Subject: RE: BS: UK Elections From: Don(Wyziwyg)T Date: 07 May 05 - 06:46 PM 100 |
Subject: RE: BS: UK Elections From: Bunnahabhain Date: 07 May 05 - 03:13 PM Well, keeping everything on paper makes it so much easier to keep track of. And crosses in the box change less than hanging chads... Bunnahabhain |
Subject: RE: BS: UK Elections From: McGrath of Harlow Date: 07 May 05 - 01:34 PM Ah well, that's over. And it strikes me that it all seems to have been a lot better tempered than the business they had over in the States last year, at least on the evidence of the Mudcat. |
Subject: RE: BS: UK Elections From: Don(Wyziwyg)T Date: 07 May 05 - 12:41 PM There's nothing we would like better than for our boys to come home, but they can't until you all stop fighting (physically or verbally). The ball is in your court. DT |
Subject: RE: BS: UK Elections From: ard mhacha Date: 07 May 05 - 09:46 AM Robomatic, It won`t make the slightest difference, at the moment the elected representitives are all locked out of any form of government, the Brits are the masters and they dictate all form of law in the wee six. If you care to look up this Thread you will find my posting on the 21st of April on the outcome of the voting in the north of Ireland, was fairly accurate, well no points for that, I live here. |
Subject: RE: BS: UK Elections From: Don(Wyziwyg)T Date: 07 May 05 - 05:15 AM OOPS! Before a host of rebuttals pour in, I should point out that the last sentence was intended purely as an analogy. I did not intend any of the characters mentioned to represent any of the party leaders. I am well aware that our Libdems would not fit into those categories. DT |
Subject: RE: BS: UK Elections From: Don(Wyziwyg)T Date: 07 May 05 - 05:10 AM We Brits did not re-elect TB, Doug. Thanks to our ridiculous electoral system, one third of us put him back in power, and that only happened because we had no realistic alternative. It was a bit like being asked to choose between Hitler, Attila the Hun, and Napolean. Napolean wins because he is slightly less hateful, but we don't feel satisfied (two thirds of us, that is). Don T. |
Subject: RE: BS: UK Elections From: GUEST,xerxes Date: 07 May 05 - 01:12 AM Yes New Labour got a battering because of the war. Perhaps as it should be every time our country goes to war. Maybe we need to remind those who govern us that war is not just something we can be "persuaded" to support. However, the war aside, what fasinated me was the constant vilification dished out to Tony Blair. I read the Daily Mail as my partner buys it and day after day they published the most vicious articles I've ever read. The personal attacks in the Dail Mail co-incided with Michael Howard's bitter personal attacks and Howard's constant repeated references to Blair's "lying". I notice that several top Conservatives were against this "lying" strategy because it was wrong, it played against Howard and it introduced a type of yob politics and disrespect hitherto unknown in this country. We can only hope that the new Conservative leadership never again employs Lynton Crosby and that the Daily Mail immolates itself in a fury of its own self-righteous propaganda. |
Subject: RE: BS: UK Elections From: robomatic Date: 06 May 05 - 06:44 PM So how about Northern Ireland? Represented here in the States as a vote against stability/ reconciliation/ further peaceful integration. |
Subject: RE: BS: UK Elections From: GUEST Date: 06 May 05 - 06:32 PM Yes Doug, that's because the alternative was worse! But he's taken a hell of a kicking for the war. |
Subject: RE: BS: UK Elections From: mandoleer Date: 06 May 05 - 06:00 PM A hell of a lot of us didn't. Ah well, at least my candidate came 5th out of 6, and the independent in Wyre Forest standing for something to do with the local hospital got back in. |
Subject: RE: BS: UK Elections From: DougR Date: 06 May 05 - 04:07 PM Good on, you Brits! You re-elected Tony Blair. DougR |
Subject: RE: BS: UK Elections From: GUEST,Tory Boy Date: 23 Apr 05 - 11:12 AM GUEST 22 Apr: Sorry I'm neither hypocrite nor nancy-boy. Also, I do not understand the "non" you mention in your question. Also also, my area is what labouring party would call multi-cultural. |
Subject: RE: BS: UK Elections From: GUEST,Chuffin right. Date: 23 Apr 05 - 11:07 AM Laura Paying "for Uni" is a good thing. When you pay your money, you will not put up with crap Lecturers recycling their dreary old stuff year after year. |
Subject: RE: BS: UK Elections From: *Laura* Date: 23 Apr 05 - 07:35 AM Lib Dems! Come on! If we all work really REALLY hard and put lots of nice Lib Dem crosses on the papers I won't have to pay for Uni next year!!! xLx |
