's happening here on the Mudcat BS....between posters with mouths and brains like open sewers and Folks getting really pissy with each other......a lot of stuff is getting taken way too seriously and blown completely out of proportion and other things that merit an angry reaction are being ignored!!! Is there a new rule ...Please leave your sense of Humor behind before entering the BS section or the Chatroom (and there's me that only recently found out how to actually get into Chat... to chat, to have a friendly exchange, perchance a giggle or two.... certainly not my place of choice to hold a deeply personal, intimate, soul searching, confidential discussion! ...$#****$$$***^^^%^%$#@!^&*) Jude |
|
08 Apr 05 - 12:47 PM (#1455491) Subject: RE: BS: Pubic information service From: PoppaGator Looks like we've established, once again, that some folks around here can be real dickheads. We're still aiting find out ~ which kind? |
|
08 Apr 05 - 12:54 PM (#1455502) Subject: RE: BS: Pubic information service From: wysiwyg Well, one kind is the kind who fails to realize how imitative Mudcat can be when some dickheads start trying to imitate or outdo other dickheads.... the kind who don't realize when they are at the top of a real slippery slope.... the kind who confuse intent with effect... the kind who would rather defend than think. In general I think the saddest decline of the Mudcat community has been the defensiveness-- swinging back when they perceive someone is taking them to task personally (who failed to read the puerility and actual intent of their minds). ~Susan |
|
08 Apr 05 - 12:59 PM (#1455510) Subject: RE: BS: Pubic information service From: Peace Here ya go. |
|
08 Apr 05 - 04:27 PM (#1455557) Subject: RE: BS: Pubic information service From: Sorcha Well, I was there, and it was just fun and funny. Guess you had to be there. Girls,it looks like we've stepped on one of their sacred cows. It seems to be OK for the blokes to discuss our bits (Temple of the Golden Globes) but we aren't allowed to discuss theirs.......oh well. |
|
08 Apr 05 - 04:34 PM (#1455561) Subject: RE: BS: Pubic information service From: artbrooks Harumph...I clearly need to spend more time in the chat room..... |
|
08 Apr 05 - 05:09 PM (#1455593) Subject: RE: BS: Pubic information service From: CarolC Ok, so I understand now what is being discussed. But now I want to know why the term "cavalier" for the unaltered kind? |
|
08 Apr 05 - 05:48 PM (#1455642) Subject: RE: BS: Pubic information service From: GUEST You may feel better when you get sober. |
|
08 Apr 05 - 05:58 PM (#1455658) Subject: RE: BS: Pubic information service From: PoppaGator Sorcha just said: Girls,it looks like we've stepped on one of their sacred cows. It seems to be OK for the blokes to discuss our bits (Temple of the Golden Globes) but we aren't allowed to discuss theirs.......oh well. I don't think anyone who objected to this discussion was male. Certainly, the single most vocal opponent was a woman, if I'm not mistaken. Uncle DaveO's suggestion that this discussion belongs down in the BS section hardly counts. He always is quick to point out BS, and when he does so, he's almost always right ~ but he expresses no objection to continuing any discussion in the appropriate venue. |
|
08 Apr 05 - 06:10 PM (#1455669) Subject: RE: BS: Pubic information service From: John MacKenzie Ruff Carol? |
|
08 Apr 05 - 06:16 PM (#1455675) Subject: RE: BS: Pubic information service From: Peace "Girls,it looks like we've stepped on one of their sacred cows." New name for the penis? |
|
08 Apr 05 - 06:24 PM (#1455689) Subject: RE: BS: Pubic information service From: Don(Wyziwyg)T Well girls, it looks like YOU'll have to wear the helmets the next time you stick your heads above the parapet. I thought it was funny anyway. Don T. |
|
08 Apr 05 - 06:31 PM (#1455700) Subject: RE: BS: Pubic information service From: CarolC So how many other cute nicnames do people have for those two particular varieties? |
|
08 Apr 05 - 06:34 PM (#1455702) Subject: RE: BS: Pubic information service From: Peace You'll end up asking every Tom, Dick and Harry that one. LOL |
|
