|
05 Nov 05 - 02:03 PM (#1598121) Subject: BS: William or Ed? or??? From: greg stephens Personally I reckon Emma was considerably more pissed than she can remember. Far from being William's or Ed's, it's going to turn out to be Brian Aldridge's. |
|
05 Nov 05 - 02:15 PM (#1598133) Subject: RE: BS: William or Ed? or??? From: Leadfingers But doesnt Emma come over as being as thick as two short planks ?? |
|
05 Nov 05 - 02:17 PM (#1598137) Subject: RE: BS: William or Ed? or??? From: sapper82 UMRA is thataway ---> uk.media.radio.archers |
|
05 Nov 05 - 02:23 PM (#1598143) Subject: RE: BS: William or Ed? or??? From: greg stephens Sapper82: you're joking. What kind of nerd would go looking at a site like that? Get a life. |
|
05 Nov 05 - 03:17 PM (#1598187) Subject: RE: BS: William or Ed? or??? From: MBSLynne Anyone opening a book on the outcome?? Personally, my money is on Will. When do we get to find out? I can't wait for the rotten cow to be proved wrong. Love Lynne |
|
05 Nov 05 - 05:54 PM (#1598304) Subject: RE: BS: William or Ed? or??? From: greg stephens I'm not sure how long these DNA tests take...the firm may be having problems with Blunkett withdrawing his funds. |
|
05 Nov 05 - 06:19 PM (#1598323) Subject: RE: BS: William or Ed? or??? From: Morticia it's gotta be Will......surely? |
|
05 Nov 05 - 07:05 PM (#1598357) Subject: RE: BS: William or Ed? or??? From: John MacKenzie My money's on Will too, mind you might turn out to be Kenton's. Whosoever the father is they will drag it out for weeks yet, Brian is more likely to be mucking out pigs on his own any day now. Giok |
|
05 Nov 05 - 11:50 PM (#1598483) Subject: RE: BS: William or Ed? or??? From: YorkshireYankee As far as the Archers (or any soap) is concerned, I always assume that whatever outcome will most complicate matters (i.e. provide more 'interesting' dramatic possibilites) is the most likely. Thus, I'd be willing to wager a large sum that the DNA tests will show Will's the Daddy -- 'cos if it's Ed's baby, that would make it far too easy for Ed & Emma to bugger off to France without nearly as much additional anguish, agonising & other juicy grist for the Archers' writers to sink their teeth into... |
|
06 Nov 05 - 04:26 AM (#1598513) Subject: RE: BS: William or Ed? or??? From: MBSLynne Yes YY, that's exactly how I see it. MUCH more interesting if it's Will's. And one in the eye for stupid Emma as well, which has got to be a bonus! On another side of this issue, surely whoever is on a child's birth certificate remains it's 'legal' father whatever it's DNA shows? I mean, pregnant women have married men who weren't the father before and their husband is then counted as the child's father even if it's known that he isn't the biological father. Surely even if the baby is Ed's, Will can still (if he feels like it) stake his claim, demand access and refuse to allow them to take the baby out of the country? Love Lynne |
|
06 Nov 05 - 05:06 AM (#1598519) Subject: RE: BS: William or Ed? or??? From: Skipjack K8 I suspect the tests will confirm that neither Will nor Ed are the father, neither indeed is Emma the mother, and there was a tragic mix-up in the soap maternity ward and the Grundy baby ended up being given up for adoption by Martin and Sonia, currently resident in Albert Square. Or so I am told. |
|
06 Nov 05 - 05:16 AM (#1598521) Subject: RE: BS: William or Ed? or??? From: Keith A of Hertford Who had a pathological hatred of the whole Grundy clan? Snatch Foster's boy! Mark my words. |
|
06 Nov 05 - 02:06 PM (#1598739) Subject: RE: BS: William or Ed? or??? From: MBSLynne Actually...you're right. To find out that NEITHER Grundy is the father would really put the cat among the pigeons!! |
|
06 Nov 05 - 02:37 PM (#1598770) Subject: RE: BS: William or Ed? or??? From: Emma B I'm going to change my name! |
|
06 Nov 05 - 03:57 PM (#1598836) Subject: RE: BS: William or Ed? or??? From: John MacKenzie OK Mo. G. |
|