Subject: RE: BS: UK Elections From: Piers Date: 23 Apr 05 - 04:04 AM Your Party are quite an interesting bunch. |
Subject: RE: BS: UK Elections From: GUEST Date: 22 Apr 05 - 05:58 PM Only problem with agreeing with 90% of what the BNP say is the remaining 10%.... At the moment I'm seriously considering voting for Your Party. They only seem to be contesting 3 seats - Holburn, Banbury and Southport. The name is so silly it appeals to me. At the moment, the Tories won't stop sending me mail (which I return with rude comments), the Lib Dems won't stop dropping things through my letterbox (I don't return these as it would cost me time and/or money, so they get recycled) and I've had one small leaflet from the UKIP. Your Party seem to be leaving me alone at least.... |
Subject: RE: BS: UK Elections From: akenaton Date: 22 Apr 05 - 05:57 PM Can we stand another two weeks of this garbage?? The entertainment value of the "Three stooges" is beginning to fade. The most amazing thing to me ,was Robin Cook on Question time defending a Prime minister whom he had accused of misleading the country, and exhorting us to vote for a party which had supported an illegal war. A stance which had caused Cook to resign from the cabinet. Are you all mad!! Ake |
Subject: RE: BS: UK Elections From: Piers Date: 22 Apr 05 - 12:52 PM I very much doubt racism can be wiped out be any amount of persuasion or campaigning solely against it. Society isn't fair in any way (the richest 1 percent own nearly four times as much wealth as the poorest 50 percent added together) and many people are looking for someone to blame, mistakenly they see people from overseas as draining limited resources and increasing competition for jobs. These flames are fanned, or even started, by the ruling/owning classes, who are seeking to ride to power on the back of it (e.g. BNP) as well diverting attention from their dominance over resources being the cause of poverty. For example, it is well documented that the upper echelons of the Ku Klux Klan comprised of plantation owners who feared the combination of black and white workers after the American civil war - divide and rule. It isn't necessarily division on strictly racial grounds (as if the human race could ever be strictly divided into races) it is usually on grounds of nationality the rich divide workers and so patriotism and nationalism are used to persuade the poor to help the rich expand or defend their resources. To get rid of the BNP and other racists, we will have to get rid of capitalism. Which is why I will be showing my positive preference for a world of common ownership of all resources, democratic control of the community by everyone, production purely to meet people's needs and free and equal access to all goods and services by writing 'socialism' across my ballot paper, as there is no socialist candidate in my parish. |
Subject: RE: BS: UK Elections From: GUEST Date: 22 Apr 05 - 12:15 PM The Tories are hypocrites and nancy-boys. Wake up Tory Boy - you are being conned. Do you live near non? or do you live in the nice White middle-class suburbs? |
Subject: RE: BS: UK Elections From: GUEST,Tory Boy Date: 22 Apr 05 - 12:13 PM Be not afraid, the Conservatives have effectively blunted the BNP, this election. Same goes for the UKIP. |
Subject: RE: BS: UK Elections From: GUEST,Patriotic Date: 22 Apr 05 - 12:12 PM Excellent! and the folk-music too, just sorry I didn't see it on TV. I might for the first time in my life actually vote BNP. I have always voted Labour because of my working-class roots, but the BNP says probably 90% of what I think. Pleasantly surprised |
Subject: RE: BS: UK Elections From: Emma B Date: 22 Apr 05 - 12:09 PM Guest, I really don't care whether you believe me or not but I'm not afraid to put my name here or condemn the "politics" of hate. Attempts to redress the inequalities of the past whether in the fields of employment, education, access etc can be "sexed-up" to appear that any group whether ethnic, female, homosexual or disabled etc is being treated preferentially by those who wish to prey on the fears of the "disadvantaged" of any colour or creed Divide and rule? |
Subject: RE: BS: UK Elections From: GUEST,Folky Date: 22 Apr 05 - 11:42 AM Well i thought the BNP Broadcast song about Frosty called Corporal Fox was excellant. I urge anyone interested in good folk to go to the bnp website www.bnp.org.uk and have a good listen. |
