BS: Obama's first anniversary

Subject: RE: BS: Obama's first anniversary
From: Little Hawk
Date: 24 Jan 10 - 06:36 PM

And that was 100!

What do I win? ;-)

Subject: RE: BS: Obama's first anniversary
From: Bill D
Date: 24 Jan 10 - 06:47 PM

"what they propose to do to solve the nation's ills?"

They don't propose anything, Peter... they just want power back, as they can manipulate various stuff easier that way. They have sort of strange assumption that 'the nation' will muddle along somehow, and they can reap the short-term benefits.

(Now, I KNOW that none of them will say it that way, but having watched their behavior since Nixon and Reagan, there's very little else I can surmise.)

Subject: RE: BS: Obama's first anniversary
From: Ebbie
Date: 24 Jan 10 - 06:52 PM

I have great faith that DougR is busy at his desk cogitating and that his eventual pronouncement will be permeated with wisdom.

Subject: RE: BS: Obama's first anniversary
From: Greg F.
Date: 25 Jan 10 - 10:48 AM

Douggie does not cogitate. He regurgitates.

Subject: RE: BS: Obama's first anniversary
From: Amos
Date: 25 Jan 10 - 11:01 AM

Why are the figures Mr. Rove used questionable, but the figures used by the Democratic leadership supplied by the same government office are not?

Perhaps because Mister Rove has a long recorded history as an opportunistic liar?


A

Subject: RE: BS: Obama's first anniversary
From: DougR
Date: 25 Jan 10 - 12:42 PM

Ah, Amos, spoken like a true objective liberal. Oops, is there such a thing.

Ebbie: If Bill D. (and yourself of course)truly want to know the answers to Bill's questions and statements, I would suggest investing in a good book. If he and you are willing, I'll offer some suggestions in another post.

DougR

Subject: RE: BS: Obama's first anniversary
From: Greg F.
Date: 25 Jan 10 - 12:49 PM

See folks? Douggie can only operate in a fact-free environment. Tho Rove has been proven time and time again- by folks on both ends of the political spectrum- to be an amoral and oppostunistic liar-for-hire, Douggie-Boy is still in denial.

He's not a partisan, he's an idiot.

Subject: RE: BS: Obama's first anniversary
From: Ebbie
Date: 25 Jan 10 - 12:51 PM

DougR, I get the impression that if you could find such a book you would transmit its ideas verbatim with the only qualification needed for the author of being a good conservative.

No matter. That would be better than no answers.

But don't suggest that we should find such a book. You are the one who holds oppositional views and without ever postulating what you think the conservative/Republicans would be doing or what should be done now.

I don't have too much hope, you know. Partly because of your inattention: It was not Bill D who asked the questions but Peter T.

Subject: RE: BS: Obama's first anniversary
From: DougR
Date: 25 Jan 10 - 02:25 PM

Ebbie: Bill D. - Peter T, whatever.

Name one good reason for me to spend my time crafting a reply to Peter T's inane questions and statements when whatever I would write would be immediately dismissed anyway. Waste of time.

Gorgeous Greg F.:"Rove has been proven time and time again - by folks on both ends of the political spectrum - to be an amoral and opportunistic liar for hire."

Really? Perhaps, since is is "proven" you would be good enough to provide us with such proof!

I will be awaiting your always so objective remarks.

DougR

Subject: RE: BS: Obama's first anniversary
From: Bill D
Date: 25 Jan 10 - 03:16 PM

" Bill D. - Peter T, whatever."

LOL...you can hardly tell us apart! Must be the auras!

And if you don't read closely, you can hardly know what was said and what the relevance is.

I provided answers....Republicans don't do ANYTHING about 'the nation's ills....they work to assure themselves that they can control the money.

