BS: One Whole Chicken in a Can

Subject: BS: One Whole Chicken in a Can
From: Goose Gander
Date: 12 Mar 10 - 12:29 PM

One Whole Chicken in a Can

Pure genius.

Subject: RE: BS: One Whole Chicken in a Can
From: Dave the Gnome
Date: 12 Mar 10 - 02:14 PM

You are one sick Goosey. I love it:-)

DeG

Subject: RE: BS: One Whole Chicken in a Can
From: frogprince
Date: 12 Mar 10 - 02:32 PM

I kinda like some of the sausage biscuit breakfast sandwiches for the grocery, but sometimes I wonder how I get past thinking about the first item on the content label: "whole ground hog". I don't really mind the thought of ears and snouts, but I try not to think of the total scope of implications there.

Subject: RE: BS: One Whole Chicken in a Can
From: Goose Gander
Date: 12 Mar 10 - 02:43 PM

Is that one whole hog, ground up like hamburger; or one whole ground hog?

Subject: RE: BS: One Whole Chicken in a Can
From: frogprince
Date: 12 Mar 10 - 02:52 PM

G.G., I've messed with a few people by referring to the content as "whole groundhog", but so far everyone has caught on and just called me a smartass.
Looking at it another way: I grew up on the farm, aware that a hog loves nothing more than to follow a cow around and eat it's soupy manure. At times I ask myself how I manage to eat any pork product without total revulsion. Why don't I find the though of eating that groundhog more acceptable? Doesn't make a bit of sense, even to meself.

Subject: RE: BS: One Whole Chicken in a Can
From: Little Hawk
Date: 12 Mar 10 - 04:09 PM

AAARGH!!!!!!!

We had one of those damned chicken-in-a-can things sitting around here for about 20 years. I've no idea where it came from or who was responsible for purchasing. I finally threw it out, still in the can.

Subject: RE: BS: One Whole Chicken in a Can
From: Rapparee
Date: 12 Mar 10 - 07:17 PM

Oh, hell, they meant it was cooked and all...no feathers or ANYTHING.