Subject: RE: BS: UK Elections From: Don(Wyziwyg)T Date: 22 Apr 05 - 11:29 AM It seems to me that the problem with our multi racial society is the perception, among the white, British, community, that those who make the laws have forgotten to include them in the mix. They feel, rightly or wrongly, that the law is slanted in favour of other ethnic groups, to their detriment. It is this perception which tends to alienate, and whether true or not, it needs to be clearly addressed. Unless our multiracial culture is demonstrably INCLUSIVE, it leaves the door open for racially motivated groups to foment unrest and intolerance, while ostensibly championing the cause of "The Native British Race". Someone, I can't remember who, said "It's not what's true that counts, but what is perceived to be true". We need to ensure that what's perceived to be true IS true, and the BNP, among others, will lose its appeal. Don T. |
Subject: RE: BS: UK Elections From: GUEST Date: 22 Apr 05 - 09:28 AM Don't believe you for one minute. OK, where was this meeting? and what was it they said/did that was so fascist? |
Subject: RE: BS: UK Elections From: Emma B Date: 22 Apr 05 - 09:25 AM And you guest have no idea about "us lot". I have, in fact, attended a private BNP meeting in the past as a guest of a member so I don't need to see the "acceptable" public face of fascism! I do know Oldham and have worked there. |
Subject: RE: BS: UK Elections From: fiddler Date: 22 Apr 05 - 08:24 AM The BNP always sound convincing until you get behind the veneer and by then you've lost the thread of a rational discussion. Fortunately at national level they are a bit of a lone voice but locally are a much more sinister and dangerous force! This thread being about the election anyone looked at the family of the leader of the Conservatives - it reads like hes got there despite all this incredible bad luck - Is it his intention to bring this bad luck doen on teh rest of us as revenge for his ancestors getting in as immigrants - legal or otherwise - and would they have got in under his proposed rules. And how far are the conservatives form Neo Nazis - they are the only party wanting to repeal human rights legislation!!!!! As I like the legislation AND it exists are they infringing on my human rights by removing it? Andy |
Subject: RE: BS: UK Elections From: GUEST Date: 22 Apr 05 - 08:06 AM "Crystal" What do you mean "the BNP hijacking OUR culture". The people in BNP are British and it's OUR British culture. Don't be so stupid. I am in the BNP - it's my culture too and I LOVE folk music. You'll find a lot in the BNP do, along with our beautiful classical music. (And you'll find many 'folkies' who agree with us too) Folk music is part of our heritage and identity - that which we are trying to save. In this so-called 'multi-racial' country White children are not taught about their English musical heritage. They are not taught about their roots but have rap/black music etc forced onto them on Kids TV. And why is it so wrong for the BNP to highlight White people being killed in racist murders? Why on earth is that "sickening"? Do we not count? You really believe all the rubbish about us being 'Neo-Nazis'. Look at our site www.bnp.org.uk "Emma B" take a look - you tell me what is so 'nazi-ish' about that. Many BNP members have grandparents who fought against the Nazis. You lot have not a clue what's happening outside this forum for example in Oldham. I challenge YOU to walk through there any time of the day and get out without being attacked by asians. |
Subject: RE: BS: UK Elections From: Piers Date: 22 Apr 05 - 07:41 AM I'm sure I read a report somewhere, a few years ago, of the BNP's fuhrer, Nick Griffin, singing some folk music at one of their hate rallies. I could only pull up this on t'internet: 'THE Bradford branch of the British National Party held its first meeting of 2005 on a very wet and windy Saturday January 9th . . . Later the audience were entertained by a set of traditional Irish folk music and revamped popular songs by a local band. ' VOICE OF FREEDOM - FEBRUARY 2005. No doubt all the while consuming a vast quantity of French lager before heading home via the Kebab shop - oh, the irony. Alistair Hulett makes reference to the BNP here. |
Subject: RE: BS: UK Elections From: Emma B Date: 22 Apr 05 - 07:39 AM A couple of us heard that while on mudchat - it was really quite sickening..... I'm hoping that this Saturday in a celebration of everything that is GOOD in the English culture we will continue to reclaim "ownership" from these nasty neo-nazis Get out there and dance, sing and play for St George (who was certainly not an Englishman!) |
