Subject: RE: BS: Mornington Crescent June 2009 From: Liz the Squeak Date: 19 Jun 09 - 04:16 AM Cordwangler's Passage That puts your king in check and me in Bedlam I think! LTS |
Subject: RE: BS: Mornington Crescent June 2009 From: Tug the Cox Date: 19 Jun 09 - 07:35 AM Actually Liz, it puts you 'Round the Horne' Shadwell |
Subject: RE: BS: Mornington Crescent June 2009 From: A Wandering Minstrel Date: 19 Jun 09 - 08:19 AM By using the Fortinbras variation (a) I can just reach... Angel, Islington |
Subject: RE: BS: Mornington Crescent June 2009 From: GUEST,Kenneth Williams (aka CrazyEddie) Date: 19 Jun 09 - 08:19 AM Well, speaking as I was, on the subject of Cordwanglers, for sixty seconds withiout repetition, hesitation, deviation or(in my case) eeeeeeelongaaaaaytion, I appear to have entered entirely the wrong recording studio. I DO apologise for the interruption, but I would like to out that I've come all the way from Great Portland Street mate! |
Subject: RE: BS: Mornington Crescent June 2009 From: GUEST,Burlington Bertie Date: 19 Jun 09 - 10:00 AM I've just had a banana, with Lady Diana, so........ Bromley by Bow That'll put you in a huff. |
Subject: RE: BS: Mornington Crescent June 2009 From: Tug the Cox Date: 19 Jun 09 - 10:51 AM What travels to Bromley by Bow , an Arrow of course. So I'm off to 'Arrow on the Hill. |
Subject: RE: BS: Mornington Crescent June 2009 From: Leadfingers Date: 19 Jun 09 - 11:29 AM Does Les Barker know about this ?? |
Subject: RE: BS: Mornington Crescent June 2009 From: Will Fly Date: 19 Jun 09 - 12:08 PM Sorry (yet again) - cookie had to be reset. Tufnell Park was me. |
Subject: RE: BS: Mornington Crescent June 2009 From: David C. Carter Date: 19 Jun 09 - 01:05 PM Due to the wrong sort of leaves on the line at Arsenal,I was forced into a triple twirl sideways shunt at Brixton,in so doing I found myself cavorting along the perpendicular to Golders Green:Four Square on the Northern Line. |
Subject: RE: BS: Mornington Crescent June 2009 From: paula t Date: 19 Jun 09 - 02:38 PM Right then.......If that's the case..... Fairlop! |
Subject: RE: BS: Mornington Crescent June 2009 From: VirginiaTam Date: 19 Jun 09 - 05:15 PM Nothing left to offer at this juncture but Belsize Park. |
Subject: RE: BS: Mornington Crescent June 2009 From: Paul Burke Date: 19 Jun 09 - 06:12 PM You're pullin' me plonker. Swiss Cottage, stitch that. |
Subject: RE: BS: Mornington Crescent June 2009 From: guitaaress Date: 19 Jun 09 - 06:13 PM Ahem! It is with great pleasure and a sense of honour among such company, since we areon the Northern line after all. Ladies and Gentlemen. "Mornington Crescent" |
Subject: RE: BS: Mornington Crescent June 2009 From: Tug the Cox Date: 19 Jun 09 - 06:20 PM Challenge! Will some Nerd offer a pretext.....go on, be creative! |
Subject: RE: BS: Mornington Crescent June 2009 From: VirginiaTam Date: 20 Jun 09 - 03:20 AM Excellent move if it hadn't been for the fact that due to weekend works on the Underground, one cannot get from Swiss Cottage direct to Mornington Crescent. Hence the 14 minute walk to St John's Wood |
Subject: RE: BS: Mornington Crescent June 2009 From: Will Fly Date: 20 Jun 09 - 04:38 AM You can't play St. John's Wood after midnight (Aprahamian Convention). Mornington Crescent still stands. (Can't make my own play at the moment...) |
Subject: RE: BS: Mornington Crescent June 2009 From: VirginiaTam Date: 20 Jun 09 - 05:01 AM Will Can you challenge a challenge, without having a play in hand? Are we playing in Greenwich Mean time or Euston Standard time? |
Subject: RE: BS: Mornington Crescent June 2009 From: GUEST,GHOST OF HUMPH Date: 20 Jun 09 - 05:33 AM Sorry, I was not paying attention to the last few moves, as I just noticed the delightful shade of Magnolia the skirting board has been painted. Do carry on! |
