|
Subject: RE: BS: More pagan stuff From: MMario Date: 05 May 00 - 09:13 AM errr...malcolm. That should be amended, because american First Nations people and polynsians and some of the asiatic ethnic groups DO have documented ....never mind....Just saw the "western European" . *thwap* |
|
Subject: RE: BS: More pagan stuff From: SDShad Date: 05 May 00 - 09:41 AM Guest,me: It would seem that you're unaware of what is happening in Christianity in modern times except for the easy media soundbites about extreme fundamentalists and abortion clinic bombers. I'd respectfully suggest that you try a little research about Creation Spirituality (not Creationism--it's entirely unrelated and in most ways opposite, as it embraces modern cosmology), and then tell us if you still feel that no Christian is friend to the earth; that every Christian is enemy to "all that lives;" that all Christian "deny the evidence of their senses." Denying the fundamental dignity of over one billion of your fellows (and humanity is all one family in the end, no?) is about as "apart from the cycles" as I can imagine. We'll never rejoin the hoop if we damn each others' beliefs that way. Chris |
|
Subject: RE: BS: More pagan stuff From: GUEST,Penny S. (elsewhere, tangentially) Date: 05 May 00 - 11:24 AM Changing the trend just a bit, I have just been reminded of the influences on the evidence that remains by seeing a colleague's display on the story of Pandora's Box. The standard school interpretation has Prometheus as the good guy, the "gods" as petty minded characters who shouldn't be let loose on terraforming a traffic island, and hope as a good thing. Apart from some interpretations suggesting that hope was the worst of the bad things in the box, which I think is fairly ancient (I expect T-bird has some idea of the sources for that) I hadn't seen anything else until the other year until I saw a cartoon version by an artist who usually does Bible stories, who had Prometheus as satanic, and visually monstrous, because he opposed Zeus, who ,as king of the gods, should be obeyed. Obviously the comparison between Pandora and Eve had been made much more evident, to the loss of a very subtle story in its own right. What interests me is the contrast between the survival of that subtle story, and the way that Skarpi's heritage has been preserved, written down by monks. There are obvious comparisons between the Northern and the Southern European pantheons, though Odin/Othin/Woden seems to have taken the places rightfully belonging to Thor/Thunor and Tyr/Tiw, and the relationship between Loki and Odin seems similar to that between Prometheus and Zeus in a number of ways. Except that Loki, in opposing a leader with a number of dubious characteristics, which he claims himself (Stirrer-of-Strife-at-Things, for example)is made deeply satanic, wrong and evil, when the situation is much more subtle than evil Loki opposing good Odin. Has a more subtle story on the lines of the Greek one been hidden by being written down by Christians who inhabited a partially Manicheian(?sp)world of black and white? I can't find a discussion about this anywhere (except odd implications by Harry Harrison in One King's Way etc, and Diana Wynne Jones in Eight Days of Luke) as books tend to write Loki off at face, evil value. One argument is that Loki had no temples. I am assured by an Indian friend that my claim that a god with an implicit association with fire does not need a personal temple as he is in all temples is exactly the position with Agni in Hinduism, a point I did not know before raising it with him. Incidentally, isn't Hinduism continuously practiced paganism? Penny |
|
Subject: RE: BS: More pagan stuff From: MAG (inactive) Date: 05 May 00 - 12:26 PM No, Okie, I suggest you try Trevor-Roper, or other actual historians who have done the actual research. I, for one, am now a sceptic on anything you have to say. Most sincerely, MAG |
|
Subject: RE: BS: More pagan stuff From: GUEST,me Date: 05 May 00 - 12:46 PM i do love this thread Chris, thank you for your kind words, but i "damn" no one. i simply avoid sources of danger, dismay and despair. frankly, any belief structure predicated on a "someone else can die for your sins" foundation is already looking in the wrong direction. a direction i choose to avoid, along with any variation of the skyfather myth. individually, i've met some fine people who claim to be xtian -- apparently, on the individual basis, xtianity is often harmless... however, the institution in all of its variations has been the most destructive force in the west for the last 1700 years. i choose not to participate, and "research" will not change my mind. you apparently mean well, and perhaps have a concern for my immortal soul... i have no such concern, i know what faces me when death calls me, and it will be as interesting as my life has been, and a step to the next thing the Mother's Light upon thee and thine, christian. |
|
Subject: RE: BS: More pagan stuff From: MMario Date: 05 May 00 - 12:56 PM "me" - "the institution in all of its variations has been the most destructive force in the west for the last 1700 years." I agree, most heartily! [and for the complete spelling out of christian I thank you. Also heartily.] I draw a HUGE, THICK line between my faith as a christian and the established religious practices of the christian church, in all it's forms.