Subject: RE: BS: UK Elections From: Crystal Date: 22 Apr 05 - 07:03 AM I'm not sure if anyone here listens to radio 4, but the party political broardcast by the BNP on last night featured someone complaining about white people being killed by black people and ended with a song, very much in the traditional style. What I have feared has happened, the BNP have started hijacking our culture (one of the most inclusive and widly influanced around) foe their own rascist ends. AAAAARRRRRGGGGGHHHHHH!!!!!!! Can we stop it? Any ideas? |
Subject: RE: BS: UK Elections From: fiddler Date: 22 Apr 05 - 04:03 AM I want my country back - hmm.. Tory Boy or BNP???? Such a big fuss about a small non issue I remembered another verse - I think No one ever mentions colour be it yellow black or red Unless you buy their houses or ask their girls to wed They don't have any predjudice that really would be bad It's just that you'd be better off back home in Trinidad Gald you (or your ancestors) did settel emma Andy |
Subject: RE: BS: UK Elections From: Piers Date: 22 Apr 05 - 03:51 AM Anyone coming to my doorstep who asks if I want my country back will have 'I was born owning nothing but my ability to work, and the only country I have ever known is called 'Tresspassers will be prosecuted' quoted at them. |
Subject: RE: BS: UK Elections From: GUEST,Tory Boy Date: 22 Apr 05 - 12:12 AM The word from the doorsteps this election is NOT that people hate immigrants, they just want their country back. The current polls showing labouring party ahead are at odds with what people are saying to canvassers and focus groups, though YOUGOV seems about right. This election is close, very close. That'll wipe the smirk from Blair's face. |
Subject: RE: BS: UK Elections From: ard mhacha Date: 21 Apr 05 - 03:34 PM Look out for two big upsets in N Ireland David Trimble leader of the Ulster Unionists is forecast to lose his seat to DUP man David Simpson,and there is a possibility that SDLP leader Mark Durkan will have strong opposition from Mitchel McLaughlin Sinn Fein. Gerry Adams Sinn Fein will enlarge their vote and may gain two extra seats, also Ian Paisley`s DUP will also strengthen their vote and gain seats from the Unionists. |
Subject: RE: BS: UK Elections From: GUEST,McGrath of Harlow Date: 21 Apr 05 - 11:33 AM The daftest thing is that refugees who are waiting for their asylum status to be sorted out are not allowed to do any paid work, even when they have skills which are in real demand - and then you have people complaining about them receiving welfare benefits, or going out begging. Labour has a pretty murky record on this. People have been sent home as bopgus asylkum seekers, only to be arrested and tortured and killed when they got there. However the Tories not only think that Labour is too soft on refugees, they have their eyes on pulling out of possible the European Convention on Human Rights and the 1951 United Nations Geneva convention on refugees. I suppose that might go down well with Bush, if he was moved to regret the loss of his mate Tony, in the event of an upset in the election. |
Subject: RE: BS: UK Elections From: Emma B Date: 21 Apr 05 - 07:39 AM Most "immigrants" to this country (and the figures are available) are, in fact, Americans, Australians and citizens of EC countries. The image of a whole army (or even a town full) of benefit seeking fraudulent asylum seekers is in fact a myth but one designed to build up resentment in the same way that the National Socialist Party did against German Jewry. I genuinely feel disgust for this current campaign and shame for the people who propogate it BTW My refugee ancestors DID settle in Crewe! |
Subject: RE: BS: UK Elections From: GUEST,McGrath of Harlow Date: 20 Apr 05 - 09:29 PM He might, reasonably enough, think that that is a necessary quality for being Prime Minister these days. |
Subject: RE: BS: UK Elections From: GUEST,Jennet Date: 20 Apr 05 - 07:34 PM Is it me, or Is Michael Howard a horrible lying bastard?? |
Subject: RE: BS: UK Elections From: fiddler Date: 20 Apr 05 - 07:49 AM I'll do some digging for the rest of the song! Andy |
Subject: RE: BS: UK Elections From: McGrath of Harlow Date: 20 Apr 05 - 05:53 AM Any more of that song Andy? Soundss if it might be worth chasing down, and the Mudcat is the best place to do that. It doesn't ring a bell for me as a Sydney Carter song I've ever come across, but he wrote a lot of songs. |
