 sj |
||
|
||
BS: 58% of 58% is
|
|
|
Subject: BS: 58% of 58% is.... From: Little Hawk Date: 03 Sep 12 - 11:47 PM 34%!!!!!!!! And that's how many American-resident chimps wear cotton underwear at least 6 days a week. The rest either go commando...or they wear silk or synthetic underwear. |
|
Subject: RE: BS: 58% of 58% is.... From: Beer Date: 03 Sep 12 - 11:54 PM No Stanfield's. ad. |
|
Subject: RE: BS: 58% of 58% is.... From: Little Hawk Date: 04 Sep 12 - 12:03 AM Fruit of the Loom, perhaps? |
|
Subject: RE: BS: 58% of 58% is.... From: Ebbie Date: 04 Sep 12 - 02:06 AM How does it happen that you know so much about chimps? You can't extrapolate from Chongo, you know. For three reasons: 1. One does not a statistic make. 2. He isn't real. 3. If he were real, he wouldn't be found dead (or alive) in a pair of undies. |
|
Subject: RE: BS: 58% of 58% is.... From: Pete Jennings Date: 04 Sep 12 - 06:17 AM 58% of 1000 = 580. 58% of 580 = 336.4 34% of 1000 = 340. You gotta stop being influenced by that chump, LH, he bad... |
|
Subject: RE: BS: 58% of 58% is.... From: TheSnail Date: 04 Sep 12 - 07:17 AM 58% of statistics are made up on the spur of the moment. |
|
Subject: RE: BS: 58% of 58% is.... From: Dead Horse Date: 04 Sep 12 - 11:17 AM 58% of this post was deleted because it contained extremely rude remarks about stati |
|
Subject: RE: BS: 58% of 58% is.... From: Q (Frank Staplin) Date: 04 Sep 12 - 11:55 AM My latest Stanfield's underwear made in China. |
|
Subject: RE: BS: 58% of 58% is.... From: Nigel Parsons Date: 04 Sep 12 - 11:58 AM Dead Horse: I like what you did there. You dropped of the end of 'statistics' (or maybe statisticians'). While the deleted part could not equate to 58% of the word, I understand why you cut it off where you did (to just 'Stati') That is because 'Stati' sticks! |
|
Subject: RE: BS: 58% of 58% is.... From: GUEST,Eliza Date: 04 Sep 12 - 12:02 PM And so does logi. |
|
Subject: RE: BS: 58% of 58% is.... From: Ed T Date: 04 Sep 12 - 12:24 PM Thongs are kinda like undies - 58% removed? Come to think of it, much can be done with "undies 58% removed"? So, be off with the rest. |
|
Subject: RE: BS: 58% of 58% is.... From: GUEST,Chongo Chimp Date: 04 Sep 12 - 12:48 PM 58% of urban chimps do not wear shoes much except when goin' to a fancy dancin' and dinin' joint. The reason for that is because our feet are like hands, good for climbin', lightin' up a stogie, takin' apart a gun and cleanin' it, stranglin' an opponent, and so on. Shoes just get in the way. Shoes are good for one thing, though. Well...2 things. Kickin' an opponent in the coconuts. Stompin' on him when he falls down. For those 2 things nothin' beats wearin' heavy leather shoes with metal cleats on 'em. - Chongo |
|
Subject: RE: BS: 58% of 58% is.... From: Ed T Date: 04 Sep 12 - 01:12 PM I suspect the last post chimpishly refers to 58% of urban ones in Canada and the US of A, not globally? |
|
Subject: RE: BS: 58% of 58% is.... From: Ed T Date: 04 Sep 12 - 01:15 PM Urban = Metro? |
|
Subject: RE: BS: 58% of 58% is.... From: GUEST,Chongo Chimp Date: 04 Sep 12 - 02:52 PM Nope, it refers to the USA cos I live in Chicago. - Chongo |
|
Subject: RE: BS: 58% of 58% is.... From: Dead Horse Date: 04 Sep 12 - 03:20 PM If 58% of Chicago was removed it would be known as The Win |
|
Subject: RE: BS: 58% of 58% is.... From: Ed T Date: 04 Sep 12 - 05:28 PM If 58% 0f Little Hawk was removed he could possibly be known as Little Ha? |
|
Subject: RE: BS: 58% of 58% is.... From: GUEST,Chongo Chimp Date: 04 Sep 12 - 06:18 PM If 58% of my weekly liquor allotment was removed, I'd be 35% more sober...and mad as hell! - Chongo |
|
Subject: RE: BS: 58% of 58% is.... From: JohnInKansas Date: 04 Sep 12 - 09:52 PM If 58% of 58% is 33.64% as indicated in the first post (corrected to remove the roundoff), then in the newspeak of recent technical reporters, since the difference between 58% and 33.64% is 24.36%, 58% is actually 124.36% of 38% which is 41.834%. So with 58% actually being only 41.834% it is obvious that 58% of 58% is actually only 58% of 41.834% which is a mere 24.26372%, unless we assume that both of the 58%s are really 41.834%s in which case 58% of 58% is about 17.5008%. And I know that this is an accurate analysis because I made it up myself just now. Confidence is additionally proven by the fact that nearly all (98% at least) news reporters I've read recently obvously use this kind of pure and unsullied logic. The nice thing about statistics is that almost any SPGWK can come up with any answer wanted, without actually knowing anything at all - about anything at all. John |