08 Apr 05 - 06:54 PM (#1455715) Subject: RE: BS: Pubic information service From: Bill D As President of SECSE (pronounced sexy) The Society for the Elimination of Cute, Silly Euphemisms, I don't participate in polls that I barely comprehend...especially when everyone is in a tizzy about it before it has even started. ;>) |
|
08 Apr 05 - 06:57 PM (#1455718) Subject: RE: BS: Pubic information service From: Peace Personally, if ya know me well enough ya don't have to ask. If ya don't know me well enough, then ya shouldn't be askin'. However, people say the damnedest things. |
|
08 Apr 05 - 06:59 PM (#1455721) Subject: RE: BS: Pubic information service From: Peace I tell 'em the same thing on the phone when they want to know what kind of car I drive, or what kind of bread I eat. Sounds like the kinda question some cheap reporter would ask and then expect an answer to. Keriste. |
|
08 Apr 05 - 07:06 PM (#1455729) Subject: RE: BS: Pubic information service From: Bill D (everyone could just wait till "no pants day" and check) |
|
08 Apr 05 - 07:08 PM (#1455731) Subject: RE: BS: Pubic information service From: Peace Here's what a few unnamed folks wanna know. Have a nice day, all. |
|
08 Apr 05 - 07:09 PM (#1455733) Subject: RE: BS: Pubic information service From: Peace Good one, Bill. LOL |
|
08 Apr 05 - 07:10 PM (#1455734) Subject: RE: BS: Pubic information service From: Davetnova please don't step on mine. |
|
08 Apr 05 - 07:11 PM (#1455736) Subject: RE: BS: Pubic information service From: Peace Then tie the thing 'round your ankle, ya daft bugger. |
|
08 Apr 05 - 07:12 PM (#1455739) Subject: RE: BS: Pubic information service From: PoppaGator i have enough trouble not stepping on my own |
|
08 Apr 05 - 07:13 PM (#1455742) Subject: RE: BS: Pubic information service From: Peace See advice I gave to Davetnova, PG. |
|
08 Apr 05 - 07:14 PM (#1455745) Subject: RE: BS: Pubic information service From: freda underhill LtS, until your post of 08 Apr 05 - 03:04 AM , i didnt understand what this post was about. i also dont understand why some people seem to take on a role of "moral guardian" of mudcat and condemn humour, just as george bush thinks he's a moral guardian of the world (and with a name like that). my first thought was that i never studied english history, i just thought some of you were being cavalier with your comments. now i understand that history, like everything else, is a freudian code for life. |
|
08 Apr 05 - 07:33 PM (#1455766) Subject: RE: BS: Pubic information service From: Peace http://www.cirp.org/library/statistics/ |
|
08 Apr 05 - 07:34 PM (#1455767) Subject: RE: BS: Pubic information service From: The Fooles Troupe I just wrap mine a few times round my neck, then over my shoulder, and depending on the weather, a few times around my waist. Any leftover length, I just stuff in my cat pocket. I've always liked long scarves, ever since I first watched Dr Who. |
|
08 Apr 05 - 07:36 PM (#1455769) Subject: RE: BS: Pubic information service From: Peace Should it have been Dr Who or Dr Whom? |
|
08 Apr 05 - 07:56 PM (#1455790) Subject: RE: BS: Pubic information service From: The Fooles Troupe Sorry Brucie - I think the Current Pedantic English Thread is elewhere.... |
|
08 Apr 05 - 07:58 PM (#1455792) Subject: RE: BS: Pubic information service From: Amos The Cavliers were ruffer, as I recall, while the Roundheads are thought to be more garbed and hooded in their approaches, although this may just be camouflage to make it easier to get close. And as for who should not be a-skin' Bruce, a roundhead feels at home being all askin. and a cavalier feels it has, well, drawbacks, so to speak. But why either category should constitute a barrier to entry, in social circles of the most revered -- if most horizontal -- sort , well, I don't understand that at all. But, if there is a moral to the moralistic puffery entered herein, it is that roundhead or cavalier, whatever is discussed, someone will find a way to look down on it. Not to put too fine a point on things. A |
|
08 Apr 05 - 07:59 PM (#1455793) Subject: RE: BS: Pubic information service From: Peace That should be 'elsewhere', Foolestroupe. LOL |
|
08 Apr 05 - 08:03 PM (#1455799) Subject: RE: BS: Pubic information service From: The Fooles Troupe You dood it again Brucie! |