Subject: RE: BS: UK Elections From: fiddler Date: 20 Apr 05 - 03:55 AM Just think if current policy proposals had been in place years ago we might not even have Micheal Howard here! He's a real ethnic himself do we want him as a neighbour let alone prime minister! One day he claimed Welsh and Immigant from Eastern Europe in the same day! Like all politicians he wants his cake and eat it too! They settled down in Manchester, they settled down in Crewe Some lived next to coloured folk and some lived next to you They cam from far Jamaica and from the Taj Mahal But those who came to our town, were the luckiest of all I think Sydney Carter but I could be wrong I've not sung it for around 30 years! It is not a problem to me or most of us I think. How many BNP folk (or Conservatives) eat curry I wonder? And the wonderful influence on our musical traditions - Moorish dancing - could all stop too! I diverge cheers for today! Andy |
Subject: RE: BS: UK Elections From: Piers Date: 20 Apr 05 - 03:52 AM Hi Trudie, The BBC site I linked to quotes it as ' . . . vote labour', but I did see '. . . vote liberal or labour' when I was looking for a source. |
Subject: RE: BS: UK Elections From: GUEST,Trudie Fitzgerald Date: 20 Apr 05 - 12:51 AM Piers It's a long time ago but wasn't the Tory slogan in Smethwick: If you want a nigger for a neighbour Vote Liberal or Labour. |
Subject: RE: BS: UK Elections From: McGrath of Harlow Date: 19 Apr 05 - 04:38 PM Or of course "If you want a Gippo for a neighbour", which goes down well with some people. There seem some indications that all this is backfiring, and driving people reluctantly back to voting for the Labour party, even though it is still led by Blair. That Guardian letter from Martin Carthy and Norma Waterson I quoted in another thread may have been a straw in the wind: Hard choice Tuesday March 22, 2005 The Guardian Until a week ago our electoral choice was straightforward: a pro-war Labour MP who has toed the party line, an anti-war Lib Dem, along with a laughable Tory. For Labour members like us, the choice was simple. Vote Lib Dem. Then Michael Howard reached into the gutter and played the Gypsy/Traveller card. The current demonising of an entire community is so shocking we are going to have to vote for a party led by a man we believe to be the slipperiest, most profoundly disliked politician to hold the office of prime minister in our lifetime. A PM whose time is up and whose representative here needs to be voted out. But sadly not by us. Not this time. Martin Carthy and Norma Waterson Robin Hood's Bay, N Yorks |
Subject: RE: BS: UK Elections From: Piers Date: 19 Apr 05 - 01:27 PM On Michael Howard, "Immigration is an issue I feel very strongly about," says Tony Scott, on holiday from Suffolk. "And he's the first person since Enoch Powell to talk about it honestly." (Link) "As I look ahead, I am filled with foreboding; like the Roman, I seem to see the River Tiber foaming with much blood". Enoch Powell, 1968. Tory leader Michael Howard has stood by claims the UK could face race riots if people think immigration is unlimited. 18/04/05 I think Michael Howard should resurrect the old 'if you want a nigger for neighbour, vote labour'(link) slogan. It's catchy and it says what he wants without fudging around the issue. |
Subject: RE: BS: UK Elections From: McGrath of Harlow Date: 19 Apr 05 - 01:21 PM If students have registered their new address, they are entitled to vote in that constituency. Otherwise they would normally be registered back with their parents, and entitled to vote there, by post if they wish. It's quite possible to be registered to vote in several places, but it's an offence to vote in both of them. No tax on voting - I think that would be seen as likely to force down turnout, which wouldn't be seen as advisable, since last time it was almost down to USA levels. On the other hand a tax on voting could bring in quite a lot of money, I wonder if anyone has thought of bringing it in... |
Subject: RE: BS: UK Elections From: Piers Date: 19 Apr 05 - 10:12 AM Council tax is a tax on a households [it is a rejigged poll tax] rather than on the ownership of a dwelling, hence tennants have to pay it rather than landlords. As Crystal says, students are usually classed as residing with their parents, so they are often not on the register of voters when they are away at University. There isn't a tax on voting. |
Subject: RE: BS: UK Elections From: GUEST,Tory Boy Date: 19 Apr 05 - 09:54 AM Whether you like it or not, increasingly people are saying that they do not like immigrants or asylum seekers on their patch. That is just a fact of life. labouring party does not have a useful policy on immigration, which is out of contol. What Michael Howard is doing is providing a lifeline to those people who are feeling swamped. He is not racist. He himself is the son of an asylum seeker. |