|
|
Subject: RE: BS: More pagan stuff From: Mbo Date: 05 May 00 - 01:11 PM I hope you are all aware that "x" as in "Xmas" and Me's "xtians" is a Christian symbol. It represents the Cross that Jesus was crucified on, so replacing "Christ" with "X" makes no difference, since they both represent the same thing. As for Jesus "dying for our sins" you have to realized when and who the documents that became The Bible were written for. I was just talking to my priest, who is a authority on Religious tezts. Also he is a great guy, who believes in "down home Catholicism" as he puts it, and will shoot down the lies and misconceptions even the most devoted Christians have. He was just telling me this week that everything in the Bible is written in metaphorical language, and cannot be taken at face value, but at practical value. "Died for our sins?" he was telling me "Who cares? What does that mean, died for our sins? It's purely metaphorical language...Jesus died for US. And anyone who willingly gives up their own life the help others muts be respected and honored." --Mbo |
|
Subject: RE: BS: More pagan stuff From: MMario Date: 05 May 00 - 01:26 PM Mbo - I have to disagree with you. (though I have heard it rationalized that way many times.) Most people agree that the shift to xmas has been primarily driven by a marketing movement to make the holy day a secular holiday. And "xmas" for "Christmas" is a recent phenomenan - within my lifespan. Following that reasoning, it would be MUCH more logical for us to have tmas and t-tian. - Unless you are equating the "x" with the greek chi, which I believe is more equivilant of the english "c" |
|
Subject: RE: BS: More pagan stuff From: SDShad Date: 05 May 00 - 01:30 PM me-- (May I call you "mini-me," for your diminuitive lower case "m"?) :-) Those purveyors of toxic Christianity whom you see as "sources of danger, dismay and despair?" Me too. To them, for all my nature-centered, gender-neutral, nonjudgemental christology, I might as well be pagan. And maybe by their definitions I am pagan. The labels matter less to me than you might suspect; if someone breathes Unity, they are my brother or sister through Yeshua in a way that I simply don't fully understand yet, regardless of the label they put on it. If I am pagan in the estimation of some and Christian to others, it matters little. But as much as I share your sensible impulse to avoid toxic individuals, at my core is also the knowledge that they are all my sisters and brothers, and entitled to my love: toxic Christians, toxic Moslems, toxic pagans, toxic Atheists. Children of the Universe all, for all their sins and foibles. And for me, it's not "someone else can die for your sins." For me, it's that this particular person's death gets my attention and shows me the path to the Light. And it might interest you to know that "Abwoon," the Aramaic word Yeshua used in what's called the Lord's Prayer that is usually translated as "Father," doesn't necessarily have to carry any gender connotation, and can mean Mother, Father, Divine Parent, Birther, Creator, or all of the above at once (which, with Yeshua, you can usually bet on layers of meaning). So to me, Alaha isn't a "skyfather"; I put no more literal stock in myths of Yahweh than I do in myths of Astarte. For me, the Divine Mother and the Divine Father are all one, a knowable metaphor for the unknowable, ineffable source of Creation. White-haired, vengeful patriarchal figures on mountain thrones need not apply. As for your immortal soul, I part with many of my brethren and sistren in the church on the necessity of my