|
18 Mar 06 - 09:52 PM (#1697338) Subject: BS: anyone seen my vagina thread ? From: GUEST,mystified and all innocent I could have sworn I left a thread here titled "another use for vagina..." only 20 minutes ago. make a cup of coffee, come back and its gone ? .. the black hole of censorship works in mysterious and arbitrary ways considering 80% of BS threads are just as complete shite as my silly little thread.. which was intended as a riposte to all the lame space-wasting cut 'n' paste & pun threads bloating and polluting the bandwidth here. It went here. JC |
|
19 Mar 06 - 05:04 PM (#1698069) Subject: RE: BS: anyone seen my vagina thread ? From: GUEST Jees, From the title, I thought you were trying to repair your virginity. |
|
19 Mar 06 - 05:28 PM (#1698090) Subject: RE: BS: anyone seen my vagina thread ? From: The Shambles Larry David's TV wife was nervous before going on stage to perform in The Vagina Monologues. To reassure her he told her that she was only going out to talk about it and did not have to go on stage and show hers to the audience......... |
|
19 Mar 06 - 05:36 PM (#1698096) Subject: RE: BS: anyone seen my vagina thread ? From: Little Hawk Yes, I saw it. Big deal. Who cares? |
|
19 Mar 06 - 06:19 PM (#1698137) Subject: RE: BS: anyone seen my vagina thread ? From: GUEST Isn't "vagina thread" another name for a thong bathing suit? |
|
19 Mar 06 - 06:53 PM (#1698151) Subject: RE: BS: anyone seen my vagina thread ? From: Georgiansilver That's this thread pretty well sewn up then. |
|
19 Mar 06 - 07:10 PM (#1698160) Subject: RE: BS: anyone seen my vagina thread ? From: Peace "anyone seen my vagina thread ?" 1) Lost your tampax did ya? 2) Why hasn't this been condemned as a copycat thread? |
|
19 Mar 06 - 07:17 PM (#1698166) Subject: RE: BS: anyone seen my vagina thread ? From: Peace Why the censorship? |
|
19 Mar 06 - 07:30 PM (#1698174) Subject: RE: BS: anyone seen my vagina thread ? From: Sorcha Ya, not that bad IMO.... |
|
19 Mar 06 - 07:37 PM (#1698180) Subject: RE: BS: anyone seen my vagina thread ? From: Sorcha PS...I haven't seen mine for years....LOL |
|
19 Mar 06 - 08:09 PM (#1698188) Subject: RE: BS: anyone seen my vagina thread ? From: GUEST,I saw it, and was glad it disappeared Peace, the question is, why do you feel you can override the editing of those who make the decisions? Joe Offer can decide to uncensor if he agrees, but re-posting without checking is not the way it's supposed to work. |
|
19 Mar 06 - 08:11 PM (#1698190) Subject: RE: BS: anyone seen my vagina thread ? From: Sorcha Only a guest passing wind.....who talks to Guests??? |
|
19 Mar 06 - 08:14 PM (#1698192) Subject: RE: BS: anyone seen my vagina thread ? From: GUEST,GUEST,mystified and all innocent is this thread closed or what !!?? can't mudcat censors make their minds up and close down & banish with consistency..??????????? ..but then again.. maybe they are open minded to the voices of reason..??? and if thats the case.. hooray!!!!! |
|
19 Mar 06 - 08:30 PM (#1698208) Subject: RE: BS: anyone seen my vagina thread ? From: Peace "Subject: RE: BS: anyone seen my vagina thread ? From: GUEST,I saw it, and was glad it disappeared - PM Date: 19 Mar 06 - 08:09 PM Peace, the question is, why do you feel you can override the editing of those who make the decisions? Joe Offer can decide to uncensor if he agrees, but re-posting without checking is not the way it's supposed to work." Oh. |
|
19 Mar 06 - 08:31 PM (#1698209) Subject: RE: BS: anyone seen my vagina thread ? From: Peace The title of this thread is more offensive than what I posted. So what's your bloody problem? |
|
19 Mar 06 - 08:31 PM (#1698210) Subject: RE: BS: anyone seen my vagina thread ? From: MaineDog Did it make necklaces, or what? |
|
19 Mar 06 - 08:35 PM (#1698212) Subject: RE: BS: anyone seen my vagina thread ? From: Peace LOL Ya think the dexterity is there for exacting work like that? |
|
19 Mar 06 - 09:00 PM (#1698225) Subject: RE: BS: anyone seen my vagina thread ? From: Sorcha Probably....LOL...just grab the string and yank....hee hee! No manual dexterity required.... |
|
19 Mar 06 - 09:02 PM (#1698227) Subject: RE: BS: anyone seen my vagina thread ? From: GUEST,pearl necklace you dirty minded folkers ! |
