When I clicked onto Mudcat, This page greeted me as if it is threat or reminder..or whatever...I guess it is in response to to one of the last posts I just posted...so, I'd like ti know which one was so 'upsetting'..fair enough?

Which one?

This one??
Subject: RE: BS: Can we afford Democracy?
From: GUEST,Guest from Sanity
Date: 20 Jun 12 - 01:27 AM

Personally I like this one.....music lyrics, delivery, chops! ..and she did it in Poland!

AND...
Hey Bobert, did you ever click the links to Biff Rose?
He lays it out pretty cool!..and right on!

GfS

This one???

Subject: RE: BS: 2012 Presidential Election
From: GUEST,Guest from Sanity
Date: 20 Jun 12 - 01:12 AM

Q: "Dunno what guest finds in that report that bears on the election."


When unemployment for our own citizens is how it is, it's rather revealing to actually SEE the policies that are implemented, in contrast to the promises, that got him elected. Import workers???..Maybe someone could find that missing and unaccounted for trillion dollars, to put our own citizens back to work...after all, it was OUR federal tax money that paid for it, to be used for our benefit...not the coddling and placating of other countries, for their economies......isn't that fair to say?
Now this is a pretty good general rule...: "The guy who wins elections is the one with better and the more convincing lies."

GfS

This one??

Subject: RE: BS: President Romney (prediction only)
From: GUEST,Guest from Sanity
Date: 20 Jun 12 - 01:03 AM

Bobbins: "Ike was right..."


"Technology will never replace the spirit of a fighting man."
                                        Dwight D. Eisenhower

GfS


Or, This one????

Subject: RE: BS: OCDTrolls...
From: GUEST,Guest from Sanity
Date: 20 Jun 12 - 12:57 AM

One man's 'troll' is another man's messenger...depends if you listen, or resist the message....The OCD could be in the eye of the beholder.

Just a thought....

GfS

Just wondering..just wondering because the thread was, "Can we afford Democracy?".....and I thought Democracy meant something Democrats believed in, and 'free speech'.......and judging from the last four posts, they were on topic, and just comments sans anything snide, or aggressive...or, well out of line.
So what was it?
Was somebody's political 'reality' feel threatened?
I don't know....I'd much prefer the person who did it tell me, rather than a bunch of 'opinions'. It's the second time, now...and wondering if someone is 'urging' it to be done, because they're running out of meaningless 'talking points', either side.....

OR could it be, that certain people's over-reactions are REALLY the reason a thread gets nasty, and then the person who the nasty remarks are made to(usually a diversionary, and off topic tactic), accompanied with indignant insults over things that were NEVER said, nor implied.
I don't thing a clarifying explanation is beyond a reasonable request.

GfS