seeking to "convert" or "save" you. In creation spirituality, there is only one true being, of which you and I are both small and equal parts. We are already one even as we differ, and your "immortal soul," whatever that even is, is already a part of the Great Unity without any intervention on my part. What you do with it is the business of you and the Great Mother, and none of mine, except to acknowledge and embrace its unity. Your revulsion at the evils committed by the church is shared by MMario, obviously, and by me. Imagine how you would feel if large number of pagans took it upon themselves to act in such a manner in the name of the Great Mother--that's how we feel about it. Their path is not our path, and to us not the path for which Yeshua died, though they use his name. Yet it would be hypocritical to say of them what they may say of us, if they knew: "they aren't Christians." Huston Smith put it very well: to the atheist there is no god; to the pagan or polytheist, there are many gods; to the monotheist, there is only one god; to the mystic there is only God. I'll be over here in the corner with the mystics. So I'll sign off with a word that comes from neither of our traditions, yet envelops all of what we both are: Namaste*, Chris *from Saskrit, roughly: "I honor that place in you where the whole Universe resides--that place where, when you are in that place in you and I am in that place in me, there is only one of us." As easily said to the Divine Parent as to each other.... |
|
Subject: RE: BS: More pagan stuff From: SDShad Date: 05 May 00 - 01:36 PM Okay, just imagine, if you will, that I properly closed off my italics above at the word "all." thankyeweversoverymuch, C. |
|
Subject: RE: BS: More pagan stuff From: Mbo Date: 05 May 00 - 01:50 PM The "chi rho" symbol has long been a symbol of Christianity as well, back to the 100's A.D., with the "x", the Greek Chi, the first letter of "Christ" meaning "anointed" and also as symbol of the Cross is the reason it was chosen, because of the duality between meaning and symbol. And WHY exactly do we Christians get the "xtians" of "tians". Are we more deserving of it? What about all "xiasm" and "xists" and "xems" and "xdus" and "xans"? Why can't we just leave everybody alone to believe what they want instead of dumbing down what we believe in the make other feel not offended. I'm not offended by anyone else's religion...if they want a giant Menorah in the town square, you'll get no complaining from me, in fact I'd enjoy it. If someone wants to pray to Allah or Buddha right there in public, I ain't gonna stop them, I'd encourage it. So why do I have to pretend like my religion is somehow less worthy of respect? We all have our nasty past histories....we can't we all just be happy and respect what other believe as well as what we do? --Mbo |
|
Subject: RE: BS: More pagan stuff From: GUEST,me Date: 05 May 00 - 02:30 PM i like lunchtime, too, it makes this thread more interactive. Chris, you may call me what you like, as long as it remains polite, and you never call me late for supper. Josh would've like this thread too, he would note just how many are getting the point of what he said in that lifetime in the galilee.
just for the heck of it... here's the real ending to the parable of the talents...
the master took the third slave, the one who'd buried the two talents in the earth and handed him over to the first, now free and rich, saying take this man and his two talents and teach him as you have learned, and if he does learn, free him and give him the talents he has earned as i have done for you.
