Subject: RE: BS: Wordle From: Doug Chadwick Date: 01 Feb 22 - 07:53 AM ONION |
Subject: RE: BS: Wordle From: Doug Chadwick Date: 01 Feb 22 - 07:54 AM ANION |
Subject: RE: BS: Wordle From: Jon Freeman Date: 01 Feb 22 - 07:54 AM ANION |
Subject: RE: BS: Wordle From: Doug Chadwick Date: 01 Feb 22 - 07:59 AM Snap! |
Subject: RE: BS: Wordle From: Jeri Date: 01 Feb 22 - 09:40 AM I didn't read this earlier because I thought someone might be typing spoilers, but you're just spelling random words. Adorbs. Just like you're typing a whole Scrabble dictionary. No, it's not hard. It's more about logic than vocabulary. Letters that aren't in it, letters that are, but are in the wrong place, letters you haven't tried yet. |
Subject: RE: BS: Wordle From: Stanron Date: 01 Feb 22 - 09:47 AM Hi Jeri. Not random words but words with three vowels to try as a first attempt. |
Subject: RE: BS: Wordle From: Jon Freeman Date: 01 Feb 22 - 09:50 AM A good crossword standard: ENNUI |
Subject: RE: BS: Wordle From: Nigel Parsons Date: 01 Feb 22 - 10:18 AM It's all very well starting with a word with 3 vowels, but there are only 5 vowels to eliminate. I prefer to start with a word with more consonants than vowels for this reason. Unless something obvious jumps out at me I start with TRAIN followed by DEMOB. This checks the 4 most common vowels and several 'popular' consonants, without repetition. Those two words usually give me some sort of guidance to what letters are definitely 'in', and a list of letters which are definitely 'out'. So far over 28 days I have scores of: 2 tries: 1 3 tries: 11 4 tries: 10 5 tries: 2 6 tries: 4 No failures though. |
Subject: RE: BS: Wordle From: Nigel Parsons Date: 01 Feb 22 - 10:19 AM Jon Freeman: A good crossword standard: ENNUI Yes, a good crossword word, but I was getting BORED with it ;) |
Subject: RE: BS: Wordle From: Jeri Date: 01 Feb 22 - 11:15 AM Oh. 3 vowels. Nobody did "toile" yet. |
Subject: RE: BS: Wordle From: Bill D Date: 01 Feb 22 - 11:18 AM Play it while you can... https://www.barrons.com/articles/new-york-times-buys-wordle |
Subject: RE: BS: Wordle From: Bill D Date: 01 Feb 22 - 11:22 AM You can always switch to https://www.cnet.com/news/lewdle-the-nsfw-wordle-clone-that-rewards-dirty-minds/ |
Subject: RE: BS: Wordle From: Mrrzy Date: 01 Feb 22 - 06:40 PM I was just about to put that here! Blicky. |
Subject: RE: BS: Wordle From: Steve Shaw Date: 02 Feb 22 - 08:27 PM Boris Bores Bones Bonks Banks Wanks (Not an original from me!) |
Subject: RE: BS: Wordle From: Jon Freeman Date: 03 Feb 22 - 07:47 AM I liked my few plays with absurdle but the same set of guesses will always lead to the same results. There must be sequences of guesses that will lead to a solution in a minimum number of guesses but I don't see how to find that out. My best attempts have taken 6 but others here may well do better. |
Subject: RE: BS: Wordle From: FreddyHeadey Date: 05 Feb 22 - 04:52 PM For the instrumentalists ,,,, Chordle https://www.chordle.synthase.cc/ |
Subject: RE: BS: Wordle From: Steve Shaw Date: 06 Feb 22 - 06:35 AM Six out of six goes so far. A three, four fours and a five. As Brucie Forsyth would have said, good game, good game! |
Subject: RE: BS: Wordle From: cnd Date: 06 Feb 22 - 09:20 AM Those of you bored by Wordle may consider Dordle |
Subject: RE: BS: Wordle From: Rusty Dobro Date: 06 Feb 22 - 02:06 PM I just tried to enter the entirely usual and frequently-used word ‘prick’, and was told it is ‘not a valid word’. Now why should that be? |
Subject: RE: BS: Wordle From: Jeri Date: 06 Feb 22 - 02:21 PM Rusty, that's funny. It was THE word a while ago. It never tells me when it's not a valid word, the game just won't take it. |
Subject: RE: BS: Wordle From: Jeri Date: 06 Feb 22 - 02:28 PM Trying to check when it happened, and I think I was wrong about them having used the word. |
Subject: RE: BS: Wordle From: Rusty Dobro Date: 06 Feb 22 - 02:53 PM Jeri: I came to the game via their website, rather than the app. Maybe that’s why I get the ‘not a valid word’ messages. |
Subject: RE: BS: Wordle From: robomatic Date: 06 Feb 22 - 03:10 PM I have been finding myself waking up so I can play the latest right after midnight. Also it is midnight my time. Not volitional. |
Subject: RE: BS: Wordle From: Jeri Date: 06 Feb 22 - 03:26 PM There IS no valid app. The website address I use is https://www.powerlanguage.co.uk/wordle/. I don't know why it gets all judgy with you. I'll try tomorrow with a non-word, but I'm pretty sure it just blinks, and won't take the word when I type a weird one. |
Subject: RE: BS: Wordle From: Steve Shaw Date: 07 Feb 22 - 06:55 PM Got it in five tonight . Peed off because Mrs Steve got it in three and her best mate got it in four. My daughter got it in five. There's a lot of luck, or not, with your first word. |
Subject: RE: BS: Wordle From: Jeri Date: 07 Feb 22 - 07:48 PM I got it in five. It would've been four, but I typed a non-word that was actually a word. The actual non-word got the blink, and not accepting, but it also flashed "that word is not in our list" (or something like it). There probably needs to be a "Wordle Anonymous" group for some of us. |
