BS: Agricultural policy letter (spoof UK)

Subject: BS: Agricultural policy letter (spoof UK)
From: nickp
Date: 13 Jul 07 - 10:30 AM

This spoof letter is currently being circulated at work and causing amusement....


Rt Hon David Miliband MP Secretary of State, Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA), Nobel House 17 Smith Square LONDON SW1P 3JR

16 May 2007

Dear Secretary of State,

My friend, who is in farming at the moment, recently received a cheque for £3,000 from the Rural Payments Agency for not rearing pigs. I would now like to join the "not rearing pigs" business.

In your opinion, what is the best kind of farm not to rear pigs on, and which is the best breed of pigs not to rear? I want to be sure I approach this endeavour in keeping with all government policies, as dictated by the EU under the Common Agricultural Policy.

I would prefer not to rear bacon pigs, but if this is not the type you want not rearing, I will just as gladly not rear porkers. Are there any advantages in not rearing rare breeds such as Saddlebacks or Gloucester Old Spots, or are there too many people already not rearing these?

As I see it, the hardest part of this programme will be keeping an accurate record of how many pigs I haven't reared. Are there any Government or Local Authority courses on this?

My friend is very satisfied with this business. He has been rearing pigs for forty years or so, and the best he ever made on them was £1,422 in 1968. That is - until this year, when he received a cheque for not rearing any.

If I get £3,000 for not rearing 50 pigs, will I get £6,000 for not rearing 100? I plan to operate on a small scale at first, holding myself down to about 4,000 pigs not raised, which will mean about £240,000 for the first year. As I become more expert in not rearing pigs, I plan to be more ambitious, perhaps increasing to, say, 40,000 pigs not reared in my second year, for which I should expect about £2.4 million from your department. Incidentally, I wonder if I would be eligible to receive tradeable carbon credits for all these pigs not producing harmful and polluting methane gases?

Another point: These pigs that I plan not to rear will not eat 2,000 tonnes of cereals. I understand that you also pay farmers for not growing crops. Will I qualify for payments for not growing cereals to not feed the pigs I don't rear?

I am also considering the "not milking cows" business, so please send any information you have on that too. Please could you also include the current DEFRA advice on set aside fields? Can this be done on an e-commerce basis with virtual fields (of which I seem to have several thousand hectares)?

In view of the above you will realise that I will be totally unemployed, and will therefore qualify for unemployment benefits.

I shall of course be voting for your party at the next general election.

Yours faithfully,

etc, etc...

Subject: RE: BS: Agricultural policy letter (spoof UK)
From: Cats at Work
Date: 13 Jul 07 - 10:42 AM

We showed this to our farming neighbours a few months back and they thought it was brilliant. Not only that but very close to the truth!

Subject: RE: BS: Agricultural policy letter (spoof UK)
From: beardedbruce
Date: 13 Jul 07 - 10:45 AM

There was a thread on the US version of this, back during the Clinton Administration.

Can we get a link to it?

Subject: RE: BS: Agricultural policy letter (spoof UK)
From: MMario
Date: 13 Jul 07 - 10:51 AM

good lord, the Reader's Digest published something similar to this back in the 1960's.

Subject: RE: BS: Agricultural policy letter (spoof UK)
From: nickp
Date: 13 Jul 07 - 11:00 AM

I had the suspicion it wasn't new but it's amusing anyway

Subject: RE: BS: Agricultural policy letter (spoof UK)
From: autolycus
Date: 13 Jul 07 - 11:07 AM

and I seem to remember a bit in the Marx Brothers (30s), when they were briefly bodyguards who charged more not to protect a person, to the point where they could specify cicumstances where the potential client wouldn't be able to afford one form of non-protection.





      Ivor