|
19 Mar 06 - 09:26 PM (#1698238) Subject: RE: BS: anyone seen my vagina thread ? From: Peace www.albinoblacksheep.com/flash/winrg.php Windows users will love that site. |
|
20 Mar 06 - 12:06 AM (#1698307) Subject: RE: BS: anyone seen my vagina thread ? From: Peace "GUEST,I saw it, and was glad it disappeared" Well then why don't you jus' log back in and message the clone and thank her? |
|
20 Mar 06 - 04:03 AM (#1698377) Subject: RE: BS: anyone seen my vagina thread ? From: The Shambles Her? |
|
20 Mar 06 - 04:22 AM (#1698389) Subject: RE: BS: anyone seen my vagina thread ? From: The Shambles Copycat threads? |
|
20 Mar 06 - 04:42 AM (#1698403) Subject: RE: BS: anyone seen my vagina thread ? From: The Shambles You may have missed this. Generally, I move the copycats to the thread they're copying... Didn't work on the Vagina/Viagra thread, I guess. -Joe Offer- |
|
20 Mar 06 - 07:26 AM (#1698488) Subject: RE: BS: anyone seen my vagina thread ? From: GUEST Our parents restricted our freedom of speech, now here we are with supposed grown ups insisting on their "Right" to use foul language in public for what appears to be shock value with no real value. GROW UP! |
|
20 Mar 06 - 08:25 AM (#1698539) Subject: RE: BS: anyone seen my vagina thread ? From: Wolfgang Has anyone missed this? Subject: RE: BS: anyone seen my vagina thread ? From: The Shambles - PM Date: 20 Mar 06 - 04:03 AM Her? -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Post - Top - Forum Home - Printer Friendly - Translate -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Subject: RE: BS: anyone seen my vagina thread ? From: The Shambles - PM Date: 20 Mar 06 - 04:22 AM Copycat threads? -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Post - Top - Forum Home - Printer Friendly - Translate -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Subject: RE: BS: anyone seen my vagina thread ? From: The Shambles - PM Date: 20 Mar 06 - 04:42 AM You may have missed this. Generally, I move the copycats to the thread they're copying... Didn't work on the Vagina/Viagra thread, I guess. -Joe Offer- Wolfgang |
|
20 Mar 06 - 10:30 AM (#1698619) Subject: RE: BS: anyone seen my vagina thread ? From: Peace Hymn? |
|
20 Mar 06 - 12:53 PM (#1698762) Subject: RE: BS: anyone seen my vagina thread ? From: Bill D It seems to be close to impossible to keep the issues straight once personal opinions kick in. Yes, we all DO differ on taste, level of boredom, tolerance for silliness, respect for 'rules' and basic 'netiquette'. We will NOT find one set of rules that everyone is happy with, but we DO have one set of rules that are applicable. This in Max's place, we post and the clones work, at his pleasure, under Joe Offer's direction. Editing/'censoring' is sometimes applied, and in borderline cases it will always be tricky to know what, how...or IF to delete or edit a post. From what I have read for the 6-7 years this debate has raged, most members (I know...not Shambles) feel that there should be some limits to freedom of speech and lines that should not be crossed. Max made it clear when he gave Joe the job that 'some' control was required. I don't recall that he said anything about voting on every case, nor that when someone disagrees with Joe's rulings, that they may just stubbornly try to do whatever they want anyway. There is an order to it all, if we pay attention to it. I have seen several final decisions *I* do not agree with, but they WERE Joe's or Max's decisions! I note that Joe is leaving 'vagina thread' and 'tampax' jokes alone right now, though those seem to me to be pretty close to 'offensive enough to edit'...fine, it is not MY place to make that final decision! I have seen stuff before it was deleted in the past, and I also did not take it on myself to repost it from some sense of righteous indignation AT the editing. Many edited & deleted posts HAVE been restored after debate and a ruling...and that, in my not-so-humble opinion, is how it oughta work...and 5 MORE years of Shambles campaiging for NO editing is not going to change my mind. YMMV |
|
20 Mar 06 - 01:04 PM (#1698774) Subject: RE: BS: anyone seen my vagina thread ? From: Michael Lost your vagina Thread? Somebody's pulled then. Mike |