|
08 Apr 05 - 08:08 PM (#1455806) Subject: RE: BS: Pubic information service From: Peace LLO You have the kind of humour I knew would not be offended, Robin. Thank you. |
|
08 Apr 05 - 08:30 PM (#1455821) Subject: RE: BS: Pubic information service From: Bee-dubya-ell Okay, now that I understand the question I can answer it. |
|
08 Apr 05 - 11:32 PM (#1455897) Subject: RE: BS: Pubic information service From: katlaughing Spaw had to use a tripod to hold it up for a pee off a bridge and even then it was draggin' in the mud w-a-y down below...mud all over his dangly bits! |
|
08 Apr 05 - 11:37 PM (#1455901) Subject: RE: BS: Pubic information service From: harpgirl I like my sweatshirt hoods off. |
|
09 Apr 05 - 12:08 AM (#1455916) Subject: RE: BS: Pubic information service From: LadyJean Pubic wasn't a missprint. I don't know why I should be surprised to see this. Many years ago, the little paper I was writing for was taken over by a British firm. I was told to write up Christenings. Which was fine for the Catholics and Episcopalians in my area, but not so good for the Swedenborgians, and then there was the very large Jewish population. I finally asked my airhead editor if she wanted me to do brises too. (A bris being the Jewish circumcision rite.) She said, brightly, "Well, I guess they had baptism back in Bible times too." I did not do brises. |
|
09 Apr 05 - 12:40 AM (#1455941) Subject: RE: BS: Pubic information service From: Big Mick I don't think that Big Ed, god of thunder is such a cutesie little name... Mick |
|
09 Apr 05 - 06:43 PM (#1456592) Subject: RE: BS: Pubic information service From: Don(Wyziwyg)T Only when it's been overstressed, and is felling quite Thor Mick Don T. |
|
09 Apr 05 - 06:46 PM (#1456596) Subject: RE: BS: Pubic information service From: Don(Wyziwyg)T Damn these sneaky typos! Feeling quite Thor, not felling........Ooh! I don't know tho'. That WOULD account for the stress. DT |
|
10 Apr 05 - 08:52 AM (#1457000) Subject: RE: BS: Pubic information service From: GUEST,MBSLynne LOL!!! guys..this is better! This is the sort of silly, friendly humourous response we were anticipating. You're right PoppaGator...it's not the men to blame for the criticism mostly. And for those who didn't understand the question in the first place...maybe that's because the poster was being 'subtle'? I hope she hasn't abandoned this thread because of the original Flak. I shall PM her to make sure she's reading it now Love Lynne |
|
10 Apr 05 - 09:17 AM (#1457025) Subject: RE: BS: Pubic information service From: Don(Wyziwyg)T It's like adolescence! Once you have worked out what it's for, all you have to do is find a way to use it. Don T. |
|
10 Apr 05 - 10:50 AM (#1457102) Subject: RE: BS: Pubic information service From: John MacKenzie As GBS said "Youth is wasted on the young" Playing the oboe is the same, learning the fingering is quite easy, it's blowing it properly that takes practice! Giok ¦¬] |
|
10 Apr 05 - 12:21 PM (#1457169) Subject: RE: BS: Pubic information service From: SINSULL That's from a man's perspective, Giok. Much ado about nothing, eh? Whenever I describe the Getaway sleeping arrangments to a newbie I am forced to recall my first meeting with Micca, the Wild Man. Ladies and gents share a shower room which is equipped with mirrors at both ends. So there I am brushing my teeth and attempting to wake up when in walks Micca in the all-together. And with strategically placed mirrors I am treated to a coming and going vista. My only reaction? "He's not circumcized!" Sorry, Miss Phiddle. Since this event did not take place in the Chat Room and since multiple other 'Catters were there to witness the event, I did not feel I was breaking a confidence by telling all. SINS, who has seen and test run both but has no preference. |
|
10 Apr 05 - 12:53 PM (#1457200) Subject: RE: BS: Pubic information service From: John MacKenzie So no testes results then Sins. G ¦¬] |
|
10 Apr 05 - 01:16 PM (#1457220) Subject: RE: BS: Pubic information service From: SINSULL Nope. No peckering order. |
|
10 Apr 05 - 03:49 PM (#1457367) Subject: RE: BS: Pubic information service From: GUEST Who shaves their pubic hair? |
|
