 sj |
||
|
||
- unnamed thread
|
|
|
Subject: - From: The Shambles Date: 03 Feb 02 - 07:02 AM I didn't want to give this thread a tile as I started it as a way for those contributors who are already ignoring threads from trolls or threads from counter-trolls to confirm, by not contributing to this thread also, that they were ignoring this thread also.
And requesting at the same time, some recognition from those that do contribute to such threads, that by ignoring threads from trolls and counter-trolls, these people are allowing the space for those that do respond, to continue a problem that need not even be a be problem if they also did not respond to treads from trolls or counter -trolls either.
|
|
Subject: RE: - From: The Shambles Date: 03 Feb 02 - 07:03 AM |
|
Subject: RE: - From: gnu Date: 03 Feb 02 - 07:04 AM |
|
Subject: RE: - From: Gareth Date: 03 Feb 02 - 07:36 AM |
|
Subject: RE: - From: GUEST Date: 03 Feb 02 - 07:46 AM |
|
Subject: RE: - From: vectis Date: 03 Feb 02 - 09:14 AM |
|
Subject: RE: - From: GUEST Date: 03 Feb 02 - 09:18 AM |
|
Subject: RE: - From: Kenny B (inactive) Date: 03 Feb 02 - 09:49 AM |
|
Subject: RE: - From: Mr Red Date: 03 Feb 02 - 10:44 AM |
|
Subject: RE: - From: GUEST Date: 03 Feb 02 - 11:39 AM |
|
Subject: RE: - From: Cobble Date: 03 Feb 02 - 11:54 AM |
|
Subject: RE: - From: GUEST Date: 03 Feb 02 - 12:07 PM |
|
Subject: RE: - From: GUEST,YOR Date: 03 Feb 02 - 12:33 PM |
|
Subject: From: Dave the Gnome Date: 03 Feb 02 - 12:35 PM |
|
Subject: RE: - From: mack/misophist Date: 03 Feb 02 - 12:50 PM OK |
|
Subject: RE: - From: Hilary Date: 03 Feb 02 - 01:08 PM |
|
Subject: RE: - From: GUEST,Flaming Troll Date: 03 Feb 02 - 01:12 PM I confirm that I am NOT replying to this thread Mind you, it has to be about the dumbest thread ever...
|
|
Subject: RE: - From: The Shambles Date: 03 Feb 02 - 02:08 PM |
|
Subject: RE: - From: catspaw49 Date: 03 Feb 02 - 02:11 PM |
|
Subject: RE: - From: GUEST,Cookieless Member Date: 03 Feb 02 - 02:11 PM This thread is a load of moronic shit. Then again, why should this thread be any different from most Mudcat threads? |
|
Subject: RE: - From: John Routledge Date: 03 Feb 02 - 02:12 PM |
|
Subject: RE: - From: GUEST, Cookieless Member Date: 03 Feb 02 - 02:24 PM You are, of course, free to use the same anonymous handle as me. We are even in basic agreement about whether this thread serves any useful purpose or not (sorry, folks, but it was bound to be just another trap the trolls couldnt resist, apart from anything else). However, there the similarity ends though. |
|
Subject: RE: - From: Ebbie Date: 03 Feb 02 - 02:24 PM |
|
Subject: RE: - From: GUEST,Peter Date: 03 Feb 02 - 02:56 PM I hereby confirm that: I will ignore every thread posted by a guest, for the guest is bad. I will not feel sorry for the guest including those who have posted as guest because they are new to mudcat, and don't understand the correct protocol. I will however laugh at, and think wonderful, anything and everything a member posts. I will never question any hurtful posts made by members. I will remember the one holy truth: members are good and guests are bad. Peter Seriously, though. Reread this thread, and tell me, honestly, if your posts would have been the same had the presenter rather than the performer been the 'catter' There's nothing wrong with cheering on your friends, but this place goes a little far imho
|
|
Subject: RE: - From: katlaughing Date: 03 Feb 02 - 03:01 PM |
|
Subject: RE: - From: Bill D Date: 03 Feb 02 - 03:17 PM |
|
Subject: RE: - From: Gareth Date: 03 Feb 02 - 03:25 PM |
|
Subject: RE: - From: GUEST Date: 03 Feb 02 - 04:15 PM
How does one confirm one is ignoring a site by letting one's resident cookie reveal one's visitation, thus disclosing that one isn't ignoring it? I can't solve this conundrum except by logging in as a guest to stay anonymous, though I am a regular member. A rather fluffy exercise. |
|
Subject: RE: - From: The Shambles Date: 03 Feb 02 - 04:20 PM |
|
Subject: RE: - From: brid widder Date: 03 Feb 02 - 04:25 PM |
