|
16 Dec 06 - 07:36 AM (#1910913) Subject: BS: Americans Vote for more troops in Iraq From: Peter T. According to President Bush, Americans appear to have voted in November for more troops in Iraq to get the job done. yours, Peter T. |
|
16 Dec 06 - 08:29 AM (#1910937) Subject: RE: BS: Americans Vote for more troops in Iraq From: kendall This man suffers from delusions of adequacy. |
|
16 Dec 06 - 09:32 AM (#1910968) Subject: RE: BS: Americans Vote for more troops in Iraq From: Greg F. Moreso the imbeciles who believe what he says. There's more of them than youmight think. |
|
16 Dec 06 - 10:48 AM (#1911014) Subject: RE: BS: Americans Vote for more troops in Iraq From: Sorcha We did? I don't remember seeing it on the ballot.......madmen. |
|
16 Dec 06 - 01:43 PM (#1911135) Subject: RE: BS: Americans Vote for more troops in Iraq From: McGrath of Harlow It's all down to what used to be called the Divine Right of Kings. Alive and well and living in the USA. (And of course in the UK, but they transferred it to the PM, the Head of State just does what she's told.) |
|
16 Dec 06 - 01:53 PM (#1911146) Subject: RE: BS: Americans Vote for more troops in Iraq From: Charley Noble Peter- Consider the source of those remarks. Consider his confidence rating in recent polling, about 30%. Whatever! Charley Noble |
|
16 Dec 06 - 06:05 PM (#1911326) Subject: RE: BS: Americans Vote for more troops in Iraq From: GUEST,Peter Woodruff And I thought george said, "Mission Accomplished." Why would we ever need anymore troops in Iraq almost 4 years later? Peter |
|
16 Dec 06 - 06:24 PM (#1911334) Subject: RE: BS: Americans Vote for more troops in Iraq From: Don Firth Bring the troops home. Send George over to clean up the mess. After all, it was his idea. Don Firth |
|
16 Dec 06 - 06:25 PM (#1911336) Subject: RE: BS: Americans Vote for more troops in Iraq From: Ron Davies What has Bush said that indicates he thought the 2006 elections meant the electorate wanted more troops sent to Iraq? I must have missed that. |
|
16 Dec 06 - 10:12 PM (#1911441) Subject: RE: BS: Americans Vote for more troops in Iraq From: Peter T. Among a myriad sources, the BBC yesterday: US President George W Bush is likely to boost troop levels in Iraq next year, an administration official has said. Up to 25,000 more troops could be deployed to try to help end the violence, the official said, speaking on condition of anonymity. The comments come a day after prominent Republican John McCain called for up to 30,000 more troops to be sent to Iraq. Mr Bush had been due to announce a new strategy on Iraq next week, but has delayed his speech until January. He is holding a flurry of meetings with top US and Iraqi officials and experts on how to change his policy. The US administration source said the mission of the additional troops would be threefold, the BBC's Adam Brookes reports from Washington: To help secure Baghdad amid daily car bombings and kidnappings To make a renewed push to quell the insurgency in the Western province of Anbar To tackle the militias behind much of the sectarian violence in the country, but especially the capital. The remarks appear to be setting the tone for Mr Bush's announcement of his new Iraq strategy, our correspondent says. He says the idea of boosting troop levels for one final push at halting the spiralling violence has been much discussed in Washington recently. The comments came a day after Senator McCain called for more troops to stabilise Iraq. "The situation is very, very serious," he said in Baghdad. "It requires an injection of additional troops to control the situation and to allow the political process to proceed," he said. There are currently 140,000 US troops in Iraq. Since a high-level review group published its findings last week, President Bush has been consulting with his military commanders and Iraqi political leaders to shape a new strategy. On Wednesday, Mr Bush said he would not be rushed into making "a difficult decision". "I've heard some ideas that would lead to defeat. And I reject those ideas, ideas such as leaving before the job is done; ideas such as not helping this government take the necessary and hard steps to be able to do its job." |
|
16 Dec 06 - 11:12 PM (#1911465) Subject: RE: BS: Americans Vote for more troops in Iraq From: Stilly River Sage A dope slap is too good for the guy. Many Americans were "enablers" for six years. They bought his story and elected him (at least the second time around). It took a lot of people a long time to come around to a rational view of this "war on terror" and what a jerk BabyBush is. So maybe Bush figures that as slow thinking as those folks are, there is still some tolerance for his approach to war? SRS |
|
16 Dec 06 - 11:14 PM (#1911468) Subject: RE: BS: Americans Vote for more troops in Iraq From: GUEST MR. RUSSERT: Would you send more American troops in order to stabilize the situation? REP. PELOSI: Yes. http://www.democraticleader.house.gov/press/articles.cfm?pressReleaseID=590 This is what Americans voted for. "meet the new boss, same as the old boss" |
|
16 Dec 06 - 11:37 PM (#1911478) Subject: RE: BS: Americans Vote for more troops in Iraq From: Ebbie You may notice that interview between Pelosi and Russert was going on three years ago. But acknowledging that would not suit your agenda, would it. Not only that but she said: "I think it would be better if we could get them to be not American that we could appeal to our European allies, NATO..." MR. RUSSERT, following up: Would you send more American troops in order to stabilize the situation? REP. PELOSI: Yes. And let me just say this, we must internationalize the situation. We cannot take no for an answer. We have to use our diplomacy to the fullest extent to get more international troops on the ground. And we have to truly internationalize and Iraqitize the situation." |