|
20 Mar 06 - 01:08 PM (#1698780) Subject: RE: BS: anyone seen my vagina thread ? From: *Laura* why is 'vagina' offensive? There's been lots of threads using innuendo/slang names - why is the correct biological term offensive? xLx |
|
20 Mar 06 - 01:16 PM (#1698783) Subject: RE: BS: anyone seen my vagina thread ? From: Peace My point above was that the remark I made about tampax was no more offensive than the thread title. I don't think vagina is at all offensive. It's the term fer gawd's sake. |
|
20 Mar 06 - 01:52 PM (#1698811) Subject: RE: BS: anyone seen my vagina thread ? From: Bill D Peace...did you post the 'tampax' reply originally? or just restore it? I, personally, think that the **context** OF the not-so-cute reply DID make it 'more offensive' than either 'vagina' or 'tampax' as a word...see how we can differ? It is not just a word that is in question, but how it appears. I posted a few years ago, a joke that used 'fuck' in its punch line....and the very use OF the word was the point....but I do not think fuck is therefore appropriate in each, every, and any case that someone might want to toss it in. Not on THIS site, anyway....(I've seen a couple where it is the standard) How do we decide? As noted...thru the rules....I can't prevent people posting in ways that are not to my taste, and I can't do much about it if the executive decision is to allow it.....but I can offer my view...and I have just done that. |
|
20 Mar 06 - 01:56 PM (#1698817) Subject: RE: BS: anyone seen my vagina thread ? From: Peace Posted it originally. |
|
20 Mar 06 - 01:59 PM (#1698823) Subject: RE: BS: anyone seen my vagina thread ? From: Peace And Bill, the thread the trool was looking for was Viagra, not vagina. That said, my post was in keeping with the thread title. If there's a problem, then maybe it should have been resolved starting with the title. |
|
20 Mar 06 - 02:01 PM (#1698827) Subject: RE: BS: anyone seen my vagina thread ? From: Peace Looking at the thread title, would you have taken it seriously? |
|
20 Mar 06 - 02:23 PM (#1698854) Subject: RE: BS: anyone seen my vagina thread ? From: Bill D 'seriously'? ..don't know how to answer that...I see the thread AS a reply, by 'guest mystified'(you?) to a missing thread I never did see, but then it went off in strange directions and when I read: ""anyone seen my vagina thread ?" 1) Lost your tampax did ya?" ...that just seemed to me to be a gratuitiously tasteless joke which, I gather, was deleted and then replaced. My posts then were directed to the rules, rather than debating whether it was tasteless... Now, since the re-posting has been left alone, I take that as a management decision, even though I, personally, might have prefered to have it remain gone. personal opinions about words are one thing, going by the rules are another... It ain't easy to 'get at' some issues. |
|
20 Mar 06 - 02:32 PM (#1698861) Subject: RE: BS: anyone seen my vagina thread ? From: GUEST,mystified/Phil [QUOTE]BS: another use for vagina... GUEST,Practical Phil 18 Mar 06 - 09:26 PM -------------------------------------------------------------------- Subject: BS: another use for vagina... From: GUEST,Practical Phil Date: 18 Mar 06 - 09:26 PM my wife is going to go beserk tomorrow morning when she wakes up sober and realises where I've stored the wrapped up leftovers of our after closing time kebab, to keep it safe and warm for tomorrows breakfast.[QUOTE] ##################################### well, for the sake of 'historical context' that's what caused all this nonsense.. if there was ever any serious sub-text, it was an intention to see how the thread developed, and if it could be 'steered'into a debate on the pros/cons of silly copycat threads. |
|
20 Mar 06 - 02:34 PM (#1698866) Subject: RE: BS: anyone seen my vagina thread ? From: Peace I have no idea who mystified Phil is. |
|
20 Mar 06 - 02:35 PM (#1698867) Subject: RE: BS: anyone seen my vagina thread ? From: Bill D *ROLLING MY EYES*...no wonder. NOW what? |
|
20 Mar 06 - 02:38 PM (#1698872) Subject: RE: BS: anyone seen my vagina thread ? From: Peace Lost your marbles didja? |
|
