Hoisting your own pair of hairy petards there, I think Mr Hertford.

By your own weird logic, historians cannot as historians be left right or up their own arses. According to Keith A of Hertford they are infallible. People on here are scoffed at for forming a different conclusion to their research.

So.. Which bit is left wing? Collecting evidence? Reading it? Laying it out, presenting it or giving your own perspective on what to conclude?

A historian you quote as gospel appears to be politically motivated? Tut tut. Next you'll be saying he is therefore selective to ensure his conclusions are backed up by selective cherry picking of evidence.

Busted
Fucking
Flush



I personally would like you to carry on spouting because I could do with a laugh and Teribus's drivel is too long winded to fully enjoy, but if I were you, I'd keep my mouth shut and go away and learn a subject before attacking anyone who doesn't see life in the wannabe tin soldier fantasy that you inhabit.