peace upon all of thee and those you love |
|
Subject: RE: BS: More pagan stuff From: SDShad Date: 05 May 00 - 02:53 PM Okay, then. mini-me it is. :-) I love that ending of the talents parable. Consequences with compassion, which I like to believe "Josh" was all about. And I'm not joshin'. "Tolerable silliness?" Good blanket phrase for religion in general, some times. Trivia note: a talent of gold was about 200 pounds. Blessed be, Chris |
|
Subject: RE: BS: More pagan stuff From: T in Oklahoma (Okiemockbird) Date: 06 May 00 - 08:54 AM MAG, good for you. I don't recall ever claiming to be anything but an amateur historian, so of course there will be gaps and blind spots in my knowledge (and even a professional would have these to some extent.) So of course you should check up on me. In your post of 25-Apr-00 - 01:17 PM, your use of the words "witchcraft persecutions" and your mention of the Malleus Maleficarum let me to conclude that your "orgy of sadism" referred to the deaths only of those who were put to death as witches (not as heretics) and only after the appearance of the Malleus Maleficarum. Apparently you meant to count heretics as well as witches, and to count prosecutions prior to the publication of the "Hammer of Witches" as well as those subsequent to it. I apologize for jumping to the wrong conclusion. I'm still not sure about the nine million figure. I have so far not succeeded in tracing the computation in Trevor-Roper's (now Baron Dacre's) writings, but only two of his older books are so far available to me. T. |
|
Subject: RE: BS: More pagan stuff From: Lepus Rex Date: 11 May 00 - 01:45 AM Hi--- Interesting thread here. One thing's been bothering me: 'xtians'. No, it doesn't offend me. But shouldn't it be 'xians' if it's going to make sense? Extra 't' there, you see... Also, I see no reason not to believe that 'paganism' hasn't survived 'til modern times in Western Europe. It's still alive in parts of Eastern Europe, such as the Russian Federation republics of Mari-el and Chuvashia, not to mention the peoples of arctic European Russia.So by pagan we mean anything not Jewish, Christian, or Muslim, right? So perhaps the Kalmyks of Khalmg Tangch (also in Rusian Federation), traditionally Tibetan/Mongol Buddhists, would count as 'pagan.' Thanks---- |
|
Subject: RE: BS: More pagan stuff From: katlaughing Date: 11 May 00 - 02:08 AM PBS has been running a Nova series on new discoveries about the Vikings. I just saw part of a segment last night which was very interesting. You can find out more at www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/vikings. I especially found this to be of interest: "Even with the advent of Christianity in the north, runes continued to appear on coffins, gravestones, and monuments, often side-by-side with more traditional Christian symbols. Like many of their contemporaries, the Norsemen Sven and Thorgot, who raised a runestone "in memory of Manni and Sveni; may God help their souls," had no problem using pagan symbols to replace the usual "may Thor hallow these Runes" with an appeal to the Christian God. The Norsemen continued the practice of mixing runes with Christian symbols until the 17th century, when the medieval church banned runes in an attempt to drive out all vestiges of superstition, paganism, and magic. Runes fell out of widespread use but did not disappear altogether, and in recent times the Vikings' enigmatic alphabet has had a resurgence at the hands of everyone from Nazis to New Agers."
|
|
Subject: RE: BS: More pagan stuff From: GUEST,Paul Crawte Date: 11 May 00 - 04:57 AM What a thread ! I guess there are lots of pagans watching from the side lines, I know of a couple who come here but haven't joined in. As a quick note, I hope people don't leave thinking all pagans are wiccans, or indeed that all witches are wiccans. I know of no pagans who claim that the music they enjoy has a continual history to "The Old Religion", and I know very few pagans who claim to have any connection, or indeed knowledge of, "The Old Religion". The music I enjoy happens to be folk music, and that kind of works well around camp fires with groups of people. Lots of people can join in with a lot of songs, there's plenty of scope for trying new things with old tunes, and the range of instruments that can be played to compliment each other is wide enough to encourage anyone with any musical leanings the opportunity to learn something simple and share it with others. So, folk music suits pagans well. Along side of the music, there's a lot of story telling going on. Old stories, new stories, good stories, crap stories. It's a great place to be. Cheers Paul (available for pagan events, playing music to entertain the good and offend the self rightous) |
|
Subject: RE: BS: More pagan stuff From: GUEST,me Date: 11 May 00 - 01:34 PM Paul, you'd be surprised just how many follow the old strong religion (which is Cordwainer Smith's term for surpressed xtianity in his Instrumentality stories, but was stolen by me for my purposes), they tend to be monotheist and pagan, and understand that the feminine principle is simply the closest to the truth form for the here and the now.
on another note.. The Messenger is an xclnt movie, so close to truth in terms of Jean's behaviors that it makes me wonder "why now".
the Mother's Light upon thee and those you love |