 sj |
||
|
||
BS: China Resolution dissent
| GUEST,Goose Gander | 04 Jun 09 - 01:34 PM | |
| Richard Bridge | 04 Jun 09 - 01:49 PM | |
| GUEST,Goose Gander | 04 Jun 09 - 01:56 PM | |
|
|
|
|||||||||||
|
BS: China Resolution dissent
|
Share Thread
|
||||||||||
|
Subject: BS: China Resolution dissent From: GUEST,Goose Gander Date: 04 Jun 09 - 01:34 PM Ron Paul offers this dissent of the meaningless China resolution currently being railroaded through Congress. Whatever you think of the man, read his words and tell me he isn't making sense . . . G.G. |
|
Subject: RE: BS: China Resolution dissent From: Richard Bridge Date: 04 Jun 09 - 01:49 PM All right: I'll tell you. He isn't making any sense. The fact that the USA continues to resile from its abhorrent internal (and Gitmo) rights record may undermine its attempt to occupy the moral high ground when calling on China to do the right thing, but the only correct position is that both should be investigated, not neither. Ah, and aren't you a guest starting a BS thread and so likely to be deleted. |
|
Subject: RE: BS: China Resolution dissent From: GUEST,Goose Gander Date: 04 Jun 09 - 01:56 PM It's meaningless and hypocritical to call for an investigation of one (20 years past) while the other goes on and on. If the resolution called for investigating both, it would have my support. Maybe I should have started a 'what is folk?' thread, or bashed Lizzie Cornish . . . |
