CONTINUED >>>>>

I present this case study as a contextual evidence contribution to this threads debate.

I suspect some folk here would be quite upset if it happens to you.

Ok, now I'll talk about my individual take on the matter.
Personally, I can't help finding it hilarious that I've attracted my first ever internet stalker.
In all honesty, the 'dubious' thread title and content
was actually quite an accurate replication & pastiche of my writing style
and the kind of crap I might post when late night binge drinking.


But the serious principle still stands.
Yes Jeri "But that thread wasn't just closed, it was deleted so from that point on, no one could read it."
fair enough rationale for thread deletion.
But that strategy is not sufficient to address the problem of alerting those who had read the thread before deletion
that it was actually not 'you' who posted such 'filth' in the first place.
They will still continue to think of you as that dirty perv....

What if a malevolent ID imposter had perpetrated this outrage against a nice sweet respectable old church lady mudcat regular ????

For the record:

This is what I posted upon discovering the ID fraud:

"Subject: RE: BS: What size is your cock ?
From: GUEST,Hookey Wole
Date: 09 Apr 12 - 05:06 PM

Let it be known a malevolent ID thief has started this thread - childish fukwit !!!

Possibly a Yank judging by the piss poor choice of euphemisms.

Mods can check IPs to back me up.


I am British - We say 'knob' 'todger' 'prick' 'willy' 'hampton' etc

signed - "The Real Hookey Wole"


However, seeing as you've credited me with a full on 8 incher
I'll overlook your idiot deception
and not demand this thread be deleted.

Mods, please don't delete this thread.
Instead just append a note of this malicious ID fraud to the opening post."

TO BE CONTINUED>>>>>?????