|
29 Oct 06 - 07:54 AM (#1871267) Subject: BS: Winona Ryder's birthday From: The Shambles 1971 Winona Ryder was born this day (29th October) in 1971.
-Joe Offer- |
|
29 Oct 06 - 08:28 AM (#1871286) Subject: RE: BS: Winona Ryder's birthday From: Georgiansilver Wish I had known I caould have stolen something from the shops for her. |
|
29 Oct 06 - 08:49 AM (#1871293) Subject: RE: BS: Winona Ryder's birthday From: GUEST I hope she is celebrating somewhere wonderful with little hawk. |
|
29 Oct 06 - 09:21 AM (#1871309) Subject: RE: BS: Winona Ryder's birthday From: number 6 I don't give a rat's ass. I do wonder what kind of cake she will have. Anyone have a recipe for a good birthday cake? biLL |
|
29 Oct 06 - 11:04 AM (#1871385) Subject: RE: BS: Winona Ryder's birthday From: GUEST Oh, Shambles, like you give a shit. |
|
29 Oct 06 - 11:28 AM (#1871408) Subject: RE: BS: Winona Ryder's birthday From: Little Hawk Ah, yes. Long live the lustrous Winona. My favorite movies of hers would be "Little Women" and "Bram Stoker's Dracula", but I like just about all of them. Oddly enough, the character she played in her first notable role in the movie "Beetlejuice" looked astonishingly similar to my first girlfriend, who was a rather strange little creature... |
|
01 Nov 06 - 05:11 AM (#1873679) Subject: BS: Winona Ryder's birthday thread? From: The Shambles What happened to Winona Ryder's birthday thread? It was in the BS section - it did receive a number of posts but it now seems to have vanished. Any explanation for this? |
|
01 Nov 06 - 05:28 AM (#1873687) Subject: BS: Winona Ryder's birthday thead(s) From: The Shambles Could anyone explain where this recent BS thread has vanished to? And where the previous thread, where I asked the same question has vanished to also? |
|
01 Nov 06 - 07:21 AM (#1873736) Subject: RE: BS: Winona Ryder's birthday thead(s) From: John MacKenzie What does she sing again? Have you contacted shoplifters Anonymous? |
|
01 Nov 06 - 07:46 AM (#1873743) Subject: RE: BS: Winona Ryder's birthday thead(s) From: The Shambles Well yes - that's a thought. She was caught on camera and there was a record of the offence. This recent BS thread - along with all of its posts - just seems to have entirely vanished without trace or explanation............... |
|
01 Nov 06 - 08:07 AM (#1873758) Subject: RE: BS: Winona Ryder's birthday thead(s) From: bobad Check here |
|
01 Nov 06 - 08:20 AM (#1873768) Subject: RE: BS: Winona Ryder's birthday thead(s) From: jacqui.c Nice one Bobad. |
|
01 Nov 06 - 08:30 AM (#1873774) Subject: RE: BS: Winona Ryder's birthday thead(s) From: The Shambles Her birthday was the 29th October 1971 - so the thread(s) must have vanished sometime since then. There must surely be a logical explanation...? |
|
01 Nov 06 - 11:48 AM (#1873895) Subject: RE: BS: Winona Ryder's birthday thead(s) From: Little Hawk My previous post to this thread ALSO has vanished into thin air! And I'm sure no one deleted it, because it was quite uncontroversial. What I said was: Long live the lustrous Winona! Happy Birthday! |
|
01 Nov 06 - 12:10 PM (#1873917) Subject: RE: BS: Winona Ryder's birthday thead(s) From: The Shambles And I'm sure no one deleted it, because it was quite uncontroversial. Why are you so sure of this? Perhaps it was your use of the word 'lustrous'? But if you click on your name to do a search of your recent posts - you will find that you will not find any record of that post or the thread. I am quite sure that my first attempt at starting this thread - to enquire about the one you posted to - was deleted. Although there was no editing comment to indicate this or explain why. Perhaps some anonymous one here just does not like Winona? |
|
01 Nov 06 - 12:23 PM (#1873927) Subject: RE: BS: Winona Ryder's birthday thead(s) From: Ebbie It was Hallowe'en, you know... |
|
01 Nov 06 - 12:27 PM (#1873929) Subject: RE: BS: Winona Ryder's birthday thead(s) From: MMario ever consider the possibility that some posts/threads did get lost in the update? |
|
01 Nov 06 - 12:47 PM (#1873939) Subject: RE: BS: Winona Ryder's birthday thead(s) From: The Shambles ever consider the possibility that some posts/threads did get lost in the update? MMario - Are you seriously suggesting that my first attempt to post this thread was also lost in the update? I have found the most likely reason why my posts fail to appear is because some anonymous fellow poster has imposed their judgement on it, deleted, moved or altered it. As this clearly did happen to the second thread - why should I think it did not happen to the original one? The only miracle is that this thread remains - but I would not bet much money on this situation remaining the case for very much longer. And as despite my request that all cases where censorship action are indicated and explained in a editing comment - and all editing comments are limited to where some form of action has actually taken place - this has not been adopted by our moderators'. As a result - any poster who cannot find their contribution has no way of knowing if this is because it has been censored, lost in some software glitch or is as a result of us being in the 'Twilight Zone. |
