Glad you've come around to that pint of view

I have not. I said it is all bollocks.

"killed in a racist attack."
Nobody suggested he was,

You did Jim. About finding out why he did it you said, "Not too difficult if you take the statements of his family and friends into consideration.
They put it down to the racist killing of his friend"

But it was not "they."
Just the one mysterious friend we know nothing about, but you have been arguing his/her case solidly for ten days!

Do you now admit that there is nothing to suggest it was a racist attack except for "friend" in which case I was right to challenge you and you were wrong to keep claiming it.