Subject: RE: BS: Mornington Crescent June 2009 From: Will Fly Date: 20 Jun 09 - 08:11 AM Lordy, Lordy - I was playing in Sussex Local Time. Time for a rethink and a stare at the magnolia... |
Subject: RE: BS: Mornington Crescent June 2009 From: David C. Carter Date: 20 Jun 09 - 11:43 AM Come,come now Will-I think you also overlooked the Wind Chill factor! We've got to keep this on the rails you know! And stay out of your Sussex Local. |
Subject: RE: BS: Mornington Crescent June 2009 From: Will Fly Date: 20 Jun 09 - 12:14 PM Unfortunately, I've just come out of my local yet again (hic!). Cockfosters! |
Subject: RE: BS: Mornington Crescent June 2009 From: Paul Burke Date: 20 Jun 09 - 04:17 PM Somebody said Mornington Crescent back there, but I'm not sure why they said Mornington Crescent. Is this some kind of game? Can someone tell me what's going on, and why High Barnet? |
Subject: RE: BS: Mornington Crescent June 2009 From: GUEST,GHOST OF HUMPH Date: 20 Jun 09 - 05:01 PM Listeners may hae noticed that the panel have been a bit on the quiet side. This was due to a large bluebottle which has been buzzing around the auditorium. This has now been duly dispatched by Samantha who informs us that she has been responsible for the undoing of a large number of flies. |
Subject: RE: BS: Mornington Crescent June 2009 From: SPB-Cooperator Date: 21 Jun 09 - 07:05 AM The reason why High Barnet is that the only alternative would have been Colindale which would have led to the immediate response of Stonebridge Park and we all know what happens after that, don't we.,, Cockfosters??? then ..... of course Royal Oak |
Subject: RE: BS: Mornington Crescent June 2009 From: Stu Date: 21 Jun 09 - 07:21 AM I tried this earlier and was challenged but I think I can play it now as it is a variation on the Cholmondley Double-Switch (Sunday mornings and Peak times) Shoreditch |
Subject: RE: BS: Mornington Crescent June 2009 From: Will Fly Date: 21 Jun 09 - 07:23 AM Royal Oak's a bit severe for a Sunday morning. I can only respond with Lancaster Gate - an elegant play by Kronsteen from the World Championships of 1983. |
Subject: RE: BS: Mornington Crescent June 2009 From: David C. Carter Date: 21 Jun 09 - 08:15 AM Sven just sent me a message by carrier pigeon saying he would be absent for a day or three because he's refurbishing his new boy scout hut,situated in Soho Square. He's put the word out that he's hoping to receieve as many new members as he can accomodate,and says he's wide open to all comers. Who am I to question his wisdom! Swiss Cottage. |
Subject: RE: BS: Mornington Crescent June 2009 From: VirginiaTam Date: 21 Jun 09 - 10:38 AM Back to Swiss Cottage? Guitaress already attempted to finish the game a few posts ago with a play of Mornington Crescent from Swiss Cottage. However the weekend works on the line still stand so you cannot have got back to Swiss Cottage unless you arrived there by one of the works trains. David are you a tube worker infiltrating the game? I have just come from a stonking good weekend at Knockholt.... so I offer Seven Oaks (which really is only One Oak since the hurricane). |
Subject: RE: BS: Mornington Crescent June 2009 From: paula t Date: 21 Jun 09 - 10:38 AM Swiss Cottage eh? That means I have no choice but to play......(You can guess what it's going to be).................... Brondesbury Park I think that puts you in knip! (sorry, but you walked into that one) |
Subject: RE: BS: Mornington Crescent June 2009 From: paula t Date: 21 Jun 09 - 11:32 AM Ah... My slow typing means I have played Brondesbuty park for Swiss Cottage....When the last play was Seven Oaks! An illegal move under article 2 subsection 7 (revised) I've actually huffed myself! Serves me right for some rather unsporting gloating! |
Subject: RE: BS: Mornington Crescent June 2009 From: Micca Date: 21 Jun 09 - 11:50 AM Well since it is midsummer and the "druids" are probably out in force Primrose Hill!Look here |
