BS: Gravity solved?

Subject: RE: BS: Gravity solved?
From: GUEST,Peter from seven stars link
Date: 20 Feb 16 - 03:41 PM

Bill, you are moving the goal posts again. You already know that I don't claim to be able to give conclusive evidence of the details of my Christian faith , though if we keep to the subject of origins , I think the biblical model is more in line with science , whereas evolutionism is often opposite to the evidence. Same goes to shimrod , concerning whom, I do not plan to push what I say is a suggestion , and look up sources , when he never provides any evidence to support his assertions.

Subject: RE: BS: Gravity solved?
From: GUEST,Dave
Date: 20 Feb 16 - 03:43 PM

No it wasn't GfS, it was written about 60AD, and now its 2016, my maths says thats less than 2000.

Subject: RE: BS: Gravity solved?
From: GUEST,Dave
Date: 20 Feb 16 - 03:56 PM

Donuel, re the telescope that the Hawaii court revoked the permit for, stick it on La Palma, it would be welcome there. Just as good a site, just not US territory thats all.

Subject: RE: BS: Gravity solved?
From: GUEST,Musket
Date: 20 Feb 16 - 04:03 PM

Why is Goofus giving a Wikipedia description of Jeffrey Archer? I said the bible plagiarises other superstitions in the same way Archer borrows from other authors.

Odd fucker.

Subject: RE: BS: Gravity solved?
From: GUEST,Dave
Date: 20 Feb 16 - 04:08 PM

Donuel, Swift has detected 1000 Gamma Ray Bursts in 12 years, some of these will result from the formation of black holes, but not all. The rate won't increase because its limited by the sensitivity of the detectors. It isn't clear that the mission will last long enough to work in tandem with JWST, in any case JWST is not a rapid reaction telescope and is the wrong thing to work in tandem with SWIFT. The Large Synoptic Survey telescope may be, but again its not clear if it will be running during the lifetime of the Swift mission. Networks of smaller telescopes are the thing.

Subject: RE: BS: Gravity solved?
From: GUEST,Shimrod
Date: 20 Feb 16 - 05:01 PM

" Same goes to shimrod , concerning whom, I do not plan to push what I say is a suggestion , and look up sources , when he never provides any evidence to support his assertions."

If you read my posts, they mainly consist of questions - which you can rarely provide satisfactory answers to, Pete.

Subject: RE: BS: Gravity solved?
From: GUEST,Guest from Sanity
Date: 20 Feb 16 - 05:46 PM

OK..approximately 1950 years ago.....big deal.

GfS

Subject: RE: BS: Gravity solved?
From: Greg F.
Date: 20 Feb 16 - 05:56 PM

That's right, Goofus - acuracy IS a big deal!