|
Subject: RE: - From: Bat Goddess Date: 03 Feb 02 - 05:03 PM |
|
Subject: RE: - From: Nemesis Date: 03 Feb 02 - 05:09 PM |
|
Subject: RE: - From: okthen Date: 03 Feb 02 - 05:31 PM |
|
Subject: Sheep? From: GUEST, Cookieless Member Date: 03 Feb 02 - 05:54 PM Who's a Sheep? Well, there's... The Shambles gnu 03-Feb-02 07:04 AM Gareth 03-Feb-02 07:36 AM GUEST 03-Feb-02 07:46 AM vectis 03-Feb-02 09:14 AM GUEST 03-Feb-02 09:18 AM Kenny B 03-Feb-02 09:49 AM Mr Red 03-Feb-02 10:44 AM GUEST 03-Feb-02 11:39 AM Cobble 03-Feb-02 11:54 AM GUEST 03-Feb-02 12:07 PM GUEST,YOR 03-Feb-02 12:33 PM Dave the gnome 03-Feb-02 12:35 PM misophist 03-Feb-02 12:50 PM Hilary 03-Feb-02 01:08 PM The Shambles 03-Feb-02 02:08 PM catspaw49 03-Feb-02 02:11 PM John Routledge 03-Feb-02 02:12 PM Ebbie 03-Feb-02 02:24 PM katlaughing 03-Feb-02 03:01 PM Bill D 03-Feb-02 03:17 PM Gareth 03-Feb-02 03:25 PM The Shambles 03-Feb-02 04:20 PM brid widder 03-Feb-02 04:25 PM Bat Goddess 03-Feb-02 05:03 PM Hille 03-Feb-02 05:09 PM okthen 03-Feb-02 05:31 PM |
|
Subject: RE: - From: PaulM Date: 03 Feb 02 - 06:04 PM As a member, who has tried to be helpful, I can only come to one conclusion. Utterlly pathetic I'm not sure if this is supposed to br a protest, but I can't see the police coming out to help.
|
|
Subject: RE: - From: Gareth Date: 03 Feb 02 - 06:32 PM |
|
Subject: RE: - From: RichM Date: 03 Feb 02 - 07:36 PM Cool...
A
Zen Thread |
|
Subject: RE: - From: Bill D Date: 03 Feb 02 - 08:28 PM ~ |
|
Subject: RE: - From: Rt Revd Sir jOhn from Hull Date: 03 Feb 02 - 08:47 PM I think this thread is stupid, there is nothing there.A case of the emperors new clothes? Or am I missing something? |
|
Subject: RE: - From: hesperis Date: 03 Feb 02 - 08:57 PM DON'T POST TO THIS THREAD! Or this one. Or this. Or this one.. Or this one... Nice try Shambles. Too bad this thread is yet another repetition. |
|
Subject: RE: - From: The Shambles Date: 04 Feb 02 - 02:05 AM |
|
Subject: RE: - From: GUEST Date: 04 Feb 02 - 03:26 AM Thank you for refreshing this, Shambles. It was such a wonderful idea, and so original (as Hesperis pointed out) Oops, sorry, I forgot. You were the guy who had to bang on, again, and again, and again, and again about Weymouth Council in thread after thread after thread, even though only three other people were interested. You got little response, so you started again, and again, and again. Thank you for refreshing this, are lives are enriched by you |
|
Subject: Obnoxious threads From: Joe Offer Date: 04 Feb 02 - 03:43 AM We've had some trolling problems lately. As always, the best way to respond to trolling is not to respond. A thread like this just makes things worse. A thread with a name like this causes problems for our search engines and such, so I'll rename it. -Joe Offer- |
|
Subject: RE: - unnamed thread From: GUEST Date: 04 Feb 02 - 03:49 AM Are you listening, Shambles?
A thread like this just makes things worsetosser |
|
Subject: RE: - unnamed thread From: The Shambles Date: 04 Feb 02 - 05:20 AM |
|
Subject: RE: - unnamed thread From: GUEST Date: 04 Feb 02 - 05:28 AM Shambles is a wanker Shambles is a wanker Tra la la la Tra la la la
|
|
Subject: RE: - unnamed thread From: GUEST Date: 04 Feb 02 - 09:39 AM And I notice we have Mudcat member Wolfgang to thank for the continuation of Drumcree Part II. Must have taken the advice from "long threads" to heart. But no member trolling going on there, of course. |
|
Subject: RE: - unnamed thread From: GUEST, Cookieless Member Date: 04 Feb 02 - 10:11 AM This thread does prove that members-with-cookies are just as responsible, if not more so, for the crap at Mudcat. Congratulations to The Shambles for proving that point and to all the other members who blankly posted for reenforcing it. |
|
Subject: RE: - unnamed thread From: GUEST Date: 04 Feb 02 - 10:26 AM And god bless Wolfgang for the setting the bait. Best thread creep the Mudcats ever seen. Up the 'ra!
|
|
Subject: RE: - unnamed thread From: The Shambles Date: 04 Feb 02 - 01:10 PM |
| Share Thread: |