|
27 May 05 - 08:23 AM (#1494175) Subject: BS: Something NEW under the Sun From: Donuel Solar Fusion? maybe not http://www.thunderbolts.info/tpod/2005/arch05/050517fusion.htm The new 100,000 rounds per minute TOTALLY SILENT machine gun http://www.rense.com/general65/dread.htm |
|
27 May 05 - 08:56 AM (#1494192) Subject: RE: BS: Something NEW under the Sun From: gnu But, such a gun, at least in 308, would violate the GC, no? |
|
27 May 05 - 09:46 AM (#1494217) Subject: RE: BS: Something NEW under the Sun From: podman Interesting articles: Also particularly notewort-y on rense.com: WICKED COHORTS Incredible Collusion Of Zionists & The Third Reich Zionists Plot To Stigmatize Lenni Brenner's '51 Documents' Mossad & 911 - US Becomes Zionist Beast Of Burden |
|
27 May 05 - 10:16 AM (#1494232) Subject: RE: BS: Something NEW under the Sun From: Bunnahabhain It does seem as if all the infomation on it is from one source, and not the most even handed one at that. It doesn't mean it's not true, but it does make it very suspect. The other thing is that it doesn't change things much. The US already has overwhelming firepower. Will it make that much difference if it can be projected by this, rather than other weapons systems? |
|
27 May 05 - 11:08 AM (#1494277) Subject: RE: BS: Something NEW under the Sun From: Bill D sounds like quite an interesting new weapon...Now I wonder how long it will be before the NRA has lobbyists trying to make it legal to own for homeowners to 'protect' themselves and for deer hunters to be 'sure' of bagging that big buck! |
|
27 May 05 - 12:10 PM (#1494358) Subject: RE: BS: Something NEW under the Sun From: TheBigPinkLad Humans. We're such clever fuckers. |
|
27 May 05 - 12:16 PM (#1494368) Subject: RE: BS: Something NEW under the Sun From: robomatic As per usual, Hakman has led off another bullsh*t thread, this time confounding Physics BS with fake weapons BS both promulgated from the same BS website which apparently is full of antisemitic BS. The DREAD as shown willnot be able to do anything as claimed. It would be noisy, it would not be accurate, it would be more dangerous to the user than to the enemy. It reminds me of the guy working on the flying hovercraft out of his backyard. It's a matter of basic physics. Unfortunately, there are other weapons being designed and promulgated which can come close to what is claimed for DREAD, but you'd have to actually get out and look at something besides web-crap to find them. You up to that, Hakman? I don't think you are. |