|
|||||||
BS: Oh, isn't she a good mother. |
Share Thread
|
Subject: BS: Oh, isn't she a good mother. From: harpmaker Date: 24 Jul 06 - 10:04 PM I listened again to a very distrought Grandma on the radio tonight, She said that she was deverstated that her son could no longer see his child after they had broke up, and granny could not also. Nor grandad.... |
Subject: RE: BS: Oh, isn't she a good mother. From: Sorcha Date: 24 Jul 06 - 10:18 PM My first question is WHY..next is WHO says? |
Subject: RE: BS: Oh, isn't she a good mother. From: Bill D Date: 24 Jul 06 - 10:18 PM ??? either I miss the point, or "deverstated" is the point. |
Subject: RE: BS: Oh, isn't she a good mother. From: Bill D Date: 24 Jul 06 - 10:20 PM and who is 'they'? |
Subject: RE: BS: Oh, isn't she a good mother. From: harpmaker Date: 24 Jul 06 - 10:31 PM sorch 1, dont know 2,the law bill yeh.. you missed the point |
Subject: RE: BS: Oh, isn't she a good mother. From: Bill D Date: 24 Jul 06 - 10:34 PM ok, I am too dense to get the point, I guess...especially when it is vaguely phrased and left to our imaginations. Ya'll have fun... |
Subject: RE: BS: Oh, isn't she a good mother. From: harpmaker Date: 24 Jul 06 - 10:38 PM But Bill, dont go.... there's more.. |
Subject: RE: BS: Oh, isn't she a good mother. From: Bill D Date: 24 Jul 06 - 10:53 PM I'm sure there must be... |
Subject: RE: BS: Oh, isn't she a good mother. From: Sorcha Date: 24 Jul 06 - 11:15 PM Yea...so when you find out, let us know?????? The Law could have Their Reasons.... |
Subject: RE: BS: Oh, isn't she a good mother. From: Amergin Date: 24 Jul 06 - 11:44 PM Well what I gathered was that the son and Grandma broke up.....and so the son couldn't see their child anymore.... |
Subject: RE: BS: Oh, isn't she a good mother. From: Amos Date: 25 Jul 06 - 12:08 AM Jeeze, guys, can we get an agreement going that we will provide ignorant readers with enough )(&*^^%$%^ CONTEXT to let them know what we are bloody well SAYING? This kinda stuff really wastes bandwidth and makes for very poor (or greatly inebriated) conversations. (rant OFF/) A |
Subject: RE: BS: Oh, isn't she a good mother. From: Bill D Date: 25 Jul 06 - 12:16 AM I tried saying that 'gently', Amos.....didn't seem to help. I think whatever El Ted and his compatriots have is catching. |
Subject: RE: BS: Oh, isn't she a good mother. From: John O'L Date: 25 Jul 06 - 01:00 AM The man and his wife seperated. Their child went with the mother. The man's parents miss their grandkids. |
Subject: RE: BS: Oh, isn't she a good mother. From: Kara Date: 25 Jul 06 - 03:29 AM That is what happens, its a shame, but ultimatley people do have the choice of staying together and making a relationship work or spliting up. Where there are kids involved this often means that one of the parents will have little or no time with the kids, but that should be taken into account when they decide to spilt up. Life and love is not a film where we all live happily ever after once we have found Mr or Mrs Right. It takes work and commitment to make a relationship last. If your ex's parents are going to tell your kids you are a horrible bitch who dumped their son for no good reason you may not wish your kids to spend time with them. If your kids are not allowed to see thier father and you do not trust his parents you may not allow them to see the grandparents. If you have sole custody of children you have sole reponsibility for them and the grandparents are after all the people who brought up their son. |
Subject: RE: BS: Oh, isn't she a good mother. From: GUEST Date: 25 Jul 06 - 04:31 AM You don't have the choice of staying together and making the relationship work if the other person is not prepared to try. I know this because I was the one who would no longer try (I had tried for 14 years and I wanted the rest of my life back). |
Subject: RE: BS: Oh, isn't she a good mother. From: dianavan Date: 25 Jul 06 - 01:34 PM Grandparents also have rights. They can apply for visitation privileges. ...unless of course the court decides that they are unfit as caregivers. |
Subject: RE: BS: Oh, isn't she a good mother. From: MMario Date: 25 Jul 06 - 01:39 PM If indeed the mother had sole custody - or perhaps the reason is that the mother and children have moved to another state - no legal reason, just the convenience factor. again, not enough information provided in the initial post. In fact - based on the initial post - it could be a gay couple that broke up |
Subject: RE: BS: Oh, isn't she a good mother. From: Bill D Date: 25 Jul 06 - 02:47 PM Based on the initial post, it could have been a drama, or a news program...or...*shrug* "wait, Bill, there's more"....not so far. *curmudgeon retires to his den to pull wings off of flies* |
Subject: RE: BS: Oh, isn't she a good mother. From: Paco Rabanne Date: 26 Jul 06 - 07:09 AM Yo Harpy, Is this something to do with 'The Archers.' |
Subject: RE: BS: Oh, isn't she a good mother. From: WFDU - Ron Olesko Date: 26 Jul 06 - 09:49 AM This incredibly vague story appears to have been influenced by a little bit of Old Grandad instead of any grandma. |
Subject: RE: BS: Oh, isn't she a good mother. From: harpmaker Date: 26 Jul 06 - 07:57 PM Shhh, has she gone yet? that scorchin' woman?? possibly with a problem on this issue. (And her from Ozz) I may have hit a raw nerve! WHEN MAM AND DAD SPLITS UP, THE LAW SAYS THE KIDS GO WITH THE MAM. ITS NOT ROCKET SCIENCE, but thats what happends, and it fucks a lot of people up. Some mothers are far worse than the father. The law is such an arse, that women 'can' play on it. (Not all) If thats not bad enough, it gives the mother years of poisoning the child against the father. While the father tries to get access. Then its too late, the damage has been done. I know its a complex issue, but its one that needs to be addressed more fairley. And thats just the start of the injustice, I could go on........ And probably will... |
Subject: RE: BS: Oh, isn't she a good mother. From: dianavan Date: 26 Jul 06 - 09:12 PM The law doesn't say that in Canada. In Canada, if their is a dispute, custody is determined by what is the least disruptive to the child (depending on the ability of that parent to provide adequate care). This quite often entails visitation rights, unless, of course, there is reason to deny the other parent or grandparents, access. Where do you live? |