Devils advocate raises some interesting points, and there is some validity in his? her? argument, however scholarly interest may not be of the same importance to me, but its fair enough that others attach a different importance to it.
MGM goes right over the top IMO IN ACCUSING devils advocaat of being a Philstine, according to the dictionary a philstine is a person who is guided by materialism and is usually disdainful of intellectual or artistic values.
has devils advocaat been disdainful of artistic values, to the contrary devils advocaat, is talking about artistic value being the benchmark for choosing a song, is there any evidence Devils whatsit is guided by materialism?
I only partly agree with devils advocaat, but surely he/SHE has a reight to put forward a case without incorectly being called a philistine by boobys such as MGM.