20 Mar 06 - 02:41 PM (#1698876) Subject: RE: BS: anyone seen my vagina thread ? From: Peace And I have no idea who Practical Phil is either. Hi Phil. Nice to meet you. Good luck with the burrito. |
|
20 Mar 06 - 02:55 PM (#1698892) Subject: RE: BS: anyone seen my vagina thread ? From: Bill D shouldn't that be "practical 'Fill'"? |
|
20 Mar 06 - 03:50 PM (#1698947) Subject: RE: BS: anyone seen my vagina thread ? From: Jeri Bill D, quoted Peace: "1) Lost your tampax did ya?" and then commented ...that just seemed to me to be a gratuitiously tasteless joke which, I gather, was deleted and then replaced. My posts then were directed to the rules, rather than debating whether it was tasteless... Now, since the re-posting has been left alone, I take that as a management decision, even though I, personally, might have prefered to have it remain gone. personal opinions about words are one thing, going by the rules are another... That's it exactly. You might have preferred to have it remain gone, but it had no business being deleted. It was rude, but so what? How does this constitute a personal attack or spam? Under what criteria previously stated by Joe could the deletion be justified? It was a mistake. If it had been left alone, somebody might have commented on how disgusted they were because people do that a lot, but it wouldn't have generated an entire thread focused on bitching. |
|
20 Mar 06 - 04:04 PM (#1698959) Subject: RE: BS: anyone seen my vagina thread ? From: Peace As long as everyone's happy . . . . . |
|
20 Mar 06 - 04:19 PM (#1698977) Subject: RE: BS: anyone seen my vagina thread ? From: Peace "GUEST,I saw it, and was glad it disappeared" I don't really care that it disappeared. I just wanted to know why. |
|
20 Mar 06 - 05:38 PM (#1699042) Subject: RE: BS: anyone seen my vagina thread ? From: Bill D ok, Jeri..*shrug*..I can't seem to get across the notion that even IF it were a mistaken deletion, the correction should be made by Joe,( due process & all that, rather than rebellion in the streets) not by individual posters decision.......so I will drop it. ↓ ↓ ↓ ↓ *boom* |
|
20 Mar 06 - 08:40 PM (#1699143) Subject: RE: BS: anyone seen my vagina thread ? From: GUEST peace posts 17 times to this thread.....why? |
|
20 Mar 06 - 08:53 PM (#1699151) Subject: RE: BS: anyone seen my vagina thread ? From: Peace Who the fuck are you? |
|
20 Mar 06 - 08:54 PM (#1699152) Subject: RE: BS: anyone seen my vagina thread ? From: Peace Make that 19 with this one included. |
|
20 Mar 06 - 08:54 PM (#1699154) Subject: RE: BS: anyone seen my vagina thread ? From: Peace In fact, make it 20. |
|
20 Mar 06 - 09:01 PM (#1699159) Subject: RE: BS: anyone seen my vagina thread ? From: Jeri Peace, there are some folks around here who claim being able to count as a major achievement. It's important to them. Bill, it wasn't a correction - he simply posted it again. If that had been deleted I might have posted it, because I was just a tad cheesed off. I have no idea why someone would have deleted it on purpose, I don't believe Joe would have thought it should have been deleted - not after he'd reopened this thread which HAD been closed - and if he had, it would have been a good opportunity for him to explain that feminine hygiene products were now illegal to mention on Mudcat. No tampons, no Kotex, no Midol or maxi-pads or panty shields. My God, where will it all end!? The menopause thread? I believe you should do what you think is right. Sometimes those in power don't agree and you have to deal with the consequences. You have to figure out which fights are worth it and which aren't, because there's a cost for even the righteous ones. This isn't about free speech. Most of the people who rant about free speech here have probably never read the first amendment. We don't get to say whatever we want here. We don't get to make personal attacks, as in Personal and Attacks (which often means flame threads), or post spam. Tampons however, are completely legal. |
|
20 Mar 06 - 09:02 PM (#1699160) Subject: RE: BS: anyone seen my vagina thread ? From: Peace BTW, Guest: Message me and I'll tell you. |
|