|
01 Nov 06 - 12:51 PM (#1873943) Subject: RE: BS: Winona Ryder's birthday thead(s) From: Liz the Squeak There's only one of us in the Twilight Zone matey..... Guess who... LTS |
|
01 Nov 06 - 12:57 PM (#1873953) Subject: RE: BS: Winona Ryder's birthday thead(s) From: Little Hawk Oh, don't be silly. The word "lustrous" means "shining like a pearl". Who would delete a post because of the word "lustrous"? A complete idiot, that's who, and I don't think that Shane is a moderator on this forum yet. |
|
01 Nov 06 - 01:01 PM (#1873963) Subject: RE: BS: Winona Ryder's birthday thead(s) From: MMario explaining all editing actions has not been adopted by our moderators because most of them feel no need for it (or at least that is what they have said publicly) and they are not required to do so by the site owner. I in no way, shape or form ever suggested that your first attempt to post this thread was lost in the update, though given the timeing I seriously do suggest that is what happened to the original thread. Regarding your attempt - I respectfully submit that anyone can make a mistake. I know I have often thought I posted something and found it is "no longer there" when the plain truth is I probably hit the wrong button. any poster who cannot find their contribution has no way of knowing if this is because it has been censored, lost in some software glitch or is as a result of us being in the 'Twilight Zone. that is normally the state of affairs on the internet. You are suggesting that Max has some obligation to tell us. He doesn't. |
|
01 Nov 06 - 01:16 PM (#1873978) Subject: RE: BS: Winona Ryder's birthday thead(s) From: The Shambles Regarding your attempt - I respectfully submit that anyone can make a mistake. I know I have often thought I posted something and found it is "no longer there" when the plain truth is I probably hit the wrong button. When you check to see your contribution is in place, see that it is, but it is not there on a subsequent visit - I respectfully submit that this was NOT the case here. It was not a mistake on my part. The adoption of my suggestion would at least ensure that if posters did not see an editing comment of explanation - they could be sure to rule out and get paranoid about imposed censorship action being responsible for the non-apperance of their contribution. Often this appears to be many poster's first assumption.........As this could be so easily be addressed - I can't help wondering why it is not. Unless the intention is to make our forum totally paranoid about possible censorship? |
|
01 Nov 06 - 01:19 PM (#1873980) Subject: RE: BS: Winona Ryder's birthday thead(s) From: MMario it is not done because the site owner doe not require it. The site owner reserves the right to edit, delete, move, etc any postings. By submitting a post the poster agrees to that. Again, standard operating procedure. |
|
01 Nov 06 - 01:28 PM (#1873986) Subject: RE: BS: Winona Ryder's birthday thead(s) From: The Shambles Again, standard operating procedure = a totally paranoid forum. Of course Max has always had the right to do this. All that is being politely requested is that posters are informed and be made aware when he does exercise this right. So they don't wrongly blame the software, their fingers or their memory for any non appearance of their words as posted. |
|
01 Nov 06 - 01:59 PM (#1874015) Subject: RE: BS: Winona Ryder's birthday thead(s) From: MMario In *your* opinion* a paranoid forum. Most people accept it - and are aware it can happen. As can lost transmissions, loss of data, etc. |
|
01 Nov 06 - 02:11 PM (#1874025) Subject: RE: BS: Winona Ryder's birthday thead(s) From: The Shambles Obviously some anonymous one here just does not like Winona? Is it really too much for posters to always be informed in an editing comment and for them to know when any form of imposed censorship has been judged to be necessary? That would prevent us from blaming the software, questioning our memory and from my poor old dog from being kicked in frustration. If you won't introduce this simple procedure for our sakes - then perhaps for the sake of our poor bruised pets. |
|
01 Nov 06 - 02:21 PM (#1874037) Subject: RE: BS: Winona Ryder's birthday thead(s) From: MMario Is it really too much for posters to always be informed in an editing comment and for them to know when any form of imposed censorship has been judged to be necessary? in the opinion of virtually every forum sponsor, moderator, and host on the planet, yes. especially when you add in "always". secondly - be definition since the forum owner has the right to delete,edit, move, etc any posting strictly speaking the term "censorship" is invalid.?
