Voting against the incumbent? Always? What if the incumbent is doing a good job? Or even a halfway decent job? What if the new guy is a moron? What if the incumbent has been in office long enough to sit on or chair committees that can do real good for your community? Term limits? Same argument. Some have suggested I.Q. tests in order to be allowed to vote. Lets not forget that I.Q. tests were a standard practice under Jim Crow. Besides, for the most part, it's the people with lower intelligence who choose not to vote anyways.
|