well that seems to put a milder perspective on it than the initial , sensationalist reporting.
but it gives the dawkins followers [ or maybe he gleaned his wording from other atheist sites ] opportunity to attack the God they say they don't believe in.
there may well prove to be cause for condemnation, and maybe legal proceedings, but seems to me that the usual suspects are more concerned with the religious affiliation of any perpetrators than that they might be offenders, who happen to be catholic.
i'm not RC but I reckon that the many charitable causes that have come out of the church balance out well against whatever [genuine] faults there may be.