10 Apr 05 - 05:14 PM (#1457440) Subject: RE: BS: Pubic information service From: GUEST People with crabs? |
|
10 Apr 05 - 05:15 PM (#1457442) Subject: RE: BS: Pubic information service From: Peace I did once when I had crabs. Stoopid. Itched like a bugger growing back in. I'll post pics later. Oh, hell, here they are. BC (before crabs). AD (after the shave). |
|
10 Apr 05 - 05:38 PM (#1457464) Subject: RE: BS: Pubic information service From: GUEST,lalala Metions that often does she not. |
|
10 Apr 05 - 08:21 PM (#1457601) Subject: RE: BS: Pubic information service From: Stilly River Sage I ignored this thread until now because I wasn't interested in a "public information service" discussion. All Dyslexic catters raise your hands! Now that I've visited, I can't see what everyone got so prick-ly about. ;-> SRS |
|
10 Apr 05 - 08:30 PM (#1457612) Subject: RE: BS: Pubic information service From: jacqui.c Yep - tried both and no preference - variety can be the spice of life. Problem with shaving is it all gets itchy when it grows back. Brucie - LEAVE THE CLICKIES ALONE!!!!!!! LOL |
|
10 Apr 05 - 08:43 PM (#1457625) Subject: RE: BS: Pubic information service From: Peace For jacqui. Orange, Kiwi OK. Get it? LOLOLOL I made a funny. LOL (Gotta change my meds.) |
|
10 Apr 05 - 08:49 PM (#1457627) Subject: RE: BS: Pubic information service From: SINSULL Help! I don't get it. Orange kiwi???? |
|
10 Apr 05 - 08:52 PM (#1457630) Subject: RE: BS: Pubic information service From: Peace O range K iwi OK. jacqui had asked me to lay off the blue clickie. Sent her a blue clickie to say OK. (It's the meds.) |
|
10 Apr 05 - 08:55 PM (#1457632) Subject: RE: BS: Pubic information service From: Peace It was funny at the time. Just like the night that Tom ######## was passed out and we shaved half his mustache. He had been very proud of that mustache. It was funny at the time. Like the time we sent Tom (another Tom) a telegram that read, "Please ignore first telegram." It was just one of those things. Lucky for us he calmed down by the time he saw us again. He was a very HUGE man. |
|
10 Apr 05 - 08:58 PM (#1457634) Subject: RE: BS: Pubic information service From: Peace Oh, yeah. We hadn't SENT a first telegram. He drove close to a hundred miles lookin' for the first telegram. Never did find it despite tracers put out by Western Union and CN/CP Telecommunications. |
|
10 Apr 05 - 11:22 PM (#1457701) Subject: RE: BS: Pubic information service From: jacqui.c Nice one Brucie. I love a man with a screwy sense of humour. |
|
10 Apr 05 - 11:24 PM (#1457704) Subject: RE: BS: Pubic information service From: Peace You gotta be in seventh heaven with Kendall then. |
|
10 Apr 05 - 11:29 PM (#1457705) Subject: RE: BS: Pubic information service From: Stilly River Sage Jacqui, Nads or waxing is much better than shaving. Nads is the best of the two. SRS |
|
11 Apr 05 - 03:08 AM (#1457768) Subject: RE: BS: Pubic information service From: The Shambles I hate to break it to the newer members, but there are actually a few community expectations here, and I'm sure I'm not the only one who recalls a time when most members not only knew them but respected them. ~Susan Certain long-term members have done exactly as they wished and have never respected any community expectations here. Sadly they have set this example and incited everyone else to follow. Chatrooms are for short one-line stuff - based on WHO is saying something. The discussion forum (yes even the B/S section) are about WHAT is being said. It is possible to still be humourous in both areas but still respect the difference between them. Back to the members........... |
|
11 Apr 05 - 04:24 AM (#1457797) Subject: RE: BS: Pubic information service From: John MacKenzie I think the term 'wet blanket' would be appropriiate at this time. G.. |
|
11 Apr 05 - 04:43 AM (#1457804) Subject: RE: BS: Pubic information service From: GUEST,catsphiddle@work No problem SINS....Micca tells the story himself when he's a few alcoholic beverages! I think circumcision is more common in the USA then it is in America...I must have led a sheltered and innocent life as I have never seen a circumsized one! On the topic of shaving pubic hair.....why not...you can shave it into all sorts of shapes...triangles and landing strips!... |
