Bill,

This link is more recent (2013) than my previous one:
Web Site Link

A quote from it: Additionally, the team found that when they applied a test to locate DNA in the dinosaurs, the test responded positively and identified the structural ghosts of DNA within the dinosaur 'cells'! Theirs is no direct evidence that this DNA is actually from the organism itself...[...]...However, (again), due to the low positive reaction of the dinosaur cells (these are definitely dinosaur cells, it's the DNA in them that is questionable) there may not be enough to recover sufficient amounts of usable DNA.

So what has been found are "structural ghosts" not the DNA itself...and even then, the "ghosts" may not be related to DNA from the organism itself. So Pete's assertion that "dino DNA has definitely been found" is actually wrong, re the present state of research, and is yet another example of the sloppy and partial sources he uses over-egging the pudding to pander to their own prejudices rather than limiting their conclusions to what the evidence actually shows!