06 Nov 05 - 06:37 PM (#1598897) Subject: RE: BS: William or Ed? or??? From: Shanghaiceltic I think it is Blunkett's. |
|
06 Nov 05 - 07:24 PM (#1598928) Subject: RE: BS: William or Ed? or??? From: John MacKenzie Or Nelson Gabriel's!! G.. |
|
07 Nov 05 - 12:28 AM (#1599068) Subject: RE: BS: William or Ed? or??? From: Shanghaiceltic Might be Jack's but he would not remember. |
|
07 Nov 05 - 12:40 AM (#1599071) Subject: RE: BS: William or Ed? or??? From: GUEST,Bill the Collie Don't know who William is; my money's on Willyum. |
|
07 Nov 05 - 02:58 AM (#1599112) Subject: RE: BS: William or Ed? or??? From: MBSLynne Hmmmm yes...Nelson Gabriel's. I think necrophillia is one story line we haven't had in the 54 years of the Archers...... |
|
07 Nov 05 - 05:11 AM (#1599166) Subject: RE: BS: William or Ed? or??? From: GUEST,folkiedave That´s because it is seen as dead boring. Dave |
|
07 Nov 05 - 05:13 AM (#1599168) Subject: RE: BS: William or Ed? or??? From: MBSLynne Groan..... |
|
07 Nov 05 - 07:34 AM (#1599217) Subject: RE: BS: William or Ed? or??? From: Splott Man I agree with Yorkshire Yankee. The test will be inconclusive. Did you spot the little aside the other day setting the scene for an avian flu storyline? |
|
07 Nov 05 - 09:33 AM (#1599303) Subject: RE: BS: William or Ed? or??? From: John MacKenzie Well brothers may have close DNA signatures, and thus the scene would be set for another 50 years+ of aspersions cast and uncast. *he he* Giok |
|
07 Nov 05 - 10:09 AM (#1599331) Subject: RE: BS: William or Ed? or??? From: mooman I would vote for Shatner too... I don't know MBSLynne... Brian and Jennifer spring to mind... Peace moo |
|
07 Nov 05 - 03:52 PM (#1599497) Subject: RE: BS: William or Ed? or??? From: MBSLynne Got it!! Julia has died of a heart attack on finding out that Lewis is the father?! |
|
07 Nov 05 - 03:56 PM (#1599500) Subject: RE: BS: William or Ed? or??? From: Skipjack K8 Nice timing, Lewis, a couple of months married to the mad battleaxe, and now Lower Loxley is yours, all yours!!!! |
|
07 Nov 05 - 05:42 PM (#1599524) Subject: RE: BS: William or Ed? or??? From: GUEST I was surprised that they managed to kill off Julia so quickly. Normally they write the character out for a few months first. For the baby my money is on neither Grundy. |
|
08 Nov 05 - 02:47 AM (#1599807) Subject: RE: BS: William or Ed? or??? From: MBSLynne I was surprised at the speed they killed off Julia as well...they must have brought the actors in specially. I never thought of that Greg! Do you think Lewis did the dirty deed (Killed Julia, not fathered the baby) |
|
08 Nov 05 - 04:59 AM (#1599863) Subject: RE: BS: William or Ed? or??? From: Morticia How about if Lewis killed Julia and fathered the baby? |
|
08 Nov 05 - 05:27 AM (#1599873) Subject: RE: BS: William or Ed? or??? From: MBSLynne Well if he brings Emma to live at Lower Loxley, Elizabeth will wish Julia back again! |
|
08 Nov 05 - 09:45 AM (#1599992) Subject: RE: BS: William or Ed? or??? From: Zany Mouse Nah - it's Oliver Sterling's! Rhiannon |
|
08 Nov 05 - 01:09 PM (#1600060) Subject: RE: BS: William or Ed? or??? From: Rt Revd Sir jOhn from Hull Its Joe Grundys. |
|
08 Nov 05 - 01:16 PM (#1600068) Subject: RE: BS: William or Ed? or??? From: Morticia what, with his bad knee? Can't see it somehow |
|
10 Nov 05 - 07:38 AM (#1601303) Subject: RE: BS: William or Ed? or??? From: MBSLynne Oho!! We won't have to wait too long! The results arrive on Monday! Can I stand the suspense?? |
|
10 Nov 05 - 08:31 AM (#1601344) Subject: RE: BS: William or Ed? or??? From: fiddler so you all thing shes a randy little tart and it could be fathered by the whole male population of the village of Ambridge! A gang bang in Ambridge! Waht is the wworld coming to? Andy PS I wouldn't send her home on a Friday night but I wouldn't take her home to meet my mum.... XXXX |
|
10 Nov 05 - 08:32 AM (#1601348) Subject: RE: BS: William or Ed? or??? From: MBSLynne ...and you CERTAINLY wouldn't take her home to meet your brother..... |
