BS: 'Snitch-gate' Indictment/s???

Subject: RE: BS: 'Snitch-gate' Indictment/s???
From: Amos
Date: 27 Oct 05 - 08:48 AM

Look for an inside scandal on Scooter shacking up with Judith Miller. You heard it here first!!

A

Subject: RE: BS: 'Snitch-gate' Indictment/s???
From: GUEST,A
Date: 27 Oct 05 - 08:39 AM

One other thing, WJC, in the late '90s, talked about how something should be done about Iraq but neglected to do so.
He just continued to allow destruction of our Barracks, Embassies and things like the USS Cole plus the first bombing of the World Trade Center to go unpunished. So, embolden by this apparent unwillingness to respond, we then were greeted with 9-11.
But, here I am, going off topic almost as much as you do.

Subject: RE: BS: 'Snitch-gate' Indictment/s???
From: GUEST,A
Date: 27 Oct 05 - 08:33 AM

I don't care who you are, stay on subject for a change. BJ wasn't mentioned.
My guy, as you put it and he isn't totally, has never been indicted. Do you know why all the living former Presidents could practice in front of the Supreme court and WJC can't?

Besides, we were not talking about the war persay, it was the overall conduct of the presidency and compared indictments in the administration of WJC as opposed to GWB. Leave out imprisonments and unexplained deaths.

Why could you not ascertain that. Go back and reread please.

Subject: RE: BS: 'Snitch-gate' Indictment/s???
From: Bobert
Date: 26 Oct 05 - 08:04 PM

Difference here GUEST, a, is that we ain't talkin' about a blow job 'er even leing about gettin one, we're talkin' about a conspiarcy to hold down the truth in ordwer to take our country to awar that has killed tens upon thousands of innocent women and children, over 2,000 Americans and with no end in sight...

Amd guess what??? Clinton weren't involved in this conspiracy and subsequest war...

Yer guy was!!!

Ain't do dogin' it...

Yer guy was!!!

Bobert

(oh, and don't give me no Clinton loving right winged bullcrap... I'm a Green and wouldn't have voted fir Clinto fir dog catcher... Though lookin' at Monika Lewinski, he prolly would have been good at it...)

Subject: RE: BS: 'Snitch-gate' Indictment/s???
From: leftydee
Date: 26 Oct 05 - 06:33 PM

guesta, Take a good look at what SRS has to say, Then read "And The Horse He Rode In On" by James Carville. Carville names names and times of the smear (cost about $8 million by most accounts) perpetrated against Clinton. It's shocking. I'm also quite certain it's true or Ken Starr would have sued. Never even objected as far as I can discern. No convictions either..... how lame is that?

Subject: RE: BS: 'Snitch-gate' Indictment/s???
From: Stilly River Sage
Date: 26 Oct 05 - 06:20 PM

No, instead, do a little research on the million$ wasted by republicans zealots as they hounded the Clinton administration for baseless charges and trumped up stupid affairs.

Clinton may have had some personal habits that republicans didn't like, but he was an articulate, intellectual, talented president who left this country in pretty good shape (particularly financially) despite the fact that he was smeared every step of the way. Bush has had several opportunities handed to him on a platter that he has not only blown, he has made far far worse than any could imagine. Afghanistan and Iraq are abominable examples of his strutting and posturing just to prove he can do it. He is spending us into a sinkhole while his cronies in business get richer beyond their wildest dreams. The fact that he was elected this second time proves that the American educational system is a shambles, that so many people couldn't think for themselves and were swayed by the rhetoric of his managers. His presence in the White House is an insult to all thinking people.

SRS

Subject: RE: BS: 'Snitch-gate' Indictment/s???
From: GUEST,a
Date: 26 Oct 05 - 05:27 PM

Why? Do you want his job?

Subject: RE: BS: 'Snitch-gate' Indictment/s???
From: Stilly River Sage
Date: 26 Oct 05 - 05:16 PM

I sure would love to see a headline

Rove: Down in P[h]lames!

Subject: RE: BS: 'Snitch-gate' Indictment/s???
From: GUEST,a
Date: 26 Oct 05 - 05:10 PM

Leftydee, now you some of the feeling we had during the Clinton years.
Take a few minutes this evening and compare how many were indicted during the Clinton years as compared to the past 5 years.

Forget about the suspicious deaths and any imprisonment(s).

Subject: RE: BS: 'Snitch-gate' Indictment/s???
From: leftydee
Date: 26 Oct 05 - 03:45 PM

I suspect that Scooter will take the rap and find a way to stay out of jail until W gives him the Prez Pardon on his way out. I sure wish they'd indict that smarmy frat boy Rove though. You just know he set the whole deal up. The arrogance of the whole Bush crowd astounds and sickens me.

Subject: RE: BS: 'Snitch-gate' Indictment/s???
From: GUEST,Janice way up North
Date: 26 Oct 05 - 01:13 PM

Libby and no one else. They'll heap all the crap on one fall guy, just like blaming Lt. Calley for all the shit that happened in Viet Nam, or Sgt. Grainer and Pvt. England for US torture policy in Iraq. Scooter will do a deuce in Club Fed, when it's you-know-who should be in the dock at the Hague.