Subject: RE: BS: Mornington Crescent June 2009 From: Will Fly Date: 21 Jun 09 - 01:57 PM Coburg Square - need I say more... |
Subject: RE: BS: Mornington Crescent June 2009 From: David C. Carter Date: 21 Jun 09 - 03:01 PM "Are you a tube worker?".....Is this a set up? I've never worked for anyone,how dare you accuse me of "working?" And I've never infiltrated anything....or anyone for that matter! Well,my private life is my own affair anyway.....so there! Stockwell. Get out of that! |
Subject: RE: BS: Mornington Crescent June 2009 From: Paul Burke Date: 21 Jun 09 - 04:09 PM It's Sunday, de Selby's Paradigm- New Cross Gate! You're in congee. |
Subject: RE: BS: Mornington Crescent June 2009 From: Tug the Cox Date: 21 Jun 09 - 06:36 PM Been to New Cross Gate already! |
Subject: RE: BS: Mornington Crescent June 2009 From: Paul Burke Date: 21 Jun 09 - 07:02 PM "Been to Brick Lane already" or "Been to Golder's Green already" would be comprehensible already. Roding Valley as a punishment. |
Subject: RE: BS: Mornington Crescent June 2009 From: David C. Carter Date: 22 Jun 09 - 06:54 AM Bal-Ham. Gateway to the south. |
Subject: RE: BS: Mornington Crescent June 2009 From: Stu Date: 23 Jun 09 - 09:09 AM Mornington Crescent! |
Subject: RE: BS: Mornington Crescent June 2009 From: GUEST,Mr Red Date: 23 Jun 09 - 10:25 AM BalHam to MC - according to "the Distinction of Parallels" you would have to avoid Pimlico which is a tall order. Can you try going via Highgate and Hanger Lane now that capital punishment is no longer on the statute? The gyratory system is beautiful at htis time of year. |
Subject: RE: BS: Mornington Crescent June 2009 From: Stu Date: 23 Jun 09 - 11:08 AM Hmmm. Good point. If I try Kaminski's Inversion and go via Gallions Reach will that do? |
Subject: RE: BS: Mornington Crescent June 2009 From: ced2 Date: 23 Jun 09 - 11:19 AM Bit London centric that game. I Will have to try and find the rules for the Northern Version of the game based on the Queensbury Triangle. Think I might have loaned them out, probably to Eric the Red. |
Subject: RE: BS: Mornington Crescent June 2009 From: Will Fly Date: 23 Jun 09 - 01:55 PM Mornington Crescent still stands - in spite of all the waffle. Unless there's a real challenge, Sugarfoot Jack claims the June Competition Prize. |
Subject: RE: BS: Mornington Crescent June 2009 From: Stu Date: 24 Jun 09 - 11:45 AM It's been an honour to compete alongside such excellent and esteemed players. |
Subject: RE: BS: Mornington Crescent June 2009 From: VirginiaTam Date: 24 Jun 09 - 12:19 PM Congratulations Sugarfoot Jack. Likewise honoured. So what shall we play in July? New Definitions? |
Subject: RE: BS: Mornington Crescent June 2009 From: Folkiedave Date: 24 Jun 09 - 01:01 PM Indeed hearty congratulations to Sugarfoot - or can I call you Jack? I still maintain that third quadrant was not allowed when in nip - but never let it be said I am a curmudgeon. July's game should be played totally in nip - that will stop any arguments. |
Subject: RE: BS: Mornington Crescent June 2009 From: Will Fly Date: 24 Jun 09 - 03:45 PM My compliments to all the participants - and to Jack for a great win - that was a game of the highest quality. Oh that our Wimbledon (Wimbledon! Wish I'd played that...) players were as gifted. |
Subject: RE: BS: Mornington Crescent June 2009 From: GUEST,GHOST OF HUMPH Date: 24 Jun 09 - 06:03 PM That leaves us with time for one final quick round of late arrivals to the banjo players ball. |
Subject: RE: BS: Mornington Crescent June 2009 From: Paul Burke Date: 25 Jun 09 - 03:21 PM Mr and Mrs Letthatfockinbanjoplayerin, and their son Hugh... |
Subject: RE: BS: Mornington Crescent June 2009 From: GUEST,CrazyEddie Date: 26 Jun 09 - 03:40 AM Mr & Mrs Lynn-Banjoes, and their daughter, Jewel Lynn-Banjoes |
Subject: RE: BS: Mornington Crescent June 2009 From: Will Fly Date: 26 Jun 09 - 04:43 AM Mr. and Mrs. Ring and their son Tone... |