Subject: RE: BS: Wordle From: Steve Shaw Date: 07 Feb 22 - 08:19 PM The first word is about 82.368% luck, but after that the luck element diminishes row by row. By line four, if you haven't got it by then, a mild panic sets in. I've never had to go to the utter panic of line five with nowhere to go...it must be awful... |
Subject: RE: BS: Wordle From: Nigel Parsons Date: 08 Feb 22 - 10:51 AM Seeing lots of people taking 6 attempts today. It seems to be a common set of letters with too many options to fill the last two. Thankfully my common first two words made it (fairly) obvious to get it in 3. Wordle 234 3/6 ??????? ??????? ?????????? |
Subject: RE: BS: Wordle From: Nigel Parsons Date: 08 Feb 22 - 10:53 AM Ah! I thought the usual "Share" wouldn't work here, but had to try. |
Subject: RE: BS: Wordle From: Steve Shaw Date: 08 Feb 22 - 05:33 PM Got it in three today. I know a few who took six too. Mrs Steve got it in two. Grr. |
Subject: RE: BS: Wordle From: Stilly River Sage Date: 08 Feb 22 - 06:13 PM I got it in three. I always aim at getting the vowels first. |
Subject: RE: BS: Wordle From: Jeri Date: 08 Feb 22 - 06:20 PM Five. I got the common letters, but there were many chances to plug in the rest of them. I aim for the vowels, then eliminate consonants. It gets down to a low number of word, and one usually just feels right. The really fast solutions, are, at least for me, a matter of luck. |
Subject: RE: BS: Wordle From: Steve Shaw Date: 08 Feb 22 - 06:28 PM Aim for vowels? For the first word I have only two rules: it must have at least two different vowels and I never include Q, X or Z. |
Subject: RE: BS: Wordle From: Nigel Parsons Date: 09 Feb 22 - 07:58 AM And watch out for American spellings! Another tricksy one today, but still got it in 3 thanks to my start words. |
Subject: RE: BS: Wordle From: Dave the Gnome Date: 09 Feb 22 - 08:03 AM Yes - Even forewarned about American spellings it still took me 5. Once I got the last three there were too many options! |
Subject: RE: BS: Wordle From: McGrath of Harlow Date: 09 Feb 22 - 08:41 AM One way to do it is always to use the word that came up as the answer the last time you played. Introduces an extra element of chance. |
Subject: RE: BS: Wordle From: Steve Shaw Date: 09 Feb 22 - 08:48 AM Oi, don't give warnings about American spellings, right? I wish to approach this in a pure, virginal manner every day! I suspected as much after the second word but ruled it out. So it took me five today. You'd think that the choice of tens of thousands of words should rule out such controversies. |
Subject: RE: BS: Wordle From: Nigel Parsons Date: 09 Feb 22 - 09:17 AM Well, although the creator of Wordle is Welsh born, he lives in New York. So perhaps US spellings are an understandable outcome. |
Subject: RE: BS: Wordle From: Steve Shaw Date: 09 Feb 22 - 11:40 AM I'm OK with it now. As long as I know. The online opprobrium accompanying today's word does reek somewhat of British imperialism. |
Subject: RE: BS: Wordle From: Jeri Date: 09 Feb 22 - 12:22 PM If British spelling is used, it would eliminate 6-letter words that would otherwise have only 5 letters. |
Subject: RE: BS: Wordle From: McGrath of Harlow Date: 09 Feb 22 - 12:54 PM I didn't see any opptobium involved or objection.. Just a warning that applies at all times. Whether it was English or American spellings involved the same issue would arise. It's just an extra trap to be evaded, and adds to the fun. |
Subject: RE: BS: Wordle From: robomatic Date: 09 Feb 22 - 02:02 PM Someone can always put together a Britword version with an extra letter and claim how it is bigger brain food. But that lets in so many other words that they probably have to increase to ten tries. It does make me want to try out 5 letter Brit words such as "lorry" which I don't think has a yank equivalent. |
Subject: RE: BS: Wordle From: Steve Shaw Date: 10 Feb 22 - 07:15 AM Four. |
Subject: RE: BS: Wordle From: McGrath of Harlow Date: 10 Feb 22 - 11:06 AM There are five letter words where the English version is different. One that comes to mind is tyre. I am sure there are others. But with the -or/-our words the English word is aways going to be excluded by the five letter format. |
Subject: RE: BS: Wordle From: Nigel Parsons Date: 10 Feb 22 - 12:37 PM There are five letter words where the English version is different. One that comes to mind is tyre. But 'tyre' is not a very good example of a 'five letter word'. |
Subject: RE: BS: Wordle From: McGrath of Harlow Date: 10 Feb 22 - 12:52 PM Very true. |
Subject: RE: BS: Wordle From: Doug Chadwick Date: 10 Feb 22 - 01:21 PM Tyres |
Subject: RE: BS: Wordle From: robomatic Date: 10 Feb 22 - 01:42 PM But does one get 'tyred'? As in tied up in tyres? |
Subject: RE: BS: Wordle From: Steve Shaw Date: 11 Feb 22 - 07:41 AM Three! |
Subject: RE: BS: Wordle From: Dave the Gnome Date: 11 Feb 22 - 08:00 AM 100! and 4 |