|
17 Dec 06 - 12:46 AM (#1911493) Subject: RE: BS: Americans Vote for more troops in Iraq From: Barry Finn Thanks Ebbie for noting that Guest's comment was 3 yrs prior & was only 15% complete. Many have changed 180 degrees within the past 3 yrs & figured out the last 85% of what was missing, though it seems some are still stuck there, just like our Lord & Master. As far as reading the vote! We pretty much know he's on a lower reading level than most so I can't blame his his misreading the vote but I can blame him for not paying attention even if he's has an IEP & has a 501 plan & yes, even though he's been tested & found to be learning disabled he should've been able to follow the explained results. That's why he has advisors but I guess no one is helping him with his OD disorder (opposional defiance). Ohh, that explains alot. Barry |
|
17 Dec 06 - 07:05 AM (#1911625) Subject: RE: BS: Americans Vote for more troops in Iraq From: GUEST,van lingle "Waist deep in the Big Muddy and the big fool said to push on." |
|
17 Dec 06 - 11:21 AM (#1911799) Subject: RE: BS: Americans Vote for more troops in Iraq From: Rapparee Yeah, van lingle, I've been thinking of that song for some time too. Now Britain says that a bunch of their troops are going to be withdrawn. The US should do the same -- follow the guidelines in the recent report. And start talking to Iran -- if W hadn't mouthed off before the last Iranian election we might be dealing with someone a bit more moderate! |
|
17 Dec 06 - 01:15 PM (#1911885) Subject: RE: BS: Americans Vote for more troops in Iraq From: Barry Finn Ya Rap, doesn't it seem that our wagging mouth often gets our jaw broken. Barry |
|
17 Dec 06 - 02:28 PM (#1911942) Subject: RE: BS: Americans Vote for more troops in Iraq From: Rapparee Sometimes that best thing to do is to shut up and wait. That's something the current group in DC can't seem to learn. |
|
17 Dec 06 - 06:21 PM (#1912148) Subject: RE: BS: Americans Vote for more troops in Iraq From: Greg F. As far as reading the vote! We pretty much know he's [Bush]on a lower reading level than most... Well, what's John McCain's excuse then? The idiot has a good chance of being the Repub. presidential candidate in 2008. Lord help us..... |
|
17 Dec 06 - 06:22 PM (#1912153) Subject: RE: BS: Americans Vote for more troops in Iraq From: Barry Finn McCain's got no excuse, he's a prisoner of flaw. Barry |
|
18 Dec 06 - 09:06 AM (#1912568) Subject: RE: BS: Americans Vote for more troops in Iraq From: Wolfgang According to President Bush, Americans appear to have voted in November for more troops in Iraq to get the job done. He may even be right as long as the year is not specified. Wolfgang |
|
18 Dec 06 - 04:21 PM (#1912971) Subject: RE: BS: Americans Vote for more troops in Iraq From: Teribus I understand that all the calls for more troops are coming from the Iraq Study Group and non-service personnel back in the USA. So far I have not heard one field commander in Iraq say that they needed more troops. I know that they are considering increasing the numbers of advisors embedded with Iraqi Forces, but that does not necessarily mean an increase in US troop levels. I think I'll wait until January when any change in strategy or direction will be explained. |
|
18 Dec 06 - 06:13 PM (#1913079) Subject: RE: BS: Americans Vote for more troops in Iraq From: Bobert What change in stategy, T-zer??? We are talkin' about granite-head Bush here, my friend... Oh yeah, they may come up with a few new slogans and phrases but this man will not adopt a truely new strategy because he is incapable of doing so... So it's more "stay the course" for even and ever and ever just as Nixon did in Vietnam... Someone will have to wrestle Bush to the ground to stop Iraqmire.... |
|
19 Dec 06 - 07:25 AM (#1913470) Subject: RE: BS: Americans Vote for more troops in Iraq From: Peter T. This looks like the plan from the latest batch of neo-cons and some of the Pentagon: http://weeklystandard.com/Utilities/printer_preview.asp?idArticle=13095&R=EF212A1FD You read it here second. yours, Peter T. |
|
19 Dec 06 - 08:51 AM (#1913536) Subject: RE: BS: Americans Vote for more troops in Iraq From: GUEST The "send in more troops" plan is not being promoted by the Iraq Study Group. According to the Bush admin, the Iraq Study Group should be shot for treason. It also isn't just a neocon plot. McCain isn't a neocon. He is a very popular Republican conservative, old school. Which shouldn't cheer anyone up, because he will likely be the next president of the United States. And Ebbie, et al--though I'm a different guest, I agree with the post of the guest who quoted Pelosi. Pelosi is the most militarist liberal on the block. Her brand of Democratic liberalism, now so popular among the Democratic party leadership, is a lot like Jesse Ventura's libertarian leaning Independence Party (or whatever he calls it these days). In other words, they are social issue liberals, but very militaristic and very pro-Pentagon. Anyone who thinks Bush and the Democratic Congress are just going to up and leave Iraq must be drinking too much Jim Jones koolaid. The Democratic party leadership has no intention of doing anything that might leave them vulnerable to the "cut and run" claims the Republicans will be levelling at them. The Iraq Study Group plan is a benefit to the Democrats looking for a phased withdrawal. But it is a benefit that could well end up a knife between the ribs come 2008 presidential season. Which begins in earnest in January. I'm guessing the Democrats will end up voting to send more troops, and do it very quickly once the new Congress is sworn in. |