BS: What If ?

Subject: RE: BS: What If ?
From: Ed T
Date: 27 Apr 16 - 12:44 PM

Donuel, interesting.
I suspect diversity is bountiful in humans, as with most species These differences are often not observed, and nor always seen for the potential advantages that many may present, to oe indivdual or otherwise. However, with broader communications, this may be changing, at least in some societies to a limited degree.

Subject: RE: BS: What If ?
From: Steve Shaw
Date: 27 Apr 16 - 11:58 AM

It's something with which I won't put up.

Subject: RE: BS: What If ?
From: Donuel
Date: 27 Apr 16 - 10:57 AM

Thnks Frog Princ,
My computer seems to running low on a's and e's.

Subject: RE: BS: What If ?
From: frogprince
Date: 27 Apr 16 - 10:40 AM

Correct that last to "knowing not am I."

Subject: RE: BS: What If ?
From: frogprince
Date: 27 Apr 16 - 10:38 AM

Some few years back, I wish I had a reference, I heard it claimed that objection to ending with a preposition derived from doing so being problematic in Latin, but that there is no valid reason to object to it in English usage. Whether that really means anything, I am knowing not.

Subject: RE: BS: What If ?
From: Donuel
Date: 27 Apr 16 - 10:11 AM

Of course to be scientifically fair, there is still the possibility that dyslexia is just an excuse for being dumb as a post and th I need to go slower than everyone else who processes oral language instantly.


btw Is ending a sentence with a preposition really n anathema to th grammer police?

Subject: RE: BS: What If ?
From: Donuel
Date: 27 Apr 16 - 09:57 AM

Ed T. I have a notion that great poets may be best described by neuro science and brain anatomy than by concepts of Romanticism.

In this age of computers even severe dyslexics like myself, whose angular gyrus brain structures harbor visual concepts rather than words and language can participate in subjects like poetry and literature, if only by translation.

Poetry came easy to me but few other forms of writing when I was young.

I revel in the mastery of language by many who grace these pages but only as fan and not a payer.

While my original name was Donuel Webster, an orator I will never be, unless I first write my thoughts and read them. But poetry allows my wiring to access pictures and association in a relative unique manner that I too don't completely understand.

I once wrote a perfect sonnet called father and son without realizing it was a sonnet form in proper lines and syllables. This phenomena is not just a monkey with a typewriter but gives evidence to an unconscious editor that seems to function while in a state of hypnotic consciousness. At least for me despite my language deficits and what some may inappropriately call a learning disability.

This possibly is what some 19th century poets experienced but I don't have any evidence. That readers are not erudite as a whole is something I wholeheartedly agree.

Subject: RE: BS: What If ?
From: Steve Shaw
Date: 26 Apr 16 - 03:11 PM

I feel like I'm being investigated. Better than being ignored!

Subject: RE: BS: What If ?
From: Ed T
Date: 26 Apr 16 - 03:08 PM

"While much recent historicist criticism has assumed early nineteenth-century readers attuned to subtle ideological nuances in poetry, actual responses from readers often come closer to clulessness. ... It is no surprise that no one understood Blake, but other poets fared not much better. ... Coleridge's 'Christabel' was 'the standing enigma which puzzles the curiosity of literary circles. What is it all about?', while another reviewer asked about Shelley, 'What, in the name of wonder on one side, and of common sense on the other, is the meaning of this metaphysical rhapsody about the unbinding of Prometheus?'. Even Keats was condemned for 'his frequent obscurity and confusion of language' and his 'unintelligible quaintness'. Byron, never to be outdone, boasted in 'Don Juan' that not only did he not understand many of his fellow poets, he did not understand himself either: 'I don't pretend that I quite understand / My own meaning when I would be very fine.' ..." 
― Andrew Elfenbein, Romanticism and the Rise of English

Subject: RE: BS: What If ?
From: Ed T
Date: 26 Apr 16 - 03:07 PM

"Incomprehensible is no better than banal – it's just its flip-side." 
― Tom McCarthy

Subject: RE: BS: What If ?
From: Donuel
Date: 26 Apr 16 - 02:18 PM

What is one year off in comparison to geologic time? Oh well it seemed like 10 years to me. My son is a memory savant not me.

What does keberoxu mean? A Barrel Zoo?

Subject: RE: BS: What If ?
From: Dave the Gnome
Date: 26 Apr 16 - 02:13 PM

Time travel?