Subject: RE: BS: Obama's first anniversary
From: Big Mick
Date: 25 Jan 10 - 04:58 PM

That, DougR is what is known as obfuscation. You never really answer a question, rather you just create smoke and then blame the people asking the question for doing so, and finally, when all else fails, you say they will just pick it apart anyway so what is the use. It is why intellectual discourse with someone of your limited abilities is near impossible. I am sure you are a nice fella to have a cuppa joe with, but not for serious debate. I actually enjoy discourse with a well informed conservative. There is much to learn. But I am afraid you just don't cut the mustard on that.

Subject: RE: BS: Obama's first anniversary
From: Bobert
Date: 25 Jan 10 - 05:28 PM

Yeah, the Reoublican Party is stuck in the just-watching mode right now, quick on criticism and slow on proposals...

I think it is a joke for them to say that we should just start all over on health care reform... That is what Obama tried to do only to be toyed with... Same for the insurance companies and the drug companies... Remember, all these folks wanted a seat at the table... For what??? Heaven knows... It ceratinly wasn't to be participants...

The sad thing is that the folks who will be hurt the most are the most vocal supporters of the Repoubs and their corporate crooks... Talk about ignorance!!!

Subject: RE: BS: Obama's first anniversary
From: Richard Bridge
Date: 25 Jan 10 - 07:16 PM

Ah well. There may be a sort of Darwinian beauty in that.

Subject: RE: BS: Obama's first anniversary
From: DougR
Date: 25 Jan 10 - 07:53 PM

Aw, Mick, now you done gone and hurt my feelings.

By the way, on January 23 at 07:03 PM I replied to your tirade about the Wall Street Journal article I mentioned in my earlier post, and me in general.

Did I miss your reply, or was there one? Or did you just decide not to reply? Perhaps you have been busy communicating with a REAL conservative (Sara Palin?)and just haven't had the time?

DougR

Subject: RE: BS: Obama's first anniversary
From: Bobert
Date: 25 Jan 10 - 09:05 PM

Oh, is Sarah Palin a REAL conservative, Dougie??? I been kinda wonderin' what a REAL consertvative believes other that Obama is a socialist, isn't a citizen, wouldn't have won if he was white, wants for the governeemnt to run yer health care, etc., etc...

Maybe you should start a thread on what REAL conservatives do believe if those beliefs ain't on the endangered species list... That would be very interesting, indeed...

B~

Subject: RE: BS: Obama's first anniversary
From: Greg F.
Date: 25 Jan 10 - 09:43 PM

I am sure you are a nice fella to have a cuppa joe with...

Documentation, please.

Subject: RE: BS: Obama's first anniversary
From: Big Mick
Date: 25 Jan 10 - 09:55 PM

Well, gee Doug, maybe you could name one good reason for me to spend my time crafting a reply to your inane questions and statements when whatever I would write would be immediately dismissed anyway.

Actually, unlike you, I actually am engaged in important issues, and making a living with my music, and just popped in quick. I will go back and read your remarks, and reply. But take a little time with your McGuffy's Reader, brush up on your comprehension skills, so you will understand them when I do, K?

Mick

Subject: RE: BS: Obama's first anniversary
From: DougR
Date: 26 Jan 10 - 02:40 PM

Gee, Mick, I'll do my feeble best.

DougR

Subject: RE: BS: Obama's first anniversary
From: DougR
Date: 27 Jan 10 - 01:10 PM

Gee, can't let this thread die before the State of the Union speech, can we?

DougR

Subject: RE: BS: Obama's first anniversary
From: DougR
Date: 29 Jan 10 - 12:29 AM

I guess we can. I was kinda hoping Mick might be able to get around to replying to the post I suggested reply to though.

DougR

Subject: RE: BS: Obama's first anniversary
From: GUEST,999
Date: 29 Jan 10 - 12:42 AM

Well, I mentioned earlier that Obama sure says nuculur in a strange manner.

Subject: RE: BS: Obama's first anniversary
From: Greg F.
Date: 29 Jan 10 - 10:46 AM

Hope Douggie-Boy is having fun talking to himself...