Sacred Harp in Time Magazine

Subject: Sacred Harp in Time Magazine
From: Nancy King
Date: 20 Jan 08 - 03:30 PM

The latest (Jan. 28 2008 – why do magazines date themselves ahead, anyhow?) issue of Time Magazine has a one-page article on the revival in popularity of Sacred Harp singing. Click here.

While it's interesting, and gratifying that any type of traditional music is recognized in the national media, I found it disappointing that the article centered on the phenomenon of the revival, rather than on WHY people are drawn to Sacred Harp.   My own opinion is that it's the complexity and challenge of singing these old songs, and the unique nature of the resulting sound, rather than the subject matter of the hymns.

What do you think?

Nancy

Subject: RE: Sacred Harp in Time Magazine
From: GUEST,leeneia
Date: 20 Jan 08 - 08:27 PM

I agree. It's not the subject, it's the nature of the music itself. If it were the subject, most people know plenty of hymns already without learning the shape-note songs.

Someone posted here lately and said that it was a pleasure to master the shape-note method, as well. As a person who has sung in choral groups, I can understand that.

Subject: RE: Sacred Harp in Time Magazine
From: GUEST,iancarterb
Date: 20 Jan 08 - 11:44 PM

Of course it's the power of the usually canonic forms and the occasional passing tone discords into glorious harmonic resolutions that invite a wider range of interest than among just the community of literal believers, many of whom seem to prefer insipid Modern Christian Music. I had the pleasure of watching a sight reading choral singer join a shape note sing this afternoon more or less by accident and just about levitate over Northfield and All Is Well, among others. She'd never heard any of it before. It was great to watch! (Great to hear too, as she was a good soprano.)

Subject: RE: Sacred Harp in Time Magazine
From: Joe Offer
Date: 21 Jan 08 - 12:30 AM

Here's the article from Time, just so it doesn't get lost:

Thursday, Jan. 17, 2008
Give Me That Old-Time Singing
By DAVID VAN BIEMA

One Saturday in January, a well-dressed man strolling Manhattan's recently gentrified Lower East Side unexpectedly found his way blocked by 35 people singing on the sidewalk. The lyrics were somber--"Then shall the dust return ... to God who gave it"--but the delivery was joyful. Asked what he thought was going on, he ventured, "I dunno. A funeral?"

Actually, it was a resurrection. The singers--housewives, ex-punkers, Evangelicals, atheists, Jews and Buddhists waiting for their usual venue above a local bar to open--were devotees of a Christian four-part choral style called Sacred Harp (the name refers to the human voice and a songbook published in 1844). Once America's dominant religious music, it was eclipsed after the Civil War. By 1960, say scholars, as few as 1,000 people clustered in the Deep South knew the style.

Yet today there are some 20,000 devotees across the country singing songs like Pisgah and Weeping Sinners. The website fasola.org lists a "singing" near you on almost any weekend. A documentary, Awake My Soul: The Story of the Sacred Harp, is airing on more than 120 public TV stations, and an album is in the works featuring alt-folk god Sufjan Stevens, alt-country hero Jim Lauderdale and (!) Led Zeppelin's John Paul Jones.

This kind of thing has precedent. In 1997 the album The Buena Vista Social Club hit big with a sound defunct even in its native Cuba. In 2000 the old-timey twang of the Coen Brothers' film O Brother, Where Art Thou? grabbed a handful of Grammys. How do you revive an art form? A few hints:

Be weird--but worthy.

Nothing is weirder than Sacred Harp. Its favored subject matter--the pilgrim, the grave, Christ's blood--is stark; its style--severe fourths and otherworldly open fifths--has been obsolete for more than a century. Its notation, in which triangles, circles and squares indicate pitch, looks like cuneiform. Yet it exudes power and integrity. Five people sound like a choir; a dozen like a hundred. It is one of the most democratic choral forms: no audience, no permanent conductor--just people addressing one another and God.

Get Lomaxed.

Almost every revived American folk-music form was once recorded for the Library of Congress by musicologist Alan Lomax. He taped Sacred Harp in 1942 and '59. Unlike other finds such as Leadbelly, it failed to spark during the 1960s folk revival, but musicologists were infected. Now the form had imitable LPs and an academic beachhead.

Attract hip advocates.

In the early 1990s, punk rockers, says singer Tim Eriksen, "were looking for that kind of intensity in other music." Eriksen's band, Cordelia's Dad, and other postpunks seized Sacred Harp and exported it to trendsetting places from Northampton, Mass., to Portland, Ore.

Score a patriarchal blessing.

Bob Dylan made a pilgrimage to Woody Guthrie. Decades later, Southern Sacred Harp royalty generously embraced the wild-eyed newcomers--many of whom were nonbelievers--in what Awake My Soul co-director Matt Hinton calls "red-state, blue-state harmony."

Procure product placement.

T-Bone Burnett, who shaped the sound of O Brother, Where Art Thou?, did the same on Anthony Minghella's Civil War film Cold Mountain. Minghella hired Eriksen to sing a non-Harp song but was lured to Harp mecca Henagar, Ala. One result, Idumea, plays hauntingly over a battle scene--and won a new batch of fans. "I went in because of Jude Law but left with Sacred Harp," says New Yorker Anna Hendrick, 22.

After 45 minutes on the sidewalk, Hendrick and the other Manhattan harpers move inside and dig in. Singings can last two days. Today the group logs just three hours. "Join in a song in sweet accord," advised one of the afternoon's tunes. And so they did.