Subject: RE: BS: What If ?
From: keberoxu
Date: 26 Apr 16 - 02:09 PM

Donuel, how is this possible? When I looked at Steve Shaw's history at Mudcat I found the "Welcome new catter Steve Shaw" thread that was begun in 2007, which is nine years ago....

Subject: RE: BS: What If ?
From: Donuel
Date: 26 Apr 16 - 02:00 PM

In the far flung dark dank and putrid recesses in the back of my mind, I dared think that Liverpool was a result of a literal pool of livers left over by the executions by King Henry the 8th to be a treat for his prize hounds.

It is 10 years to the day that Steve Shaw wrote "keep going, don't stop now. Keep going" in response to a thread in which I explored embryonic wordless memory and the possibility of quantum neuro connections as well as endocrinal, hormonal, electrical and light transmitter/messengers in the human brain.

Seeing that he still seems to egg on posters, I wonder if he remembers that 40 page post in which he encouraged me to squeeze every last drop of reductio-absurdum realite' all over mudcat BS.

Did you also start school yard fights among other kids while you merely watched?

I don't think even Spaw was ready for that tract of Uber Meta Para Abnormal speculation into the unforeseen path of brain research.

Subject: RE: BS: What If ?
From: Steve Shaw
Date: 26 Apr 16 - 10:21 AM

Anfield superhero...

Subject: RE: BS: What If ?
From: Donuel
Date: 26 Apr 16 - 10:08 AM

What if at this very moment, the habitat and nutritional opportunities and lack of them, is creating many new species of hmo Sapiens to take advantage of the mono homogeneous aspects of today's semi toxic suburban life.

Sudbury man
Rockvillathal
Davonportman
Chestermen United
Patheticopithicus ...

Subject: RE: BS: What If ?
From: punkfolkrocker
Date: 26 Apr 16 - 09:45 AM

what if wearing an "I'm a mudcat member" badge instantly made you irresistibly super cool and sexy.. ??????? 😎

Subject: RE: BS: What If ?
From: Fossil
Date: 26 Apr 16 - 09:34 AM

It is 01:30AM here. What if I stopped reading this nonsense, turned the computer off and went to bed? Would anything really change? Feel free to discuss it while I'm gone...

Subject: RE: BS: What If ?
From: Steve Shaw
Date: 26 Apr 16 - 05:00 AM

😴💤

Subject: RE: BS: What If ?
From: Doug Chadwick
Date: 26 Apr 16 - 04:20 AM

Well now, Steve; it all depends what you mean by 'Incomprehensible'...


Come on Steve; give Michael the benefit of the joke.

DC

Subject: RE: BS: What If ?
From: MGM·Lion
Date: 26 Apr 16 - 04:07 AM

I shall be as lazy as I like, Steve, without the leave of thee!

≈M≈

I am not bound to please thee with my answers
The Merchant of Venice IV i 65

Subject: RE: BS: What If ?
From: Dave the Gnome
Date: 26 Apr 16 - 03:58 AM

I think the office jargon thread has got to you, Steve :-)

Subject: RE: BS: What If ?
From: Steve Shaw
Date: 25 Apr 16 - 08:43 PM

Keep on with it, Donuel. I'll forever be trying to hitch my horse to your wagon.

Subject: RE: BS: What If ?
From: Donuel
Date: 25 Apr 16 - 08:40 PM

Steve, some days I feel as though I will never finish my epic stream of consciousness work entitled "The Complete Works of Inchoate Perceptionistic Reality"

The editor assures me that I have already out Prousted Proust.

Subject: RE: BS: What If ?
From: Steve Shaw
Date: 25 Apr 16 - 08:40 PM

Don't be so lazy, Michael. If it's not incomprehensible, which I still claim it to be, then explain it to me.

Subject: RE: BS: What If ?
From: Donuel
Date: 25 Apr 16 - 08:08 PM

Evidence the second coming is less than the first

Subject: RE: BS: What If ?
From: Donuel
Date: 25 Apr 16 - 08:04 PM

My God!











is bettern your god.

Subject: RE: BS: What If ?
From: Dave the Gnome
Date: 25 Apr 16 - 11:56 AM

I have presented a number of evidences of why the evolutionary story can not be true.

So, where in the pages of countless scientific journals and texts are these evidences published then? Are they classed as mainstream science? If not, why not? I am not saying theses evidences are wrong, Just that, on balance, I would guess they come under what some call pseudo science or what should be referred to more correctly as complete bollocks.