|
11 Apr 05 - 04:56 AM (#1457807) Subject: RE: BS: Pubic information service From: Micca Brucie, when we sent a similar telegram it read, " Ignore previous telegram all may yet be well" it caused a lot of consternation. as to SRS's "Nads" link, it would be funny if they sponsored a football team, what the chant would be? "Go......" |
|
11 Apr 05 - 05:13 AM (#1457811) Subject: RE: BS: Pubic information service From: GUEST Slight thread creep, but you should have seen my cousin when we shaved his eyebrows when he got blind drunk one night. Boy, was he surprised the next morning - but you couldn't tell to look at him. |
|
11 Apr 05 - 08:13 AM (#1457886) Subject: RE: BS: Pubic information service From: jacqui.c "You gotta be in seventh heaven with Kendall then. " Brucie - that's one of the reasons I married him! |
|
11 Apr 05 - 08:17 AM (#1457890) Subject: RE: BS: Pubic information service From: GUEST,ZXs And some of the other reasons? |
|
11 Apr 05 - 08:18 AM (#1457893) Subject: RE: BS: Pubic information service From: GUEST,Bill the Collie 100 |
|
11 Apr 05 - 08:21 AM (#1457898) Subject: RE: BS: Pubic information service From: Leadfingers Guest Bill the Collie - that was 97 |
|
11 Apr 05 - 08:23 AM (#1457902) Subject: RE: BS: Pubic information service From: Leadfingers What the hell happened there ?? It clearly said 97 when I posted . And I double checked !! |
|
11 Apr 05 - 12:49 PM (#1458089) Subject: RE: BS: Pubic information service From: MBSLynne Timewarp Terry |
|
11 Apr 05 - 01:50 PM (#1458139) Subject: RE: BS: Pubic information service From: Micca " It's just a jump to the left..... Then a step to the riiiight...." |
|
11 Apr 05 - 02:10 PM (#1458150) Subject: RE: BS: Pubic information service From: Rustic Rebel Since I don't have, what it is you are talking about (whatever the hell that is), I can't see any sense 'dick'-ing around in this thread! |
|
11 Apr 05 - 02:23 PM (#1458170) Subject: RE: BS: Pubic information service From: Amos You got the principle of it anyway, RR!! :) Reminds me of that wily aristocrat who sent telegrams to half the members of Parliament saying "Flee--all is discovered" just to see how many of them left town the next day -- if I remember the story rightly -- I believe it was a significant number. A |
|
11 Apr 05 - 02:38 PM (#1458187) Subject: RE: BS: Pubic information service From: SINSULL Great! WYSIWYG and Shambles have appointed themselves Arbiters of Elegance (look it up) in the Chat where I have never seen either one of them. Now we'll have to change the entire format. Those of you who insist on having intelligent discussions on serious topics are forthwith ordered to keep your comments to "quip" length and all threads resulting from discussions in the Chat are now banned. Will someone add this to the permanent Facts thread? And to newer members: Get used to it. Part of the expectations here is that you will occasionally be subjected to know-it-all pontificating from those who really don't know it all. As to NADS - I prefer microwaveable wax that doesn't require fabric strips to rip out the offending hairs. Not for the faint of heart. |
|
11 Apr 05 - 02:58 PM (#1458199) Subject: RE: BS: Pubic information service From: Peace Sounds so much better than using a razor with a sharp blade. So what do ya do? Pour the hot wax on yer crotch and then let it dry THEN tear it off thus taking with it the offending hairs? Sounds like a plan. Next time I get crabs I will remember that. However, seems as if the hot wax would kill the crabs and maybe just that should be enough. Right? |
|
11 Apr 05 - 03:16 PM (#1458216) Subject: RE: BS: Pubic information service From: Amos I am wincing just reading about such an approach. A |
|
11 Apr 05 - 03:49 PM (#1458237) Subject: RE: BS: Pubic information service From: jimmyt Boy! I almost missed this whole fascinating discussion on Protocol in the chatroom! I guess I should not announce the premier of my new line of Spring Thongs! SOmeone may take offense. I will try to keep the chat converstaion on a higher plane then.........perhaps pushup bras? jimmyt one of the proud king's men! |
|
