What I am ranting about is that Richard/Webb's pockets are being lined at the expense of people on low incomes such as carers, cleaners, people who work in hospitality, people who work in fast food chains, people on exploitative/zero-hour contracts, people living on benefits - who do work of benefit to society. personally, issues of guilt are irrelevant - it is enough for the court to make a public statement that in his opinion the BBC were out of order - end off! Then means test the award, so that the full £210,000 would be paid to someone on average wage or less, but thereafter the amount would be reduced pound for pound. Or even better - that Richard/Webb will get the money once his has done 1,000 hours doing some socially useful work.