|
|||||||
BS: Joe Offer f/ Homeland Security Secretary |
Share Thread
![]() |
Subject: RE: BS: Joe Offer f/ Homeland Security Secretary From: Once Famous Date: 18 Dec 04 - 04:34 PM I am not in denial, Big Mick. I just brushed my teeth, so I must be in dental. |
Subject: RE: BS: Joe Offer f/ Homeland Security Secretary From: Ebbie Date: 18 Dec 04 - 04:53 PM No. I have not EVER posted as 'Guest' to speak to you, Marvin. So stop and think: What makes you tso sure that many members have done that to you? When you are wrong in one instance, don't you see that you may be wrong in other instances? |
Subject: RE: BS: Joe Offer f/ Homeland Security Secretary From: Joe Offer Date: 18 Dec 04 - 05:13 PM Martin - if people do battle with you, then I suppose they get what they deserve - not that I like seeing any battles here. That's not what people complain about. It's the unprovoked attacks on people who were paying no attention to you at all, the sexual innuendos that come out sounding like leering threats - that sort of thing. Believe me, Martin, you are NOT an innocent victim here. I have seen people attack you when it wasn't warranted, but usually it's the other way around. -Joe Offer- By the way, there are very few Mudcatters who log off to post anonymously - and I haven't seen one who has done that to attack you. The anonymous people who attack you are our usual anonymous people. They find you easy prey. |
Subject: RE: BS: Joe Offer f/ Homeland Security Secretary From: Amos Date: 18 Dec 04 - 07:02 PM Martin: If I thought all your abuse was in self defense or even thought it was possible, I would never have taken you to task for it. I am really sorry, but I don't see it -- what I have seen is gratuitous abuse, over and over, in your posts, as though you were carrying out some battle that no-one else could see. Whatever the reason for it, I second Mick's suggestion as to reviewing your own posts. Seems to me, in spite of your unwarranted assertions about my viewpoint, that you aren't really doing credit to your own views by "defending" them like a Cheapside fishwife. What you seem to have, which I value highly, is a strong point of view. I just wish you could express it more fluently instead of resorting to abuse. A |
Subject: RE: BS: Joe Offer f/ Homeland Security Secretary From: Once Famous Date: 19 Dec 04 - 03:50 PM Goons like you see vitually anything challanging to your pathetic ego as abuse, Amos. And Joe, it's well been documented here seems that you stand up for your friends and favorite posters. I don't believe it at all about the attacking Guests. The style of writing is to similiar to some. The ones who I spar with are the ones with the bruised egos. Again, excuse me if I can dish out a more forceful insult to one hurled at me initially. I find the Guests even easier prey. You can really haul off on them and call them every possible name in the book and really not care. They get what they richly deserve. Other regulars have agreed with me on this and have also suggested to me who the sign-off guests just might be. So Joe, maybe it's just some of your closest friends here you are covering for. Either way, it's no big deal for me. |
Subject: RE: BS: Joe Offer f/ Homeland Security Secretary From: Ebbie Date: 19 Dec 04 - 03:55 PM I think it might be illuminating if we each printed out every one of Marvin's posts. You first, Marvin. |
Subject: RE: BS: Joe Offer f/ Homeland Security Secretary From: Once Famous Date: 19 Dec 04 - 04:10 PM Eat dung, ebbie/eddie. You are not my judge. You are no one's judge. But you are quite a pathetic old woman for thinking that you are. If you want to read my posts, please do. Many of you have already found them to be your true source of your life's focus. It's really quite laughable how much time you spend on them. It's actually very gratifying. Makes me feel that you are all paying attention. Thanks for reading this one, also! |
Subject: RE: BS: Joe Offer f/ Homeland Security Secretary From: Ebbie Date: 19 Dec 04 - 05:29 PM You're welcome. Eddie |
Subject: RE: BS: Joe Offer f/ Homeland Security Secretary From: Bill D Date: 19 Dec 04 - 05:56 PM *giggle* |
Subject: RE: BS: Joe Offer f/ Homeland Security Secretary From: Little Hawk Date: 19 Dec 04 - 06:04 PM And "The Beat Goes On"... (Sonny and Cher) |
Subject: RE: BS: Joe Offer f/ Homeland Security Secretary From: Joe Offer Date: 19 Dec 04 - 06:30 PM You're right, Martin. I've been criticized for sticking up for you and Gargoyle. You'll find documentation of that, but not much else. Maybe I should be sorry I believed in you, that I thought people should give you more of a chance. -Joe Offer- |
Subject: RE: BS: Joe Offer f/ Homeland Security Secretary From: Once Famous Date: 20 Dec 04 - 03:59 PM Joe, it just kind of makes you wonder, doesn't it? |
Subject: RE: BS: Joe Offer f/ Homeland Security Secretary From: GUEST Date: 20 Dec 04 - 04:28 PM Well dammit...I habv blundered into the "Martin Gibson-Takemine is Shite" thread by accident. I wabz sure thet this was for supporting Joe for a high office but it is just another music thread and Joe's got it in the BS section fore some reason. I would think thet the Kay Teisco-Silvertone would be a candidate obver the Martins and Gibsons, as they are fairly good guitars and not too shitey at all, unless left outside or near the stove for enny lenth obv time. Joe, pleez move this outta the BS hellhole area and into the music section if you want my vote. I know, it iz hard to keep vigilante obver all this, but I am surprised this one got by you. anonymously, Tweed |
Subject: RE: BS: Joe Offer f/ Homeland Security Secretary From: Once Famous Date: 20 Dec 04 - 04:34 PM I remember it being in the music section. Haven't looked at it for quite a while. Maybe it's time to go back and see the sawdust from all of those sushi boards. |