11 Apr 05 - 04:39 PM (#1458292) Subject: RE: BS: Pubic information service From: Amos JimmyT: Please contact me at your earliest opportunity regarding the line you mention of pushup Bras. The brotherhood of the Temple of the Golden Globes is looking for good designs to consider for uniforms as they transform their order into a new, dynamic, and feeling organization suitable to the youth and vitality and forward approach of the Curvaceous 21st Century. We are seeking a well-rounded, balanced design which combines a certain flair and thrust with the necessary modicum of discretion which will allow meditation to occur without excess, a target-center which I feel you have touched on in your past and can provide dexterous and sensitive talent to in the fullness of time. I look forward to your response. Brother Tacitus Divine, Forward-Looking Design Directior Temple of the Golden Globes |
|
11 Apr 05 - 06:20 PM (#1458406) Subject: RE: BS: Pubic information service From: Stilly River Sage Nads is washable so the fabric is reused. Nads is basically sugar, honey, molasses, every sticky thing you can think of, cooked together into a product with the viscosity of strawberry jam (and it gets thicker as it ages, in the same way as honey crystalizes, but still works great). How is hot wax different? I couldn't subject a son to circumcision any more than I could subject a daughter to it. SRS |
|
11 Apr 05 - 06:23 PM (#1458409) Subject: RE: BS: Pubic information service From: PoppaGator The thing about being circumsized (or not) is that you'll never know whrther or not anything would feel any different the other way. Unless, of course, you got circumsized as an adult, which wouldn't feel very good at all, I wouldn't imagine. |
|
11 Apr 05 - 08:01 PM (#1458511) Subject: RE: BS: Pubic information service From: SINSULL Spring Thongs? Are those the ones with the surprise slinky inside? Definitely want to shave if you wear one of those both for aesthetics and not to get hairs caught in the spring - OUCH! |
|
11 Apr 05 - 10:38 PM (#1458603) Subject: RE: BS: Pubic information service From: jimmyt Mary, I will have you know the spring is installed to help "mother nature" along just a bit instead of the little blue pill. Puts the "Boing" back in your step. FOrget I even mentioned it. I am sure it is inappropriate and I stand chastised! jimmyt |
|
12 Apr 05 - 01:49 AM (#1458685) Subject: RE: BS: Pubic information service From: GUEST,Redwood And hows about depilated bottomholes y'all? Is it worth all that trouble? Public hair spreads and keeps on spreading. |
|
12 Apr 05 - 02:08 AM (#1458690) Subject: RE: BS: Pubic information service From: Peace It's a menace, a public menace. SO ARE CRABS. |
|
12 Apr 05 - 02:34 AM (#1458701) Subject: RE: BS: Pubic information service From: Micca just to keep it musical, Tune "My Bonny lies over the ocean" My one skin lies over my two skin my two skin lies over my three my three skin lies over my four skin oh bring back my four skin to me |
|
12 Apr 05 - 02:40 AM (#1458706) Subject: RE: BS: Pubic information service From: Davetnova Now hair removal may have it's reasons. Circumcision may have it's reasons. But what possible reason is there for anal bleaching? |
|
12 Apr 05 - 02:45 AM (#1458711) Subject: RE: BS: Pubic information service From: Peace Wot the hell is anal beaching? Is this like what whales do? |
|
12 Apr 05 - 02:48 AM (#1458714) Subject: RE: BS: Pubic information service From: Peace Here ya go. NO picture included. Of course, there could have been, and because it would have shown a bleached anus, who'd see it, right? What WILL they think of next? |
|
12 Apr 05 - 03:10 AM (#1458724) Subject: RE: BS: Pubic information service From: MBSLynne SRS...no neither would I subject a son to circumcision. Taking off bits that nature intended you to have seems like a bad idea to me anyway. I've been a long time actually joining this discussion. I've seen and er...experienced....both types (all types??) and don't have a preference either. Don't think it makes any difference to sexual activity. Shaved bits however.....surely once they start to grow back the stubble is bloody scratchy for one's partner? Love Lynne |
|