20 Mar 06 - 09:13 PM (#1699169) Subject: RE: BS: anyone seen my vagina thread ? From: JennyO So the question is, was the thread deleted because it was offensive or because it was a copycat thread? We'll probably never know. When I spotted it, I thought - 'uh oh, I don't think they're gonna leave that one there!', so I wasn't surprised when it was deleted. Then the same post turned up in the Viagra thread and was left there, so that suggests to me that the thread was deleted because it was a copycat - or maybe as some have said, the clones changed their minds. Who knows? One thing's for sure, it got a lot more exposure (;-)) from being deleted than if it had just been left alone. Yes, it was a bit 'off', but it wasn't a derogatory term and not half as bad as some things I've seen. Talk about a storm in a teacup!! |
|
20 Mar 06 - 09:14 PM (#1699171) Subject: RE: BS: anyone seen my vagina thread ? From: Peace Are copycat threads being deleted then? Just asking. |
|
20 Mar 06 - 09:15 PM (#1699173) Subject: RE: BS: anyone seen my vagina thread ? From: Bill D well, it's not even easy to drop the subject... ok...I see the point. I regret getting involved. I will adjust my sensitivity meters accordingly. I don't usually get this deep into this sort of issue, and I think I'd best remember to be more careful in the future. g' night all.... |
|
20 Mar 06 - 09:25 PM (#1699182) Subject: RE: BS: anyone seen my vagina thread ? From: Joe Offer Yes, Tampons are generally considered to be completely legal on Mudcat. In my janitorial days, I had other opinions about them which I will decline to discuss here.... As for the thread, I moved the one message in the "vagina" thread to the "viagra" thread from which it spawned - because it was a copycat, and because I figured I was going to get all kinds of complaints about the thread title from Mudcatters named Prudence and Chastity and Fortitudina. That effectively deleted the "Vagina" thread since there were no messages in it. When we get a surfeit of copycat threads, I sometimes consolidate a few of them by moving messages - I try to avoid deletions. As is evidenced by the popularity of this thread, my efforts at consolidation in this case, resulted in multiplication. The best-laid plans of mice and men... -Joe Offer- |
|
20 Mar 06 - 09:35 PM (#1699187) Subject: RE: BS: anyone seen my vagina thread ? From: The Shambles The best-laid plans of mice and men... -Joe Offer- Perhaps you can just concentrate on influencing our forum by what you post - rather than what posts of others you feel youself qualified to judge and censor? Or as you are not happy with our forum - just start a site of your own - where you can interfere as much as you like? |
|
20 Mar 06 - 09:38 PM (#1699189) Subject: RE: BS: anyone seen my vagina thread ? From: The Shambles Proposal for members only posting of BS |
|
20 Mar 06 - 09:51 PM (#1699194) Subject: RE: BS: anyone seen my vagina thread ? From: JennyO Or as you are not happy with our forum He didn't say that, Roger. He and the clones are ASSISTING Max in keeping the Mudcat running smoothly - not 'interfering' as you put it. Sometimes there are tough calls, made more difficult by having to deal with prudes at one end and people like YOU at the other. I figured you'd be along soon to gloat, but if you see this as an opportunity for more repetitive self-righteous crap, why don't you just put a sock in it? We've heard it all before. 47 |
|
20 Mar 06 - 09:54 PM (#1699195) Subject: RE: BS: anyone seen my vagina thread ? From: The Shambles Germans who wish to use firearms should join the SS or the SA - ordinary citizens don't need guns, as their having guns doesn't serve the State. Heinrich Himmler |
|
20 Mar 06 - 09:58 PM (#1699201) Subject: RE: BS: anyone seen my vagina thread ? From: The Shambles And despite our best efforts, Mudcat is no longer a pleasant place to hang out and goof off or have a good discussion. So, I think something has to be done. Joe Offer In this thread Proposal for members only posting of BS |
|
20 Mar 06 - 10:03 PM (#1699205) Subject: RE: BS: anyone seen my vagina thread ? From: The Shambles I think that where I've watched a movie go wrong, it's usually because the dread committee has been interfering with it. John Le Carre |
|