|
11 Nov 05 - 04:55 AM (#1602133) Subject: RE: BS: William or Ed? or??? From: GUEST Could've happened at those marriage preparation classes . . . |
|
11 Nov 05 - 05:35 AM (#1602153) Subject: RE: BS: William or Ed? or??? From: Shiplap Structure3 Could have been Tom Archers organic sausage |
|
11 Nov 05 - 07:49 AM (#1602211) Subject: RE: BS: William or Ed? or??? From: MBSLynne If they are THAT potent, I hate to think what things will be like now Brian's got hold of them! |
|
14 Nov 05 - 07:24 AM (#1604465) Subject: RE: BS: William or Ed? or??? From: MBSLynne Well tonight's the night! Can we stand the excitement? |
|
14 Nov 05 - 07:30 AM (#1604474) Subject: RE: BS: William or Ed? or??? From: GUEST, topsie No, It'll fade into the music just as they're getting the results, and we'll have to wait till tomorrow. |
|
14 Nov 05 - 07:44 AM (#1604488) Subject: RE: BS: William or Ed? or??? From: greg stephens I have it on good authority, from a source in BBC Birmingham, that Tom's sausages are indeed going to feature in a story-line, but not this one. It will concern animal rights protesters, Julia Pargeter's body, and the manufacture of the Tom's snorkers. |
|
14 Nov 05 - 02:07 PM (#1604804) Subject: RE: BS: William or Ed? or??? From: Skipjack K8 It's Will's!!!!! |
|
14 Nov 05 - 02:09 PM (#1604806) Subject: RE: BS: William or Ed? or??? From: Keith A of Hertford I knew all along! |
|
14 Nov 05 - 02:19 PM (#1604819) Subject: RE: BS: William or Ed? or??? From: Morticia told you it was Will's |
|
14 Nov 05 - 02:56 PM (#1604858) Subject: RE: BS: William or Ed? or??? From: MBSLynne Yes!!! Serve the silly bitch right! |
|
14 Nov 05 - 05:28 PM (#1605002) Subject: RE: BS: William or Ed? or??? From: Zany Mouse Ah - so the French plan is doomed to failure then! Rhiannon |
|
14 Nov 05 - 06:12 PM (#1605023) Subject: RE: BS: William or Ed? or??? From: Shanghaiceltic Argggh! Well now the manure has hit the rotating device. |
|
14 Nov 05 - 06:40 PM (#1605044) Subject: RE: BS: William or Ed? or??? From: GUEST,Giok at Logan Airport But Edward;s always loved Emma, so she will stay with him, stand by for a custody battle, there is many many miles in this one yet, you mark my words!! Giok |
|
14 Nov 05 - 06:53 PM (#1605061) Subject: RE: BS: William or Ed? or??? From: Herga Kitty Emma's as thick as 3 short planks, otherwise she wouldn't have been taking driving lessons from the man who nicked his brother's car and crashed it with her in it. |
|
15 Nov 05 - 04:21 AM (#1605308) Subject: RE: BS: William or Ed? or??? From: Gervase It's going to get messy. Willyum won't get sole custody because the wee'un is still a baby, but he'll throw all sorts of dirt into the argument, while Emma, splashing around in the shallow end of the gene pool, will simply get paranoid and throw more dirt back. I predict a major rigt betwixt the Grundys and the Carters (as if Neil was miserable enough already!). And Ed will probably crash another car. |
|
15 Nov 05 - 07:25 AM (#1605375) Subject: RE: BS: William or Ed? or??? From: Splott Man Either way, the baby is still a Grundy. Another 25 years of fun. |
|
17 Mar 06 - 08:20 AM (#1696031) Subject: RE: BS: William or Ed? or??? From: Rt Revd Sir jOhn from Hull I reckon George will get kidnapped. |
|
17 Mar 06 - 10:01 AM (#1696107) Subject: RE: BS: William or Ed? or??? From: MBSLynne Nah..that's been tried already. Don't think it will happen again. Can't they send Emma to Spain where she can be shot by basque separatists? Love Lynne |
|
17 Mar 06 - 10:06 AM (#1696117) Subject: RE: BS: William or Ed? or??? From: greg stephens We haven't had a raking up old paedophilic abuse story yet. I wonder if I am the only person who remembers Jack Woolley kissing Will?(I'm not making it up!) |
|
17 Mar 06 - 01:59 PM (#1696336) Subject: RE: BS: William or Ed? or??? From: MBSLynne OK...how old was Will at the time? |