|
||||||||
|
BS: Mudcat ~~ why all the HTML required for links?
|
|
|||||||
|
Subject: RE: BS: Mudcat ~~ why all the HTML required for links? From: MGM·Lion Date: 02 Aug 10 - 12:54 AM ... except that they don't call "Classics' Classics for some reason, but some foncy-poncy name of their perverse Oxonian own that I haven't forgotten exactly but can't be bothered to recall just now. Oh ~ 101, btw. ~Michael~ |
|
Subject: RE: BS: Mudcat ~~ why all the HTML required for links? From: MikeL2 Date: 02 Aug 10 - 02:45 PM hi ¡¡¡ ʎʞɔıןɔ ǝɥʇ ɥʇıʍ ǝןbnɹʇs ןןıʇs ı ʇnq - oʇ ǝןqɐ ǝq pןnoɥs ǝuoʎuɐ os ʇı op uɐɔ ı But I am not complaining. I like Mudcat the way it is. Cheers MikeL2 |