|
31 Jul 06 - 02:09 AM (#1797391) Subject: Five Presidents Instead Of One Better? From: GUEST,Wildresident Would it be more effective to have more than one president in the executive branch to handle domestic and foreign issues more efficiently...... I believe so. |
|
31 Jul 06 - 02:10 AM (#1797394) Subject: RE: Five Presidents Instead Of One Better? From: GUEST No |
|
31 Jul 06 - 02:30 AM (#1797402) Subject: RE: Five Presidents Instead Of One Better? From: Ebbie Ha. We already have. |
|
31 Jul 06 - 08:31 AM (#1797590) Subject: RE: Five Presidents Instead Of One Better? From: Bobert Yeah, we have Presidents Bush, Bush, Cheney, Rice, Rove, Falwell, Limbaugh, Coulter, Wolfowittz, Pearle, Rumsfeld, etc... No wonder we have so many failing policies... Too many cooks... 'er crooks... |
|
31 Jul 06 - 01:30 PM (#1797885) Subject: RE: Five Presidents Instead Of One Better? From: DougR In the kitchen, Bobert? DougR |
|
31 Jul 06 - 01:40 PM (#1797896) Subject: RE: Five Presidents Instead Of One Better? From: Bill D "Government by committee" works fine until they all decide at the same time to be "first among equals". |
|
31 Jul 06 - 01:51 PM (#1797910) Subject: RE: Five Presidents Instead Of One Better? From: artbrooks Isn't that what they call a Junta? |