20 Mar 06 - 10:15 PM (#1699213) Subject: RE: BS: anyone seen my vagina thread ? From: Peace Jesus, Shambles, give the folks a break. People make mistakes; we all screw up from time to time. The more pedestrian expression is 'Shit Happens'. Let it go. The US in in Iraq. Neocons are going after the whole bloody world. Iran is trying to get nukes. Men and women are going through menopause, and it's a cast-iron sonuvabitch to get a good hamburger where I live. Canadians are trying to figure out who their patron saint is; I don't drink but I'm wanna start, and Bearded bruce says we are killing 3,000,000 people over the next few years because we sell them asbestos. So, on a scale of 1 to 10, where's this stuff at, huh? |
|
20 Mar 06 - 10:17 PM (#1699217) Subject: RE: BS: anyone seen my vagina thread ? From: Peace And if I'd known it was going to cause all the trouble it did, I would have said Kotex instead! |
|
20 Mar 06 - 10:19 PM (#1699219) Subject: RE: BS: anyone seen my vagina thread ? From: The Shambles As for the thread, I moved the one message in the "vagina" thread to the "viagra" thread from which it spawned - because it was a copycat, and because I figured I was going to get all kinds of complaints about the thread title from Mudcatters named Prudence and Chastity and Fortitudina. Joe Offer If Prudence and Co do not like our forum - why are they (like so many others who are thought by our censors and their supporters to be malcontents) invited to leave and find somwhere to their liking? And as the complaints of Prudence and Co do not seem to be viewed with much sympathy by our censor - is it really sensible to take anticipatory censorship action BEFORE Prudence and Co even have a chance to complain about what other posters may choose to post? Or are the imaginary complaints Prudence and Co just being used as yet another excuse to censor what is not to the censor's personal taste and to shape our forum by this? |
|
20 Mar 06 - 10:29 PM (#1699222) Subject: RE: BS: anyone seen my vagina thread ? From: GUEST Peace, in stating that "Shit happens!" You should be aware that the corrolary to that is: "Yes, but there is usually an ashole involved!" |
|
20 Mar 06 - 10:30 PM (#1699224) Subject: RE: BS: anyone seen my vagina thread ? From: The Shambles Of the 23,547 complaints filed with the FCC in July, 23,542 came from the Parents Television Council, which provides handy online complaint forms for members who aren't comfortable thinking for themselves. Richard Roeper |
|
21 Mar 06 - 12:58 AM (#1699228) Subject: RE: BS: anyone seen my vagina thread ? From: Peace "You should be aware that the corrolary to that is:" It's the Toyota Corrolary. |
|
21 Mar 06 - 01:54 AM (#1699237) Subject: RE: BS: anyone seen my vagina thread ? From: katlaughing I saw it and was glad it disappeared and my name isn't Prudence. It was a stupid copycat title and started by a GUEST. IMO, anything thread like that started by a GUEST deserves to be deleted or moved. |
|
21 Mar 06 - 02:59 AM (#1699242) Subject: RE: BS: anyone seen my vagina thread ? From: Joe Offer Good point, Kat. I don't want to start another battle about Guest posting, but if a registered Mudcatter starts too many copycat threads, he risks building himself a reputation as an asshole. That tends to encourage him not to act like an asshole. Practical Phil, who started the "Vagina" thread, had never posted under that name before - or since. He/She is completely anonymous, and has removed him/herself from the burden of being treated like an asshole for having acted like one. So, Phil, I guess that's the price you pay for anonymity. -Joe Offer- |
|
21 Mar 06 - 10:43 AM (#1699261) Subject: RE: BS: anyone seen my vagina thread ? From: GUEST,mystified asshole Phil ? for the sake of wasting of 1 hours spare time, how many hotmail email accounts, and thus registered mudcat members names do you think we anonymous assholes can create to satisfy the demands of anti guest obsessives. ..talk about [toilet] papering over the [ass] cracks when the real problems lie deeper down the U-bend. so what matters most in the scale of significance here, the substance of the message.. or the name of its communicater ? but apart from all that.......... lets have fun here ! |
|
21 Mar 06 - 10:51 AM (#1699265) Subject: RE: BS: anyone seen my vagina thread ? From: Peace Would you be terribly upset if I corrected your spelling? |