Subject: RE: BS: What If ?
From: Pete from seven stars link
Date: 25 Apr 16 - 10:44 AM

I think what he means is , a word that comes in handy to put someone down!

Subject: RE: BS: What If ?
From: MGM·Lion
Date: 25 Apr 16 - 07:36 AM

Well now, Steve; it all depends what you mean by 'Incomprehensible'...

≈M≈

Subject: RE: BS: What If ?
From: Steve Shaw
Date: 24 Apr 16 - 06:53 PM

Well, Michael, "depends what you mean by..." cannot apply to the likes of Pete. He does not know himself what he means when it comes to anything at all that he says. One does bear in mind your stricture, of course, but, on this forum, it can, at times, have only limited application. vide Pete's last post. Incomprehensible.

Subject: RE: BS: What If ?
From: Pete from seven stars link
Date: 24 Apr 16 - 05:35 PM

Can't argue with that lion!    However, even when trying to explain carefully , someone ...if cap fits...will say ,...well what about , or but this....

Subject: RE: BS: What If ?
From: MGM·Lion
Date: 24 Apr 16 - 02:12 AM

Any of you other oldies round here remember Prof C.E.M. Joad from the 1940s? A London Univ Philosophy teacher, he was one of the original pillars of the popular BBC radio 'Brains Trust' question·&·answer prog, the original "Any Questions". He got rather a lot of ridicule by habitually prefacing his answers with "It depends what you mean by...": became a sort of catchphrase which comic impressionists would take up when pretending to be him. But I always thought, even at 8 yrs old, that the guy had a point -- doesn't it so often depend on "what you mean by..."?

A consideration I frequently feel posters to threads like this would do well to bear in mind and allow for in their responses.

≈M≈

Subject: RE: BS: What If ?
From: Steve Shaw
Date: 23 Apr 16 - 07:53 PM

Inchoate but in the right camp, Donuel.

Subject: RE: BS: What If ?
From: Donuel
Date: 23 Apr 16 - 07:39 PM

If you want to write some popular science fiction, one may use bible verses/descriptions to demonstrate how people are often right for the wrong reasons and how reasons can be wrong. Fill in all the details with a Perspectivism that explains character development and lack of it.
The ending should reward both sides of the religious debate by having the irrational become a bit more rational and the intractable have the epiphany of listening for the first time.

This kind of sci fi is schlock but it sells.

It also is representative of the typical mudcat religious/non religious debate. Doing the real work of helping people is the profoundly honest work of both the religious and non religious.
Action no matter how small is worth a million words.

Subject: RE: BS: What If ?
From: Steve Shaw
Date: 23 Apr 16 - 06:13 PM

So how many of the twelve apostles were women? Take your time...

How many New Testament writings were by women? Take your time...

As for the "first proclaimer of the resurrection," well the resurrection is a well-known Christian lie, one of many. But never mind. We propagate these lies in order to get to deeper truths, don't we? Beats telling the plain truth every time!

So list the good things that Christianity has done for the planet. Take your time...

Subject: RE: BS: What If ?
From: Pete from seven stars link
Date: 23 Apr 16 - 06:01 PM

You are extremely blinkered to write off the Christian faith as having done no good and been unworthy of respect. And I could quote atheists that agree with that assessment    And for the benefit of anyone wondering , here are a couple of texts that speak of God caring for his people in feminine imagery. Deuteronomy 32 11f. Matthew 23. 27. Luke 15. 8-10.   Cf too Paul describing his care alo in feminine terms 1 Thessalonians 2. 7.   You are also in error re women following and propagating his word. As well as scattered texts in acts and the epistles , the first proclaimer of the ressurection of Christ was a woman.

Subject: RE: BS: What If ?
From: Steve Shaw
Date: 23 Apr 16 - 05:43 PM

I am not aware that threads are "dedicated" to prayer requests. Actually, that would be quite a good idea, then the rest of us could avoid them. Let me tell you that I never take offence personally at anything I ever read here. As for religious buildings and religious music, they were conceived and executed by my fellow human beings, not your God. They are as much mine as they are yours. I advise you to keep them out of the argument.