Please remember that this is a thread about Winona Ryder, not about Mudcat Editing Policy. That's it. The End. Finis. Schluss.No further discussion of anything but Winona Ryder will be permitted in this thread.-Joe Offer- |
|
01 Nov 06 - 02:22 PM (#1874038) Subject: RE: BS: Winona Ryder's birthday thead(s) From: fat B****rd Was she in "The Piano" ? Worth watching for Harvey Keitel as a sort of Maori. Oh what the'ell. Happy birthday Winnie. |
|
01 Nov 06 - 02:43 PM (#1874061) Subject: RE: BS: Winona Ryder's birthday thead(s) From: Joe Offer Right off, I can't recall any film in which Winona Ryder played a likeable character. She seems to excel in portraying creepy people - but her characters certainly make you think. I don't think I'd feel at ease having her living next door, but I have a lot of respect for her as an actress. -Joe- |
|
01 Nov 06 - 02:53 PM (#1874070) Subject: RE: BS: Winona Ryder's birthday thead(s) From: Charlie Baum It was Holly Hunter in "The Piano": http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0107822/ Winona Ryder's movies are listed here: http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000213/?fr=c2l0ZT1kZnx0dD0xfGZiPXV8cG49MHxrdz0xfHE9d2lub25hfGZ0PTF8bXg9MjB8bG09NTAwfGNvPTF8aHRtbD0xfG5tPTE_;fc=1;ft=22;fm=1 |
|
01 Nov 06 - 03:07 PM (#1874081) Subject: RE: BS: Winona Ryder's birthday thead(s) From: Becca72 Thank you, Joe, for all that you do :-) My favorite movie she was in has got to be "Heathers". Very dark, but funny as hell. |
|
01 Nov 06 - 03:18 PM (#1874090) Subject: RE: BS: Winona Ryder's birthday thead(s) From: Peace 'Was she in "The Piano" ?' You'd have to empty the piano to get Winona in it. |
|
01 Nov 06 - 03:47 PM (#1874108) Subject: RE: BS: Winona Ryder's birthday thead(s) From: fat B****rd 'allo, Bruce. Fancy a bagel ?. Thanks Charlie B. I'll get me anorak. |
|
01 Nov 06 - 03:55 PM (#1874115) Subject: RE: BS: Winona Ryder's birthday thead(s) From: Little Hawk What???? What're you talkin' about, Joe? She has played likable characters in most of her films. A little bit quirky, maybe, but definitely likeable. She was tremendously likable in "Little Women", for instance, and also in "Welcome Back Roxy Carmichael", "Mermaids", "Reality Bites", "American Quilt", and "Bram Stoker's Dracula", to mention a few. She played an unlikable character in "The Crucible". |
|
01 Nov 06 - 04:16 PM (#1874138) Subject: RE: BS: Winona Ryder's birthday thead(s) From: catspaw49 Maybe she's just unlikeable Hawkster. She's kind of a bony, scraggly haired thing with a pretty well fogettable body and a whiny voice...................ooops, sorry....You like her doncha'? Well.........No accounting for taste and all that. My apologies. Spaw |
|
01 Nov 06 - 04:47 PM (#1874165) Subject: RE: BS: Winona Ryder's birthday thead(s) From: Wesley S Another good reason why the BS section should be for members only. |
|
01 Nov 06 - 05:15 PM (#1874188) Subject: RE: BS: Winona Ryder's birthday thead(s) From: Little Hawk Apropos of what, Wesley? There have only been 2 posts on this entire thread which were not from members, and they were not terribly significant post either. Spaw - Yeah, sure. Just wait till I find out which particular female notables you find attractive. Just wait. |
|
01 Nov 06 - 05:22 PM (#1874196) Subject: RE: BS: Winona Ryder's birthday thead(s) From: Wesley S I must have posted in the wrong thread. My mistake. |
|
01 Nov 06 - 07:19 PM (#1874272) Subject: RE: BS: Winona Ryder's birthday thead(s) From: GUEST Ryder in "Girl, Interrupted" with Angelina Jolie .. they made a good duo. The book was pretty good too. |