|
21 Mar 06 - 10:53 AM (#1699269) Subject: RE: BS: anyone seen my vagina thread ? From: Peace JUST KIDDING! |
|
21 Mar 06 - 10:53 AM (#1699272) Subject: RE: BS: anyone seen my vagina thread ? From: GUEST no.. not at all.. its a free world after all |
|
21 Mar 06 - 11:00 AM (#1699278) Subject: RE: BS: anyone seen my vagina thread ? From: Peace It's time to break into song, isn't it? |
|
21 Mar 06 - 01:12 PM (#1699384) Subject: RE: BS: anyone seen my vagina thread ? From: The Shambles So, Phil, I guess that's the price you pay for anonymity. -Joe Offer- What price do our unknown number of voluteer fellow posters - with their ability to impose their judgement upon the posts of other posters - pay for their anonymity? |
|
21 Mar 06 - 01:17 PM (#1699393) Subject: RE: BS: anyone seen my vagina thread ? From: Wesley S .02 cents ? |
|
21 Mar 06 - 02:10 PM (#1699462) Subject: RE: BS: anyone seen my vagina thread ? From: Bert Generally, I move the copycats to the thread they're copying... Didn't work on the Vagina/Viagra thread, I guess. -Joe Offer- Joe, That doesn't make a lot of sense to me, 'cos copy cat threads are usually just a play on words and they usually go in a completely different direction from the original. It seems to that lumping them together is mixing apples and oranges and would simply server to lose, or hide the content of, the copying thread. Also, many times the copying thread is a lot better than the original. |
|
21 Mar 06 - 03:53 PM (#1699559) Subject: RE: BS: anyone seen my vagina thread ? From: GUEST and is it really acceptable or polite procedure imposing all the copycat crap on the person who started the origional thread being parodied, whether they want it or not ? |
|
21 Mar 06 - 09:28 PM (#1699804) Subject: RE: BS: anyone seen my vagina thread ? From: Big Mick Most of the copycat threads, IMO, are inane and a waste of bandwidth. Joe shows a lot more restraint than I would. Mick |
|
21 Mar 06 - 09:38 PM (#1699808) Subject: RE: BS: anyone seen my vagina thread ? From: Joe Offer If there are four copycat threads going, I leave them alone. The "Vagina" copycat was the first copy of the "viagra" thread, but there were a lot of copycats active that day. So, heck, I put the vagina together with the viagra, and I thought they would be very happy together... I guess I was wrong. So, what's the viagra going to do without the vagina? -Joe- |
|
21 Mar 06 - 09:39 PM (#1699811) Subject: RE: BS: anyone seen my vagina thread ? From: Jeri Probably headed over to the Brokeback Mountain thread... |
|
21 Mar 06 - 10:02 PM (#1699817) Subject: RE: BS: anyone seen my vagina thread ? From: Peace "So, what's the viagra going to do without the vagina?" Perhaps sing a rousing rendition of "Stand Tall" by Burton Cummings. Never been this blue Never knew the meaning of a heartache But then again, I never lost at love before Somewhere down the road Maybe all those years will find some meaning I just can't think about them now Or live them out anymore Stand tall, don't you fall For God's sake don't go and do something foolish All you're feeling right now is silly human pride Oooooh, Stand tall, don't you fall Don't you do something you might regret later You're feelin' it like everyone, it's silly human pride Never lasted so long, no, Through so much or through so many I just can't believe I could throw it all away Sometimes late at night When there's nothing here except my old piano I'd almost give my hands to make you see my way Stand tall, don't you fall For God's sake don't go and do something foolish All you're feeling right now is silly human pride You've got me down on my knees for ya mama Stand tall, don't you fall Don't you do something you might regret later You're feelin' it like everyone It's silly human pride |
|
21 Mar 06 - 10:05 PM (#1699818) Subject: RE: BS: anyone seen my vagina thread ? From: The Shambles Where is it written that censorship should or will imposed by some posters upon their fellow on matters only of personal taste and our forum be shaped by this? What is the point of encouraging (by example) the public posting only of any personal judgements by anyone upon other posters or the worth of their contributions? |