I have no reason whatsoever to single out Keith for criticism. I do single out however the broad thrust of his argument.

No Musket, that is how it should have gone.
I say that Christians are bearing the brunt of persecution.
You and others saying yes it is terrible but you are not convinced their suffering is the worst, or that religion is the issue.
Me saying I am convinced but thanks for your contribution.

What I got was the same old accusations first from Jim and then from you.
I must have an agenda.
I must be a bad person.

" That I pounce on instances of his agenda is neither here nor there. I do not wish to change views, merely to challenge what I see as agenda ridden points masquerading as innocent observation."

I have no agenda.
You have produced no "instances."
There is no "masquerading" except in your prejudiced imagination.

Please remind me what I should apologise for.
Do you still claim I spoke of UKIP as we, and when are you going to produce it?