BS: Should Bush be Impeached?

Subject: RE: BS: Should Bush be Impeached?
From: emjay
Date: 28 Oct 04 - 09:21 PM

Yes, Amos, the third one in your list has Ramsey Clark. That's the name I was trying to remember, a former US Attorney General. What he has written is very thoughtful and worth reading.

Subject: RE: BS: Should Bush be Impeached?
From: Amos
Date: 28 Oct 04 - 09:19 PM

No, worse...he's been lying to the public and murdering people in other countries!! Ooooo!


A

Subject: RE: BS: Should Bush be Impeached?
From: GUEST
Date: 28 Oct 04 - 09:02 PM

Has he been eatin pussy in the oval office?

Subject: RE: BS: Should Bush be Impeached?
From: Amos
Date: 28 Oct 04 - 09:00 PM

There are websites and a movement to make it happen.

Here's one: http://www.impeachbush.tv/

and another: http://impeachbush.meetup.com/

and another: http://impeachbush.pephost.org/site/PageServer?pagename=VTI_homepage&JServSessionIdr008=3pqx2bajx1.app13b

and another: http://www.abe1x.org/impeachbush/

There are probably more...


A

Subject: RE: BS: Should Bush be Impeached?
From: emjay
Date: 28 Oct 04 - 08:01 PM

He would have to be impeached by the congress and unless control changes with this election, there is very little chance that an impeachment could happen.
"High crimes and misdemeanors" or something like that is the standard. Actually someone, a high placed leagal figure, did go so far as to draw up the papers--I wish I could remember who, and they looked pretty good to me--but as I said, it has to do with the party that controls the congress. Clinton was impeached by a Republican congress and over absolutely nothing--he lied in response to questions he shouldn't have been asked.
AS the little button sayd, "Clinton lied, nobody died. Bush lied, thousands died."

Subject: RE: BS: Should Bush be Impeached?
From: Little Hawk
Date: 28 Oct 04 - 07:54 PM

Impeached? He should be arrested by a World tribunal and tried for war crimes. So should Blair. But how do you arrest people who are back up by the World's biggest nuclear arsenals?

Subject: RE: BS: Should Bush be Impeached?
From: PoppaGator
Date: 28 Oct 04 - 07:51 PM

You're on to something there, Bobert.

I've been thinking quite a bit lately that Bush might well be re-elected (like Nixon in '72) and then very quickly find himself in big trouble (also like Nixon in '73, post-Watergate).

The two huge blocs of single issue voters (anti-abortion and anti-gun-control) are so firmly in the Bush camp that the Democrats may not be able to win. At the very least, the election will probably be close enough for the GOP to steal it again, more easily than last time now that they control the Executive Branch.

Once the election is over, however, the continuing revelations of Neo-Con greed and stupidity will NOT be over. Something big is very likely to hit the fan before mid-2005.

Subject: BS: Should Bush be Impeached?
From: Bobert
Date: 28 Oct 04 - 07:28 PM

Well, like I have said on several occasions, the Bush folks will figure out some way to steal the upcoming election so...

... what should activists do after the election/selection/court decision?

Bush has lied to the American people and taken the country to war behind these lies. If the nation could attempt to impeach Bill Clinton for an affair which killed no one, then why should it not attempt to impeach Georg Bush whoes lies have lead to over 100,000 deaths, 1200 of them American?

Bobert