12 Apr 05 - 03:55 AM (#1458744) Subject: RE: BS: Pubic information service From: Peace Other than the religious aspect of circumcision, there was thought at one time that the circumcised penis was 'healthier'; that is, easier to keep clean, etc. It is easier to keep clean, but any guy who cares about his cleanliness will draw back the foreskin when he showers or bathes and wash himself. Conventional wisdom is not always wise. One aspect of the difference that people have not addressed is the ability of a person with an uncircumcised penis to last longer during coitus--that is, to ejaculate less quickly. That is due to the foreskin covering the glans penis (the cap or head) and thus preventing the degree of friction that a circumcised penis would experience. However, other literature demonstrates that that can be overcome (hehehe) by mental control and the importance of the female's experience to the male involved. IMO, of course. |
|
12 Apr 05 - 07:26 AM (#1458876) Subject: RE: BS: Pubic information service From: MBSLynne Well most of the circumcised ones I met were when I was young (and so were they) and in more recent, maturer times they've mostly been uncircumcised, so it's hard to tell if it's true about lasting longer, since experience also has a lot to do with that too.... Love Lynne |
|
12 Apr 05 - 08:47 AM (#1458955) Subject: RE: BS: Pubic information service From: GUEST,Giok That could be expressed by a 'sliding scale', but you'd have to programme in variables like drink which can add or subtract depending on the amount consumed. Can't remember the last time somebody tried to get me drunk in order to seduce me though! Giok ¦¬] |
|
12 Apr 05 - 10:12 AM (#1459022) Subject: RE: BS: Pubic information service From: MBSLynne So...what festivals are you going to this year Giok? And what do you drink? Love Lynne |
|
12 Apr 05 - 11:35 AM (#1459088) Subject: RE: BS: Pubic information service From: GUEST,Hannah I guess that if you've a funny-coloured anus when it's clean, you'd want to have it bleached so that any sexual partner doesn't start a conversation about it when you are in the midst of something interesting. |
|
12 Apr 05 - 11:49 AM (#1459108) Subject: RE: BS: Pubic information service From: Stilly River Sage
you'd want to have it bleached so that any sexual partner doesn't start a conversation about it when you are in the midst of something interesting. I'm not sure whether that remark should simply stand on its own as the most absurd one-liner I've ever had the pleasure to read here at Mudcat, or if I should write a small script to demonstrate the sort of sexual encounter between two partners in an apparently well-lit room, deep in the throes of passion, when one remarks to the other about the color of their asshole. Do you think HBO could do something with it? SRS |
|
12 Apr 05 - 01:36 PM (#1459221) Subject: RE: BS: Pubic information service From: John MacKenzie Never did like brown eyes myself. G.. |
|
12 Apr 05 - 01:42 PM (#1459228) Subject: RE: BS: Pubic information service From: Amos I thought the Mudcat had covered all imaginable topics, proper or not, but this is, um, new territory for me. I do recall Henry Miller in some book I read in my teens mentioning a sighting under conditions such as those described above, but he didn't start a conversation about it, having both his minds on other things. Four-year old boy in the bath, playing with his scrotum: "Mommy, are these my brains??" Mother: "Not yet, dear." A |
|
12 Apr 05 - 03:22 PM (#1459307) Subject: RE: BS: Pubic information service From: Liz the Squeak God has a cruel and unusual sense of humour... man was given both brains and a penis and only enough blood to run one at a time! Re: experience - no difference from what I remember..... it's been a very long time since I saw a 'roundhead'.... And Brucie - your second paragraph in your last post ~ bollocks! LTS |
|
12 Apr 05 - 03:25 PM (#1459310) Subject: RE: BS: Pubic information service From: Peace Possibly, Liz. However, the info comes from a site I found that addressed the issue. The site seems to have been started and is maintained by uncircumcised men. Just reporting what I read. Didn't mean to offend you--or anyone else for that matter. |