Subject: RE: BS: 'Snitch-gate' Indictment/s???
From: jeffp
Date: 26 Oct 05 - 12:52 PM

My guesses:

Libby - 95+% likely to be indicted, probably for obstruction of justice

Rove - 50%

Cheney >5%

Subject: RE: BS: 'Snitch-gate' Indictment/s???
From: GUEST,A
Date: 26 Oct 05 - 12:50 PM

I just wish I could do something to lessen the bad news for the Libs and Socialists in this and other threads.
Won't be long now"??? It has already been announced that "no indictments today".

Hold your applause - and watch out for the Wilsons' problems to increase.

Subject: RE: BS: 'Snitch-gate' Indictment/s???
From: GUEST,saulgoldie
Date: 26 Oct 05 - 12:27 PM

Time now: 12:26. Won't be long now. All the ins and outs of the case hurt my purty little head trying to keep em straight. But I am guessing 2 or more indictments, and at least one of them will really hurt Bush & Co. At any rate, this will make any second term "progress" (read: REgress, IMHO) will be much more difficult than it was a month ago.

The only thing more pathetic than this whole escapade is the Democrats' non-response. Apparently, they want to be an EX-party. Oh, sorry for the thread drift. Please return to the question at hand, which is "Who will be indicted?"

Subject: RE: BS: 'Snitch-gate' Indictment/s???
From: Peace
Date: 22 Oct 05 - 06:51 PM

Bobert: She play accordian.

Subject: RE: BS: 'Snitch-gate' Indictment/s???
From: Bobert
Date: 22 Oct 05 - 06:48 PM

Ouch, Dougie!!!

You gonna take that, buddie??? Heck, I met CarolC at the Getaway and she might be 5 feet tall and 80 pounds... Like I said, "You gonna take that?"

Subject: RE: BS: 'Snitch-gate' Indictment/s???
From: CarolC
Date: 22 Oct 05 - 06:15 PM

Possibly. But it's a hell of a lot more fun than the alternative.

Subject: RE: BS: 'Snitch-gate' Indictment/s???
From: DougR
Date: 22 Oct 05 - 06:13 PM

Wow, Carol C, you DO have a vivid imagination don't you?

DougR

Subject: RE: BS: 'Snitch-gate' Indictment/s???
From: Peace
Date: 22 Oct 05 - 02:35 AM

Right ya are, Uncle Dave.

Subject: RE: BS: 'Snitch-gate' Indictment/s???
From: dianavan
Date: 22 Oct 05 - 01:44 AM

I changed my mind in view of new evidence. Rove got the info from Libby and Libby got the info from Cheney. I'm gonna go for broke and put all of my money on Cheney.

Definitely A but also B and C.

But if its anyone, C will have to take the fall.

Subject: RE: BS: 'Snitch-gate' Indictment/s???
From: Uncle_DaveO
Date: 21 Oct 05 - 06:21 PM

That's "Scooter", not "Scotter".   

Dave Oesterreich

Subject: RE: BS: 'Snitch-gate' Indictment/s???
From: dianavan
Date: 20 Oct 05 - 09:54 PM

I vote for B and C and that probably won't happen. B will have to take the fall for C if only for the govt. to save face. Of course, I doubt if he will do any jail time. Probably restrictions of some sort and a fine. Behind the scenes, he will reap huge benefits and will be set for life. Some people will do anything for money. Prostitutes come in all shapes and sizes.

Subject: RE: BS: 'Snitch-gate' Indictment/s???
From: CarolC
Date: 20 Oct 05 - 08:29 PM

I don't know, but the question is bringing up some interesting possibilities in my mind. Consider this scenario... Cheny resigns and Condoleeza Rice is appointed VP (I heard there's a rumor going around about this possibility). Then Bush gets impeached and removed from office. That would make Condoleeza Rice both the first female president and the first African American president. Since she's such a neocon blood-for-oil war monger, we wouldn't want her in office for too long, but a couple of years would be enough to at least pave the way for a woman with an actual conscience to have a decent shot at the job (and I'm not talking about Hillary Clinton). Plus, the Republicans would be much less inclined to try to shoot her down just for being a woman because if they did, they would be shooting down one of their own.

Subject: RE: BS: 'Snitch-gate' Indictment/s???
From: Peace
Date: 20 Oct 05 - 06:02 PM

I have no faith in American justice when it comes to politicians and bureaucrats. Bastards protect each other and justice is never served. My thoughts? Indictments with pardons for Scotter and Karl.

Subject: RE: BS: 'Snitch-gate' Indictment/s???
From: Rapparee
Date: 20 Oct 05 - 05:58 PM

You forgot "None of the above." That's who I always want to vote for these days.

Subject: BS: 'Snitch-gate' Indictment/s???
From: Bobert
Date: 20 Oct 05 - 05:38 PM

Okay, here's the short list of possibilities:

A. Dick Cheney

B. Scotter Libby

C. Karl Rove

D. No Indictments

E. B & C

F. None of the above

Vote early and vote often....

My guess is "B" or "D".... But, given the crooks in charge, "D" is more likely... They can say stuff like, "Well, Scooter, didn't intend for Valarie Plame to get outed as a CIA operative in retaliation for her husband's blowing the whistle on the Niger lie. Intent is hard to prove... Blah, blah, blah..."

But what yer take...

Bobert