Subject: RE: BS: What If ?
From: Pete from seven stars link
Date: 23 Apr 16 - 05:31 PM

Knowledge, Steve, can never be exhaustive, and it does not have to be , if in debate, any party is unable to counter, or explain his position to the questioner. Even if said questioner is less academically qualified. And this is what we find here. I have presented a number of evidences of why the evolutionary story can not be true. Just about the only ...rebuttal..are appeals to authority and numbers of fellow believers.          And why should you object to requests for prayer on dedicated threads where this would be expected.   , even if it were delusional , and why should that be offensive to you, especially as you are quite happy to listen to religious music, and visit ecclesiastical buildings where you will encounter far more reference to God.

Subject: RE: BS: What If ?
From: Steve Shaw
Date: 22 Apr 16 - 07:28 PM

You have never once called "evolutionism" to account because you clearly lack the intellectual capacity, let alone the knowledge, to do so. There are no crusading atheists here. The crusaders on this forum are, without exception, Christians. Catholics in particular, which I suppose lets you off the hook slightly. These people regard their stance as the default, as indeed you yourself do. You think nothing of the offensive. practice seen in those threads which ask people for prayers, on a forum that involves so many people who don't share your delusions. Why, otherwise, would you take such umbrage at the merest piss-taking out of your beloved God? Your chosen belief system, old chap, has never, in the history of mankind, earned the merest shred of respect by dint of any good that it's ever done. The opposite, in fact. As for your God having any feminine attributes, well here's a new thing. Scour that bible of yours, that bible that you take so literally, and show me one single reference to a female God. He's all-male, mate. All three of him. The role of his women was never to follow him and propagate his word, just to wash his feet and his dead body and weep. It's what women do, in your world.

Subject: RE: BS: What If ?
From: Ed T
Date: 22 Apr 16 - 07:26 PM

Bicycle sprockets?

Well, "Ezekiel saw da wheel", or so he claimed. So, it is somewhat related.;)

Subject: RE: BS: What If ?
From: Pete from seven stars link
Date: 22 Apr 16 - 06:16 PM

Funny thing is, it is usually the atheists...that is the crusading ones...who change almost any subject into an opportunity to attack Christian belief. Steve, of course has just told us , pretty much, that respect for God is out the window, whether he exists or not. Yet when I call evolutionism to account he cries blue murder. A case of one rule for you, and another for me, methinks.                   Thanks . Lion, for beating me to the post . There are other scriptures also that describe Gods care in feminine terms. I hope this brings a bit of balance to the discussion..

Subject: RE: BS: What If ?
From: MGM·Lion
Date: 22 Apr 16 - 06:36 AM

Don't blame me -- it was old Mo whodunit!

Subject: RE: BS: What If ?
From: Steve Shaw
Date: 22 Apr 16 - 06:22 AM

"... in the image of God created He him; male and female created He them"

Get thee immediately to the grammar pedants' thread, Michael. 😂

Subject: RE: BS: What If ?
From: Steve Shaw
Date: 22 Apr 16 - 06:18 AM

"Agod, If I posted a question about bicycle sprockets would the response still be about religion?"

Very likely. Why, I once saw a painting of the Virgin Mary with a spiky halo that looked just like a bicycle sprocket. I didn't count the teeth. On the halo, not the Virgin. Duh.

Subject: RE: BS: What If ?
From: Monique
Date: 22 Apr 16 - 06:11 AM

Page 7 about "male and female".

Subject: RE: BS: What If ?
From: MGM·Lion
Date: 22 Apr 16 - 05:11 AM

Ebbie —

Genesis I 27: "So God created man in His own image, in the image of God created He him; male and female created He them"

≈M≈

Subject: RE: BS: What If ?
From: Ebbie
Date: 22 Apr 16 - 12:08 AM

I can see why some people might be disturbed when a totally unrelated subject elicits unsolicited random religion comments - again - but as you may have noticed, human beings tend to be like that. Frankly, I like it.

Subject: RE: BS: What If ?
From: Donuel
Date: 21 Apr 16 - 09:28 PM

dude you are the fish whisperer.

Steve Shaw , that flap flap is a mistake in notation rendition. It should be an arppegiated tremolo effect not a flap flap. It should sound like rain.


Ebbie, do you think a black hole has gender?

xeberatu, utuberex?


Agod, If I posted a question about bicycle sprockets would the response still be about religion?

Subject: RE: BS: What If ?
From: Ebbie
Date: 21 Apr 16 - 09:27 PM

"...we are created in the image of God as male and female." pete/7 stars

Question: Where does it say that, Pete? I don't recall that.