BS: Wish List, you get 1 wish granted.

Subject: BS: Wish List, you get 1 wish granted.
From: Donuel
Date: 02 Apr 11 - 10:29 PM

If you made a wish list, what would it look like?

If only one of those wishes (or anothers) could be granted which would it be?


I started toying around with hypothetical wish lists like this
3 WISH LISTS


but then realized how meaningful a wish list can be and wondered if people would give their wish to another and many other things...

Subject: RE: BS: Wish List, you get 1 wish granted.
From: GUEST,999
Date: 03 Apr 11 - 12:27 AM

Beautiful statement, Don.

Subject: RE: BS: Wish List, you get 1 wish granted.
From: Beer
Date: 03 Apr 11 - 12:39 AM

Very well done Don.
ad.

Subject: RE: BS: Wish List, you get 1 wish granted.
From: gnu
Date: 03 Apr 11 - 07:44 AM

Indeed. As usual.

Subject: RE: BS: Wish List, you get 1 wish granted.
From: Donuel
Date: 03 Apr 11 - 10:11 AM

I have edited it to fine tune the questions in order to shape the internal dialog of the viewer.

The difference is subtle but there is a thousand word reason.

http://usera.imagecave.com/donuel/wish-list4.jpg


thanks gnu

Subject: RE: BS: Wish List, you get 1 wish granted.
From: Ed T
Date: 03 Apr 11 - 10:31 AM

Where would one be without good health and accessible health care?

Subject: RE: BS: Wish List, you get 1 wish granted.
From: Donuel
Date: 03 Apr 11 - 10:45 AM

I have never spoken of the thousands of decisions that go into what appears to be a simple message devised of three lists or a carefully crafted picture that will speak more directly to a subconscious dialog within a viewer.

What one leaves out is more important than what is said so I left out the executive office, health care and social justice but they are still there subjectively. The easiest to find is social justice.

Fine print connotes the theft of corporations as in contracts and advertising...the large print giveth and the fine print taketh away.

The picture above 'Is your wish granted?' is a one dollar bill that only looks like a hundred representing the scam of Wall St. money manipulation and what you end up with.

The needs and wants of the middle class is purposefully succint and simple. It is resonable and not greedy. It is not vindictive and aggressive like the corporation wishes.

The Questions at the end force a person to answer yes or no. Even if they answer yes there is room for doubt in that decision.
Then the last question breadks the pattern and the present tense forces a person with a confrontation of having to choose now, and not rely on a past decision or memory.

This entire message is constructed so that even a well hypnotized follower of Glen Beck would find agreement without causing cognitive dissonance with the opposite teachings of Becks oligarchy freidly message. That is the nature of obvious truth however mental conditioning is something that needs to be overcome without triggering the reflexive knee jerk of disagreement.

There is more I could say, but this should highlight what goes into message that does not rely soley on emotion and hyperbole.